LynnNg personal page - To The Moon

LynnNg

LynnNg

No personal profile

339Follow

25Followers

1Topic

0Badge

2022-12-19

2022-12-19

2022-12-19

Great ariticle, would you like to share it?

@CaptainTiger:[Game] Screenshot to Predict the Score of World Cup final!

2022-12-01

$Apple(AAPL)$ Gogogo

2022-12-01

$Apple(AAPL)$ Go!

2022-11-30

$DJIA(.DJI)$ Go

2022-10-06

$Apple(AAPL)$ggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggg

2022-10-05

$Apple(AAPL)$Go go go go go

2022-10-05

$Apple(AAPL)$Go

2022-10-05

$Apple(AAPL)$go

2022-10-04

$S&P 500(.SPX)$Go

2022-10-02

2022-10-02

$NASDAQ(.IXIC)$yo

2022-09-30

2022-09-29

$NikkoAM-STC Asia REIT(CFA.SI)$Share

2022-09-29

2022-09-28

$NASDAQ(.IXIC)$

2022-09-27

$S&P 500(.SPX)$

2022-09-26

$S&P 500(.SPX)$JF

2022-09-25

Go to Tiger App to see more news

{"i18n":{"language":"en_US"},"userPageInfo":{"id":"4088814878354060","uuid":"4088814878354060","gmtCreate":1625720626317,"gmtModify":1625728766995,"name":"LynnNg","pinyin":"lynnng","introduction":"","introductionEn":null,"signature":"","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5f569eb8b2a3f73cf3debc58ec85b953","hat":null,"hatId":null,"hatName":null,"vip":1,"status":2,"fanSize":25,"headSize":339,"tweetSize":177,"questionSize":0,"limitLevel":999,"accountStatus":4,"level":{"id":3,"name":"书生虎","nameTw":"書生虎","represent":"努力向上","factor":"发布10条非转发主帖,其中5条获得他人回复或点赞","iconColor":"3C9E83","bgColor":"A2F1D9"},"themeCounts":1,"badgeCounts":0,"badges":[],"moderator":false,"superModerator":false,"manageSymbols":null,"badgeLevel":null,"boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"favoriteSize":0,"symbols":null,"coverImage":null,"realNameVerified":"success","userBadges":[{"badgeId":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493-2","templateUuid":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493","name":"Senior Tiger","description":"Join the tiger community for 1000 days","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0063fb68ea29c9ae6858c58630e182d5","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/96c699a93be4214d4b49aea6a5a5d1a4","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/35b0e542a9ff77046ed69ef602bc105d","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":1,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2024.04.04","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1001},{"badgeId":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84-1","templateUuid":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84","name":"Real Trader","description":"Completed a transaction","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e08a1cc2087a1de93402c2c290fa65b","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4504a6397ce1137932d56e5f4ce27166","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4b22c79415b4cd6e3d8ebc4a0fa32604","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100}],"userBadgeCount":2,"currentWearingBadge":{"badgeId":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493-2","templateUuid":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493","name":"Senior Tiger","description":"Join the tiger community for 1000 days","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0063fb68ea29c9ae6858c58630e182d5","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/96c699a93be4214d4b49aea6a5a5d1a4","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/35b0e542a9ff77046ed69ef602bc105d","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":1,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2024.04.04","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1001},"individualDisplayBadges":null,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"location":null,"starInvestorFollowerNum":0,"starInvestorFlag":false,"starInvestorOrderShareNum":0,"subscribeStarInvestorNum":0,"ror":null,"winRationPercentage":null,"showRor":false,"investmentPhilosophy":null,"starInvestorSubscribeFlag":false},"baikeInfo":{},"tab":"post","tweets":[{"id":9926064704,"gmtCreate":1671423165509,"gmtModify":1676538534080,"author":{"id":"4088814878354060","authorId":"4088814878354060","name":"LynnNg","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5f569eb8b2a3f73cf3debc58ec85b953","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4088814878354060","authorIdStr":"4088814878354060"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/AAPL\">$Apple(AAPL)$&nbsp;</a><v-v data-views=\"1\"></v-v>","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/AAPL\">$Apple(AAPL)$&nbsp;</a><v-v data-views=\"1\"></v-v>","text":"$Apple(AAPL)$","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/9ca58817138722ad0b581f395e326010","width":"1125","height":"2000"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9926064704","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":377,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9926064264,"gmtCreate":1671423139059,"gmtModify":1676538534073,"author":{"id":"4088814878354060","authorId":"4088814878354060","name":"LynnNg","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5f569eb8b2a3f73cf3debc58ec85b953","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4088814878354060","authorIdStr":"4088814878354060"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/AAPL\">$Apple(AAPL)$&nbsp;</a>","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/AAPL\">$Apple(AAPL)$&nbsp;</a>","text":"$Apple(AAPL)$","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/195123e9ec5107097fe2aae74a3ae742","width":"1125","height":"2000"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9926064264","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":328,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9926065724,"gmtCreate":1671423017069,"gmtModify":1676538534041,"author":{"id":"4088814878354060","authorId":"4088814878354060","name":"LynnNg","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5f569eb8b2a3f73cf3debc58ec85b953","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4088814878354060","authorIdStr":"4088814878354060"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Great ariticle, would you like to share it?","listText":"Great ariticle, would you like to share it?","text":"Great ariticle, would you like to share it?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9926065724","repostId":"9928977208","repostType":1,"repost":{"id":9928977208,"gmtCreate":1671183005704,"gmtModify":1676538505099,"author":{"id":"3527667618000160","authorId":"3527667618000160","name":"CaptainTiger","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5d0e54b757b231beb8b11fd49de85317","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3527667618000160","authorIdStr":"3527667618000160"},"themes":[],"title":"[Game] Screenshot to Predict the Score of World Cup final!","htmlText":"Hi&nbsp;Tigers!2022&nbsp;Qatar&nbsp;World&nbsp;Cup&nbsp;final has been confirmed:&nbsp;Argentina vs FranceWill&nbsp;Messi's&nbsp;Argentina&nbsp;lift&nbsp;the&nbsp;trophy,&nbsp;or&nbsp;France&nbsp;defend&nbsp;the&nbsp;title&nbsp;successfully?&nbsp;The&nbsp;final&nbsp;will&nbsp;kick&nbsp;off&nbsp;at&nbsp;11&nbsp;pm&nbsp;on&nbsp;18&nbsp;Dec,&nbsp;SGT.&nbsp;Let's&nbsp;play&nbsp;a&nbsp;game&nbsp;first!&nbsp;You&nbsp;stand&nbsp;a&nbsp;chance&nbsp;to&nbsp;win&nbsp;tons&nbsp;of&nbsp;coins&nbsp;and&nbsp;Tiger&nbsp;Trade&nbsp;T-shirts!How&nbsp;to&nbsp;take&nbsp;part1.&nbsp;Take&nbsp;a&nbsp;screenshot&nbsp;to&nbsp;predict&nbsp;the&nbsp;score&nbsp;of&nbsp;Argentina vs France&nbsp;in&nbsp;90&nbsp;mins!&nbsp;2.&nbsp;Send&nbsp;your&nbsp;screenshots&nbsp;in&nbsp;the&nbsp;comments&nbsp;section.&nbsp;REWARD","listText":"Hi&nbsp;Tigers!2022&nbsp;Qatar&nbsp;World&nbsp;Cup&nbsp;final has been confirmed:&nbsp;Argentina vs FranceWill&nbsp;Messi's&nbsp;Argentina&nbsp;lift&nbsp;the&nbsp;trophy,&nbsp;or&nbsp;France&nbsp;defend&nbsp;the&nbsp;title&nbsp;successfully?&nbsp;The&nbsp;final&nbsp;will&nbsp;kick&nbsp;off&nbsp;at&nbsp;11&nbsp;pm&nbsp;on&nbsp;18&nbsp;Dec,&nbsp;SGT.&nbsp;Let's&nbsp;play&nbsp;a&nbsp;game&nbsp;first!&nbsp;You&nbsp;stand&nbsp;a&nbsp;chance&nbsp;to&nbsp;win&nbsp;tons&nbsp;of&nbsp;coins&nbsp;and&nbsp;Tiger&nbsp;Trade&nbsp;T-shirts!How&nbsp;to&nbsp;take&nbsp;part1.&nbsp;Take&nbsp;a&nbsp;screenshot&nbsp;to&nbsp;predict&nbsp;the&nbsp;score&nbsp;of&nbsp;Argentina vs France&nbsp;in&nbsp;90&nbsp;mins!&nbsp;2.&nbsp;Send&nbsp;your&nbsp;screenshots&nbsp;in&nbsp;the&nbsp;comments&nbsp;section.&nbsp;REWARD","text":"Hi Tigers!2022 Qatar World Cup final has been confirmed: Argentina vs FranceWill Messi's Argentina lift the trophy, or France defend the title successfully? The final will kick off at 11 pm on 18 Dec, SGT. Let's play a game first! You stand a chance to win tons of coins and Tiger Trade T-shirts!How to take part1. Take a screenshot to predict the score of Argentina vs France in 90 mins! 2. Send your screenshots in the comments section. REWARD","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/9f4fdd4f4517983169cf2ce1b645836b","width":"500","height":"281"}],"top":1,"highlighted":2,"essential":1,"paper":2,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9928977208","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":0,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":441,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9965994693,"gmtCreate":1669867600713,"gmtModify":1676538260142,"author":{"id":"4088814878354060","authorId":"4088814878354060","name":"LynnNg","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5f569eb8b2a3f73cf3debc58ec85b953","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4088814878354060","authorIdStr":"4088814878354060"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/AAPL\">$Apple(AAPL)$&nbsp;</a><v-v data-views=\"1\"></v-v>Gogogo","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/AAPL\">$Apple(AAPL)$&nbsp;</a><v-v data-views=\"1\"></v-v>Gogogo","text":"$Apple(AAPL)$ Gogogo","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/dfa35be011c45fbfadd9614f1a157c86","width":"1125","height":"2000"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9965994693","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":582,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9965994962,"gmtCreate":1669867529856,"gmtModify":1676538260119,"author":{"id":"4088814878354060","authorId":"4088814878354060","name":"LynnNg","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5f569eb8b2a3f73cf3debc58ec85b953","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4088814878354060","authorIdStr":"4088814878354060"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/AAPL\">$Apple(AAPL)$&nbsp;</a><v-v data-views=\"1\"></v-v>Go!","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/AAPL\">$Apple(AAPL)$&nbsp;</a><v-v data-views=\"1\"></v-v>Go!","text":"$Apple(AAPL)$ Go!","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/21b3c2dd0e9de2b5234c3c61d798153a","width":"1125","height":"2000"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9965994962","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":306,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9962275438,"gmtCreate":1669795423024,"gmtModify":1676538244923,"author":{"id":"4088814878354060","authorId":"4088814878354060","name":"LynnNg","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5f569eb8b2a3f73cf3debc58ec85b953","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4088814878354060","authorIdStr":"4088814878354060"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/.DJI\">$DJIA(.DJI)$&nbsp;</a><v-v data-views=\"1\"></v-v>Go","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/.DJI\">$DJIA(.DJI)$&nbsp;</a><v-v data-views=\"1\"></v-v>Go","text":"$DJIA(.DJI)$ Go","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/a3d6b42e72f3c002c73d29c5f85132c6","width":"1125","height":"1861"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9962275438","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":440,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9915691132,"gmtCreate":1665017904926,"gmtModify":1676537544576,"author":{"id":"4088814878354060","authorId":"4088814878354060","name":"LynnNg","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5f569eb8b2a3f73cf3debc58ec85b953","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4088814878354060","authorIdStr":"4088814878354060"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/AAPL\">$Apple(AAPL)$</a><v-v data-views=\"1\"></v-v>ggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggg","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/AAPL\">$Apple(AAPL)$</a><v-v data-views=\"1\"></v-v>ggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggg","text":"$Apple(AAPL)$ggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggg","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/9e405ade24109b266691a490928253d1","width":"1125","height":"2103"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9915691132","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":346,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9915078059,"gmtCreate":1664931482371,"gmtModify":1676537530698,"author":{"id":"4088814878354060","authorId":"4088814878354060","name":"LynnNg","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5f569eb8b2a3f73cf3debc58ec85b953","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4088814878354060","authorIdStr":"4088814878354060"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/AAPL\">$Apple(AAPL)$</a><v-v