Jon1997 personal page - To The Moon

Jon1997

Jon1997

No personal profile

61Follow

40Followers

1Topic

0Badge

10-09

$Apple(AAPL)$ Wins

09-27

07-07

Tiger

@TigerEvents:🐯 Embrace a New Decade: Bring Art to Life with AI

01-14

Trying fhjjh f FYI ikjjj bffg HJ jdgjjjff

01-13

Ggghhhh bhhhhh hhhhh

01-13

Ggghhj gggghjj hhhjjjj gghhhhhhv hggg

01-12

Fffhhh gghhh ggjjj ggjj Ggg

01-12

Dehumidifier fgHJ ffhjjjjjjii gghhh

01-11

Gfdf ggjj ghjjjn Bgf

01-11

Gggggh gggg Gggh ggjjj gghhgfff

01-10

Vgddhh Ggggh HJ ggjjj gffhjjjhhh

01-09

Ggdddg jjjjdr ggttttyh bhhhhgfff

01-09

Gfdffghh frttyyh gyyyiijj hhhh

01-09

Gfdfhj ggjjj gffjkk hhhhhfffffg gg

01-08

Hhhjj Ggggh gfdfhj ggggffdffx

01-08

Gghhh FD hhh gfdhjjj gggfghh

01-08

Tgfffghj gghhh fffhhh gggghjj hhh

01-08

Gfdfhjj ffffjj ggghijb ffhjgdfhh hdfghjjj

01-07

Gggghjj gggghjj g go jjjj hgghjjjb

01-06

Hhgddfg hjjjjff Ggggh ggggh

Go to Tiger App to see more news

{"i18n":{"language":"en_US"},"userPageInfo":{"id":"3581831301083382","uuid":"3581831301083382","gmtCreate":1619335429213,"gmtModify":1673229678244,"name":"Jon1997","pinyin":"jon1997","introduction":"","introductionEn":"","signature":"","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/56a6c402888c604fd1da304b410f7134","hat":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a3dee1aa3a3a3c1814833a4d3f8a5669","hatId":"award-c0e90532fb42ac6de18e25e95db73047","hatName":"2023新年头像框","vip":1,"status":2,"fanSize":40,"headSize":61,"tweetSize":191,"questionSize":0,"limitLevel":999,"accountStatus":2,"level":{"id":3,"name":"书生虎","nameTw":"書生虎","represent":"努力向上","factor":"发布10条非转发主帖,其中5条获得他人回复或点赞","iconColor":"3C9E83","bgColor":"A2F1D9"},"themeCounts":1,"badgeCounts":0,"badges":[],"moderator":false,"superModerator":false,"manageSymbols":null,"badgeLevel":null,"boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"favoriteSize":0,"symbols":null,"coverImage":null,"realNameVerified":"init","userBadges":[{"badgeId":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493-2","templateUuid":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493","name":"Senior Tiger","description":"Join the tiger community for 1000 days","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0063fb68ea29c9ae6858c58630e182d5","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/96c699a93be4214d4b49aea6a5a5d1a4","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/35b0e542a9ff77046ed69ef602bc105d","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2024.01.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1001}],"userBadgeCount":1,"currentWearingBadge":null,"individualDisplayBadges":null,"crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"location":null,"starInvestorFollowerNum":0,"starInvestorFlag":false,"starInvestorOrderShareNum":0,"subscribeStarInvestorNum":0,"ror":null,"winRationPercentage":null,"showRor":false,"investmentPhilosophy":null,"starInvestorSubscribeFlag":false},"baikeInfo":{},"tab":"post","tweets":[{"id":358102746943848,"gmtCreate":1728464212868,"gmtModify":1728464216821,"author":{"id":"3581831301083382","authorId":"3581831301083382","name":"Jon1997","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/56a6c402888c604fd1da304b410f7134","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3581831301083382","authorIdStr":"3581831301083382"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/AAPL\">$Apple(AAPL)$&nbsp;</a> Wins","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/AAPL\">$Apple(AAPL)$&nbsp;</a> Wins","text":"$Apple(AAPL)$ Wins","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/4ae8e6d99d8d455b7e8543e1ad566d86","width":"960","height":"2688"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/358102746943848","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":147,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":353936762429600,"gmtCreate":1727418433268,"gmtModify":1727418437472,"author":{"id":"3581831301083382","authorId":"3581831301083382","name":"Jon1997","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/56a6c402888c604fd1da304b410f7134","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3581831301083382","authorIdStr":"3581831301083382"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/AAPL\">$Apple(AAPL)$&nbsp;</a>&nbsp;","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/AAPL\">$Apple(AAPL)$&nbsp;</a>&nbsp;","text":"$Apple(AAPL)$","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/353936762429600","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":19,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":324869748535424,"gmtCreate":1720343277093,"gmtModify":1720343280555,"author":{"id":"3581831301083382","authorId":"3581831301083382","name":"Jon1997","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/56a6c402888c604fd1da304b410f7134","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3581831301083382","authorIdStr":"3581831301083382"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Tiger","listText":"Tiger","text":"Tiger","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/324869748535424","repostId":"324215697076360","repostType":1,"repost":{"id":324215697076360,"gmtCreate":1720154566907,"gmtModify":1720170002049,"author":{"id":"3527667667103859","authorId":"3527667667103859","name":"TigerEvents","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/c266ef25181ace18bec1262357bbe1a8","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3527667667103859","authorIdStr":"3527667667103859"},"themes":[],"title":"🐯 Embrace a New Decade: Bring Art to Life with AI","htmlText":"As we mark the tenth anniversary of Tiger Brokers, we've been graced with an exceptional gift from Barcode—a vibrant AI-generated image of a Tiger Team. This artwork not only showcases Barcode's creativity and talent but also ignites our imagination for the boundless potential of art combined with technology.We believe that our Tiger community is a treasure trove of artists and creative minds. We would like to invite you to participate in the Tiger AI Art Challenge. Create Tigers in a variety of scenarios using artificial intelligence software.🎨 How to Participate:Choose your preferred AI art tool and create AI artwork that includes TigerShare your AI artwork in the comment section of this post and describe why you choose the scene or what inspires your creation.The artwork from barcode📅 E","listText":"As we mark the tenth anniversary of Tiger Brokers, we've been graced with an exceptional gift from Barcode—a vibrant AI-generated image of a Tiger Team. This artwork not only showcases Barcode's creativity and talent but also ignites our imagination for the boundless potential of art combined with technology.We believe that our Tiger community is a treasure trove of artists and creative minds. We would like to invite you to participate in the Tiger AI Art Challenge. Create Tigers in a variety of scenarios using artificial intelligence software.🎨 How to Participate:Choose your preferred AI art tool and create AI artwork that includes TigerShare your AI artwork in the comment section of this post and describe why you choose the scene or what inspires your creation.The artwork from barcode📅 E","text":"As we mark the tenth anniversary of Tiger Brokers, we've been graced with an exceptional gift from Barcode—a vibrant AI-generated image of a Tiger Team. This artwork not only showcases Barcode's creativity and talent but also ignites our imagination for the boundless potential of art combined with technology.We believe that our Tiger community is a treasure trove of artists and creative minds. We would like to invite you to participate in the Tiger AI Art Challenge. Create Tigers in a variety of scenarios using artificial intelligence software.🎨 How to Participate:Choose your preferred AI art tool and create AI artwork that includes TigerShare your AI artwork in the comment section of this post and describe why you choose the scene or what inspires your creation.The artwork from barcode📅 E","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/2e9d5bc6c9b14f8d5b54fa39f8af03b5"},{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/f9204f015daf9ca9e640bcc2444b8316"},{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/492c30dfe3fe7895df156077a8a33df6"}],"top":1,"highlighted":2,"essential":2,"paper":2,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/324215697076360","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":0,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":3,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":207,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":262777670078464,"gmtCreate":1705188863885,"gmtModify":1705188868297,"author":{"id":"3581831301083382","authorId":"3581831301083382","name":"Jon1997","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/56a6c402888c604fd1da304b410f7134","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3581831301083382","authorIdStr":"3581831301083382"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Trying fhjjh f FYI ikjjj bffg HJ jdgjjjff","listText":"Trying fhjjh f FYI ikjjj bffg HJ jdgjjjff","text":"Trying fhjjh f FYI ikjjj bffg HJ jdgjjjff","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/262777670078464","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":408,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":262544098975824,"gmtCreate":1705131843133,"gmtModify":1705131845588,"author":{"id":"3581831301083382","authorId":"3581831301083382","name":"Jon1997","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/56a6c402888c604fd1da304b410f7134","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3581831301083382","authorIdStr":"3581831301083382"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ggghhhh bhhhhh hhhhh","listText":"Ggghhhh bhhhhh hhhhh","text":"Ggghhhh bhhhhh hhhhh","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/262544098975824","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":305,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":262543717892272,"gmtCreate":1705131819204,"gmtModify":1705131823251,"author":{"id":"3581831301083382","authorId":"3581831301083382","name":"Jon1997","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/56a6c402888c604fd1da304b410f7134","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3581831301083382","authorIdStr":"3581831301083382"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ggghhj gggghjj hhhjjjj gghhhhhhv hggg","listText":"Ggghhj gggghjj hhhjjjj gghhhhhhv hggg","text":"Ggghhj gggghjj hhhjjjj gghhhhhhv hggg","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/262543717892272","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":345,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":262066356220088,"gmtCreate":1705015806677,"gmtModify":1705015810703,"author":{"id":"3581831301083382","authorId":"3581831301083382","name":"Jon1997","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/56a6c402888c604fd1da304b410f7134","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3581831301083382","authorIdStr":"3581831301083382"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Fffhhh gghhh ggjjj &nbsp;ggjj Ggg","listText":"Fffhhh gghhh ggjjj &nbsp;ggjj Ggg","text":"Fffhhh gghhh ggjjj ggjj Ggg","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/262066356220088","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":356,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":262065890603096,"gmtCreate":1705015687615,"gmtModify":1705015692567,"author":{"id":"3581831301083382","authorId":"3581831301083382","name":"Jon1997","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/56a6c402888c604fd1da304b410f7134","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3581831301083382","authorIdStr":"3581831301083382"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Dehumidifier fgHJ ffhjjjjjjii gghhh","listText":"Dehumidifier fgHJ ffhjjjjjjii gghhh","text":"Dehumidifier fgHJ ffhjjjjjjii gghhh","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/262065890603096","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":181,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":261821569306824,"gmtCreate":1704931644092,"gmtModify":1704931648199,"author":{"id":"3581831301083382","authorId":"3581831301083382","name":"Jon1997","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/56a6c402888c604fd1da304b410f7134","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3581831301083382","authorIdStr":"3581831301083382"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Gfdf ggjj ghjjjn Bgf","listText":"Gfdf ggjj ghjjjn Bgf","text":"Gfdf ggjj ghjjjn Bgf","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/261821569306824","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":419,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":261821178446040,"gmtCreate":1704931550069,"gmtModify":1704931554624,"author":{"id":"3581831301083382","authorId":"3581831301083382","name":"Jon1997","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/56a6c402888c604fd1da304b410f7134","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3581831301083382","authorIdStr":"3581831301083382"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Gggggh gggg Gggh ggjjj gghhgfff","listText":"Gggggh gggg Gggh ggjjj gghhgfff","text":"Gggggh gggg Gggh ggjjj gghhgfff","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/261821178446040","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":342,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":261459659129016,"gmtCreate":1704843407922,"gmtModify":1704843411843,"author":{"id":"3581831301083382","authorId":"3581831301083382","name":"Jon1997","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/56a6c402888c604fd1da304b410f7134","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3581831301083382","authorIdStr":"3581831301083382"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Vgddhh Ggggh HJ ggjjj gffhjjjhhh","listText":"Vgddhh Ggggh HJ ggjjj gffhjjjhhh","text":"Vgddhh Ggggh HJ ggjjj gffhjjjhhh","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/261459659129016","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":489,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":261110434680904,"gmtCreate":1704758127687,"gmtModify":1704758131823,"author":{"id":"3581831301083382","authorId":"3581831301083382","name":"Jon1997","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/56a6c402888c604fd1da304b410f7134","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3581831301083382","authorIdStr":"3581831301083382"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ggdddg jjjjdr ggttttyh bhhhhgfff","listText":"Ggdddg jjjjdr ggttttyh bhhhhgfff","text":"Ggdddg jjjjdr ggttttyh bhhhhgfff","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/261110434680904","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":400,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":261110207611040,"gmtCreate":1704758066470,"gmtModify":1704758071587,"author":{"id":"3581831301083382","authorId":"3581831301083382","name":"Jon1997","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/56a6c402888c604fd1da304b410f7134","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3581831301083382","authorIdStr":"3581831301083382"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Gfdffghh frttyyh gyyyiijj hhhh","listText":"Gfdffghh frttyyh gyyyiijj hhhh","text":"Gfdffghh frttyyh gyyyiijj hhhh","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/261110207611040","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":200,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":261109928825016,"gmtCreate":1704758024547,"gmtModify":1704758028684,"author":{"id":"3581831301083382","authorId":"3581831301083382","name":"Jon1997","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/56a6c402888c604fd1da304b410f7134","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3581831301083382","authorIdStr":"3581831301083382"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Gfdfhj ggjjj gffjkk hhhhhfffffg gg","listText":"Gfdfhj ggjjj gffjkk hhhhhfffffg gg","text":"Gfdfhj ggjjj gffjkk hhhhhfffffg gg","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/261109928825016","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":60,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":260752841658440,"gmtCreate":1704670824704,"gmtModify":1704670828610,"author":{"id":"3581831301083382","authorId":"3581831301083382","name":"Jon1997","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/56a6c402888c604fd1da304b410f7134","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3581831301083382","authorIdStr":"3581831301083382"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Hhhjj Ggggh gfdfhj ggggffdffx","listText":"Hhhjj Ggggh gfdfhj ggggffdffx","text":"Hhhjj Ggggh gfdfhj ggggffdffx","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/260752841658440","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":195,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":260752006365352,"gmtCreate":1704670696870,"gmtModify":1704670700823,"author":{"id":"3581831301083382","authorId":"3581831301083382","name":"Jon1997","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/56a6c402888c604fd1da304b410f7134","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3581831301083382","authorIdStr":"3581831301083382"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Gghhh FD hhh gfdhjjj gggfghh","listText":"Gghhh FD hhh gfdhjjj gggfghh","text":"Gghhh FD hhh gfdhjjj gggfghh","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/260752006365352","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":138,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":260751710666984,"gmtCreate":1704670573599,"gmtModify":1704670577496,"author":{"id":"3581831301083382","authorId":"3581831301083382","name":"Jon1997","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/56a6c402888c604fd1da304b410f7134","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3581831301083382","authorIdStr":"3581831301083382"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Tgfffghj gghhh fffhhh gggghjj hhh","listText":"Tgfffghj gghhh fffhhh gggghjj hhh","text":"Tgfffghj gghhh fffhhh gggghjj hhh","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/260751710666984","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":203,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":260751420670000,"gmtCreate":1704670487639,"gmtModify":1704670491851,"author":{"id":"3581831301083382","authorId":"3581831301083382","name":"Jon1997","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/56a6c402888c604fd1da304b410f7134","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3581831301083382","authorIdStr":"3581831301083382"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Gfdfhjj ffffjj ggghijb ffhjgdfhh hdfghjjj","listText":"Gfdfhjj ffffjj ggghijb ffhjgdfhh hdfghjjj","text":"Gfdfhjj ffffjj ggghijb ffhjgdfhh