data-views=\"1\"></v-v>Go go go go go","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/AAPL\">$Apple(AAPL)$</a><v-v data-views=\"1\"></v-v>Go go go go go","text":"$Apple(AAPL)$Go go go go go","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/efe59dd6646452c741f19a76cdc4d219","width":"1170","height":"2292"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9915078059","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":446,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9915073366,"gmtCreate":1664931351156,"gmtModify":1676537530651,"author":{"id":"4088814878354060","authorId":"4088814878354060","name":"LynnNg","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5f569eb8b2a3f73cf3debc58ec85b953","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4088814878354060","authorIdStr":"4088814878354060"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/AAPL\">$Apple(AAPL)$</a><v-v data-views=\"1\"></v-v>Go&nbsp;","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/AAPL\">$Apple(AAPL)$</a><v-v data-views=\"1\"></v-v>Go&nbsp;","text":"$Apple(AAPL)$Go","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/a34414a175e7ac41a720e297267cc1e4","width":"1125","height":"2103"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9915073366","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":435,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9915079705,"gmtCreate":1664931316508,"gmtModify":1676537530643,"author":{"id":"4088814878354060","authorId":"4088814878354060","name":"LynnNg","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5f569eb8b2a3f73cf3debc58ec85b953","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4088814878354060","authorIdStr":"4088814878354060"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/AAPL\">$Apple(AAPL)$</a><v-v data-views=\"1\"></v-v>go","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/AAPL\">$Apple(AAPL)$</a><v-v data-views=\"1\"></v-v>go","text":"$Apple(AAPL)$go","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/b3b2c380283ce5afb90747117c58cbcd","width":"1125","height":"2103"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9915079705","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":519,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9912534439,"gmtCreate":1664849859922,"gmtModify":1676537518935,"author":{"id":"4088814878354060","authorId":"4088814878354060","name":"LynnNg","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5f569eb8b2a3f73cf3debc58ec85b953","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4088814878354060","authorIdStr":"4088814878354060"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/.SPX\">$S&amp;P 500(.SPX)$</a><v-v data-views=\"1\"></v-v>Go","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/.SPX\">$S&amp;P 500(.SPX)$</a><v-v data-views=\"1\"></v-v>Go","text":"$S&P 500(.SPX)$Go","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/c1c3e087d72cd2b1bf469f715080f662","width":"1170","height":"2325"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9912534439","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":288,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9912015457,"gmtCreate":1664702589679,"gmtModify":1676537496408,"author":{"id":"4088814878354060","authorId":"4088814878354060","name":"LynnNg","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5f569eb8b2a3f73cf3debc58ec85b953","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4088814878354060","authorIdStr":"4088814878354060"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/AAPL\">$Apple(AAPL)$</a><v-v data-views=\"1\"></v-v>","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/AAPL\">$Apple(AAPL)$</a><v-v data-views=\"1\"></v-v>","text":"$Apple(AAPL)$","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/0a8e8de2aab759d4c818f97943d8e39e","width":"1170","height":"2292"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9912015457","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":276,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9912015134,"gmtCreate":1664702504929,"gmtModify":1676537496393,"author":{"id":"4088814878354060","authorId":"4088814878354060","name":"LynnNg","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5f569eb8b2a3f73cf3debc58ec85b953","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4088814878354060","authorIdStr":"4088814878354060"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/.IXIC\">$NASDAQ(.IXIC)$</a>yo","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/.IXIC\">$NASDAQ(.IXIC)$</a>yo","text":"$NASDAQ(.IXIC)$yo","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/1cfc553d7c8ed4dc95e4ca72e00152d3","width":"1170","height":"2445"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9912015134","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":124,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9916397902,"gmtCreate":1664506444506,"gmtModify":1676537468125,"author":{"id":"4088814878354060","authorId":"4088814878354060","name":"LynnNg","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5f569eb8b2a3f73cf3debc58ec85b953","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4088814878354060","authorIdStr":"4088814878354060"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/.DJI\">$DJIA(.DJI)$</a><v-v data-views=\"1\"></v-v>","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/.DJI\">$DJIA(.DJI)$</a><v-v data-views=\"1\"></v-v>","text":"$DJIA(.DJI)$","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9916397902","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":118,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9918505505,"gmtCreate":1664411728008,"gmtModify":1676537449100,"author":{"id":"4088814878354060","authorId":"4088814878354060","name":"LynnNg","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5f569eb8b2a3f73cf3debc58ec85b953","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4088814878354060","authorIdStr":"4088814878354060"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/CFA.SI\">$NikkoAM-STC Asia REIT(CFA.SI)$</a>Share","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/CFA.SI\">$NikkoAM-STC Asia REIT(CFA.SI)$</a>Share","text":"$NikkoAM-STC Asia REIT(CFA.SI)$Share","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/ad2ce52330dbb6c9e42160cc8be20f48","width":"1170","height":"2325"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9918505505","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":135,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9918508276,"gmtCreate":1664411511295,"gmtModify":1676537449011,"author":{"id":"4088814878354060","authorId":"4088814878354060","name":"LynnNg","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5f569eb8b2a3f73cf3debc58ec85b953","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4088814878354060","authorIdStr":"4088814878354060"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/.DJI\">$DJIA(.DJI)$</a><v-v data-views=\"1\"></v-v>","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/.DJI\">$DJIA(.DJI)$</a><v-v data-views=\"1\"></v-v>","text":"$DJIA(.DJI)$","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/d678df7b4f5e6430023b3778f4b4a8a8","width":"1170","height":"2325"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9918508276","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":171,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9918342503,"gmtCreate":1664327629903,"gmtModify":1676537433379,"author":{"id":"4088814878354060","authorId":"4088814878354060","name":"LynnNg","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5f569eb8b2a3f73cf3debc58ec85b953","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4088814878354060","authorIdStr":"4088814878354060"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/.IXIC\">$NASDAQ(.IXIC)$</a><v-v data-views=\"1\"></v-v>","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/.IXIC\">$NASDAQ(.IXIC)$</a><v-v data-views=\"1\"></v-v>","text":"$NASDAQ(.IXIC)$","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/539ec3e3a23fd864ec302cbc05b6a7ee","width":"1170","height":"2445"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9918342503","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":114,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9911497942,"gmtCreate":1664241023386,"gmtModify":1676537416161,"author":{"id":"4088814878354060","authorId":"4088814878354060","name":"LynnNg","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5f569eb8b2a3f73cf3debc58ec85b953","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4088814878354060","authorIdStr":"4088814878354060"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/.SPX\">$S&amp;P 500(.SPX)$</a><v-v data-views=\"1\"></v-v>","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/.SPX\">$S&amp;P 500(.SPX)$</a><v-v data-views=\"1\"></v-v>","text":"$S&P 500(.SPX)$","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/7155b3e471fee83fa5d9380cdef8cb1f","width":"1170","height":"2325"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9911497942","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":219,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9911123307,"gmtCreate":1664158367709,"gmtModify":1676537399212,"author":{"id":"4088814878354060","authorId":"4088814878354060","name":"LynnNg","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5f569eb8b2a3f73cf3debc58ec85b953","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4088814878354060","authorIdStr":"4088814878354060"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/.SPX\">$S&amp;P 500(.SPX)$</a><v-v data-views=\"1\"></v-v>JF","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/.SPX\">$S&amp;P 500(.SPX)$</a><v-v data-views=\"1\"></v-v>JF","text":"$S&P 500(.SPX)$JF","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/e8ccf46bedc2959381016b49313c0a4d","width":"1170","height":"2325"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9911123307","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":133,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9911999073,"gmtCreate":1664106195595,"gmtModify":1676537391272,"author":{"id":"4088814878354060","authorId":"4088814878354060","name":"LynnNg","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5f569eb8b2a3f73cf3debc58ec85b953","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4088814878354060","authorIdStr":"4088814878354060"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/AAPL\">$Apple(AAPL)$</a><v-v data-views=\"1\"></v-v>","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/AAPL\">$Apple(AAPL)$</a><v-v data-views=\"1\"></v-v>","text":"$Apple(AAPL)$","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/640ceeb7b224cd628a773738f088e5ad","width":"1170","height":"2292"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9911999073","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":153,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"hots":[{"id":9027556104,"gmtCreate":1654054880908,"gmtModify":1676535386695,"author":{"id":"4088814878354060","authorId":"4088814878354060","name":"LynnNg","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5f569eb8b2a3f73cf3debc58ec85b953","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4088814878354060","authorIdStr":"4088814878354060"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/CFA.SI\">$NikkoAM-STC Asia REIT(CFA.SI)$</a>Let's go","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/CFA.SI\">$NikkoAM-STC Asia REIT(CFA.SI)$</a>Let's go","text":"$NikkoAM-STC Asia REIT(CFA.SI)$Let's go","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/e62b14b00121e8e62e0f22b08de8c4c0","width":"1170","height":"2292"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":2,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9027556104","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":30,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":891909577,"gmtCreate":1628312509599,"gmtModify":1703504971651,"author":{"id":"4088814878354060","authorId":"4088814878354060","name":"LynnNg","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5f569eb8b2a3f73cf3debc58ec85b953","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4088814878354060","authorIdStr":"4088814878354060"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Bdbdjjd","listText":"Bdbdjjd","text":"Bdbdjjd","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":3,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/891909577","repostId":"1157428986","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1157428986","pubTimestamp":1628296262,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1157428986?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-08-07 08:31","market":"us","language":"en","title":"US IPO Week Ahead: 2 banks test the waters amid annual summer slowdown","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1157428986","media":"renaissancecap...","summary":"The IPO market is getting a breather as the August lull continues to set in, with just two banks sch","content":"<p>The IPO market is getting a breather as the August lull continues to set in, with just two banks scheduled for the week ahead.