hdfghjjj","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/260751420670000","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":165,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":260407431966896,"gmtCreate":1704586394201,"gmtModify":1704586417428,"author":{"id":"3581831301083382","authorId":"3581831301083382","name":"Jon1997","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/56a6c402888c604fd1da304b410f7134","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3581831301083382","authorIdStr":"3581831301083382"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Gggghjj gggghjj g go jjjj hgghjjjb","listText":"Gggghjj gggghjj g go jjjj hgghjjjb","text":"Gggghjj gggghjj g go jjjj hgghjjjb","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/260407431966896","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":102,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":260042840613096,"gmtCreate":1704497509620,"gmtModify":1704497513446,"author":{"id":"3581831301083382","authorId":"3581831301083382","name":"Jon1997","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/56a6c402888c604fd1da304b410f7134","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3581831301083382","authorIdStr":"3581831301083382"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Hhgddfg hjjjjff Ggggh ggggh","listText":"Hhgddfg hjjjjff Ggggh ggggh","text":"Hhgddfg hjjjjff Ggggh ggggh","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/260042840613096","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":28,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"hots":[{"id":262543717892272,"gmtCreate":1705131819204,"gmtModify":1705131823251,"author":{"id":"3581831301083382","authorId":"3581831301083382","name":"Jon1997","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/56a6c402888c604fd1da304b410f7134","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3581831301083382","authorIdStr":"3581831301083382"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ggghhj gggghjj hhhjjjj gghhhhhhv hggg","listText":"Ggghhj gggghjj hhhjjjj gghhhhhhv hggg","text":"Ggghhj gggghjj hhhjjjj gghhhhhhv hggg","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/262543717892272","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":345,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":262777670078464,"gmtCreate":1705188863885,"gmtModify":1705188868297,"author":{"id":"3581831301083382","authorId":"3581831301083382","name":"Jon1997","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/56a6c402888c604fd1da304b410f7134","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3581831301083382","authorIdStr":"3581831301083382"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Trying fhjjh f FYI ikjjj bffg HJ jdgjjjff","listText":"Trying fhjjh f FYI ikjjj bffg HJ jdgjjjff","text":"Trying fhjjh f FYI ikjjj bffg HJ jdgjjjff","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/262777670078464","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":408,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":262544098975824,"gmtCreate":1705131843133,"gmtModify":1705131845588,"author":{"id":"3581831301083382","authorId":"3581831301083382","name":"Jon1997","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/56a6c402888c604fd1da304b410f7134","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3581831301083382","authorIdStr":"3581831301083382"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ggghhhh bhhhhh hhhhh","listText":"Ggghhhh bhhhhh hhhhh","text":"Ggghhhh bhhhhh hhhhh","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/262544098975824","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":305,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":260752841658440,"gmtCreate":1704670824704,"gmtModify":1704670828610,"author":{"id":"3581831301083382","authorId":"3581831301083382","name":"Jon1997","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/56a6c402888c604fd1da304b410f7134","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3581831301083382","authorIdStr":"3581831301083382"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Hhhjj Ggggh gfdfhj ggggffdffx","listText":"Hhhjj Ggggh gfdfhj ggggffdffx","text":"Hhhjj Ggggh gfdfhj ggggffdffx","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/260752841658440","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":195,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":324869748535424,"gmtCreate":1720343277093,"gmtModify":1720343280555,"author":{"id":"3581831301083382","authorId":"3581831301083382","name":"Jon1997","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/56a6c402888c604fd1da304b410f7134","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3581831301083382","authorIdStr":"3581831301083382"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Tiger","listText":"Tiger","text":"Tiger","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/324869748535424","repostId":"324215697076360","repostType":1,"repost":{"id":324215697076360,"gmtCreate":1720154566907,"gmtModify":1720170002049,"author":{"id":"3527667667103859","authorId":"3527667667103859","name":"TigerEvents","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/c266ef25181ace18bec1262357bbe1a8","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3527667667103859","authorIdStr":"3527667667103859"},"themes":[],"title":"🐯 Embrace a New Decade: Bring Art to Life with AI","htmlText":"As we mark the tenth anniversary of Tiger Brokers, we've been graced with an exceptional gift from Barcode—a vibrant AI-generated image of a Tiger Team. This artwork not only showcases Barcode's creativity and talent but also ignites our imagination for the boundless potential of art combined with technology.We believe that our Tiger community is a treasure trove of artists and creative minds. We would like to invite you to participate in the Tiger AI Art Challenge. Create Tigers in a variety of scenarios using artificial intelligence software.🎨 How to Participate:Choose your preferred AI art tool and create AI artwork that includes TigerShare your AI artwork in the comment section of this post and describe why you choose the scene or what inspires your creation.The artwork from barcode📅 E","listText":"As we mark the tenth anniversary of Tiger Brokers, we've been graced with an exceptional gift from Barcode—a vibrant AI-generated image of a Tiger Team. This artwork not only showcases Barcode's creativity and talent but also ignites our imagination for the boundless potential of art combined with technology.We believe that our Tiger community is a treasure trove of artists and creative minds. We would like to invite you to participate in the Tiger AI Art Challenge. Create Tigers in a variety of scenarios using artificial intelligence software.🎨 How to Participate:Choose your preferred AI art tool and create AI artwork that includes TigerShare your AI artwork in the comment section of this post and describe why you choose the scene or what inspires your creation.The artwork from barcode📅 E","text":"As we mark the tenth anniversary of Tiger Brokers, we've been graced with an exceptional gift from Barcode—a vibrant AI-generated image of a Tiger Team. This artwork not only showcases Barcode's creativity and talent but also ignites our imagination for the boundless potential of art combined with technology.We believe that our Tiger community is a treasure trove of artists and creative minds. We would like to invite you to participate in the Tiger AI Art Challenge. Create Tigers in a variety of scenarios using artificial intelligence software.🎨 How to Participate:Choose your preferred AI art tool and create AI artwork that includes TigerShare your AI artwork in the comment section of this post and describe why you choose the scene or what inspires your creation.The artwork from barcode📅 E","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/2e9d5bc6c9b14f8d5b54fa39f8af03b5"},{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/f9204f015daf9ca9e640bcc2444b8316"},{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/492c30dfe3fe7895df156077a8a33df6"}],"top":1,"highlighted":2,"essential":2,"paper":2,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/324215697076360","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":0,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":3,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":207,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":262066356220088,"gmtCreate":1705015806677,"gmtModify":1705015810703,"author":{"id":"3581831301083382","authorId":"3581831301083382","name":"Jon1997","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/56a6c402888c604fd1da304b410f7134","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3581831301083382","authorIdStr":"3581831301083382"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Fffhhh gghhh ggjjj &nbsp;ggjj Ggg","listText":"Fffhhh gghhh ggjjj &nbsp;ggjj Ggg","text":"Fffhhh gghhh ggjjj ggjj Ggg","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/262066356220088","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":356,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":262065890603096,"gmtCreate":1705015687615,"gmtModify":1705015692567,"author":{"id":"3581831301083382","authorId":"3581831301083382","name":"Jon1997","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/56a6c402888c604fd1da304b410f7134","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3581831301083382","authorIdStr":"3581831301083382"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Dehumidifier fgHJ ffhjjjjjjii gghhh","listText":"Dehumidifier fgHJ ffhjjjjjjii gghhh","text":"Dehumidifier fgHJ ffhjjjjjjii gghhh","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/262065890603096","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":181,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":261821569306824,"gmtCreate":1704931644092,"gmtModify":1704931648199,"author":{"id":"3581831301083382","authorId":"3581831301083382","name":"Jon1997","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/56a6c402888c604fd1da304b410f7134","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3581831301083382","authorIdStr":"3581831301083382"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Gfdf ggjj ghjjjn Bgf","listText":"Gfdf ggjj ghjjjn Bgf","text":"Gfdf ggjj ghjjjn Bgf","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/261821569306824","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":419,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":261110434680904,"gmtCreate":1704758127687,"gmtModify":1704758131823,"author":{"id":"3581831301083382","authorId":"3581831301083382","name":"Jon1997","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/56a6c402888c604fd1da304b410f7134","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3581831301083382","authorIdStr":"3581831301083382"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ggdddg jjjjdr ggttttyh bhhhhgfff","listText":"Ggdddg jjjjdr ggttttyh bhhhhgfff","text":"Ggdddg jjjjdr ggttttyh bhhhhgfff","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/261110434680904","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":400,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":261110207611040,"gmtCreate":1704758066470,"gmtModify":1704758071587,"author":{"id":"3581831301083382","authorId":"3581831301083382","name":"Jon1997","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/56a6c402888c604fd1da304b410f7134","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3581831301083382","authorIdStr":"3581831301083382"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Gfdffghh frttyyh gyyyiijj hhhh","listText":"Gfdffghh frttyyh gyyyiijj hhhh","text":"Gfdffghh frttyyh gyyyiijj hhhh","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/261110207611040","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":200,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":261109928825016,"gmtCreate":1704758024547,"gmtModify":1704758028684,"author":{"id":"3581831301083382","authorId":"3581831301083382","name":"Jon1997","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/56a6c402888c604fd1da304b410f7134","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3581831301083382","authorIdStr":"3581831301083382"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Gfdfhj ggjjj gffjkk hhhhhfffffg gg","listText":"Gfdfhj ggjjj gffjkk hhhhhfffffg gg","text":"Gfdfhj ggjjj gffjkk hhhhhfffffg gg","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/261109928825016","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":60,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":259838775554288,"gmtCreate":1704447565140,"gmtModify":1704447569394,"author":{"id":"3581831301083382","authorId":"3581831301083382","name":"Jon1997","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/56a6c402888c604fd1da304b410f7134","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3581831301083382","authorIdStr":"3581831301083382"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ggggh frthhh hhhjjjretbcrfhhhhj","listText":"Ggggh frthhh hhhjjjretbcrfhhhhj","text":"Ggggh frthhh hhhjjjretbcrfhhhhj","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/259838775554288","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":100,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9092370274,"gmtCreate":1644543728480,"gmtModify":1676533939321,"author":{"id":"3581831301083382","authorId":"3581831301083382","name":"Jon1997","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/56a6c402888c604fd1da304b410f7134","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3581831301083382","authorIdStr":"3581831301083382"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Hello","listText":"Hello","text":"Hello","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9092370274","repostId":"2210187875","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2210187875","kind":"highlight","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in markets, business, politics, entertainment and technology","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Reuters","id":"1036604489","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868"},"pubTimestamp":1644532585,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2210187875?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-02-11 06:36","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Wall Street Ends down Sharply on Fears of Aggressive Fed Rate Hikes","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2210187875","media":"Reuters","summary":"* CPI rose 7.5% in January, above estimates* Bullard \"dramatically\" more hawkish* Disney jumps on upbeat quarterly results* Indexes: Dow -1.47%, S&P 500 -1.81%, Nasdaq -2.10%Feb 10 (Reuters) - Wall St","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>* CPI rose 7.5% in January, above estimates</p><p>* Bullard &#34;dramatically&#34; more hawkish</p><p>* Disney jumps on upbeat quarterly results</p><p>* Indexes: Dow -1.47%, S&amp;P 500 -1.81%, Nasdaq -2.10%</p><p>Feb 10 (Reuters) - Wall Street ended sharply lower on Thursday after U.S. consumer prices data came in hotter than expected and subsequent comments from a Federal Reserve official raised fears the U.S. central bank will hike rates aggressively to fight inflation.</p><p>U.S. Labor Department data showed consumer prices surged 7.5% last month on a year-over-year basis, topping economists&#39; estimates of 7.3% and marking the biggest annual increase in inflation in 40 years.</p><p>U.S. stocks fell further after St. Louis Federal Reserve Bank President James Bullard said the data had made him &#34;dramatically&#34; more hawkish. Bullard, a voting member of the Fed&#39;s rate-setting committee this year, said he now wanted a full percentage point of interest rate hikes by July 1.</p><p>&#34;Inflation tends to be kryptonite to valuations. Higher inflation causes multiples to compress, and that&#39;s what we&#39;re experiencing right now,&#34; said Terry Sandven, chief equity strategist at U.S. Bank Wealth Management in Minneapolis.</p><p>&#34;Volatility is likely to remain until in the number and magnitude of Fed rate hikes is better known.&#34;</p><p>Within minutes of Bullard comments, rate futures contracts were fully pricing an increase in the Fed&#39;s target range for its policy rate to 1%-1.25% by the end of its policy meeting in June, with some bets on an even steeper rate hike path.</p><p>Megacap growth stocks Tesla Inc, Nvidia and Microsoft each lost around 3%.</p><p>The Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 1.47% to end at 35,241.59 points, while the S&amp;P 500 lost 1.81% to 4,504.06.</p><p>The Nasdaq Composite dropped 2.1% to 14,185.64. It was the seventh time in 2022 that the Nasdaq lost more than 2% in a session.</p><p>The S&amp;P 500 is now down about 5% in 2022, and the Nasdaq is down about 9%.</p><p>All of the 11 S&amp;P 500 sector indexes declined, with technology, down 2.75%, and real estate, down 2.86%, leading the way lower.</p><p>Meanwhile, U.S. companies continued to report upbeat quarterly results. With 78% of the S&amp;P 500 companies that have reported results beating analysts&#39; profit estimates, according to Refinitiv data.</p><p>Walt Disney Co rose 3.4% after beating revenue and profit estimates on strong subscriber additions and attendance at U.S. theme parks.</p><p>Barbie maker Mattel Inc and cereal maker Kellogg Co gained 7.65% and 3.11%, respectively, after forecasting full-year profits above market expectations.</p><p>Thursday&#39;s session was busy. Volume on U.S. exchanges was 12.8 billion shares, compared with a 12.5 billion average over the last 20 trading days.</p><p>Declining issues outnumbered advancing ones on the NYSE by a 3.08-to-1 ratio; on Nasdaq, a 2.26-to-1 ratio favored decliners.</p><p>The S&amp;P 500 posted 31 new 52-week highs and 4 new lows; the Nasdaq Composite recorded 55 new highs and 102 new lows.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Wall Street Ends down Sharply on Fears of Aggressive Fed Rate Hikes</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWall Street Ends down Sharply on Fears of Aggressive Fed Rate Hikes\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1036604489\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Reuters </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-02-11 06:36</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>* CPI rose 7.5% in January, above estimates</p><p>* Bullard &#34;dramatically&#34; more hawkish</p><p>* Disney jumps on upbeat quarterly results</p><p>* Indexes: Dow -1.47%, S&amp;P 500 -1.81%, Nasdaq -2.10%</p><p>Feb 10 (Reuters) - Wall Street ended sharply lower on Thursday after U.S. consumer prices data came in hotter than expected and subsequent comments from a Federal Reserve official raised fears the U.S. central bank will hike rates aggressively to fight inflation.</p><p>U.S. Labor Department data showed consumer prices surged 7.5% last month on a year-over-year basis, topping economists&#39; estimates of 7.3% and marking the biggest annual increase in inflation in 40 years.</p><p>U.S. stocks fell further after St. Louis Federal Reserve Bank President James Bullard said the data had made him &#34;dramatically&#34; more hawkish. Bullard, a voting member of the Fed&#39;s rate-setting committee this year, said he now wanted a full percentage point of interest rate hikes by July 1.</p><p>&#34;Inflation tends to be kryptonite to valuations. Higher inflation causes multiples to compress, and that&#39;s what we&#39;re experiencing right now,&#34; said Terry Sandven, chief equity strategist at U.S. Bank Wealth Management in Minneapolis.</p><p>&#34;Volatility is likely to remain until in the number and magnitude of Fed rate hikes is better known.&#34;</p><p>Within minutes of Bullard comments, rate futures contracts were fully pricing an increase in the Fed&#39;s target range for its policy rate to 1%-1.25% by the end of its policy meeting in June, with some bets on an even steeper rate hike path.</p><p>Megacap growth stocks Tesla Inc, Nvidia and Microsoft each lost around 3%.</p><p>The Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 1.47% to end at 35,241.59 points, while the S&amp;P 500 lost 1.81% to 4,504.06.</p><p>The Nasdaq Composite dropped 2.1% to 14,185.64. It was the seventh time in 2022 that the Nasdaq lost more than 2% in a session.</p><p>The S&amp;P 500 is now down about 5% in 2022, and the Nasdaq is down about 9%.</p><p>All of the 11 S&amp;P 500 sector indexes declined, with technology, down 2.75%, and real estate, down 2.86%, leading the way lower.</p><p>Meanwhile, U.S. companies continued to report upbeat quarterly results. With 78% of the S&amp;P 500 companies that have reported results beating analysts&#39; profit estimates, according to Refinitiv data.</p><p>Walt Disney Co rose 3.4% after beating revenue and profit estimates on strong subscriber additions and attendance at U.S. theme parks.</p><p>Barbie maker Mattel Inc and cereal maker Kellogg Co gained 7.65% and 3.11%, respectively, after forecasting full-year profits above market expectations.</p><p>Thursday&#39;s session was busy. Volume on U.S. exchanges was 12.8 billion shares, compared with a 12.5 billion average over the last 20 trading days.</p><p>Declining issues outnumbered advancing ones on the NYSE by a 3.08-to-1 ratio; on Nasdaq, a 2.26-to-1 ratio favored decliners.</p><p>The S&amp;P 500 posted 31 new 52-week highs and 4 new lows; the Nasdaq Composite recorded 55 new highs and 102 new lows.</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"BK4190":"消闲用品","BK4212":"包装食品与肉类","BK4534":"瑞士信贷持仓","MAT":"美国美泰公司","BK4555":"新能源车","BK4533":"AQR资本管理(全球第二大对冲基金)","BK4559":"巴菲特持仓","BK4527":"明星科技股","SPY":"标普500ETF","TSLA":"特斯拉","BK4550":"红杉资本持仓","DIS":"迪士尼","NVDA":"英伟达","BK4551":"寇图资本持仓",".DJI":"道琼斯",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite","MSFT":"微软","BK4504":"桥水持仓",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index","BK4099":"汽车制造商","K":"家乐氏","BK4548":"巴美列捷福持仓"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2210187875","content_text":"* CPI rose 7.5% in January, above estimates* Bullard \"dramatically\" more hawkish* Disney jumps on upbeat quarterly results* Indexes: Dow -1.47%, S&P 500 -1.81%, Nasdaq -2.10%Feb 10 (Reuters) - Wall Street ended sharply lower on Thursday after U.S. consumer prices data came in hotter than expected and subsequent comments from a Federal Reserve official raised fears the U.S. central bank will hike rates aggressively to fight inflation.U.S. Labor Department data showed consumer prices surged 7.5% last month on a year-over-year basis, topping economists' estimates of 7.3% and marking the biggest annual increase in inflation in 40 years.U.S. stocks fell further after St. Louis Federal Reserve Bank President James Bullard said the data had made him \"dramatically\" more hawkish. Bullard, a voting member of the Fed's rate-setting committee this year, said he now wanted a full percentage point of interest rate hikes by July 1.\"Inflation tends to be kryptonite to valuations. Higher inflation causes multiples to compress, and that's what we're experiencing right now,\" said Terry Sandven, chief equity strategist at U.S. Bank Wealth Management in Minneapolis.\"Volatility is likely to remain until in the number and magnitude of Fed rate hikes is better known.\"Within minutes of Bullard comments, rate futures contracts were fully pricing an increase in the Fed's target range for its policy rate to 1%-1.25% by the end of its policy meeting in June, with some bets on an even steeper rate hike path.Megacap growth stocks Tesla Inc, Nvidia and Microsoft each lost around 3%.The Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 1.47% to end at 35,241.59 points, while the S&P 500 lost 1.81% to 4,504.06.The Nasdaq Composite dropped 2.1% to 14,185.64. It was the seventh time in 2022 that the Nasdaq lost more than 2% in a session.The S&P 500 is now down about 5% in 2022, and the Nasdaq is down about 9%.All of the 11 S&P 500 sector indexes declined, with technology, down 2.75%, and real estate, down 2.86%, leading the way lower.Meanwhile, U.S. companies continued to report upbeat quarterly results. With 78% of the S&P 500 companies that have reported results beating analysts' profit estimates, according to Refinitiv data.Walt Disney Co rose 3.4% after beating revenue and profit estimates on strong subscriber additions and attendance at U.S. theme parks.Barbie maker Mattel Inc and cereal maker Kellogg Co gained 7.65% and 3.11%, respectively, after forecasting full-year profits above market expectations.Thursday's session was busy. Volume on U.S. exchanges was 12.8 billion shares, compared with a 12.5 billion average over the last 20 trading days.Declining issues outnumbered advancing ones on the NYSE by a 3.08-to-1 ratio; on Nasdaq, a 2.26-to-1 ratio favored decliners.The S&P 500 posted 31 new 52-week highs and 4 new lows; the Nasdaq Composite recorded 55 new highs and 102 new lows.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":232,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9078844588,"gmtCreate":1657673330744,"gmtModify":1676536043439,"author":{"id":"3581831301083382","authorId":"3581831301083382","name":"Jon1997","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/56a6c402888c604fd1da304b410f7134","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3581831301083382","authorIdStr":"3581831301083382"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Hi","listText":"Hi","text":"Hi","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9078844588","repostId":"1167819236","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1167819236","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1657667207,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1167819236?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-07-13 07:06","market":"us","language":"en","title":"White House Expects \"Elevated\" but \"Out of Date\" Inflation Numbers for June","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1167819236","media":"The Hill","summary":"The White House is bracing for “highly elevated” inflation numbers when the Labor Department on Wedn","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>The White House is bracing for “highly elevated” inflation numbers when the Labor Department on Wednesday releases its consumer price index, a key gauge of inflation for the month of June. But the administration argued the data will not reflect recent progress that has brought down down gas prices.</p><p>“We expect the headline number, which includes gas and food, to be highly elevated mainly because gas prices were so elevated in June,” White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre told reporters. “Gas and food prices continue to be heavily impacted by the war in Ukraine, and there are a few important points to keep in mind when we get this backwards-looking data.”</p><p>Jean-Pierre argued the numbers will already be “out of date” because gas prices have already come down and are expected to fall more in the coming days. Gas prices have fallen for 27 consecutive days, according to data from GasBuddy, which tracks fuel prices.</p><p>Jean-Pierre reiterated that fighting inflation is President Biden’s top economic priority.</p><p>The costs of food and energy in particular have been an issue for the American public, with record high prices over the last several months causing headaches among the general public. The price of gas topped $5 per gallon last month.</p><p>The White House has attributed rising costs to the Russian invasion of Ukraine and a resulting blockade of grain exports that have rattled food supply chains. Russia is also a major exporter of oil, increasing the global price of fuel.</p><p>Biden is slated to visit Saudi Arabia this week, and while officials have downplayed the significance of oil prices in that visit, the president may argue that nations in the Middle East should pump more oil to meet global demand.</p></body></html>","source":"lsy1657606627878","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>White House Expects \"Elevated\" but \"Out of Date\" Inflation Numbers for June</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWhite House Expects \"Elevated\" but \"Out of Date\" Inflation Numbers for June\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-07-13 07:06 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/3553803-white-house-expects-elevated-but-out-of-date-inflation-numbers-for-june/><strong>The Hill</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>The White House is bracing for “highly elevated” inflation numbers when the Labor Department on Wednesday releases its consumer price index, a key gauge of inflation for the month of June. But the ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/3553803-white-house-expects-elevated-but-out-of-date-inflation-numbers-for-june/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".DJI":"道琼斯",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index"},"source_url":"https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/3553803-white-house-expects-elevated-but-out-of-date-inflation-numbers-for-june/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1167819236","content_text":"The White House is bracing for “highly elevated” inflation numbers when the Labor Department on Wednesday releases its consumer price index, a key gauge of inflation for the month of June. But the administration argued the data will not reflect recent progress that has brought down down gas prices.“We expect the headline number, which includes gas and food, to be highly elevated mainly because gas prices were so elevated in June,” White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre told reporters. “Gas and food prices continue to be heavily impacted by the war in Ukraine, and there are a few important points to keep in mind when we get this backwards-looking data.”Jean-Pierre argued the numbers will already be “out of date” because gas prices have already come down and are expected to fall more in the coming days. Gas prices have fallen for 27 consecutive days, according to data from GasBuddy, which tracks fuel prices.Jean-Pierre reiterated that fighting inflation is President Biden’s top economic priority.The costs of food and energy in particular have been an issue for the American public, with record high prices over the last several months causing headaches among the general public. The price of gas topped $5 per gallon last month.The White House has attributed rising costs to the Russian invasion of Ukraine and a resulting blockade of grain exports that have rattled food supply chains. Russia is also a major exporter of oil, increasing the global price of fuel.Biden is slated to visit Saudi Arabia this week, and while officials have downplayed the significance of oil prices in that visit, the president may argue that nations in the Middle East should pump more oil to meet global demand.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":29,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9040718109,"gmtCreate":1655701023802,"gmtModify":1676535689251,"author":{"id":"3581831301083382","authorId":"3581831301083382","name":"Jon1997","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/56a6c402888c604fd1da304b410f7134","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3581831301083382","authorIdStr":"3581831301083382"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Hi","listText":"Hi","text":"Hi","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9040718109","repostId":"1177872379","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1177872379","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1655697066,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1177872379?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-06-20 11:51","market":"hk","language":"en","title":"Alibaba Is Cheaper Than Ever","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1177872379","media":"Seeking Alpha","summary":"SummaryAlibaba's annual operating cash flow has increased more than tenfold since 2013, surpassing t","content":"<html><head></head><body><p><b>Summary</b></p><ul><li>Alibaba&#39;s annual operating cash flow has increased more than tenfold since 2013, surpassing the $20 billion mark. Yet, the share price hasn&#39;t gone anywhere.</li><li>Moreover, Alibaba&#39;s cash balance has increased more than tenfold, from $5.3 billion in 2013 to more than $70 billion today. Yet, as mentioned above, the share price hasn&#39;t moved.</li><li>As a result, Alibaba&#39;s cash position now reflects ~25% of its market cap. This anomaly cannot last much longer, especially since the Chinese tech crackdown is finally easing.</li><li>Alibaba is dirt cheap, trading less than 50 cents on the dollar, and the company has authorized the biggest buyback in its history. The market will eventually come to its senses.</li><li>Alibaba, as a brand, ranks in the top 10 list globally, surpassing the likes of McDonald&#39;s, Tesla and Coca-Cola.</li></ul><p>Alibaba (NYSE:BABA) (OTCPK:BABAF) has essentially given up all of its gains since its IPO in 2014. In other words, Alibaba has been &#39;dead money&#39; for almost a decade. However, unlike its share price, fundamentally, Alibaba has made remarkable progress on multiple fronts. Most notably, Alibaba has turned into a cash flow machine, with cash from operations increasing tenfold since its IPO, which in turn has led to a soaring cash balance, making the company cash rich.</p><p>The main reason why Alibaba has entered severely distressed territory is due to the crisis around Chinese tech companies; the so-called &#39;China&#39;s tech crackdown&#39;. The good news is that this crackdown seems to be easing. The first positive signs were reported last month and just yesterday Reuters reported that China&#39;s central bank has apparentlyacceptedAnt Group&#39;s application to set up a financial holding company, which is seen as a key step to revive Jack Ma&#39;s fintech business stock market debut. This created enthusiasm, with Alibaba&#39;s share price jumping as much as 10%. However, shortly thereafter, Alibaba pared its gains as Chinese state media denied the Reuters report that the PBOC accepted Ant&#39;s application. In any event, it seems that we are amidst a positive sentiment shift, after years of pain, and this is already starting to be reflected in Alibaba&#39;s share price. So far this year, the general market indices are in severe turmoil, but Alibaba is faring somewhat better. Specifically, on a YTD basis, Alibaba is down &#39;only&#39; ~14%, outperforming the major US indices, with the tech-heavy Nasdaq being by far the worst performer, down almost 31%.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e0aaaa8416a2f128caa44f636a83ce1a\" tg-width=\"635\" tg-height=\"467\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/>Data by YCharts</p><p>Before we go into more detail to illustrate Alibaba&#39;s substantial progress since its IPO, it is important to note the following. Even though Alibaba has faced (and will likely continue to face) various macro and regulatory headwinds, it remains one of the world&#39;s leading brands. Based on data fromKantar BrandZ, Alibaba ranks in the top 10 list globally surpassing brands of the likes of McDonald&#39;s (MCD), Tesla (TSLA), Coca-Cola (KO) and NIKE (NKE). This is quite an achievement.</p><p><b>The World&#39;s Most Valuable Brands in 2021</b></p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/76fab964f57c0f70c87f43d8ffe61974\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"324\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>Visual Capitalist</p><p>As per thelatest earnings release<i>,</i>Alibaba&#39;s financial performance remains impressive, despite reporting a single-digit increase in its fourth-quarter revenue, its slowest growth yet amid COVID-19 outbreaks. Revenue increased 9% as a result of lower demand due to COVID-19 outbreaks in March and logistics and supply chain disruptions at its core e-commerce platforms (Tmall and Taobao). That said, Alibaba’s sales growth still exceeded analyst estimates. Eventually, supply chain disruptions and COVID-19 lockdowns will ease and Alibaba&#39;s growth will accelerate.</p><p>Looking at the bigger picture, Alibaba is a much stronger company compared to its IPO days. Specifically, annual cash flow from operations surpassed the market $20 billion mark in 2018 and has remained above that level ever since.</p><p><b>Alibaba: Annual Cash Flow from Operations</b><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/afba1957e435da89228d501a1a15e39f\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"196\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>Seeking Alpha</p><p>Alibaba reached its peak annual cash flow from operations in 2021, surpassing $35 billion. I have little doubt that we will be breaking new records in the coming years, once things calm down a little. To put things into perspective, annual operating cash flow was just $2.3 billion in 2013. It is fair to say that the progress that has been made over the past decade is remarkable. What is also remarkable is the growing cash balance (i.e. Total Cash &amp; Short Term Investments), which exceeds $70 billion, and is also hovering around record high levels.</p><p><b>Alibaba: Total Cash And Short Term Investments</b><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/07dcc29bc2e191b1f712e2af79a263ce\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"198\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>Seeking Alpha</p><p>To put things into perspective, the cash balance was only $5.4 billion in 2013 and, due to strong operating cash flow, it surpassed the $70 billion mark in 2021, and has remained above that level ever since. This is a really nice position to be in.