</p>\n<p>Utah-based digital bank&nbsp;<b>FinWise Bancorp</b>(FINW) plans to raise $58 million at a $183 million market cap. FinWise Bank makes loans to and takes deposits from consumers and small businesses across the US. As of 3/31/21, FinWise Bancorp had total assets of $330 million, total loans of $245 million, total deposits of $189 million, and total shareholders’ equity of $52 million.</p>\n<p>Alabama bank&nbsp;<b>Southern States Bancshares</b>(SSBK) plans to raise $40 million at a $174 million market cap. Southern States Bank is a full service community bank, serving businesses and individuals through 15 branches across Alabama and Georgia. As of 3/31/21, Southern States had total assets of $1.5 billion, total loans of $1.1 billion, total deposits of $1.3 billion, and total shareholders’ equity of $145 million.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8919c8c9b4257f3c84869f14fa89bcab\" tg-width=\"1414\" tg-height=\"356\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p>","source":"lsy1619493174116","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>US IPO Week Ahead: 2 banks test the waters amid annual summer slowdown</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nUS IPO Week Ahead: 2 banks test the waters amid annual summer slowdown\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-08-07 08:31 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.renaissancecapital.com/IPO-Center/News/85076/US-IPO-Week-Ahead-2-banks-test-the-waters-amid-annual-summer-slowdown><strong>renaissancecap...</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>The IPO market is getting a breather as the August lull continues to set in, with just two banks scheduled for the week ahead.\nUtah-based digital bank FinWise Bancorp(FINW) plans to raise $58 million ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.renaissancecapital.com/IPO-Center/News/85076/US-IPO-Week-Ahead-2-banks-test-the-waters-amid-annual-summer-slowdown\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"FINW":"Finwise Bancorp","SSBK":"Southern States Bancshares, Inc."},"source_url":"https://www.renaissancecapital.com/IPO-Center/News/85076/US-IPO-Week-Ahead-2-banks-test-the-waters-amid-annual-summer-slowdown","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1157428986","content_text":"The IPO market is getting a breather as the August lull continues to set in, with just two banks scheduled for the week ahead.\nUtah-based digital bank FinWise Bancorp(FINW) plans to raise $58 million at a $183 million market cap. FinWise Bank makes loans to and takes deposits from consumers and small businesses across the US. As of 3/31/21, FinWise Bancorp had total assets of $330 million, total loans of $245 million, total deposits of $189 million, and total shareholders’ equity of $52 million.\nAlabama bank Southern States Bancshares(SSBK) plans to raise $40 million at a $174 million market cap. Southern States Bank is a full service community bank, serving businesses and individuals through 15 branches across Alabama and Georgia. As of 3/31/21, Southern States had total assets of $1.5 billion, total loans of $1.1 billion, total deposits of $1.3 billion, and total shareholders’ equity of $145 million.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":273,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":899198476,"gmtCreate":1628166984195,"gmtModify":1703502407133,"author":{"id":"4088814878354060","authorId":"4088814878354060","name":"LynnNg","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5f569eb8b2a3f73cf3debc58ec85b953","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4088814878354060","authorIdStr":"4088814878354060"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Oo","listText":"Oo","text":"Oo","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/899198476","repostId":"2157436962","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2157436962","pubTimestamp":1628166180,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2157436962?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-08-05 20:23","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Is BioNTech Contradicting Pfizer About the Need for Booster Doses?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2157436962","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"It might seem to be the case, at least at first glance.","content":"<p>Will a third booster dose be needed or not? Not all healthcare experts agree on the answer to that question. Not all COVID-19 vaccine makers seem to agree, either. In this <i>Motley Fool Live</i> video <b>recorded on July 28</b>, Motley Fool contributors Keith Speights and Brian Orelli discuss whether or not <b>BioNTech</b> (NASDAQ:BNTX) is contradicting its big partner, <b>Pfizer</b> (NYSE:PFE), about the need for booster doses.</p>\n<p><b>Keith Speights: </b>Let's move to another COVID story. I think most of our viewers are aware that Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla hasn't been shy at all about stating his view that booster doses for COVID-19 vaccines will likely be needed. That's been Pfizer's stance for a while now.</p>\n<p>But Uğur Şahin CEO of Pfizer's partner BioNTech, told <i>The Wall Street Journal</i> recently that he's not calling for a third booster shot yet. Brian, do you think these two CEOs of partner companies are contradicting each other or is there really more nuance to the story?</p>\n<p><b>Brian Orelli:</b> Yes. The problem here is that we really just don't know when people will need a booster shot until we see a lot of cases in COVID-19 in people who were treated early in the vaccination process. Pfizer's CEO seems to be arguing that there's enough data to say that we've reached that point, and BioNTech's CEO seems to be saying that the government should be making that decision.</p>\n<p>It's not exactly polar opposites. Perhaps the implication by BioNTech's CEO is that there isn't enough data to say that yet, but I'm not sure that he's completely going that far. I tend to agree with BioNTech's CEO. It just depends on how conservative you want to be in terms of waiting for the booster shots.</p>\n<p>I think obviously the more conservative governments are, the more that benefits the companies. If they want to be really conservative and give the booster shot when they first start seeing cases versus when they see enough cases to justify the booster shot, then that will obviously benefit both of these companies.</p>\n<p><b>Speights:</b> For what it's worth, I did see that Pfizer has released some preliminary data that seems to back up their view that booster doses would be helpful. I think this data shows much higher levels of neutralizing antibody levels with a third booster shot. I don't think it's been peer-reviewed yet. I'm sure they're sharing this with the FDA.</p>\n<p>We'll see what happens here. But Brian, let me just get you to make a prediction here. At this point, do you foresee that Pfizer will win Emergency Use Authorization for a third booster dose before the end of this year?</p>\n<p><b>Orelli:</b> Before the end of this year, probably. That means they've got to file in maybe end of October, beginning of November. I think that's probably reasonable. That gives them four months of additional data.</p>\n<p>We're definitely seeing breakthrough cases right now. It's how much breakthrough cases are there, but also what's the severity of those breakthrough cases. If it's going to be people mostly just have the equivalent of a cold or something between a cold and flu, then I'm not sure that the FDA is going to approve a booster dose considering that there are side effects involved, and so you're avoiding getting that level of severity of the disease, but you're exposing yourself to potential side effects from the booster dose.</p>\n<p>The FDA has to weigh that out. It's not only the number of cases that are happening but also the severity of the cases is going to determine whether the FDA decides to go through with authorization of the booster dose and when it does.</p>\n<p><b>Speights:</b> Right. I do think the federal government is getting ready in case. The U.S. government has announced another supply order with Pfizer and BioNTech for 200 million doses. The country doesn't need those extra doses at this point unless third shots are going to be given. I think the U.S. is getting ready just in case that ends up being necessary.</p>\n<p><b>Orelli:</b> I think we're probably going to end up with booster shots eventually. It's just when exactly the timing of that is. I think it's still somewhat up in the air.</p>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Is BioNTech Contradicting Pfizer About the Need for Booster Doses?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nIs BioNTech Contradicting Pfizer About the Need for Booster Doses?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-08-05 20:23 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/08/05/is-biontech-contradicting-pfizer-about-the-need-fo/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Will a third booster dose be needed or not? Not all healthcare experts agree on the answer to that question. Not all COVID-19 vaccine makers seem to agree, either. In this Motley Fool Live video ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/08/05/is-biontech-contradicting-pfizer-about-the-need-fo/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"PFE":"辉瑞"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/08/05/is-biontech-contradicting-pfizer-about-the-need-fo/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2157436962","content_text":"Will a third booster dose be needed or not? Not all healthcare experts agree on the answer to that question. Not all COVID-19 vaccine makers seem to agree, either. In this Motley Fool Live video recorded on July 28, Motley Fool contributors Keith Speights and Brian Orelli discuss whether or not BioNTech (NASDAQ:BNTX) is contradicting its big partner, Pfizer (NYSE:PFE), about the need for booster doses.\nKeith Speights: Let's move to another COVID story. I think most of our viewers are aware that Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla hasn't been shy at all about stating his view that booster doses for COVID-19 vaccines will likely be needed. That's been Pfizer's stance for a while now.\nBut Uğur Şahin CEO of Pfizer's partner BioNTech, told The Wall Street Journal recently that he's not calling for a third booster shot yet. Brian, do you think these two CEOs of partner companies are contradicting each other or is there really more nuance to the story?\nBrian Orelli: Yes. The problem here is that we really just don't know when people will need a booster shot until we see a lot of cases in COVID-19 in people who were treated early in the vaccination process. Pfizer's CEO seems to be arguing that there's enough data to say that we've reached that point, and BioNTech's CEO seems to be saying that the government should be making that decision.\nIt's not exactly polar opposites. Perhaps the implication by BioNTech's CEO is that there isn't enough data to say that yet, but I'm not sure that he's completely going that far. I tend to agree with BioNTech's CEO. It just depends on how conservative you want to be in terms of waiting for the booster shots.\nI think obviously the more conservative governments are, the more that benefits the companies. If they want to be really conservative and give the booster shot when they first start seeing cases versus when they see enough cases to justify the booster shot, then that will obviously benefit both of these companies.\nSpeights: For what it's worth, I did see that Pfizer has released some preliminary data that seems to back up their view that booster doses would be helpful. I think this data shows much higher levels of neutralizing antibody levels with a third booster shot. I don't think it's been peer-reviewed yet. I'm sure they're sharing this with the FDA.\nWe'll see what happens here. But Brian, let me just get you to make a prediction here. At this point, do you foresee that Pfizer will win Emergency Use Authorization for a third booster dose before the end of this year?\nOrelli: Before the end of this year, probably. That means they've got to file in maybe end of October, beginning of November. I think that's probably reasonable. That gives them four months of additional data.\nWe're definitely seeing breakthrough cases right now. It's how much breakthrough cases are there, but also what's the severity of those breakthrough cases. If it's going to be people mostly just have the equivalent of a cold or something between a cold and flu, then I'm not sure that the FDA is going to approve a booster dose considering that there are side effects involved, and so you're avoiding getting that level of severity of the disease, but you're exposing yourself to potential side effects from the booster dose.\nThe FDA has to weigh that out. It's not only the number of cases that are happening but also the severity of the cases is going to determine whether the FDA decides to go through with authorization of the booster dose and when it does.\nSpeights: Right. I do think the federal government is getting ready in case. The U.S. government has announced another supply order with Pfizer and BioNTech for 200 million doses. The country doesn't need those extra doses at this point unless third shots are going to be given. I think the U.S. is getting ready just in case that ends up being necessary.\nOrelli: I think we're probably going to end up with booster shots eventually. It's just when exactly the timing of that is. I think it's still somewhat up in the air.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":283,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":807152053,"gmtCreate":1628010315472,"gmtModify":1703499633288,"author":{"id":"4088814878354060","authorId":"4088814878354060","name":"LynnNg","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5f569eb8b2a3f73cf3debc58ec85b953","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4088814878354060","authorIdStr":"4088814878354060"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Uuub","listText":"Uuub","text":"Uuub","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":8,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/807152053","repostId":"1127822150","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1127822150","pubTimestamp":1628004167,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1127822150?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-08-03 23:22","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Nvidia falls 1% on report U.K. could block Arm acquisition.","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1127822150","media":"seekingalpha","summary":"(Aug 3) NVIDIA Corp fell 1% after a report that the U.K.'s antitrust authority is evaluating blockin","content":"<p>(Aug&nbsp;3)&nbsp;<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NVDA\">NVIDIA Corp</a> fell 1% after a report that the U.K.'s antitrust authority is evaluating blocking an Arm (ARMHF) acquisition.</p>\n<p>The U.K. regulator said in a report that Softbank's (OTCPK:SFTBY) sale of Arm to Nvidia could have implications for national security, according to traders, who cited a Bloomberg report. No final decision has beeen made and the regulator could still approve the deal.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c72945e1874681dbed356c19fe1277d0\" tg-width=\"1323\" tg-height=\"633\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>\n<p></p>","source":"seekingalpha","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Nvidia falls 1% on report U.K. could block Arm acquisition.</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nNvidia falls 1% on report U.K. could block Arm acquisition.\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-08-03 23:22 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/news/3723989-nvidia-falls-on-report-uk-could-block-arm-acquisition><strong>seekingalpha</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>(Aug 3) NVIDIA Corp fell 1% after a report that the U.K.'s antitrust authority is evaluating blocking an Arm (ARMHF) acquisition.\nThe U.K. regulator said in a report that Softbank's (OTCPK:SFTBY) sale...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/news/3723989-nvidia-falls-on-report-uk-could-block-arm-acquisition\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"NVDA":"英伟达"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/news/3723989-nvidia-falls-on-report-uk-could-block-arm-acquisition","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/5a36db9d73b4222bc376d24ccc48c8a4","article_id":"1127822150","content_text":"(Aug 3) NVIDIA Corp fell 1% after a report that the U.K.'s antitrust authority is evaluating blocking an Arm (ARMHF) acquisition.\nThe U.K. regulator said in a report that Softbank's (OTCPK:SFTBY) sale of Arm to Nvidia could have implications for national security, according to traders, who cited a Bloomberg report. No final decision has beeen made and the regulator could still approve the deal.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":226,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":804094914,"gmtCreate":1627911354338,"gmtModify":1703497701941,"author":{"id":"4088814878354060","authorId":"4088814878354060","name":"LynnNg","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5f569eb8b2a3f73cf3debc58ec85b953","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4088814878354060","authorIdStr":"4088814878354060"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Aaaa","listText":"Aaaa","text":"Aaaa","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/804094914","repostId":"1110751791","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1110751791","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Stock Market Quotes, Business News, Financial News, Trading Ideas, and Stock Research by Professionals","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Benzinga","id":"1052270027","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d08bf7808052c0ca9deb4e944cae32aa"},"pubTimestamp":1627910385,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1110751791?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-08-02 21:19","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Is Lordstown Motors Stock About To Pull Back?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1110751791","media":"Benzinga","summary":"Shares of Lordstown Motors Corp. may have broken an important support level. Even worse, there’s a c","content":"<p>Shares of&nbsp;<b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/RIDE\">Lordstown Motors Corp.</a></b>&nbsp;may have broken an important support level. Even worse, there’s a chance this level will turn into resistance. This could keep a ceiling over the stock.</p>\n<p>The support was at $7. When RIDE reached it in May, the downtrend ended. This is because at this level, there was more demand than there was supply of the shares. The buyers took all the shares the sellers had and a rebound followed.</p>\n<p>But now the shares have broken this support level. They are trading lower.</p>\n<p>Many of the investors who bought RIDE at $7 now regret their decision to do so. A number of them decide to sell, but they will only if they can sell them at the same price they bought at. This way they won’t lose any money.</p>\n<p>As a result, they place their sell orders at $7. If there are enough of them, it will form resistance. This supply of stock may keep a top on the price.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/83205ce32db5a8714cea3d25a6bc2ae9\" tg-width=\"1608\" tg-height=\"821\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Is Lordstown Motors Stock About To Pull Back?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nIs Lordstown Motors Stock About To Pull Back?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/d08bf7808052c0ca9deb4e944cae32aa);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Benzinga </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-08-02 21:19</p>\n</div>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Shares of&nbsp;<b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/RIDE\">Lordstown Motors Corp.</a></b>&nbsp;may have broken an important support level. Even worse, there’s a chance this level will turn into resistance. This could keep a ceiling over the stock.</p>\n<p>The support was at $7. When RIDE reached it in May, the downtrend ended. This is because at this level, there was more demand than there was supply of the shares. The buyers took all the shares the sellers had and a rebound followed.</p>\n<p>But now the shares have broken this support level. They are trading lower.</p>\n<p>Many of the investors who bought RIDE at $7 now regret their decision to do so. A number of them decide to sell, but they will only if they can sell them at the same price they bought at. This way they won’t lose any money.</p>\n<p>As a result, they place their sell orders at $7. If there are enough of them, it will form resistance. This supply of stock may keep a top on the price.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/83205ce32db5a8714cea3d25a6bc2ae9\" tg-width=\"1608\" tg-height=\"821\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1110751791","content_text":"Shares of Lordstown Motors Corp. may have broken an important support level. Even worse, there’s a chance this level will turn into resistance. This could keep a ceiling over the stock.\nThe support was at $7. When RIDE reached it in May, the downtrend ended. This is because at this level, there was more demand than there was supply of the shares. The buyers took all the shares the sellers had and a rebound followed.\nBut now the shares have broken this support level. They are trading lower.\nMany of the investors who bought RIDE at $7 now regret their decision to do so. A number of them decide to sell, but they will only if they can sell them at the same price they bought at. This way they won’t lose any money.\nAs a result, they place their sell orders at $7. If there are enough of them, it will form resistance. This supply of stock may keep a top on the price.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":57,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":806721210,"gmtCreate":1627695237130,"gmtModify":1703494788047,"author":{"id":"4088814878354060","authorId":"4088814878354060","name":"LynnNg","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5f569eb8b2a3f73cf3debc58ec85b953","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4088814878354060","authorIdStr":"4088814878354060"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Hjj","listText":"Hjj","text":"Hjj","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/806721210","repostId":"1152039134","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1152039134","pubTimestamp":1627689014,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1152039134?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-31 07:50","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Jim Cramer: Robinhood's IPO Debacle Shows How Little Has Changed Over the Decades","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1152039134","media":"The Street","summary":"Take it from a guy who knows, the process is really flawed.\n\nWhat should Robinhood (HOOD) -Get Repor","content":"<blockquote>\n Take it from a guy who knows, the process is really flawed.\n</blockquote>\n<p>What should Robinhood&nbsp;(<b>HOOD</b>) -Get Report&nbsp;have done to avoid the IPO debacle?</p>\n<p>I can't speak to what happened on Thursday, who was in charge, who argued for what.</p>\n<p>I can only tell you what I argued for 22 years ago whenTheStreet.comwas coming public. First, as the founder, I was determined to award all the subscribers with stock to demonstrate my loyalty to them.</p>\n<p>Second, I was insistent that the deal be priced much lower than the underwriters wanted. We had already made a ton of money for initial investors. Why not leave a lot on the table and let the new investors do well?</p>\n<p>Third, I wanted enough stock placed with good hands that there would be no flippers and I wanted close coordination with the various brokers who tended to infiltrate the process and hijack the openings by batching market orders and opening the stocks way too high and then shorting them all the way down.</p>\n<p>I lost on every single point.</p>\n<p>The underwriters said we could not allocate to subscribers.</p>\n<p>Second, the price of the deal would not be controlled to where we could have a small pop so everyone would win.</p>\n<p>Third, the over-the-transom orders, those who placed market orders, were batched by an outfit called Knight Securities, not the underwriter, Goldman Sachs, and it opened at $62 -- it wasn't even clear what the opening price was it was so chaotic -- traded to $66, like how Robinhood traded to $39 and change, and then never traded higher.</p>\n<p>Everyone who bought that day lost money.</p>\n<p>Everyone who sold that day made money.</p>\n<p>No subscribers got in, most bought at the opening, from what I can tell, and I alienated everyone except the big dogs.</p>\n<p>It is amazing that here we are in 2021 and the process, while letting clients in, failed to price it so that Robinhood left money on the table. Believe me, it was possible to do so. But the underwriters and the management chose not to do so. We don't know which side screwed up, or both, but there was a successful blueprint; believe me, if I knew what it was in 1999, they knew what it is now.</p>\n<p>I always regretted what happened. Most people blamed me as I was the face of the process. I was astounded by how horrendous it was and did not \"take the long view\" because the long view sucked.</p>\n<p>Why do these things go wrong? I do blame the underwriter because they do this every day and the principals only do it once. They have to keep the management from betraying the shareholders because the shareholders think that it is management's fault. No underwriter is EVER going to say that they screwed up. That's not in the cards.</p>\n<p>So, we sit back and we marvel about how badly the deal went even as it was well within the province of the underwriter and the principals to make it so Robinhood left more on the table.</p>\n<p>Greed?</p>\n<p>Stupidity?</p>\n<p>How about poor execution and a lack of transparency that shows how badly it was handled.</p>\n<p>Just like the offering ofTheStreet.com.