</p><p>Despite outstanding overall progress since the IPO, including the above-mentioned impressive financial results, the market cap has fallen to below $300 billion, and is hovering around record low levels. Looking at it differently,<b>Alibaba&#39;s cash position now reflects ~25% of its market cap</b>. I don&#39;t believe this anomaly will last for too long, and investors who accumulate at today&#39;s depressed prices stand to benefit tremendously, once the dust settles. It is a matter of when, not if. That said, it doesn&#39;t mean that it will be a smooth ride going forward. Yes, Alibaba is like a coil spring, but it can most certainly drop further. After all, market sentiment is terrible right now, and for good reasons. High inflation, interest rate hikes, the war in Ukraine and supply chain disruptions are amongst the biggest factors contributing to the market turmoil. As a value investor, the sell off has not made Alibaba a riskier investment. In contrast, investors can now buy one dollar for even less, which in a way makes Alibaba less risky. Based on Alibaba&#39;s massive cash pile and strong ongoing cash flow generation, I estimate that Alibaba is currently trading well below 50 cents on the dollar. Also, as long as the share price remains flattish, the discount to fair value will widen even more, as the cash balance will keep on increasing, all else constant, therefore adding to Alibaba&#39;s wealth. Also, it is important to note that Alibaba is better diversified compared to its IPO days. Don&#39;t discount its 1 billion global active consumers (spread across many online brands), high-margin cloud business and growing brick-and-mortar empire. My bet is that, over the next decade, Alibaba will be a much bigger company and even more diversified. However, even if Alibaba doesn&#39;t grow at all, it still is cheap today. I always stress test my investments, trying to be as prudent as possible. To this end, I assume the following scenario for Alibaba.</p><ul><li>Investment horizon of 10 years</li><li>average annual run rate in operating cash flow of $20-$25 billion (this is almost $10 billion less than the peak level experienced in 2021)</li><li>a static world, with zero growth; this means that over the next decade operating cash flow will remain constant at $20-$25 billion annually, and this cash will not be reinvested i.e. it will simply be accumulated on the balance sheet (in other words, zero revenue growth, zero innovation, zero M&amp;A activity, zero share buybacks, etc.).</li></ul></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Alibaba Is Cheaper Than Ever</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nAlibaba Is Cheaper Than Ever\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-06-20 11:51 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/article/4519179-alibaba-stock-cheaper-than-ever-baba-babaf><strong>Seeking Alpha</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>SummaryAlibaba's annual operating cash flow has increased more than tenfold since 2013, surpassing the $20 billion mark. Yet, the share price hasn't gone anywhere.Moreover, Alibaba's cash balance has ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4519179-alibaba-stock-cheaper-than-ever-baba-babaf\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"BABA":"阿里巴巴"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4519179-alibaba-stock-cheaper-than-ever-baba-babaf","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1177872379","content_text":"SummaryAlibaba's annual operating cash flow has increased more than tenfold since 2013, surpassing the $20 billion mark. Yet, the share price hasn't gone anywhere.Moreover, Alibaba's cash balance has increased more than tenfold, from $5.3 billion in 2013 to more than $70 billion today. Yet, as mentioned above, the share price hasn't moved.As a result, Alibaba's cash position now reflects ~25% of its market cap. This anomaly cannot last much longer, especially since the Chinese tech crackdown is finally easing.Alibaba is dirt cheap, trading less than 50 cents on the dollar, and the company has authorized the biggest buyback in its history. The market will eventually come to its senses.Alibaba, as a brand, ranks in the top 10 list globally, surpassing the likes of McDonald's, Tesla and Coca-Cola.Alibaba (NYSE:BABA) (OTCPK:BABAF) has essentially given up all of its gains since its IPO in 2014. In other words, Alibaba has been 'dead money' for almost a decade. However, unlike its share price, fundamentally, Alibaba has made remarkable progress on multiple fronts. Most notably, Alibaba has turned into a cash flow machine, with cash from operations increasing tenfold since its IPO, which in turn has led to a soaring cash balance, making the company cash rich.The main reason why Alibaba has entered severely distressed territory is due to the crisis around Chinese tech companies; the so-called 'China's tech crackdown'. The good news is that this crackdown seems to be easing. The first positive signs were reported last month and just yesterday Reuters reported that China's central bank has apparentlyacceptedAnt Group's application to set up a financial holding company, which is seen as a key step to revive Jack Ma's fintech business stock market debut. This created enthusiasm, with Alibaba's share price jumping as much as 10%. However, shortly thereafter, Alibaba pared its gains as Chinese state media denied the Reuters report that the PBOC accepted Ant's application. In any event, it seems that we are amidst a positive sentiment shift, after years of pain, and this is already starting to be reflected in Alibaba's share price. So far this year, the general market indices are in severe turmoil, but Alibaba is faring somewhat better. Specifically, on a YTD basis, Alibaba is down 'only' ~14%, outperforming the major US indices, with the tech-heavy Nasdaq being by far the worst performer, down almost 31%.Data by YChartsBefore we go into more detail to illustrate Alibaba's substantial progress since its IPO, it is important to note the following. Even though Alibaba has faced (and will likely continue to face) various macro and regulatory headwinds, it remains one of the world's leading brands. Based on data fromKantar BrandZ, Alibaba ranks in the top 10 list globally surpassing brands of the likes of McDonald's (MCD), Tesla (TSLA), Coca-Cola (KO) and NIKE (NKE). This is quite an achievement.The World's Most Valuable Brands in 2021Visual CapitalistAs per thelatest earnings release,Alibaba's financial performance remains impressive, despite reporting a single-digit increase in its fourth-quarter revenue, its slowest growth yet amid COVID-19 outbreaks. Revenue increased 9% as a result of lower demand due to COVID-19 outbreaks in March and logistics and supply chain disruptions at its core e-commerce platforms (Tmall and Taobao). That said, Alibaba’s sales growth still exceeded analyst estimates. Eventually, supply chain disruptions and COVID-19 lockdowns will ease and Alibaba's growth will accelerate.Looking at the bigger picture, Alibaba is a much stronger company compared to its IPO days. Specifically, annual cash flow from operations surpassed the market $20 billion mark in 2018 and has remained above that level ever since.Alibaba: Annual Cash Flow from OperationsSeeking AlphaAlibaba reached its peak annual cash flow from operations in 2021, surpassing $35 billion. I have little doubt that we will be breaking new records in the coming years, once things calm down a little. To put things into perspective, annual operating cash flow was just $2.3 billion in 2013. It is fair to say that the progress that has been made over the past decade is remarkable. What is also remarkable is the growing cash balance (i.e. Total Cash & Short Term Investments), which exceeds $70 billion, and is also hovering around record high levels.Alibaba: Total Cash And Short Term InvestmentsSeeking AlphaTo put things into perspective, the cash balance was only $5.4 billion in 2013 and, due to strong operating cash flow, it surpassed the $70 billion mark in 2021, and has remained above that level ever since. This is a really nice position to be in.Despite outstanding overall progress since the IPO, including the above-mentioned impressive financial results, the market cap has fallen to below $300 billion, and is hovering around record low levels. Looking at it differently,Alibaba's cash position now reflects ~25% of its market cap. I don't believe this anomaly will last for too long, and investors who accumulate at today's depressed prices stand to benefit tremendously, once the dust settles. It is a matter of when, not if. That said, it doesn't mean that it will be a smooth ride going forward. Yes, Alibaba is like a coil spring, but it can most certainly drop further. After all, market sentiment is terrible right now, and for good reasons. High inflation, interest rate hikes, the war in Ukraine and supply chain disruptions are amongst the biggest factors contributing to the market turmoil. As a value investor, the sell off has not made Alibaba a riskier investment. In contrast, investors can now buy one dollar for even less, which in a way makes Alibaba less risky. Based on Alibaba's massive cash pile and strong ongoing cash flow generation, I estimate that Alibaba is currently trading well below 50 cents on the dollar. Also, as long as the share price remains flattish, the discount to fair value will widen even more, as the cash balance will keep on increasing, all else constant, therefore adding to Alibaba's wealth. Also, it is important to note that Alibaba is better diversified compared to its IPO days. Don't discount its 1 billion global active consumers (spread across many online brands), high-margin cloud business and growing brick-and-mortar empire. My bet is that, over the next decade, Alibaba will be a much bigger company and even more diversified. However, even if Alibaba doesn't grow at all, it still is cheap today. I always stress test my investments, trying to be as prudent as possible. To this end, I assume the following scenario for Alibaba.Investment horizon of 10 yearsaverage annual run rate in operating cash flow of $20-$25 billion (this is almost $10 billion less than the peak level experienced in 2021)a static world, with zero growth; this means that over the next decade operating cash flow will remain constant at $20-$25 billion annually, and this cash will not be reinvested i.e. it will simply be accumulated on the balance sheet (in other words, zero revenue growth, zero innovation, zero M&A activity, zero share buybacks, etc.).","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":255,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9092370703,"gmtCreate":1644543746556,"gmtModify":1676533939328,"author":{"id":"3581831301083382","authorId":"3581831301083382","name":"Jon1997","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/56a6c402888c604fd1da304b410f7134","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3581831301083382","authorIdStr":"3581831301083382"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Interesting&nbsp;","listText":"Interesting&nbsp;","text":"Interesting","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9092370703","repostId":"2210515293","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2210515293","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1644542698,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2210515293?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-02-11 09:24","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Tesla: Going Underground With the Boring Company","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2210515293","media":"TipRanks","summary":"Have you heard of the tunnel economy yet? Morgan Stanley’s Adam Jonas thinks you should. The analyst","content":"<div>\n<p>Have you heard of the tunnel economy yet? Morgan Stanley’s Adam Jonas thinks you should. The analyst has been researching this area’s potential to innovate at the intersection of transportation and ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.tipranks.com/news/article/tesla-going-underground-with-the-boring-company/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":"lsy1606183248679","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Tesla: Going Underground With the Boring Company</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nTesla: Going Underground With the Boring Company\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-02-11 09:24 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.tipranks.com/news/article/tesla-going-underground-with-the-boring-company/><strong>TipRanks</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Have you heard of the tunnel economy yet? Morgan Stanley’s Adam Jonas thinks you should. The analyst has been researching this area’s potential to innovate at the intersection of transportation and ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.tipranks.com/news/article/tesla-going-underground-with-the-boring-company/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"TSLA":"特斯拉","BK4534":"瑞士信贷持仓","BK4527":"明星科技股","BK4555":"新能源车","BK4550":"红杉资本持仓","BK4533":"AQR资本管理(全球第二大对冲基金)","BK4099":"汽车制造商","BK4548":"巴美列捷福持仓","BK4551":"寇图资本持仓"},"source_url":"https://www.tipranks.com/news/article/tesla-going-underground-with-the-boring-company/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2210515293","content_text":"Have you heard of the tunnel economy yet? Morgan Stanley’s Adam Jonas thinks you should. The analyst has been researching this area’s potential to innovate at the intersection of transportation and infrastructure.And if you are looking to stake a bet on this theme, the stock to own, according to Jonas, would be… Tesla (TSLA).“Our work on the tunnel economy has deepened our appreciation for Tesla’s potential role in the build-out of renewable transport infrastructure across a range of modalities,” the 5-star analyst said. “As the world’s most valuable auto company and a key promoter of autonomous technology, we believe Tesla will have an enabling role to play in the development of The Boring Company,” which is majority owned by Elon Musk.Jonas views the company as potentially the “main disrupter in the tunnel industry” to drive the path to a ~$20 billion US Tunnel TAM by 2050. There are also “potential synergies” here with the other elements of the 'Muskonomy,' - Tesla, SpaceX, and Neuralink.The Boring Company has set its sights on developing a subterranean infrastructure at 10 times the speed of conventional TBMs (tunnel boring machines) at 1/100th the cost. I.e., instead of spending $1 billion per mile over 10 years, the company plans to do so at $10 million per mile in under 1 year, and all privately funded, to boot.Can that actually be done? Certain TBM experts say no. “We’ve heard similar critiques from A&D and auto industry experts about SpaceX and Tesla over the years,” Jonas noted.The analyst sees the investment trajectory playing out in a similar fashion to that of autonomous cars, eVTOL and space. Little investor interest to begin with, but as boring becomes prevalent in more cities and more miles of tunnels open up for commercial use, the analyst expects the investment community to prick up their ears – this is around 2023 and 2024. Then the ‘red dot’ moment will hit, when the “broader investment community may appreciate the theme and its relevance on existing and new publicly traded companies.”Unsurprisingly, Jonas is a Tesla bull, rating the stock an Overweight (i.e. Buy) along with a $1,300 price target. Should the figure be met, investors are looking at one-year upside of ~44%.Overall, among the analyst community, the majority are on Tesla's side. Factoring in 17 Buys, 7 Holds and 6 Sells, the EV giant has a Moderate Buy consensus rating. The forecast calls for one-year gains of ~22%, given the average price target clocks in at $1,105 and change.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":153,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9965783800,"gmtCreate":1670025126301,"gmtModify":1676538289740,"author":{"id":"3581831301083382","authorId":"3581831301083382","name":"Jon1997","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/56a6c402888c604fd1da304b410f7134","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3581831301083382","authorIdStr":"3581831301083382"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Hhh","listText":"Hhh","text":"Hhh","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9965783800","repostId":"1152464265","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1152464265","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1670022054,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1152464265?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-12-03 07:00","market":"us","language":"en","title":"11 Hours With Sam Bankman-Fried: Inside the Bahamian Penthouse After FTX’s Fall","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1152464265","media":"Bloomberg","summary":"Sam Bankman-Fried’s $30 million Bahamas penthouse looks like a dorm after the students have left for winter break. The dishwasher is full. Towels are piled in the laundry room. Bat streamers from a Ha","content":"<html><head></head><body><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/cb8b5a354d9d687bd95cdff74dddc508\" tg-width=\"1214\" tg-height=\"811\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p>Sam Bankman-Fried’s $30 million Bahamas penthouse looks like a dorm after the students have left for winter break. The dishwasher is full. Towels are piled in the laundry room. Bat streamers from a Halloween party are still hanging from a doorway. Two boxes of Legos sit on the floor of one bedroom. And then there are the shoes—dozens of sneakers and heels piled in the foyer, left behind by employees who fled the island of New Providence last month when his cryptocurrency exchangeFTX imploded.</p><p>“It’s been an interesting few weeks,” Bankman-Fried says in a chipper tone as he greets me. It’s a muggy Saturday afternoon, eight days after FTX filed for bankruptcy. He’s shoeless, in white gym socks, a red T-shirt and wrinkled khaki shorts. His standard uniform.</p><p>This isn’t part of the typical tour Bankman-Fried gave to the many reporters who came to tell the tale of the boy-genius-crypto-billionaire who slept on a beanbag chair next to his desk and only got rich so he could give it all away, and it’s easy to see why. The apartment is at the top of one of the luxury condo buildings that border a marina in a gated community called Albany. Outside, deckhands buff the stanchions of a 200-foot yacht owned by a fracking billionaire. A bronze replica of Wall Street’s<i>Charging Bull</i>statue stands on the lawn, which is as manicured as the residents. I feel like I’ve crash-landed on an alien planet populated solely by the very rich and the people who work for them.