</p>","source":"lsy1610613172068","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Jim Cramer: Robinhood's IPO Debacle Shows How Little Has Changed Over the Decades</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nJim Cramer: Robinhood's IPO Debacle Shows How Little Has Changed Over the Decades\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-07-31 07:50 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.thestreet.com/investing/cramer-robinhood-ipo-debacle-thestreet-7-30-21><strong>The Street</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Take it from a guy who knows, the process is really flawed.\n\nWhat should Robinhood (HOOD) -Get Report have done to avoid the IPO debacle?\nI can't speak to what happened on Thursday, who was in charge,...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.thestreet.com/investing/cramer-robinhood-ipo-debacle-thestreet-7-30-21\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"HOOD":"Robinhood"},"source_url":"https://www.thestreet.com/investing/cramer-robinhood-ipo-debacle-thestreet-7-30-21","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1152039134","content_text":"Take it from a guy who knows, the process is really flawed.\n\nWhat should Robinhood (HOOD) -Get Report have done to avoid the IPO debacle?\nI can't speak to what happened on Thursday, who was in charge, who argued for what.\nI can only tell you what I argued for 22 years ago whenTheStreet.comwas coming public. First, as the founder, I was determined to award all the subscribers with stock to demonstrate my loyalty to them.\nSecond, I was insistent that the deal be priced much lower than the underwriters wanted. We had already made a ton of money for initial investors. Why not leave a lot on the table and let the new investors do well?\nThird, I wanted enough stock placed with good hands that there would be no flippers and I wanted close coordination with the various brokers who tended to infiltrate the process and hijack the openings by batching market orders and opening the stocks way too high and then shorting them all the way down.\nI lost on every single point.\nThe underwriters said we could not allocate to subscribers.\nSecond, the price of the deal would not be controlled to where we could have a small pop so everyone would win.\nThird, the over-the-transom orders, those who placed market orders, were batched by an outfit called Knight Securities, not the underwriter, Goldman Sachs, and it opened at $62 -- it wasn't even clear what the opening price was it was so chaotic -- traded to $66, like how Robinhood traded to $39 and change, and then never traded higher.\nEveryone who bought that day lost money.\nEveryone who sold that day made money.\nNo subscribers got in, most bought at the opening, from what I can tell, and I alienated everyone except the big dogs.\nIt is amazing that here we are in 2021 and the process, while letting clients in, failed to price it so that Robinhood left money on the table. Believe me, it was possible to do so. But the underwriters and the management chose not to do so. We don't know which side screwed up, or both, but there was a successful blueprint; believe me, if I knew what it was in 1999, they knew what it is now.\nI always regretted what happened. Most people blamed me as I was the face of the process. I was astounded by how horrendous it was and did not \"take the long view\" because the long view sucked.\nWhy do these things go wrong? I do blame the underwriter because they do this every day and the principals only do it once. They have to keep the management from betraying the shareholders because the shareholders think that it is management's fault. No underwriter is EVER going to say that they screwed up. That's not in the cards.\nSo, we sit back and we marvel about how badly the deal went even as it was well within the province of the underwriter and the principals to make it so Robinhood left more on the table.\nGreed?\nStupidity?\nHow about poor execution and a lack of transparency that shows how badly it was handled.\nJust like the offering ofTheStreet.com.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":141,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":149670714,"gmtCreate":1625725928738,"gmtModify":1703747199030,"author":{"id":"4088814878354060","authorId":"4088814878354060","name":"LynnNg","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5f569eb8b2a3f73cf3debc58ec85b953","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4088814878354060","authorIdStr":"4088814878354060"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Testing&nbsp;","listText":"Testing&nbsp;","text":"Testing","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":1,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/149670714","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":52,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9937715230,"gmtCreate":1663504855420,"gmtModify":1676537280416,"author":{"id":"4088814878354060","authorId":"4088814878354060","name":"LynnNg","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5f569eb8b2a3f73cf3debc58ec85b953","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4088814878354060","authorIdStr":"4088814878354060"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/CFA.SI\">$NikkoAM-STC Asia REIT(CFA.SI)$</a>Chan","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/CFA.SI\">$NikkoAM-STC Asia REIT(CFA.SI)$</a>Chan","text":"$NikkoAM-STC Asia REIT(CFA.SI)$Chan","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/2cc9fe29fa2be00fe390cdc75f1ee085","width":"1170","height":"2325"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9937715230","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":348,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9933718189,"gmtCreate":1662343948341,"gmtModify":1676537041049,"author":{"id":"4088814878354060","authorId":"4088814878354060","name":"LynnNg","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5f569eb8b2a3f73cf3debc58ec85b953","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4088814878354060","authorIdStr":"4088814878354060"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/CFA.SI\">$NikkoAM-STC Asia REIT(CFA.SI)$</a>Share share shar&nbsp;","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/CFA.SI\">$NikkoAM-STC Asia REIT(CFA.SI)$</a>Share share shar&nbsp;","text":"$NikkoAM-STC Asia REIT(CFA.SI)$Share share shar","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/c64a79e2f4e010efca6381eb19dfd8be","width":"1170","height":"2205"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9933718189","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":183,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9087468610,"gmtCreate":1651037492920,"gmtModify":1676534839246,"author":{"id":"4088814878354060","authorId":"4088814878354060","name":"LynnNg","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5f569eb8b2a3f73cf3debc58ec85b953","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4088814878354060","authorIdStr":"4088814878354060"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/HSCCI\">$HSCCI(HSCCI)$</a>Share it","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/HSCCI\">$HSCCI(HSCCI)$</a>Share it","text":"$HSCCI(HSCCI)$Share it","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/0ee474824863e41a7efde47b2cb27f57","width":"1125","height":"1827"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":1,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9087468610","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":432,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":896256211,"gmtCreate":1628587358233,"gmtModify":1703508620173,"author":{"id":"4088814878354060","authorId":"4088814878354060","name":"LynnNg","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5f569eb8b2a3f73cf3debc58ec85b953","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4088814878354060","authorIdStr":"4088814878354060"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ddf","listText":"Ddf","text":"Ddf","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/896256211","repostId":"1120741121","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1120741121","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Stock Market Quotes, Business News, Financial News, Trading Ideas, and Stock Research by Professionals","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Benzinga","id":"1052270027","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d08bf7808052c0ca9deb4e944cae32aa"},"pubTimestamp":1628585487,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1120741121?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-08-10 16:51","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Apple Says It Will 'Refuse' Any Demands To Surveil Content Beyond Child Sexual Abuse From Governments","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1120741121","media":"Benzinga","summary":"Apple has stressed that it will not allow any government to conduct surveillance using its new tool ","content":"<p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AAPL\">Apple</a> has stressed that it will not allow any government to conduct surveillance using its new tool aimed at detecting child sexual abuse material (CSAM).</p>\n<p><b>What Happened:</b>&nbsp;Apple said its CSAM detection capability is built solely to detect known CSAM images stored in iCloud Photos that have been identified by experts at the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children (NCMEC) and other child safety groups.</p>\n<p>“Let us be clear, this technology is limited to detecting CSAM stored in iCloud and we will not accede to any government’s request to expand it,” Apple said in a document posted to its website.</p>\n<p>The tech giant added that the feature does not work on the private&nbsp;<b>iPhone</b>&nbsp;photo library on the device.</p>\n<p><b>Why It Matters:</b>&nbsp;<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AAPL\">Apple</a> announced the launch of the new features last week but ittriggered a controversyover whether the system reduces Apple user privacy.</p>\n<p>Security experts are worried that the technology could be eventually be expanded to scan phones for other prohibited content. It could also be used by authoritarian governments to spy on dissidents and protestors.</p>\n<p><b>Will Cathcart</b>, the head of&nbsp;<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/FB\">Facebook</a>'s&nbsp;WhatsApp instant messaging app,criticized&nbsp;Apple’s plan to launch the new features, calling it a “setback for people’s privacy all over the world.”</p>\n<p><b>Price Action</b>: Apple shares closed less than 0.1% lower in Monday’s trading at $146.09.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Apple Says It Will 'Refuse' Any Demands To Surveil Content Beyond Child Sexual Abuse From Governments</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nApple Says It Will 'Refuse' Any Demands To Surveil Content Beyond Child Sexual Abuse From Governments\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/d08bf7808052c0ca9deb4e944cae32aa);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Benzinga </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-08-10 16:51</p>\n</div>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AAPL\">Apple</a> has stressed that it will not allow any government to conduct surveillance using its new tool aimed at detecting child sexual abuse material (CSAM).</p>\n<p><b>What Happened:</b>&nbsp;Apple said its CSAM detection capability is built solely to detect known CSAM images stored in iCloud Photos that have been identified by experts at the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children (NCMEC) and other child safety groups.</p>\n<p>“Let us be clear, this technology is limited to detecting CSAM stored in iCloud and we will not accede to any government’s request to expand it,” Apple said in a document posted to its website.</p>\n<p>The tech giant added that the feature does not work on the private&nbsp;<b>iPhone</b>&nbsp;photo library on the device.</p>\n<p><b>Why It Matters:</b>&nbsp;<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AAPL\">Apple</a> announced the launch of the new features last week but ittriggered a controversyover whether the system reduces Apple user privacy.</p>\n<p>Security experts are worried that the technology could be eventually be expanded to scan phones for other prohibited content. It could also be used by authoritarian governments to spy on dissidents and protestors.</p>\n<p><b>Will Cathcart</b>, the head of&nbsp;<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/FB\">Facebook</a>'s&nbsp;WhatsApp instant messaging app,criticized&nbsp;Apple’s plan to launch the new features, calling it a “setback for people’s privacy all over the world.”</p>\n<p><b>Price Action</b>: Apple shares closed less than 0.1% lower in Monday’s trading at $146.09.</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AAPL":"苹果"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1120741121","content_text":"Apple has stressed that it will not allow any government to conduct surveillance using its new tool aimed at detecting child sexual abuse material (CSAM).\nWhat Happened: Apple said its CSAM detection capability is built solely to detect known CSAM images stored in iCloud Photos that have been identified by experts at the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children (NCMEC) and other child safety groups.