</p><p>Bankman-Fried leads me down a marble-floored hallway to a small bedroom, where he perches on a plush brown couch. Always known for being jittery, he taps his foot so hard it rattles a coffee table, smacks gum and rubs his index finger with his thumb like he’s twirling an invisible fidget spinner. But he seems almost cheerful as he explains why he’s invited me into his 12,000-square-foot bolthole, against the advice of his lawyers, even as investigators from theUS Department of Justice probewhether he used customers’ funds to prop up his hedge fund, a crime that could send him to prison for years. (Spoiler alert: It sure looks like he did.)</p><p>“What I’m focusing on is what I can do, right now, to try and make things as right as possible,” Bankman-Fried says. “I can’t do that if I’m just focused on covering my ass.”</p><p>But he seems to be doing just that, with me here and all along the apology tour he’ll later embark on, which will include a video appearance at a<i>New York Times</i>conference and an interview on<i>Good Morning America</i>. He’s been trying to blame his firm’s failure on a hazy combination of comically poor bookkeeping, wildly misjudged risks and complete ignorance of what his hedge fund was doing. In other words, an alumnus of both MIT and the elite Wall Street trading firmJane Streetis arguing that he was just dumb with the numbers—not pulling a conscious fraud. Talking in detail to journalists about what’s certain to be the subject of extensive litigation seems like an unusual strategy, but it makes sense: The press helped him create his only-honest-man-in-crypto image, so why not use them to talk his way out of trouble?</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/79b2ba9ef6da8454146f200cdc460f6e\" tg-width=\"1000\" tg-height=\"666\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>Bankman-Fried after an interview on<i>Bloomberg Wealth With David Rubenstein</i>on Aug. 17, 2022.Photographer: Jeenah Moon/Bloomberg</p><p>He doesn’t say so, but one reason he might be willing to speak with me is that I’m one of the reporters who helped build him up. After spending two days at FTX’s offices in February, I flew past the brightred flagsat his company—its lack of corporate governance, the ties to his Alameda Research hedge fund, its profligate spending on marketing, the fact that it operated largely outside US jurisdiction. Iwrote a storyfocused on whether Bankman-Fried would follow through on his plans to donate huge sums to charity and his connections to an unusual philanthropic movement calledeffective altruism.</p><p>It wasn’t the most embarrassingly puffy of the many puff pieces that came out about him. (“After my interview with SBF, I was convinced: I was talking to a future trillionaire,” one writer said in an article commissioned by a venture capital firm.) But my tone wasn’t entirely dissimilar. “Bankman-Fried is a thought experiment from a college philosophy seminar come to life,” I wrote. “Should someone who wants to save the world first amass as much money and power as possible, or will the pursuit corrupt him along the way?” Now it seems pretty clear that a better question would’ve been whether the business was ascam from the start.</p><p>I tell Bankman-Fried I want to talk about the decisions that led to FTX’s collapse, and why he took them. Earlier in the week, inlate-night DM exchangeswith a<i>Vox</i>reporter and on a phone call with a YouTuber, he made comments that many interpreted as an admission that everything he said was a lie. (“So the ethics stuff, mostly a front?” the<i>Vox</i>reporter asked. “Yeah,” Bankman-Fried replied.) He’d spoken so cynically about his motivations that to many it seemed like a comic book character was pulling off his mask to reveal the villain who’d been hiding there all along.</p><p>I set out on this visit with a different working theory. Maybe I was feeling the tug of my past reporting, but I still didn’t think the talk about charity was all made up. Since he was a teenager, Bankman-Fried has described himself as utilitarian—following the philosophy that the correct action is the one likely to result in the greatest good for the greatest number of people. He said his endgame was making and donating enough money to prevent pandemics and stop runaway artificial intelligence from destroying humanity. Faced with a crisis, and believing he was the hero of his own sci-fi movie, he might’ve thought it was right to make a crazy, even illegal, gamble to save his company.</p><p>To be clear, if that’s what happened, it’s the logic of a megalomaniac, not a martyr. The money wasn’t his to gamble with, and “the ends justify the means” is a cliché of bad ethics. But if it’s what he believed, he might still think he’d made the right decision, even if it didn’t work out. It seemed to me that’s what he meant when he messaged<i>Vox</i>, “The worst quadrant is sketchy + lose. The best is win + ???” I want to probe that, in part because it might get him to talk more candidly about what had happened to his customers’ money.</p><p>I decide to approach the topic gingerly, on terms I think he’ll relate to, as it seems he’s in less of a crime-confess-y mood. He’s said he likes to evaluate decisions in terms of expected value—the odds of success times the likely payoff—so I begin by asking: “Should I judge you by your impact, or by the expected value of your decision?”</p><p>“When all is said and done, what matters is your actual realized impact. Like, that’s what actually matters to the world,” he says. “But, obviously, there’s luck.”</p><p>That’s the in I’m looking for. For the next 11 hours—with breaks for fundraising calls and a very awkward dinner—I try to get him to tell me exactly what he meant. He denies that he’s committed fraud or lied to anyone and blames FTX’s failure on his sloppiness and inattention. But at points it seems like he’s saying he got<i>un</i>lucky, or miscalculated the odds.</p><p>Bankman-Fried tells me he’s still got a chance to raise $8 billion to save his company. He seems delusional, or committed to pretending this is still an error he can fix, and either way, the few supporters remaining at his penthouse seem unlikely to set him straight. The grim scene reminds me a bit of the end of<i>Scarface</i>, with Tony Montana holed up in his mansion, semi-incoherent, his unknown enemies sneaking closer. But instead of mountains of cocaine, Bankman-Fried is clinging to spreadsheet tabs filled with wildly optimistic cryptocurrency valuations.</p><p>Think of FTX like an offshore casino. Customers sent in money, then gambled on the price of hundreds ofcryptocurrencies—not just Bitcoin or Ether, but more obscure coins. In crypto slang, the latter are called shitcoins, because almost no one knows what they’re for. But in the past few years, otherwise respectable people, from retired dentists to heads of state, convinced themselves that these coins werethe future of finance. Or at least that enough other people might think so to make the price go up. Bankman-Fried’s casino was growing so fast that earlier this year some of Silicon Valley’s top venture capitalists invested in it at a $32 billion valuation.</p><p>The problem surfaced last month. After a rival crypto-casino kingpin raised concerns about FTX on Twitter, customers rushed to cash in their chips. But when Bankman-Fried’s casino opened the vault, their money wasn’t there. According to multiple news reports citing people familiar with the matter, it had been secretly lent to Bankman-Fried’s hedge fund, which had lost it in some mix of bad bets, insane spending and perhaps something even sketchier. John Ray III, the lawyer who’s now chief executive officer of the bankrupt exchange, has alleged in court that FTX covered up the loans using secret software.</p><p>Bankman-Fried denies this again to me. Returning to the framework of expected value, I ask him if the decisions he made were correct.</p><p>“I think that I’ve made a lot of plus-EV decisions and a few very large boneheaded decisions,” he says. “Certainly in retrospect, those very large decisions were very bad, and may end up overwhelming everything else.”</p><p>The chain of events, in his telling, started about four years ago. Bankman-Fried was in Hong Kong, where he’d moved from Berkeley, California, with a small group of friends from the effective-altruism community. Together they ran a successful startup crypto hedge fund,Alameda Research. (The name itself was an early example of his casual attitude toward rules—it was chosen to avoid scrutiny from banks, which frequently closed its accounts. “If we named our company like, Shitcoin Daytraders Inc., they’d probably just reject us,” Bankman-Fried told a podcaster in 2021. “But, I mean, no one doesn’t like research.”)</p><p>The fund had made millions of dollars exploiting inefficiencies across cryptocurrency exchanges. (Ex-employees, even those otherwise critical of Bankman-Fried, have said this is true, though some have said Alameda then lost some of that money because of bad trades and mismanagement.) Bankman-Fried and his friends began considering starting their own exchange—what would become FTX.</p><p>The way Bankman-Fried later described this decision reveals his attitude toward risk. He estimated there was an 80% chance the exchange would fail to attract enough customers. But he’s said one should always take a bet, even a long-shot one, if the expected value is positive, calling this stance “risk neutral.” But it actually meant he would take risks that to a normal person sound insane. “As an individual, to make a bet where it’s like, ‘I’m going to gamble my $10 billion and either get $20 billion or $0, with equal probability,’ would be madness,” Rob Wiblin, host of an effective-altruism podcast, said to Bankman-Fried in April. “But from an altruistic point of view, it’s not so crazy.”</p><p>“Completely agree,” Bankman-Fried replied. He told another interviewer that he’d make a bet described as a chance of “51% you double the earth out somewhere else, 49% it all disappears.”</p><p>Bankman-Fried and his friends jump-started FTX by having Alameda provide liquidity. It was a huge conflict of interest. Imagine if the top executives at an online poker site also entered its high-stakes tournaments—the temptation to cheat by peeking at other players’ cards would be huge. But Bankman-Fried assured customers that Alameda would play by the same rules as everyone else, and enough people came to trade that FTX took off. “Having Alameda provide liquidity on FTX early on was the right decision, because I think that helped make FTX a great product for users, even though it obviously ended up backfiring,” Bankman-Fried tells me.</p><p>Part of FTX’s appeal was that it was mostly a derivatives exchange, which allowed customers to trade “on margin,” meaning with borrowed money. That’s a key to his defense. Bankman-Fried argues no one should be surprised that big traders on FTX, including Alameda, were borrowing from the exchange, and that his fund’s position just somehow got out of hand. “Everyone was borrowing and lending,” he says. “That’s been its calling card.” But FTX’s normal margin system, crypto traders tell me, would never have permitted anyone to accumulate a debt that looked like Alameda’s. When I ask if Alameda had to follow the same margin rules as other traders, he admits the fund did not. “There was more leeway,” he says.</p><p>That wouldn’t have been so important had Alameda stuck to its original trading strategy of relatively low-risk arbitrage trades. But in 2020 and 2021, as Bankman-Fried became the face of FTX, amajor political donorand a favorite of Silicon Valley, Alameda faced more competition in that market-making business. It shifted its strategy to, essentially, gambling on shitcoins.</p><p>As Caroline Ellison, then Alameda’s co-CEO, explained in aMarch 2021 post on Twitter: “The way to really make money is figure out when the market is going to go up and get balls long before that,” she wrote, adding that she’d learned the strategy from the classic market-manipulation memoir,<i>Reminiscences of a Stock Operator.</i>Her co-CEO said in another tweet that a profitable strategy was buying Dogecoin becauseElon Musktweeted about it.</p><p>The reason they were bragging about what sounded like a high schooler’s tactics was that it was working better than anyone knew. When we spoke in February 2022, Bankman-Fried told me that Alameda had made $1 billion the previous year. He now says that was Alameda’s arbitrage profits. On top of that, its shitcoins gained tens of billions of dollars of value, at least on paper. “If you mark everything to market, I do believe at one point my net worth got to $100 billion,” Bankman-Fried says.</p><p>Any trader would know this wasn’t nearly as good as it sounded. The large pile of tokens couldn’t be turned into cash without crashing the market. Much of it was even made of tokens that Bankman-Fried and his friends had spun up themselves, such as FTT, Serum or Maps—the official currency of a nonsensical crypto-meets-mapping app—or were closely affiliated with, like Solana. While Bankman-Fried acknowledges the pile was worth something less than $100 billion—maybe he’d mark it down a third, he says—he maintains that he could have extracted quite a lot of real money from his holdings.</p><p>But he didn’t. Instead, Alameda borrowed billions of dollars from other crypto lenders—not FTX—and sunk them into more crypto bets. Publicly, Bankman-Fried presented himself as an ethical operator andcalled for regulationto rein in crypto’s worst excesses. But through his hedge fund, he’d actually become the market’s most degenerate gambler. I ask him why, if he really thought he could sell the tokens, he didn’t. “Why not, like, take some risk off?”</p><p>“OK. In retrospect, absolutely. That would’ve been the right, like, unambiguously the right thing to do,” he says. “But also it was just, like, hilariously well-capitalized.”</p><p>Near the peak of the great shitcoin boom, in April 2022, FTX hosted a lavish conference at a resort and casino in Nassau. It was Bankman-Fried’s coming out party. He got to share the stage with quarterback Tom Brady. Also there: former Prime Minister Tony Blair and ex-President Bill Clinton, who extended a fatherly hand when the young crypto executive seemed nervous. The author Michael Lewis, who’s working on a book about Bankman-Fried, praised him in a fawning interview onstage. “You’re breaking land speed records. And I don’t think people are really noticing what’s happened, just how dramatic the revolution has become,” Lewis said, asking when crypto would take over Wall Street.</p><p>The next month, thecrypto crash began. It started when a popular set of coins called Terra and Luna collapsed, wiping out $60 billion. Terra and Luna were almost openly a Ponzi scheme, but some of the biggest crypto funds had invested in them with borrowed money and went bankrupt. This made the lenders who’d lent billions of dollars to Alameda nervous. They asked Alameda to repay the loans, with real money. It needed billions of dollars, fast, or it would go bust.</p><p>There are two different versions of what happened next. Two people with knowledge of the matter told me that Ellison, by then the sole head of Alameda, had told her side of the story to her staff amid the crisis. Ellison said that she, Bankman-Fried and his two top lieutenants—Gary Wang and Nishad Singh—had discussed the shortfall. Instead of admitting Alameda’s failure, they decided to use FTX customer funds to cover it, according to the people. If that’s true, all four executives would’ve knowingly committed fraud. (Ellison, Wang and Singh didn’t respond to messages seeking comment.)</p><p>When I put this to Bankman-Fried, he screws up his eyes, furrows his eyebrows, puts his hands in his hair and thinks for a few seconds.</p><p>“So, it’s not how I remember what happened,” Bankman-Fried says. But he surprises me by acknowledging that there had been a meeting, post-Luna crash, where they debated what to do about Alameda’s debts. The way he tells it, he was packing for a trip to DC and “only kibitzing on parts of the discussion.” It didn’t seem like a crisis, he says. It was a matter of extending a bit more credit to a fund that already traded on margin and still had a pile of collateral worth way more than enough to cover the loan. (Although the pile of collateral was largely shitcoins.)</p><p>“That was the point at which Alameda’s margin position on FTX got, well, it got more leveraged substantially,” he says. “Obviously, in retrospect, we should’ve just said no. I sort of didn’t realize then how large the position had gotten.”</p><p>“You were all aware there was a chance this would not work,” I say.</p><p>“That’s right,” he says. “But I thought that the risk was substantially smaller.”</p><p>I try to imagine what he could’ve been thinking. If FTX had liquidated Alameda’s position, the fund would’ve gone bankrupt, and even if the exchange didn’t take direct losses, customers would’ve lost confidence in it. Bankman-Fried points out that the companies that lent money to Alameda might have failed, too, causing a hard-to-predict cascade of events.</p><p>“Now let’s say you don’t margin call Alameda,” I posit. “Maybe you think there’s like a 70% chance everything will be OK, it’ll all work out?”</p><p>“Yes, but also in the cases where it didn’t work out, I thought the downside was not nearly as high as it was,” he says. “I thought that there was the risk of a much smaller hole. I thought it was going to be manageable.”</p><p>Bankman-Fried pulls out his laptop (an Acer Predator) and opens a spreadsheet to show what he meant. It’s similar to thebalance sheethe reportedly showed investors when he was seeking a last-minute bailout, which he says consolidated FTX and Alameda’s positions because by then the fund had defaulted on its debt. On one line—labeled “What I *thought*”—he lists $8.9 billion in debts and way more than enough money to pay them: $9 billion in liquid assets, $15.4 billion in “less liquid” assets and $3.2 billion in “illiquid” ones. He tells me this was more or less the position he was considering when he had the meeting with the other executives.</p><p>“It looks naively to me like, you know, there’s still some significant liabilities out there, but, like, we should be able to cover it,” he says.</p><p>“So what’s the problem, then?”</p><p>Bankman-Fried points to another place on the spreadsheet, which he says shows the actual truth of the situation at the time of the meeting. This one shows similar numbers, but with $8 billion less liquid assets.</p><p>“What’s the difference between these two rows here?” he asks.</p><p>“You didn’t have $8 billion in cash that you thought you had,” I say.</p><p>“That’s correct. Yes.”</p><p>“You misplaced $8 billion?” I ask.</p><p>“Misaccounted,” Bankman-Fried says, sounding almost proud of his explanation. Sometimes, he says, customers would wire money to Alameda Research instead of sending it directly to FTX. (Some banks were more willing to work with the hedge fund than the exchange, for some reason.) He claims that somehow, FTX’s internal accounting system double-counted this money, essentially crediting it to both the exchange and the fund.</p><p>That still doesn’t explain why the money was gone. “Where did the $8 billion go?” I ask.</p><p>To answer, Bankman-Fried creates a new tab on the spreadsheet and starts typing. He lists Alameda and FTX’s biggest cash flows. One of the biggest expenses is paying a net $2.5 billion toBinance, a rival, to buy out its investment in FTX. He also lists $250 million for real estate, $1.5 billion for expenses, $4 billion for venture capital investments, $1.5 billion for acquisitions and $1 billion labeled “fuckups.” Even accounting for both firms’ profits, and all the venture capital money raised by FTX, it tallies to negative $6.5 billion.</p><p>Bankman-Fried is telling me that the billions of dollars customers wired to Alameda is gone simply because the companies spent way more than they made. He claims he paid so little attention to his expenses that he didn’t realize he was spending more than he was taking in. “I was real lazy about this mental math,” the former physics major says. He creates another column in his spreadsheet and types in much lower numbers to show what he thought he was spending at the time.</p><p>It seems to me like he is, without saying it exactly, blaming his underlings for FTX’s failure, especially Ellison, the head of Alameda. The two had dated and lived together at times. She was part of Bankman-Fried’s Future Fund, which was supposed to distribute FTX and Alameda’s earnings to effective-altruist-approved causes. It seems unlikely she would’ve blown billions of dollars without asking. “People might take, like, the TLDR as, like, it was my ex-girlfriend’s fault,” I tell him. “That is sort of what you’re saying.”</p><p>“I think the biggest failure was that it wasn’t entirely clear whose fault it was,” he says.</p><p>Bankman-Fried tells me he has to make a call. After a while, the sun goes down and I’m hungry. I’m allowed to join a group of Bankman-Fried’s supporters for dinner, as long as I don’t mention their names.</p><p>With the curtains drawn, the living room looks considerably less grand than it does in pictures. I’ve been told that FTX employees gathered here amid the crisis, while Bankman-Fried worked in another apartment. Addled by stress and sleep deprivation, they wept and hugged one another. Most didn’t say goodbye as they left the island, one by one. Many flew back to their childhood homes to be with their parents.</p><p>The supporters at the dinner tell me they feel like the press has been unfair. They say that Bankman-Fried and his friends weren’t the polyamorous partiers the tabloids have portrayed and that they did little besides work. Earlier in the week, a Bahamian man who’d served as FTX’s round-the-clock chauffeur and gofer also told me the reports weren’t true. “People make it seem like this big<i>Wolf of Wall Street</i>thing,” he said. “Bro, it was a bunch of nerds.”</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b87535c118f069e782e80762398d0a9c\" tg-width=\"1000\" tg-height=\"1000\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>Illustration: Maxime Mouysset for Bloomberg Businessweek</p><p>By the time I finish my plate of off-the-record rice and beans, Bankman-Fried is free again. We return to the study. He’s barefoot now, having balled up his gym socks and stuffed them behind a couch cushion. He lies on the couch, his computer on his lap. The light from the screen casts shadows of his curls on his forehead.</p><p>I notice a skin-colored patch on his arm. He tells me it’s a transdermal antidepressant, selegiline. I ask if he’s using it as a performance enhancer or to treat depression. “Nothing’s binary,” he says. “But I’ve been borderline depressed for my whole life.” He adds that he also sometimes takes Adderall—“10 milligrams at a time, a few times a day”—as did some of his colleagues, but that talk of drug use is overblown. “I don’t think that was the problem,” he says.</p><p>I tell Bankman-Fried my theory about his motivation, sidestepping the question of whether he misappropriated customer funds. Bankman-Fried denies that his world-saving goals made him willing to take giant gambles. As we talk more, it seems like he’s saying he made some kind of bet but hadn’t calculated the expected value properly.</p><p>“I was comfortable taking the risk that, like, I may end up kind of falling flat,” he says, staring at his computer screen, where he had pulled up a game and was leading an army of cartoon knights and fairies into battle. “But what actually happened was disastrously bad and, like, no significant chance of that happening would’ve made sense to risk, and that was a fuckup. Like, that was a mass miscalculation in downside.”</p><p>I read Bankman-Fried a post by Will MacAskill, one of the founders of the effective-altruism movement. He recruited Bankman-Fried into it when he was a junior at MIT and this year had joined the board of Bankman-Fried’s Future Fund. On Nov. 11,MacAskill wrote on Twitterthat Bankman-Fried had betrayed him. “For years, the EA community has emphasized the importance of integrity, honesty and the respect of common-sense moral constraints,” MacAskill wrote. “If customer funds were misused, then Sam did not listen; he must have thought he was above such considerations.”</p><p>Bankman-Fried closes his eyes and pushes his toes against one arm of the couch, clenching the other arm with his hands. “That’s not how I view what happened,” he says. “But I did fuck up. I think really what I want to say is, like, I’m really fucking sorry. By far the worst thing about this is that it will tarnish the reputation of people who are dedicated to doing nothing but what they thought was best for the world.” Bankman-Fried trails off. On his computer screen, his army casts spells and swings swords unattended.</p><p>I ask what he’d say to people who are comparing him to the most famous Ponzi schemer of recent times. “Bernie Madoff also said he had good intentions and gave a lot to charity,” I say.</p><p>“FTX was a legitimate, profitable, thriving business. And I fucked up by, like, allowing a margin position to get too big on it. One that endangered the platform. It was a completely unnecessary and unforced error, which like maybe I got super unlucky on, but, like, that was my bad.”</p><p>“It fucking sucks,” he adds. “But it wasn’t inherent to what the business was. It was just a fuckup. A huge fuckup.”</p><p>To me, it doesn’t really seem like a fuckup. Even if I believe that he misplaced and accidentally spent $8 billion, he’s already told me that Alameda had been allowed to violate FTX’s margin rules. This wasn’t some little technical thing. He was so proud of FTX’s margining system that he’d been lobbying regulators for it to be used on US exchanges instead of traditional safeguards. In May, Bankman-Fried himself said on Twitter that exchanges should never extend credit to a fund and put other customers’ assets at risk. He wrote that the idea an exchange would even have that discretion was “scary.” I read him the tweets and ask: “Isn’t that, like, exactly what you did, right around that time?”</p><p>“Yeah, I guess that’s kind of fair,” he says. Then he seems to claim that this was evidence the rules he was lobbying for were a good idea. “I think this is one of the things that would have stopped.”</p><p>“You had a rule on your platform. You didn’t follow it,” I say.</p><p>By now it’s past midnight, and—operating without the benefit of any prescription stimulants—I’m worn out. I ask Bankman-Fried if I can see the apartment’s deck before I leave. Outside, crickets chirp as we stand by the pool. The marina is dark, lit only by the spotlights of yachts. As I say goodbye, Bankman-Fried bites into a burger bun and starts talking about potential bailouts with one of his supporters.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>11 Hours With Sam Bankman-Fried: Inside the Bahamian Penthouse After FTX’s Fall</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n11 Hours With Sam Bankman-Fried: Inside the Bahamian Penthouse After FTX’s Fall\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-12-03 07:00 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2022-12-02/inside-sam-bankman-fried-s-bahamian-penthouse-after-ftx-s-collapse?srnd=premium-asia><strong>Bloomberg</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Sam Bankman-Fried’s $30 million Bahamas penthouse looks like a dorm after the students have left for winter break. The dishwasher is full. Towels are piled in the laundry room. Bat streamers from a ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2022-12-02/inside-sam-bankman-fried-s-bahamian-penthouse-after-ftx-s-collapse?srnd=premium-asia\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"COIN":"Coinbase Global, Inc.","GBTC":"Grayscale Bitcoin Trust"},"source_url":"https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2022-12-02/inside-sam-bankman-fried-s-bahamian-penthouse-after-ftx-s-collapse?srnd=premium-asia","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1152464265","content_text":"Sam Bankman-Fried’s $30 million Bahamas penthouse looks like a dorm after the students have left for winter break. The dishwasher is full. Towels are piled in the laundry room. Bat streamers from a Halloween party are still hanging from a doorway. Two boxes of Legos sit on the floor of one bedroom. And then there are the shoes—dozens of sneakers and heels piled in the foyer, left behind by employees who fled the island of New Providence last month when his cryptocurrency exchangeFTX imploded.“It’s been an interesting few weeks,” Bankman-Fried says in a chipper tone as he greets me. It’s a muggy Saturday afternoon, eight days after FTX filed for bankruptcy. He’s shoeless, in white gym socks, a red T-shirt and wrinkled khaki shorts. His standard uniform.This isn’t part of the typical tour Bankman-Fried gave to the many reporters who came to tell the tale of the boy-genius-crypto-billionaire who slept on a beanbag chair next to his desk and only got rich so he could give it all away, and it’s easy to see why. The apartment is at the top of one of the luxury condo buildings that border a marina in a gated community called Albany. Outside, deckhands buff the stanchions of a 200-foot yacht owned by a fracking billionaire. A bronze replica of Wall Street’sCharging Bullstatue stands on the lawn, which is as manicured as the residents. I feel like I’ve crash-landed on an alien planet populated solely by the very rich and the people who work for them.Bankman-Fried leads me down a marble-floored hallway to a small bedroom, where he perches on a plush brown couch. Always known for being jittery, he taps his foot so hard it rattles a coffee table, smacks gum and rubs his index finger with his thumb like he’s twirling an invisible fidget spinner. But he seems almost cheerful as he explains why he’s invited me into his 12,000-square-foot bolthole, against the advice of his lawyers, even as investigators from theUS Department of Justice probewhether he used customers’ funds to prop up his hedge fund, a crime that could send him to prison for years. (Spoiler alert: It sure looks like he did.)“What I’m focusing on is what I can do, right now, to try and make things as right as possible,” Bankman-Fried says. “I can’t do that if I’m just focused on covering my ass.”But he seems to be doing just that, with me here and all along the apology tour he’ll later embark on, which will include a video appearance at aNew York Timesconference and an interview onGood Morning America. He’s been trying to blame his firm’s failure on a hazy combination of comically poor bookkeeping, wildly misjudged risks and complete ignorance of what his hedge fund was doing. In other words, an alumnus of both MIT and the elite Wall Street trading firmJane Streetis arguing that he was just dumb with the numbers—not pulling a conscious fraud. Talking in detail to journalists about what’s certain to be the subject of extensive litigation seems like an unusual strategy, but it makes sense: The press helped him create his only-honest-man-in-crypto image, so why not use them to talk his way out of trouble?Bankman-Fried after an interview onBloomberg Wealth With David Rubensteinon Aug. 17, 2022.Photographer: Jeenah Moon/BloombergHe doesn’t say so, but one reason he might be willing to speak with me is that I’m one of the reporters who helped build him up. After spending two days at FTX’s offices in February, I flew past the brightred flagsat his company—its lack of corporate governance, the ties to his Alameda Research hedge fund, its profligate spending on marketing, the fact that it operated largely outside US jurisdiction. Iwrote a storyfocused on whether Bankman-Fried would follow through on his plans to donate huge sums to charity and his connections to an unusual philanthropic movement calledeffective altruism.It wasn’t the most embarrassingly puffy of the many puff pieces that came out about him. (“After my interview with SBF, I was convinced: I was talking to a future trillionaire,” one writer said in an article commissioned by a venture capital firm.) But my tone wasn’t entirely dissimilar. “Bankman-Fried is a thought experiment from a college philosophy seminar come to life,” I wrote. “Should someone who wants to save the world first amass as much money and power as possible, or will the pursuit corrupt him along the way?” Now it seems pretty clear that a better question would’ve been whether the business was ascam from the start.I tell Bankman-Fried I want to talk about the decisions that led to FTX’s collapse, and why he took them. Earlier in the week, inlate-night DM exchangeswith aVoxreporter and on a phone call with a YouTuber, he made comments that many interpreted as an admission that everything he said was a lie. (“So the ethics stuff, mostly a front?” theVoxreporter asked. “Yeah,” Bankman-Fried replied.) He’d spoken so cynically about his motivations that to many it seemed like a comic book character was pulling off his mask to reveal the villain who’d been hiding there all along.I set out on this visit with a different working theory. Maybe I was feeling the tug of my past reporting, but I still didn’t think the talk about charity was all made up. Since he was a teenager, Bankman-Fried has described himself as utilitarian—following the philosophy that the correct action is the one likely to result in the greatest good for the greatest number of people. He said his endgame was making and donating enough money to prevent pandemics and stop runaway artificial intelligence from destroying humanity. Faced with a crisis, and believing he was the hero of his own sci-fi movie, he might’ve thought it was right to make a crazy, even illegal, gamble to save his company.To be clear, if that’s what happened, it’s the logic of a megalomaniac, not a martyr. The money wasn’t his to gamble with, and “the ends justify the means” is a cliché of bad ethics. But if it’s what he believed, he might still think he’d made the right decision, even if it didn’t work out. It seemed to me that’s what he meant when he messagedVox, “The worst quadrant is sketchy + lose. The best is win + ???” I want to probe that, in part because it might get him to talk more candidly about what had happened to his customers’ money.I decide to approach the topic gingerly, on terms I think he’ll relate to, as it seems he’s in less of a crime-confess-y mood. He’s said he likes to evaluate decisions in terms of expected value—the odds of success times the likely payoff—so I begin by asking: “Should I judge you by your impact, or by the expected value of your decision?”“When all is said and done, what matters is your actual realized impact. Like, that’s what actually matters to the world,” he says. “But, obviously, there’s luck.”That’s the in I’m looking for. For the next 11 hours—with breaks for fundraising calls and a very awkward dinner—I try to get him to tell me exactly what he meant. He denies that he’s committed fraud or lied to anyone and blames FTX’s failure on his sloppiness and inattention. But at points it seems like he’s saying he gotunlucky, or miscalculated the odds.Bankman-Fried tells me he’s still got a chance to raise $8 billion to save his company. He seems delusional, or committed to pretending this is still an error he can fix, and either way, the few supporters remaining at his penthouse seem unlikely to set him straight. The grim scene reminds me a bit of the end ofScarface, with Tony Montana holed up in his mansion, semi-incoherent, his unknown enemies sneaking closer. But instead of mountains of cocaine, Bankman-Fried is clinging to spreadsheet tabs filled with wildly optimistic cryptocurrency valuations.Think of FTX like an offshore casino. Customers sent in money, then gambled on the price of hundreds ofcryptocurrencies—not just Bitcoin or Ether, but more obscure coins. In crypto slang, the latter are called shitcoins, because almost no one knows what they’re for. But in the past few years, otherwise respectable people, from retired dentists to heads of state, convinced themselves that these coins werethe future of finance. Or at least that enough other people might think so to make the price go up. Bankman-Fried’s casino was growing so fast that earlier this year some of Silicon Valley’s top venture capitalists invested in it at a $32 billion valuation.The problem surfaced last month. After a rival crypto-casino kingpin raised concerns about FTX on Twitter, customers rushed to cash in their chips. But when Bankman-Fried’s casino opened the vault, their money wasn’t there. According to multiple news reports citing people familiar with the matter, it had been secretly lent to Bankman-Fried’s hedge fund, which had lost it in some mix of bad bets, insane spending and perhaps something even sketchier. John Ray III, the lawyer who’s now chief executive officer of the bankrupt exchange, has alleged in court that FTX covered up the loans using secret software.Bankman-Fried denies this again to me. Returning to the framework of expected value, I ask him if the decisions he made were correct.