\n“Let us be clear, this technology is limited to detecting CSAM stored in iCloud and we will not accede to any government’s request to expand it,” Apple said in a document posted to its website.\nThe tech giant added that the feature does not work on the private iPhone photo library on the device.\nWhy It Matters: Apple announced the launch of the new features last week but ittriggered a controversyover whether the system reduces Apple user privacy.\nSecurity experts are worried that the technology could be eventually be expanded to scan phones for other prohibited content. It could also be used by authoritarian governments to spy on dissidents and protestors.\nWill Cathcart, the head of Facebook's WhatsApp instant messaging app,criticized Apple’s plan to launch the new features, calling it a “setback for people’s privacy all over the world.”\nPrice Action: Apple shares closed less than 0.1% lower in Monday’s trading at $146.09.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":126,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":806728952,"gmtCreate":1627695303176,"gmtModify":1703494788376,"author":{"id":"4088814878354060","authorId":"4088814878354060","name":"LynnNg","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5f569eb8b2a3f73cf3debc58ec85b953","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4088814878354060","authorIdStr":"4088814878354060"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Hhghhkkf","listText":"Hhghhkkf","text":"Hhghhkkf","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/806728952","repostId":"1138566016","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1138566016","pubTimestamp":1627689251,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1138566016?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-31 07:54","market":"us","language":"en","title":"It’s Open Season on Closed-End Fund Activists. How Fund Holders Can Win—and Lose","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1138566016","media":"Barron's","summary":"TheTempleton Global Incomefund frustrated investors for years. Despite star manager Michael Hasensta","content":"<p>TheTempleton Global Incomefund frustrated investors for years. Despite star manager Michael Hasenstab at the helm, the closed-end fund returned an average of 0.3% annually in the past decade, versus an average 7% for peers in global income. Also frustrating, its shares rarely traded close to the fund’s underlying net asset value, or NAV. The discount averaged 11% in the past three years.</p>\n<p>Investors have caught a break, however, thanks to Saba Capital Management, a hedge fund shop run by activist investor Boaz Weinstein. Saba amassed a 20% stake in the Templeton fund and recently won four contested board seats. It has been pressuring the board to take actions to boost the share price. Its moves have paid off: The fund has returned a total 4.5% this year as its share price improved, and the discount to NAV has shrunk to 4%.</p>\n<p>Tactics like Saba’s have long infuriated mutual fund companies; no one wants a hedge fund threatening a coup. Now, with some help from Congress, the playing field could tilt in favor of closed-end funds and their company sponsors, due to a bill recently introduced in the House. That could work against the interests of fund investors.</p>\n<p>The Increasing Investor Opportunities Act, introduced in June by Rep. Anthony Gonzalez (R., Ohio) and Rep. Gregory Meeks (D., New York), includes two measures that could make it much tougher for hedge funds to pressure closed-end funds and win proxy fights. One proposed change would lift the current 15% limit on closed-end-fund ownership of illiquid private funds, such as venture-capital and private-equity funds. A second measure would prevent activist hedge funds from acquiring more than 10% of a closed-end fund’s shares.</p>\n<p>A spokesman for Gonzalez declined to comment. Meeks didn’t respond to requests for comment.</p>\n<p>Proponents of the changes say they would expand access to private markets for retail investors. They also say hedge funds are exploiting gaps in securities laws at a cost to long-term shareholders, saddling them with tax liabilities, higher fees, and forced fund liquidations. The bill would eliminate a “loophole that activist investors have used to extract short-term profits at the expense of retail investors,” the Investment Company Institute, or ICI, said in a recent statement.</p>\n<p>Hedge funds and portfolio managers who invest in closed-end funds say that mutual fund companies are simply trying to protect a pool of assets and fees from shareholder interference. Most retail investors don’t vote their shares in proxy contests. That may leave fund boards largely free to pursue their own agendas.</p>\n<p>“Activism plays an important role, and if this bill passes, it will become more difficult for activists to threaten or create changes,” says Matt Buffington, a portfolio manager at Dryden Capital, an activist hedge fund.</p>\n<p>Gregory Neer, a portfolio manager with Relative Value Partners, an advisory firm that invests in closed-end funds, agrees. “The ability for investors to pressure funds is beneficial to all shareholders,” he says.</p>\n<p>Closed-end funds have long been popular with investors due to their high yields and steady distributions. Many use leverage, borrowing money at market rates to boost payouts. They also generate income with options strategies and investments in high-yielding areas of the stock and bond markets.</p>\n<p>But the funds have structural drawbacks. Expense ratios are steep, averaging 2.1%, according to Morningstar Direct. And since the funds have a fixed number of shares outstanding, prices reflect market demand for both a fund and its underlying assets. Funds usually trade at a discount to NAV. While it is attractive, in theory, to pay 90 cents for a dollar of assets, investors might never see the extra dime.</p>\n<p>Hedge funds aim to exploit this inefficiency, buying closed-end funds at below-market value. They then pressure fund boards to take steps to lift the funds’ prices. The playbook is straightforward: accumulate a stake, win board seats, and then force a fund company into a tender offer, whereby it agrees to repurchase shares at nearly full price.</p>\n<p>If that fails, a hedge fund might try to replace a fund’s manager, orchestrate a liquidation of the fund, or get it converted to an open-end fund—moves that could also pay off with the share price rising to parity with the NAV. Firms like Saba have also taken over funds entirely.</p>\n<p>Giving closed-end funds freedom to own more private securities could throw a wrench into the strategy. Tender offers work only if a fund can liquidate most of its holdings at market prices. Because venture-capital and private-equity holdings generally don’t trade publicly, their pricing isn’t transparent. “When closed-end funds invest in illiquid things, it protects them from activism,” one activist manager tells<i>Barron’s</i>.</p>\n<p>Removing the cap on private-fund ownership is “in line with a legislative agenda of getting retail investors more access to private investments,” says Thomas DeCapo, an attorney for the mutual fund industry.</p>\n<p>And capping activists at 10% of a fund doesn’t stop them from mounting proxy campaigns. “Nothing about this is antidemocratic,” he says. “It doesn’t stop a majority of investors who are unhappy or want change. It stops one investor from using its economic power, with other people’s money, to basically force changes on everybody else.”</p>\n<p>Investor advocates see it differently, however, saying fund investors could wind up paying higher fees for funds that hold more-opaque investments. “It’s just another fund-of-funds structure, and those are notoriously high-fee,” says Tyler Gellasch, head of Healthy Markets, an investor-protection group.</p>\n<p>Individual hedge funds technically can’t own more than 3% of a closed-end fund, under ownership restrictions in the Investment Company Act of 1940. But they skirt the rule by building stakes through affiliated entities, creating enough of a critical mass to force changes at a fund through proxy voting.</p>\n<p>The ICI—the mutual fund industry’s lobby—has tried to persuade regulators to crack down on hedge funds. In a submission to the Securities and Exchange Commission last year, the ICI argued that hedge fund campaigns often consume a fund’s resources, trigger tax liabilities for long-term investors, and result in the forced selling of securities to meet a hedge fund’s demands for a tender offer. A fund’s expense ratio could increase if it is forced to buy back shares and its asset base shrinks.</p>\n<p>The activist community’s “assault” on the industry has had a chilling effect on product launches, the ICI said, resulting in fewer closed-end funds on the market today than in 2007.</p>\n<p>But hedge funds argue that changing the 1940 act would amount to a power grab by mutual funds. “This is all coming from the mutual fund industry, and it’s no coincidence that this protects them,” says Phil Goldstein, co-founder of Bulldog Investors, an activist that has long targeted closed-end funds. “There are funds with terrible performance and wide discounts. The ICI never says we need a mechanism where shareholders can hold those managers accountable.”</p>\n<p>Imposing an ownership cap would also make proxy campaigns less economic. Limited to 10%, hedge funds wouldn’t own enough shares, with sufficient economic interest, to justify the expense of a proxy contest, which can cost millions of dollars. “If you’re limited to 10% and have to spend 2.5% of your assets on a proxy campaign, you’d say it’s too risky,” says Goldstein. “Meanwhile, management isn’t spending anything—just shareholder money. They want to make it economically unattractive to run a proxy contest.”</p>\n<p>Regulators and courts have expressed skepticism about some defenses that closed-end funds have adopted to prevent shareholder challenges. And, the SEC might not side with the fund industry. Since 2010, the SEC has warned fund companies against using state securities laws to thwart hedge fund takeovers. The SEC dropped its objection to these state “control share” laws last year under its Republican chairman, Jay Clayton. But the new, Democratic chairman, Gary Gensler, might reinstate the SEC’s objection—a reason for the industry to enlist Congress to change the law. The SEC didn’t respond to requests for comment.</p>\n<p>Institutional Shareholder Services,a firm that makes recommendations on proxy voting, says investors should reject fund companies’ use of state control-share laws, which limit the voting rights of shareholders. With the SEC on the sidelines, ISS says, “CEF shareholders are denied important voting rights and are subject to management entrenchment.”</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/70323ed9daef142f19afd48be72b6299\" tg-width=\"755\" tg-height=\"334\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/68beb47d59eb02e90b04eb7093f9f17b\" tg-width=\"759\" tg-height=\"285\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">Hedge funds don’t always win, but investors might want to ride along as activists build a stake. “When an activist comes in, you usually see an increase in the share price and a decrease in the discount,” says Matt Souther, an associate finance professor at the University of South Carolina.</p>\n<p>Templeton Global Income’s (ticker: GIM) discount to NAV could narrow further if Saba acquires more shares or tries to take over the fund’s $743 million in assets. Saba recently took over management of another fund, Voya Prime Rate Trust, which it rebrandedSaba Capital Income &amp; Opportunities(BRW).Franklin Templetonand Saba declined to comment.</p>\n<p>Miller/Howard High Income Equity(HIE) is also in Saba’s crosshairs. The fund is a “term trust” with a mandated liquidation date in 2024. It trades at a 5.9% discount to NAV. “In a worst-case scenario, you buy it at a discount and you’ll earn an excess return from now to 2024 because that discount will narrow,” says Patrick Galley, co-manager ofRiverNorth Opportunities(RIV), a closed-end fund that owns HIE.</p>\n<p>Other closed-end funds in which Saba owns stakes includeSource Capital(SOR) andInvesco Dynamic Credit Opportunities(VTA). Bulldog has built a position inTortoise Energy Independence(NDP).</p>\n<p>Some closed-end funds look attractive on their fundamentals.Adams Diversified Equity(ADX) offers exposure to big tech stocks, trades at a 14% discount to NAV, and is committed to an annualized distribution of at least 6%. “For investors who expect tech to do well, ADX is a good holding,” says David Tepper, a closed-end investor and head of Tepper Capital Management in San Francisco.</p>\n<p>Sprott Focus Trust(FUND) is another fund he likes. Veteran small-cap manager Whitney George runs it, and his family owns 45% of the shares. It trades at a 10% discount and yields 5.7%. Tepper also favorsRoyce Global Value Trust(RGT), trading at a 9% discount and yielding 7.9%.</p>\n<p>None of these funds has attracted much activist involvement, according to securities filings. But if activists see opportunity, they could pile in and pressure fund management—assuming that Congress doesn’t rewrite the rules of engagement.</p>","source":"lsy1610680873436","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>It’s Open Season on Closed-End Fund Activists. How Fund Holders Can Win—and Lose</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nIt’s Open Season on Closed-End Fund Activists. How Fund Holders Can Win—and Lose\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-07-31 07:54 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.marketwatch.com/articles/congress-closed-end-funds-legislation-51627657959?mod=newsviewer_click><strong>Barron's</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>TheTempleton Global Incomefund frustrated investors for years. Despite star manager Michael Hasenstab at the helm, the closed-end fund returned an average of 0.3% annually in the past decade, versus ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.marketwatch.com/articles/congress-closed-end-funds-legislation-51627657959?mod=newsviewer_click\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://www.marketwatch.com/articles/congress-closed-end-funds-legislation-51627657959?mod=newsviewer_click","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1138566016","content_text":"TheTempleton Global Incomefund frustrated investors for years. Despite star manager Michael Hasenstab at the helm, the closed-end fund returned an average of 0.3% annually in the past decade, versus an average 7% for peers in global income. Also frustrating, its shares rarely traded close to the fund’s underlying net asset value, or NAV. The discount averaged 11% in the past three years.\nInvestors have caught a break, however, thanks to Saba Capital Management, a hedge fund shop run by activist investor Boaz Weinstein. Saba amassed a 20% stake in the Templeton fund and recently won four contested board seats. It has been pressuring the board to take actions to boost the share price. Its moves have paid off: The fund has returned a total 4.5% this year as its share price improved, and the discount to NAV has shrunk to 4%.\nTactics like Saba’s have long infuriated mutual fund companies; no one wants a hedge fund threatening a coup. Now, with some help from Congress, the playing field could tilt in favor of closed-end funds and their company sponsors, due to a bill recently introduced in the House. That could work against the interests of fund investors.\nThe Increasing Investor Opportunities Act, introduced in June by Rep. Anthony Gonzalez (R., Ohio) and Rep. Gregory Meeks (D., New York), includes two measures that could make it much tougher for hedge funds to pressure closed-end funds and win proxy fights. One proposed change would lift the current 15% limit on closed-end-fund ownership of illiquid private funds, such as venture-capital and private-equity funds. A second measure would prevent activist hedge funds from acquiring more than 10% of a closed-end fund’s shares.\nA spokesman for Gonzalez declined to comment. Meeks didn’t respond to requests for comment.\nProponents of the changes say they would expand access to private markets for retail investors. They also say hedge funds are exploiting gaps in securities laws at a cost to long-term shareholders, saddling them with tax liabilities, higher fees, and forced fund liquidations. The bill would eliminate a “loophole that activist investors have used to extract short-term profits at the expense of retail investors,” the Investment Company Institute, or ICI, said in a recent statement.\nHedge funds and portfolio managers who invest in closed-end funds say that mutual fund companies are simply trying to protect a pool of assets and fees from shareholder interference. Most retail investors don’t vote their shares in proxy contests. That may leave fund boards largely free to pursue their own agendas.\n“Activism plays an important role, and if this bill passes, it will become more difficult for activists to threaten or create changes,” says Matt Buffington, a portfolio manager at Dryden Capital, an activist hedge fund.\nGregory Neer, a portfolio manager with Relative Value Partners, an advisory firm that invests in closed-end funds, agrees. “The ability for investors to pressure funds is beneficial to all shareholders,” he says.\nClosed-end funds have long been popular with investors due to their high yields and steady distributions. Many use leverage, borrowing money at market rates to boost payouts. They also generate income with options strategies and investments in high-yielding areas of the stock and bond markets.\nBut the funds have structural drawbacks. Expense ratios are steep, averaging 2.1%, according to Morningstar Direct. And since the funds have a fixed number of shares outstanding, prices reflect market demand for both a fund and its underlying assets. Funds usually trade at a discount to NAV. While it is attractive, in theory, to pay 90 cents for a dollar of assets, investors might never see the extra dime.\nHedge funds aim to exploit this inefficiency, buying closed-end funds at below-market value. They then pressure fund boards to take steps to lift the funds’ prices. The playbook is straightforward: accumulate a stake, win board seats, and then force a fund company into a tender offer, whereby it agrees to repurchase shares at nearly full price.\nIf that fails, a hedge fund might try to replace a fund’s manager, orchestrate a liquidation of the fund, or get it converted to an open-end fund—moves that could also pay off with the share price rising to parity with the NAV. Firms like Saba have also taken over funds entirely.\nGiving closed-end funds freedom to own more private securities could throw a wrench into the strategy. Tender offers work only if a fund can liquidate most of its holdings at market prices. Because venture-capital and private-equity holdings generally don’t trade publicly, their pricing isn’t transparent. “When closed-end funds invest in illiquid things, it protects them from activism,” one activist manager tellsBarron’s.\nRemoving the cap on private-fund ownership is “in line with a legislative agenda of getting retail investors more access to private investments,” says Thomas DeCapo, an attorney for the mutual fund industry.\nAnd capping activists at 10% of a fund doesn’t stop them from mounting proxy campaigns. “Nothing about this is antidemocratic,” he says. “It doesn’t stop a majority of investors who are unhappy or want change. It stops one investor from using its economic power, with other people’s money, to basically force changes on everybody else.”\nInvestor advocates see it differently, however, saying fund investors could wind up paying higher fees for funds that hold more-opaque investments. “It’s just another fund-of-funds structure, and those are notoriously high-fee,” says Tyler Gellasch, head of Healthy Markets, an investor-protection group.\nIndividual hedge funds technically can’t own more than 3% of a closed-end fund, under ownership restrictions in the Investment Company Act of 1940. But they skirt the rule by building stakes through affiliated entities, creating enough of a critical mass to force changes at a fund through proxy voting.\nThe ICI—the mutual fund industry’s lobby—has tried to persuade regulators to crack down on hedge funds. In a submission to the Securities and Exchange Commission last year, the ICI argued that hedge fund campaigns often consume a fund’s resources, trigger tax liabilities for long-term investors, and result in the forced selling of securities to meet a hedge fund’s demands for a tender offer. A fund’s expense ratio could increase if it is forced to buy back shares and its asset base shrinks.\nThe activist community’s “assault” on the industry has had a chilling effect on product launches, the ICI said, resulting in fewer closed-end funds on the market today than in 2007.\nBut hedge funds argue that changing the 1940 act would amount to a power grab by mutual funds. “This is all coming from the mutual fund industry, and it’s no coincidence that this protects them,” says Phil Goldstein, co-founder of Bulldog Investors, an activist that has long targeted closed-end funds. “There are funds with terrible performance and wide discounts. The ICI never says we need a mechanism where shareholders can hold those managers accountable.”\nImposing an ownership cap would also make proxy campaigns less economic. Limited to 10%, hedge funds wouldn’t own enough shares, with sufficient economic interest, to justify the expense of a proxy contest, which can cost millions of dollars. “If you’re limited to 10% and have to spend 2.5% of your assets on a proxy campaign, you’d say it’s too risky,” says Goldstein. “Meanwhile, management isn’t spending anything—just shareholder money. They want to make it economically unattractive to run a proxy contest.”\nRegulators and courts have expressed skepticism about some defenses that closed-end funds have adopted to prevent shareholder challenges. And, the SEC might not side with the fund industry. Since 2010, the SEC has warned fund companies against using state securities laws to thwart hedge fund takeovers. The SEC dropped its objection to these state “control share” laws last year under its Republican chairman, Jay Clayton. But the new, Democratic chairman, Gary Gensler, might reinstate the SEC’s objection—a reason for the industry to enlist Congress to change the law. The SEC didn’t respond to requests for comment.\nInstitutional Shareholder Services,a firm that makes recommendations on proxy voting, says investors should reject fund companies’ use of state control-share laws, which limit the voting rights of shareholders. With the SEC on the sidelines, ISS says, “CEF shareholders are denied important voting rights and are subject to management entrenchment.”\nHedge funds don’t always win, but investors might want to ride along as activists build a stake. “When an activist comes in, you usually see an increase in the share price and a decrease in the discount,” says Matt Souther, an associate finance professor at the University of South Carolina.\nTempleton Global Income’s (ticker: GIM) discount to NAV could narrow further if Saba acquires more shares or tries to take over the fund’s $743 million in assets. Saba recently took over management of another fund, Voya Prime Rate Trust, which it rebrandedSaba Capital Income & Opportunities(BRW).Franklin Templetonand Saba declined to comment.\nMiller/Howard High Income Equity(HIE) is also in Saba’s crosshairs. The fund is a “term trust” with a mandated liquidation date in 2024. It trades at a 5.9% discount to NAV. “In a worst-case scenario, you buy it at a discount and you’ll earn an excess return from now to 2024 because that discount will narrow,” says Patrick Galley, co-manager ofRiverNorth Opportunities(RIV), a closed-end fund that owns HIE.\nOther closed-end funds in which Saba owns stakes includeSource Capital(SOR) andInvesco Dynamic Credit Opportunities(VTA). Bulldog has built a position inTortoise Energy Independence(NDP).\nSome closed-end funds look attractive on their fundamentals.Adams Diversified Equity(ADX) offers exposure to big tech stocks, trades at a 14% discount to NAV, and is committed to an annualized distribution of at least 6%. “For investors who expect tech to do well, ADX is a good holding,” says David Tepper, a closed-end investor and head of Tepper Capital Management in San Francisco.\nSprott Focus Trust(FUND) is another fund he likes. Veteran small-cap manager Whitney George runs it, and his family owns 45% of the shares. It trades at a 10% discount and yields 5.7%. Tepper also favorsRoyce Global Value Trust(RGT), trading at a 9% discount and yielding 7.9%.\nNone of these funds has attracted much activist involvement, according to securities filings. But if activists see opportunity, they could pile in and pressure fund management—assuming that Congress doesn’t rewrite the rules of engagement.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":65,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":803097953,"gmtCreate":1627395657572,"gmtModify":1703489143072,"author":{"id":"4088814878354060","authorId":"4088814878354060","name":"LynnNg","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5f569eb8b2a3f73cf3debc58ec85b953","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4088814878354060","authorIdStr":"4088814878354060"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Hhhh","listText":"Hhhh","text":"Hhhh","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/803097953","repostId":"1185029173","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1185029173","pubTimestamp":1627395062,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1185029173?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-27 22:11","market":"us","language":"en","title":"General Motors Vs. Tesla: Which Stock Is The Better Value?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1185029173","media":"seekingalpha","summary":"Summary\n\nGM and TSLA are two very different companies, but both want to grow their EV presence massi","content":"<p><b>Summary</b></p>\n<ul>\n <li>GM and TSLA are two very different companies, but both want to grow their EV presence massively.