“I think that I’ve made a lot of plus-EV decisions and a few very large boneheaded decisions,” he says. “Certainly in retrospect, those very large decisions were very bad, and may end up overwhelming everything else.”The chain of events, in his telling, started about four years ago. Bankman-Fried was in Hong Kong, where he’d moved from Berkeley, California, with a small group of friends from the effective-altruism community. Together they ran a successful startup crypto hedge fund,Alameda Research. (The name itself was an early example of his casual attitude toward rules—it was chosen to avoid scrutiny from banks, which frequently closed its accounts. “If we named our company like, Shitcoin Daytraders Inc., they’d probably just reject us,” Bankman-Fried told a podcaster in 2021. “But, I mean, no one doesn’t like research.”)The fund had made millions of dollars exploiting inefficiencies across cryptocurrency exchanges. (Ex-employees, even those otherwise critical of Bankman-Fried, have said this is true, though some have said Alameda then lost some of that money because of bad trades and mismanagement.) Bankman-Fried and his friends began considering starting their own exchange—what would become FTX.The way Bankman-Fried later described this decision reveals his attitude toward risk. He estimated there was an 80% chance the exchange would fail to attract enough customers. But he’s said one should always take a bet, even a long-shot one, if the expected value is positive, calling this stance “risk neutral.” But it actually meant he would take risks that to a normal person sound insane. “As an individual, to make a bet where it’s like, ‘I’m going to gamble my $10 billion and either get $20 billion or $0, with equal probability,’ would be madness,” Rob Wiblin, host of an effective-altruism podcast, said to Bankman-Fried in April. “But from an altruistic point of view, it’s not so crazy.”“Completely agree,” Bankman-Fried replied. He told another interviewer that he’d make a bet described as a chance of “51% you double the earth out somewhere else, 49% it all disappears.”Bankman-Fried and his friends jump-started FTX by having Alameda provide liquidity. It was a huge conflict of interest. Imagine if the top executives at an online poker site also entered its high-stakes tournaments—the temptation to cheat by peeking at other players’ cards would be huge. But Bankman-Fried assured customers that Alameda would play by the same rules as everyone else, and enough people came to trade that FTX took off. “Having Alameda provide liquidity on FTX early on was the right decision, because I think that helped make FTX a great product for users, even though it obviously ended up backfiring,” Bankman-Fried tells me.Part of FTX’s appeal was that it was mostly a derivatives exchange, which allowed customers to trade “on margin,” meaning with borrowed money. That’s a key to his defense. Bankman-Fried argues no one should be surprised that big traders on FTX, including Alameda, were borrowing from the exchange, and that his fund’s position just somehow got out of hand. “Everyone was borrowing and lending,” he says. “That’s been its calling card.” But FTX’s normal margin system, crypto traders tell me, would never have permitted anyone to accumulate a debt that looked like Alameda’s. When I ask if Alameda had to follow the same margin rules as other traders, he admits the fund did not. “There was more leeway,” he says.That wouldn’t have been so important had Alameda stuck to its original trading strategy of relatively low-risk arbitrage trades. But in 2020 and 2021, as Bankman-Fried became the face of FTX, amajor political donorand a favorite of Silicon Valley, Alameda faced more competition in that market-making business. It shifted its strategy to, essentially, gambling on shitcoins.As Caroline Ellison, then Alameda’s co-CEO, explained in aMarch 2021 post on Twitter: “The way to really make money is figure out when the market is going to go up and get balls long before that,” she wrote, adding that she’d learned the strategy from the classic market-manipulation memoir,Reminiscences of a Stock Operator.Her co-CEO said in another tweet that a profitable strategy was buying Dogecoin becauseElon Musktweeted about it.The reason they were bragging about what sounded like a high schooler’s tactics was that it was working better than anyone knew. When we spoke in February 2022, Bankman-Fried told me that Alameda had made $1 billion the previous year. He now says that was Alameda’s arbitrage profits. On top of that, its shitcoins gained tens of billions of dollars of value, at least on paper. “If you mark everything to market, I do believe at one point my net worth got to $100 billion,” Bankman-Fried says.Any trader would know this wasn’t nearly as good as it sounded. The large pile of tokens couldn’t be turned into cash without crashing the market. Much of it was even made of tokens that Bankman-Fried and his friends had spun up themselves, such as FTT, Serum or Maps—the official currency of a nonsensical crypto-meets-mapping app—or were closely affiliated with, like Solana. While Bankman-Fried acknowledges the pile was worth something less than $100 billion—maybe he’d mark it down a third, he says—he maintains that he could have extracted quite a lot of real money from his holdings.But he didn’t. Instead, Alameda borrowed billions of dollars from other crypto lenders—not FTX—and sunk them into more crypto bets. Publicly, Bankman-Fried presented himself as an ethical operator andcalled for regulationto rein in crypto’s worst excesses. But through his hedge fund, he’d actually become the market’s most degenerate gambler. I ask him why, if he really thought he could sell the tokens, he didn’t. “Why not, like, take some risk off?”“OK. In retrospect, absolutely. That would’ve been the right, like, unambiguously the right thing to do,” he says. “But also it was just, like, hilariously well-capitalized.”Near the peak of the great shitcoin boom, in April 2022, FTX hosted a lavish conference at a resort and casino in Nassau. It was Bankman-Fried’s coming out party. He got to share the stage with quarterback Tom Brady. Also there: former Prime Minister Tony Blair and ex-President Bill Clinton, who extended a fatherly hand when the young crypto executive seemed nervous. The author Michael Lewis, who’s working on a book about Bankman-Fried, praised him in a fawning interview onstage. “You’re breaking land speed records. And I don’t think people are really noticing what’s happened, just how dramatic the revolution has become,” Lewis said, asking when crypto would take over Wall Street.The next month, thecrypto crash began. It started when a popular set of coins called Terra and Luna collapsed, wiping out $60 billion. Terra and Luna were almost openly a Ponzi scheme, but some of the biggest crypto funds had invested in them with borrowed money and went bankrupt. This made the lenders who’d lent billions of dollars to Alameda nervous. They asked Alameda to repay the loans, with real money. It needed billions of dollars, fast, or it would go bust.There are two different versions of what happened next. Two people with knowledge of the matter told me that Ellison, by then the sole head of Alameda, had told her side of the story to her staff amid the crisis. Ellison said that she, Bankman-Fried and his two top lieutenants—Gary Wang and Nishad Singh—had discussed the shortfall. Instead of admitting Alameda’s failure, they decided to use FTX customer funds to cover it, according to the people. If that’s true, all four executives would’ve knowingly committed fraud. (Ellison, Wang and Singh didn’t respond to messages seeking comment.)When I put this to Bankman-Fried, he screws up his eyes, furrows his eyebrows, puts his hands in his hair and thinks for a few seconds.“So, it’s not how I remember what happened,” Bankman-Fried says. But he surprises me by acknowledging that there had been a meeting, post-Luna crash, where they debated what to do about Alameda’s debts. The way he tells it, he was packing for a trip to DC and “only kibitzing on parts of the discussion.” It didn’t seem like a crisis, he says. It was a matter of extending a bit more credit to a fund that already traded on margin and still had a pile of collateral worth way more than enough to cover the loan. (Although the pile of collateral was largely shitcoins.)“That was the point at which Alameda’s margin position on FTX got, well, it got more leveraged substantially,” he says. “Obviously, in retrospect, we should’ve just said no. I sort of didn’t realize then how large the position had gotten.”“You were all aware there was a chance this would not work,” I say.“That’s right,” he says. “But I thought that the risk was substantially smaller.”I try to imagine what he could’ve been thinking. If FTX had liquidated Alameda’s position, the fund would’ve gone bankrupt, and even if the exchange didn’t take direct losses, customers would’ve lost confidence in it. Bankman-Fried points out that the companies that lent money to Alameda might have failed, too, causing a hard-to-predict cascade of events.“Now let’s say you don’t margin call Alameda,” I posit. “Maybe you think there’s like a 70% chance everything will be OK, it’ll all work out?”“Yes, but also in the cases where it didn’t work out, I thought the downside was not nearly as high as it was,” he says. “I thought that there was the risk of a much smaller hole. I thought it was going to be manageable.”Bankman-Fried pulls out his laptop (an Acer Predator) and opens a spreadsheet to show what he meant. It’s similar to thebalance sheethe reportedly showed investors when he was seeking a last-minute bailout, which he says consolidated FTX and Alameda’s positions because by then the fund had defaulted on its debt. On one line—labeled “What I *thought*”—he lists $8.9 billion in debts and way more than enough money to pay them: $9 billion in liquid assets, $15.4 billion in “less liquid” assets and $3.2 billion in “illiquid” ones. He tells me this was more or less the position he was considering when he had the meeting with the other executives.“It looks naively to me like, you know, there’s still some significant liabilities out there, but, like, we should be able to cover it,” he says.“So what’s the problem, then?”Bankman-Fried points to another place on the spreadsheet, which he says shows the actual truth of the situation at the time of the meeting. This one shows similar numbers, but with $8 billion less liquid assets.“What’s the difference between these two rows here?” he asks.“You didn’t have $8 billion in cash that you thought you had,” I say.“That’s correct. Yes.”“You misplaced $8 billion?” I ask.“Misaccounted,” Bankman-Fried says, sounding almost proud of his explanation. Sometimes, he says, customers would wire money to Alameda Research instead of sending it directly to FTX. (Some banks were more willing to work with the hedge fund than the exchange, for some reason.) He claims that somehow, FTX’s internal accounting system double-counted this money, essentially crediting it to both the exchange and the fund.That still doesn’t explain why the money was gone. “Where did the $8 billion go?” I ask.To answer, Bankman-Fried creates a new tab on the spreadsheet and starts typing. He lists Alameda and FTX’s biggest cash flows. One of the biggest expenses is paying a net $2.5 billion toBinance, a rival, to buy out its investment in FTX. He also lists $250 million for real estate, $1.5 billion for expenses, $4 billion for venture capital investments, $1.5 billion for acquisitions and $1 billion labeled “fuckups.” Even accounting for both firms’ profits, and all the venture capital money raised by FTX, it tallies to negative $6.5 billion.Bankman-Fried is telling me that the billions of dollars customers wired to Alameda is gone simply because the companies spent way more than they made. He claims he paid so little attention to his expenses that he didn’t realize he was spending more than he was taking in. “I was real lazy about this mental math,” the former physics major says. He creates another column in his spreadsheet and types in much lower numbers to show what he thought he was spending at the time.It seems to me like he is, without saying it exactly, blaming his underlings for FTX’s failure, especially Ellison, the head of Alameda. The two had dated and lived together at times. She was part of Bankman-Fried’s Future Fund, which was supposed to distribute FTX and Alameda’s earnings to effective-altruist-approved causes. It seems unlikely she would’ve blown billions of dollars without asking. “People might take, like, the TLDR as, like, it was my ex-girlfriend’s fault,” I tell him. “That is sort of what you’re saying.”“I think the biggest failure was that it wasn’t entirely clear whose fault it was,” he says.Bankman-Fried tells me he has to make a call. After a while, the sun goes down and I’m hungry. I’m allowed to join a group of Bankman-Fried’s supporters for dinner, as long as I don’t mention their names.With the curtains drawn, the living room looks considerably less grand than it does in pictures. I’ve been told that FTX employees gathered here amid the crisis, while Bankman-Fried worked in another apartment. Addled by stress and sleep deprivation, they wept and hugged one another. Most didn’t say goodbye as they left the island, one by one. Many flew back to their childhood homes to be with their parents.The supporters at the dinner tell me they feel like the press has been unfair. They say that Bankman-Fried and his friends weren’t the polyamorous partiers the tabloids have portrayed and that they did little besides work. Earlier in the week, a Bahamian man who’d served as FTX’s round-the-clock chauffeur and gofer also told me the reports weren’t true. “People make it seem like this bigWolf of Wall Streetthing,” he said. “Bro, it was a bunch of nerds.”Illustration: Maxime Mouysset for Bloomberg BusinessweekBy the time I finish my plate of off-the-record rice and beans, Bankman-Fried is free again. We return to the study. He’s barefoot now, having balled up his gym socks and stuffed them behind a couch cushion. He lies on the couch, his computer on his lap. The light from the screen casts shadows of his curls on his forehead.I notice a skin-colored patch on his arm. He tells me it’s a transdermal antidepressant, selegiline. I ask if he’s using it as a performance enhancer or to treat depression. “Nothing’s binary,” he says. “But I’ve been borderline depressed for my whole life.” He adds that he also sometimes takes Adderall—“10 milligrams at a time, a few times a day”—as did some of his colleagues, but that talk of drug use is overblown. “I don’t think that was the problem,” he says.I tell Bankman-Fried my theory about his motivation, sidestepping the question of whether he misappropriated customer funds. Bankman-Fried denies that his world-saving goals made him willing to take giant gambles. As we talk more, it seems like he’s saying he made some kind of bet but hadn’t calculated the expected value properly.“I was comfortable taking the risk that, like, I may end up kind of falling flat,” he says, staring at his computer screen, where he had pulled up a game and was leading an army of cartoon knights and fairies into battle. “But what actually happened was disastrously bad and, like, no significant chance of that happening would’ve made sense to risk, and that was a fuckup. Like, that was a mass miscalculation in downside.”I read Bankman-Fried a post by Will MacAskill, one of the founders of the effective-altruism movement. He recruited Bankman-Fried into it when he was a junior at MIT and this year had joined the board of Bankman-Fried’s Future Fund. On Nov. 11,MacAskill wrote on Twitterthat Bankman-Fried had betrayed him. “For years, the EA community has emphasized the importance of integrity, honesty and the respect of common-sense moral constraints,” MacAskill wrote. “If customer funds were misused, then Sam did not listen; he must have thought he was above such considerations.”Bankman-Fried closes his eyes and pushes his toes against one arm of the couch, clenching the other arm with his hands. “That’s not how I view what happened,” he says. “But I did fuck up. I think really what I want to say is, like, I’m really fucking sorry. By far the worst thing about this is that it will tarnish the reputation of people who are dedicated to doing nothing but what they thought was best for the world.” Bankman-Fried trails off. On his computer screen, his army casts spells and swings swords unattended.I ask what he’d say to people who are comparing him to the most famous Ponzi schemer of recent times. “Bernie Madoff also said he had good intentions and gave a lot to charity,” I say.“FTX was a legitimate, profitable, thriving business. And I fucked up by, like, allowing a margin position to get too big on it. One that endangered the platform. It was a completely unnecessary and unforced error, which like maybe I got super unlucky on, but, like, that was my bad.”“It fucking sucks,” he adds. “But it wasn’t inherent to what the business was. It was just a fuckup. A huge fuckup.”To me, it doesn’t really seem like a fuckup. Even if I believe that he misplaced and accidentally spent $8 billion, he’s already told me that Alameda had been allowed to violate FTX’s margin rules. This wasn’t some little technical thing. He was so proud of FTX’s margining system that he’d been lobbying regulators for it to be used on US exchanges instead of traditional safeguards. In May, Bankman-Fried himself said on Twitter that exchanges should never extend credit to a fund and put other customers’ assets at risk. He wrote that the idea an exchange would even have that discretion was “scary.” I read him the tweets and ask: “Isn’t that, like, exactly what you did, right around that time?”“Yeah, I guess that’s kind of fair,” he says. Then he seems to claim that this was evidence the rules he was lobbying for were a good idea. “I think this is one of the things that would have stopped.”“You had a rule on your platform. You didn’t follow it,” I say.By now it’s past midnight, and—operating without the benefit of any prescription stimulants—I’m worn out. I ask Bankman-Fried if I can see the apartment’s deck before I leave. Outside, crickets chirp as we stand by the pool. The marina is dark, lit only by the spotlights of yachts. As I say goodbye, Bankman-Fried bites into a burger bun and starts talking about potential bailouts with one of his supporters.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":92,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9077422332,"gmtCreate":1658559352726,"gmtModify":1676536177174,"author":{"id":"3581831301083382","authorId":"3581831301083382","name":"Jon1997","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/56a6c402888c604fd1da304b410f7134","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3581831301083382","authorIdStr":"3581831301083382"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Bbj","listText":"Bbj","text":"Bbj","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9077422332","repostId":"2253066929","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2253066929","kind":"highlight","pubTimestamp":1658542584,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2253066929?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-07-23 10:16","market":"us","language":"en","title":"The 2 Safest Energy Dividends Right Now","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2253066929","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"These passive income stalwarts will let investors rest easy no matter what the market is doing.","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>The energy industry had some of the hottest stocks on the market over the past two years, but with fears of a recession potentially dampening demand for oil and gas, the <b>S&amp;P 500</b> <b>Energy</b> index is down 25% since its peak last month.</p><p>The cost of a barrel of oil is down to around $100 per barrel, and gasoline at the pumps has broken from its record high last month of $5 a gallon. But upstream, midstream, and downstream energy stocks are still taking a beating.</p><p>That makes it a critical time to consider where you&#39;ve been putting your money to work and whether you should be investing in dividend stocks to protect your downside. History shows income-generating stocks outperform non-dividend stocks even in the worst of times, so if we&#39;re heading into a new period of market turbulence, it may be the right time to find companies that pay a safe dividend and can pad your pockets during this uncertainty.</p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/CVX\">Chevron </a> and <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/EPD\">Enterprise Products Partners</a> offer two of the most dependable dividends in the energy sector right now.</p><h3><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/CVX\">Chevron </a></h3><p>As one of the biggest integrated energy companies, Chevron stands to benefit from the global need for fossil fuels that will last for years, decades even. Despite alternative fuel sources filling an increasing percentage of our energy needs, there isn&#39;t the capacity available for wind, solar, or biofuels to displace oil and gas as our primary providers.</p><p>Even though oil&#39;s price has dropped from its highs, it remains elevated and will likely stay elevated for some time to come. Chevron has told investors that even if oil drops to $50 a barrel -- what it deems its break-even price -- it would be able to maintain its record-setting stock buyback rate of $10 billion annually plus finance its dividend without worry, while a price of $75 a barrel would allow for further increases in both.</p><p>It also noted that during the depths of the pandemic lockdown with oil averaging $30 a barrel (there was a point where the price even went negative), Chevron maintained its payout while still investing in its business even as many of its rivals suspended their dividends.</p><p>The oil giant has a record of increasing its dividend for 35 consecutive years, most recently in January when it hiked the quarterly payout 6% to $1.42 per share, or $5.68 annually. With a healthy yield of 4.1% annually, Chevron is a Dividend Aristocrat, and its payout remains one of the industry&#39;s safest.</p><h3><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/EPD\">Enterprise Products Partners</a></h3><p>Unlike Chevron having its hand in all aspects of the oil and gas supply chain, Enterprise Products Partners specializes in the midstream channel, owning one of the largest pipeline networks in the U.S. with over 50,000 miles of pipeline, 14 billion cubic feet of natural gas storage, and 260 million barrels of storage capacity for natural gas liquids (NGLs), crude oil, refined products, and petrochemicals. It also has 21 NGL processing plants.</p><p>Enterprise Products Partners is also one of the largest publicly traded partnerships in the country. As the middleman in the process, it thrives because it has a stable stream of revenue and predictable cash flows. Much of its revenue is derived from long-term, fixed-fee, or take-or-pay contracts that mean it gets paid whether its customers accept delivery of the product or not.</p><p>Although the midstream player doesn&#39;t yet have the same longevity as Chevron in raising its dividend, at 23 consecutive years and counting, it is fast closing in on the 25-year threshold needed to become a Dividend Aristocrat.</p><p>It&#39;s also a very safe dividend as its distribution-coverage ratio, or the amount of cash flow available for distribution compared to what the company disburses to its shareholders, of 1.8. The ratio should not fall below 1 as that implies the payout is unsustainable. But even during the pandemic, Enterprise&#39;s distribution-coverage ratio never got close to 1 and ended the year at 1.6.</p></body></html>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>The 2 Safest Energy Dividends Right Now</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nThe 2 Safest Energy Dividends Right Now\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-07-23 10:16 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/07/22/the-2-safest-energy-dividends-right-now/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>The energy industry had some of the hottest stocks on the market over the past two years, but with fears of a recession potentially dampening demand for oil and gas, the S&P 500 Energy index is down ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/07/22/the-2-safest-energy-dividends-right-now/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"CVX":"雪佛龙","EPD":"Enterprise Products Partners L.P"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/07/22/the-2-safest-energy-dividends-right-now/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2253066929","content_text":"The energy industry had some of the hottest stocks on the market over the past two years, but with fears of a recession potentially dampening demand for oil and gas, the S&P 500 Energy index is down 25% since its peak last month.The cost of a barrel of oil is down to around $100 per barrel, and gasoline at the pumps has broken from its record high last month of $5 a gallon. But upstream, midstream, and downstream energy stocks are still taking a beating.That makes it a critical time to consider where you've been putting your money to work and whether you should be investing in dividend stocks to protect your downside. History shows income-generating stocks outperform non-dividend stocks even in the worst of times, so if we're heading into a new period of market turbulence, it may be the right time to find companies that pay a safe dividend and can pad your pockets during this uncertainty.Chevron  and Enterprise Products Partners offer two of the most dependable dividends in the energy sector right now.Chevron As one of the biggest integrated energy companies, Chevron stands to benefit from the global need for fossil fuels that will last for years, decades even. Despite alternative fuel sources filling an increasing percentage of our energy needs, there isn't the capacity available for wind, solar, or biofuels to displace oil and gas as our primary providers.Even though oil's price has dropped from its highs, it remains elevated and will likely stay elevated for some time to come. Chevron has told investors that even if oil drops to $50 a barrel -- what it deems its break-even price -- it would be able to maintain its record-setting stock buyback rate of $10 billion annually plus finance its dividend without worry, while a price of $75 a barrel would allow for further increases in both.It also noted that during the depths of the pandemic lockdown with oil averaging $30 a barrel (there was a point where the price even went negative), Chevron maintained its payout while still investing in its business even as many of its rivals suspended their dividends.The oil giant has a record of increasing its dividend for 35 consecutive years, most recently in January when it hiked the quarterly payout 6% to $1.42 per share, or $5.68 annually. With a healthy yield of 4.1% annually, Chevron is a Dividend Aristocrat, and its payout remains one of the industry's safest.Enterprise Products PartnersUnlike Chevron having its hand in all aspects of the oil and gas supply chain, Enterprise Products Partners specializes in the midstream channel, owning one of the largest pipeline networks in the U.S. with over 50,000 miles of pipeline, 14 billion cubic feet of natural gas storage, and 260 million barrels of storage capacity for natural gas liquids (NGLs), crude oil, refined products, and petrochemicals. It also has 21 NGL processing plants.Enterprise Products Partners is also one of the largest publicly traded partnerships in the country. As the middleman in the process, it thrives because it has a stable stream of revenue and predictable cash flows. Much of its revenue is derived from long-term, fixed-fee, or take-or-pay contracts that mean it gets paid whether its customers accept delivery of the product or not.Although the midstream player doesn't yet have the same longevity as Chevron in raising its dividend, at 23 consecutive years and counting, it is fast closing in on the 25-year threshold needed to become a Dividend Aristocrat.It's also a very safe dividend as its distribution-coverage ratio, or the amount of cash flow available for distribution compared to what the company disburses to its shareholders, of 1.8. The ratio should not fall below 1 as that implies the payout is unsustainable. But even during the pandemic, Enterprise's distribution-coverage ratio never got close to 1 and ended the year at 1.6.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":107,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9041836762,"gmtCreate":1656031874056,"gmtModify":1676535754282,"author":{"id":"3581831301083382","authorId":"3581831301083382","name":"Jon1997","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/56a6c402888c604fd1da304b410f7134","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3581831301083382","authorIdStr":"3581831301083382"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Hi","listText":"Hi","text":"Hi","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9041836762","repostId":"1103591580","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1103591580","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1656025427,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1103591580?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-06-24 07:03","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Wall Street Posts Solid Gains, As Defensives, Tech Shine","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1103591580","media":"StreetInsider","summary":"Wall Street's main indexes posted solid gains on Thursday, fueled by strong performance from defensi","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Wall Street&#39;s main indexes posted solid gains on Thursday, fueled by strong performance from defensive and tech shares that outweighed declines for economically sensitive groups as worries persisted about a potential recession.</p><p>The benchmark S&amp;P 500 swung between positive and negative during the session, but stocks picked up steam heading into the market&#39;s close. Benchmark U.S. Treasury yields fell to two-week lows, supporting tech and other rate-sensitive growth stocks.</p><p>Trading has remained volatile in the wake of the S&amp;P 500 last week logging its biggest weekly percentage drop since March 2020. Investors are weighing how far stocks could fall after the index earlier this month fell over 20% from its January all-time high, confirming the common definition of a bear market.</p><p>“There is a tremendous amount of uncertainty about the outlook and so the market is confused,” said Walter Todd, chief investment officer at Greenwood Capital in South Carolina.</p><p>The Dow Jones Industrial Average rose 194.23 points, or 0.64%, to 30,677.36, the S&amp;P 500 gained 35.84 points, or 0.95%, to 3,795.73 and the Nasdaq Composite added 179.11 points, or 1.62%, to 11,232.19.</p><p>In his second day of testifying before Congress, U.S. central bank chief Jerome Powell said the Fed&#39;s commitment to reining in 40-year-high inflation is &#34;unconditional&#34; but also comes with the risk of higher unemployment.</p><p>U.S. business activity slowed considerably in June as high inflation and declining consumer confidence dampened demand across the board, a survey on Thursday showed.</p><p>“The Fed wants to see things start to slow and the data is starting to reflect that,” said James Ragan, director of wealth management research atD.A. Davidson.</p><p>Citigroup analysts are forecasting a near 50% probability of a global recession.</p><p>“Economic growth is slowing. Is it going to slow enough to go into a recession, that’s the big question,” Ragan said.</p><p>Defensive groups considered safer bets in rocky economic times were the top-performing S&amp;P 500 sectors. Among them, utilities gained 2.4%, healthcare rose 2.2% and real estate added 2%.</p><p>The heavyweight tech sector rose 1.4%, with Microsoft gaining 2.3% and Apple up 2.2%.</p><p>The energy sector slumped 3.8%, continuing its recent pullback after soundly outperforming the market for most of 2022. Declines in Exxon Mobil and Chevron were the biggest individual drags on the S&amp;P 500, with Exxon dropping 3% and Chevron falling 3.7%.</p><p>Other economically sensitive sectors also fell. Materials lost 1.4%, while industrials and financials dipped about 0.5% each.</p><p>Advancing issues outnumbered declining ones on the NYSE by a 1.41-to-1 ratio; on Nasdaq, a 1.67-to-1 ratio favored advancers.</p><p>The S&amp;P 500 posted one new 52-week high and 40 new lows; the Nasdaq Composite recorded 32 new highs and 194 new lows.</p><p>About 12.4 billion shares changed hands in U.S. exchanges, compared with the 12.5 billion daily average over the last 20 sessions.</p></body></html>","source":"highlight_streetinsider","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Wall Street Posts Solid Gains, As Defensives, Tech Shine</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWall Street Posts Solid Gains, As Defensives, Tech Shine\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-06-24 07:03 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.streetinsider.com/Market+Check/Wall+Street+posts+solid+gains%2C+as+defensives%2C+tech+shine/20245971.html><strong>StreetInsider</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Wall Street's main indexes posted solid gains on Thursday, fueled by strong performance from defensive and tech shares that outweighed declines for economically sensitive groups as worries persisted ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.streetinsider.com/Market+Check/Wall+Street+posts+solid+gains%2C+as+defensives%2C+tech+shine/20245971.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".DJI":"道琼斯",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite"},"source_url":"https://www.streetinsider.com/Market+Check/Wall+Street+posts+solid+gains%2C+as+defensives%2C+tech+shine/20245971.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1103591580","content_text":"Wall Street's main indexes posted solid gains on Thursday, fueled by strong performance from defensive and tech shares that outweighed declines for economically sensitive groups as worries persisted about a potential recession.The benchmark S&P 500 swung between positive and negative during the session, but stocks picked up steam heading into the market's close. Benchmark U.S. Treasury yields fell to two-week lows, supporting tech and other rate-sensitive growth stocks.Trading has remained volatile in the wake of the S&P 500 last week logging its biggest weekly percentage drop since March 2020. Investors are weighing how far stocks could fall after the index earlier this month fell over 20% from its January all-time high, confirming the common definition of a bear market.“There is a tremendous amount of uncertainty about the outlook and so the market is confused,” said Walter Todd, chief investment officer at Greenwood Capital in South Carolina.The Dow Jones Industrial Average rose 194.23 points, or 0.64%, to 30,677.36, the S&P 500 gained 35.84 points, or 0.95%, to 3,795.73 and the Nasdaq Composite added 179.11 points, or 1.62%, to 11,232.19.In his second day of testifying before Congress, U.S. central bank chief Jerome Powell said the Fed's commitment to reining in 40-year-high inflation is \"unconditional\" but also comes with the risk of higher unemployment.U.S. business activity slowed considerably in June as high inflation and declining consumer confidence dampened demand across the board, a survey on Thursday showed.“The Fed wants to see things start to slow and the data is starting to reflect that,” said James Ragan, director of wealth management research atD.A. Davidson.Citigroup analysts are forecasting a near 50% probability of a global recession.“Economic growth is slowing. Is it going to slow enough to go into a recession, that’s the big question,” Ragan said.Defensive groups considered safer bets in rocky economic times were the top-performing S&P 500 sectors. Among them, utilities gained 2.4%, healthcare rose 2.2% and real estate added 2%.The heavyweight tech sector rose 1.4%, with Microsoft gaining 2.3% and Apple up 2.2%.The energy sector slumped 3.8%, continuing its recent pullback after soundly outperforming the market for most of 2022. Declines in Exxon Mobil and Chevron were the biggest individual drags on the S&P 500, with Exxon dropping 3% and Chevron falling 3.7%.Other economically sensitive sectors also fell. Materials lost 1.4%, while industrials and financials dipped about 0.5% each.Advancing issues outnumbered declining ones on the NYSE by a 1.41-to-1 ratio; on Nasdaq, a 1.67-to-1 ratio favored advancers.The S&P 500 posted one new 52-week high and 40 new lows; the Nasdaq Composite recorded 32 new highs and 194 new lows.About 12.4 billion shares changed hands in U.S. exchanges, compared with the 12.5 billion daily average over the last 20 sessions.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":22,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9956001106,"gmtCreate":1673837592106,"gmtModify":1676538892288,"author":{"id":"3581831301083382","authorId":"3581831301083382","name":"Jon1997","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/56a6c402888c604fd1da304b410f7134","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3581831301083382","authorIdStr":"3581831301083382"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Gghhhjj ghhjjjjjjj hikjjhhh Hhh","listText":"Gghhhjj ghhjjjjjjj hikjjhhh Hhh","text":"Gghhhjj ghhjjjjjjj hikjjhhh Hhh","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9956001106","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":102,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"lives":[]}