</li>\n <li>Management teams have highly ambitious goals, such as AV leadership (TSLA) and EV leadership (GM). Whether these goals will be achieved is a different story, however.</li>\n <li>The two companies could be attractive for different types of investors, but it may also make sense to stay on the sidelines here.</li>\n</ul>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8b8dce2c00e6e99d840af7caf6aedbee\" tg-width=\"1536\" tg-height=\"1024\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>gremlin/E+ via Getty Images</span></p>\n<p><b>Article Thesis</b></p>\n<p>Auto companies are doing very well in the current environment, as strong demand for new cars and rising average sales prices will lead to strong profits in 2021. There are, however, vast differences between EV pure-plays such as Tesla, Inc. (TSLA), and legacy auto companies such as General Motors Company (GM). Even though GM has been moving into the EV direction in recent years, it is still primarily an ICE vehicle company, unlike Tesla, the current leader in the EV space. In this article, we will pitch these two companies against each other in order to find out what stock is more suitable for what type of investor.</p>\n<p><b>The Auto Industry: Cyclical, But Having Good Times Right Now</b></p>\n<p>There are industries that are very resilient versus all kinds of crises, such as software tech or healthcare, as their products are needed/required no matter what. The auto industry, on the other hand, is highly cyclical, as consumers only buy new cars when they have surplus liquidity and as long as they are not too worried about the future. On top of that, auto companies are also impacted to a significant degree by fluctuating prices for their end products and the commodities that are needed to build a vehicle.</p>\n<p>2020, not surprisingly, was a pretty bad year for most auto companies, as sales declined due to the impact of the pandemic. Tesla is somewhat of an outlier, as it did not report declining vehicle sales, thanks to ongoing market share gains for EVs in the US and globally. Nevertheless, even Tesla had a year of&nbsp;below-average growth&nbsp;in 2020. GM, for comparison, saw its revenue&nbsp;decline by around 10%&nbsp;in 2020.</p>\n<p>Thanks to massive fiscal and monetary stimulus, coupled with an ongoing economic recovery, the near-term outlook for the whole industry is way better than what we saw in 2020, however. Consumers have also reduced their spending on things such as travel, dining out, etc. which results in more available cash that can be used for buying a vehicle. Vehicle prices, for used cars and new ones, have risen&nbsp;quite a lot in 2021 so far, and combined with higher deliveries, that should result in strong profit growth for the whole industry. Both Tesla and General Motors should benefit from recovering automobile markets in 2021.</p>\n<p><b>GM Stock Valuation</b></p>\n<p>General Motors Company is, like most other legacy auto companies, trading at a pretty inexpensive valuation. This is the result of the cyclicality of the business, worries about the future, and generally relatively low growth rates for the industry. Based on current earnings per share estimates for 2021 and 2022, GM is valued at single-digit earnings multiples:</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6ce5c76d5663ca2aa20801bf03412f50\" tg-width=\"635\" tg-height=\"450\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Data by YCharts</span></p>\n<p>GM trades for slightly less than 8x net profits, using 2021 estimates and 2022 estimates. The company is also looking very inexpensive on an enterprise value to EBITDA basis. The reading for this metric, which accounts for a company's debt, stands at just 6.7. Oftentimes, EV/EBITDA multiples of 10 and below are seen as inexpensive.</p>\n<p>We can also look at the cash flows that GM generates in order to gauge its valuation.In 2020, which was a pretty weak year for the company, GM generated an operating cash flow of $7.5 billion, while free cash flow totaled $2.6 billion. GM thus trades at 11x 2020's operating cash flow, while the 2020 free cash flow multiple is 31. Since 2020 was a way weaker year compared to what we can expect from 2021 and 2022, it seems pretty clear that cash flows will rise considerably going forward.</p>\n<p><b>TSLA Stock Valuation</b></p>\n<p>Tesla, unlike GM, is seen as a high-growth company deserving a significantly higher valuation than its legacy auto peers. This is, to some extent, certainly true -- Tesla has been delivering strong growth for years, and its business should continue to grow at a compelling pace going forward. Whether this does justify its current valuation is a different question, however.</p>\n<p>Based on current earnings per share estimates, Tesla is trading at the following earnings multiples:</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/311f78f87c31f97c7afd8234ab9e310d\" tg-width=\"635\" tg-height=\"450\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Data by YCharts</span></p>\n<p>Tesla, Inc. trades at 144x this year's expected EPS, and at 99x next year's net profits. Looking at the EV/EBITDA ratio, we see that the reading of 68 is very high as well -- almost exactly 10x as high as that of General Motors.</p>\n<p>In 2020, Tesla has generated operating cash flows of $5.9 billion, while its free cash flow totaled $2.8 billion during the same time. This pencils out to an operating cash flow multiple of 105, while the free cash flow multiple is 220. In other words, Tesla trades at an extremely high valuation, both in absolute terms, and relative to how its auto peers are valued. It seems noteworthy that Tesla's free cash flow, in absolute terms, was slightly<i>higher</i>than that of GM in 2020, which is certainly a feat for the EV pureplay. This is, however, partially the result of lower investments -- GM spent $5 billion on capital expenditures, while Tesla invested around $3 billion.</p>\n<p><b>Is GM A Better Stock Than Tesla?</b></p>\n<p>The answer depends on what you are looking for in an investment. Tesla clearly is the company that delivers higher relative growth, as it will grow sales by somewhere between 60%-80% this year, which is absolutely out of reach for all legacy auto companies, including GM. Tesla, on the other hand, is trading at an extremely high valuation - despite selling only around 500,000 vehicles last year, the company is valued at $620 billion, which is more than GM, Volkswagen (OTCPK:VWAGY), Stellantis (STLA), and Toyota (TM) combined - these sell around 30 million vehicles a year, however (combined).</p>\n<p>Tesla is thus priced for massive growth right now, and its current market capitalization implies that the company will eventually sell 20 million, 30 million, or even more cars in a single year. There are bulls that believe that this will indeed come true, but I personally think that this is far from guaranteed. The legacy players, including GM, are ramping up their EV investments rapidly, and there is a large number of new EV startups, including companies such as NIO (NIO) or Lucid (LCID) that are looking to take market share from Tesla.</p>\n<p>I am convinced that Tesla will continue to see its sales rise in the coming years, but I doubt that Tesla will sell anything close to 10 million cars in 2025 -- one of&nbsp;the predictions by ARK(ARKK).</p>\n<p>Tesla's shares are also pricing in a successful autonomous vehicle business, even though Tesla's FSD model is still stuck at Level 2 autonomous, even while some other companies have Level 4 tech on the road. An investment in Tesla is thus, I think, a bet on AV tech and massive business growth. This could pay off, as it cannot be ruled out that Tesla will eventually prevail with its AV approach. For now, however, it looks like others are ahead of the company, such as Alphabet's (GOOG)(NASDAQ:GOOGL)Waymo.</p>\n<p>General Motors is much more of an old-school value investment right here - its growth prospects are less exciting, but its valuation is pretty inexpensive. GM plans&nbsp;to roll out around 30&nbsp;electric vehicles by 2025, on top of that, the company also has a stated goal of becoming the leader in the North American EV space. Ambitious investments of around $27 billion through 2025 will certainly allow for the introduction of new, attractive, and capable EV models, but it still seems far from guaranteed that GM will sell more EVs than Ford and Tesla in North America in 2025. Even if that does not happen, however, that would not necessarily be a disaster. The good thing about a value stock like GM is that not too many things have to go right for the company to be a viable investment.</p>\n<p>Whereas Tesla is priced for massive growth, GM is currently priced as if it will eventually go out of business. If the company manages to stabilize its earnings around the current level or grow them by a couple of percentage points, that could be enough for very solid returns from the current price, thanks to a pretty low starting valuation. GM currently does not pay any dividends, but if the company gets back to paying out $0.38 per share per quarter, as it did before the pandemic, investors would get a solid yield of 2.8%.</p>\n<p>Whether you prefer GM or Tesla thus ultimately depends on your investment approach --<i>do you prefer value or growth?</i>-- and on your belief in Elon Musk. If you think he will be able to pull off AV in a big way, Tesla might be the better choice for you. But if you think that one should invest based on what we see today, and not based on what might happen in the future, GM might be the better choice for you among these two. There is, of course, also the option to invest in both, or in neither, as a case can be made for avoiding the automobile industry altogether, due to the aforementioned cyclicality and high competitive pressures.</p>\n<p><b>Is GM Or TSLA A Good Stock To Buy Now?</b></p>\n<p>TSLA has managed to grow quickly and the business is throwing off solid amounts of cash, which is certainly a feat. But the company is priced for perfection, and I doubt we will see Tesla sell 5, 10, or 20 million cars in the foreseeable future. I thus personally would avoid the stock due to its excessively high valuation, but others will disagree on that and see a lot of potential value in things like Tesla's AV endeavors.</p>\n<p>GM is looking way more reasonably valued in comparison, but its future is also far from certain. It remains to be seen whether the company will be successful with its massive EV investments -- so far, it isn't. Becoming the EV leader is an ambitious goal, but as everyone knows, announcing such a goal does not necessarily make it happen. GM looks like the better choice among the two from a risk-to-potential-reward perspective to me, but I do not find it extremely attractive at current prices, either. Whether any of these stocks is a good fit for your portfolio thus depends on your investment approach, and what you think the management teams at the two companies will be able to pull off in the coming years.</p>\n<p>I personally think that growing competition in the EV space, coming from all sides (legacy auto, EV pure-plays, and tech companies), could spell trouble for the whole industry, as competition could pressure margins for all players. I thus do not want to invest in either of these companies right here, even though they&nbsp;<i>could</i>&nbsp;be very successful if management teams can pull off what they are indicating they want to do.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>General Motors Vs. Tesla: Which Stock Is The Better Value?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nGeneral Motors Vs. Tesla: Which Stock Is The Better Value?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-07-27 22:11 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/article/4441547-general-motors-vs-tesla-stock-better-value><strong>seekingalpha</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Summary\n\nGM and TSLA are two very different companies, but both want to grow their EV presence massively.\nManagement teams have highly ambitious goals, such as AV leadership (TSLA) and EV leadership (...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4441547-general-motors-vs-tesla-stock-better-value\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"GM":"通用汽车","TSLA":"特斯拉"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4441547-general-motors-vs-tesla-stock-better-value","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1185029173","content_text":"Summary\n\nGM and TSLA are two very different companies, but both want to grow their EV presence massively.\nManagement teams have highly ambitious goals, such as AV leadership (TSLA) and EV leadership (GM). Whether these goals will be achieved is a different story, however.\nThe two companies could be attractive for different types of investors, but it may also make sense to stay on the sidelines here.\n\ngremlin/E+ via Getty Images\nArticle Thesis\nAuto companies are doing very well in the current environment, as strong demand for new cars and rising average sales prices will lead to strong profits in 2021. There are, however, vast differences between EV pure-plays such as Tesla, Inc. (TSLA), and legacy auto companies such as General Motors Company (GM). Even though GM has been moving into the EV direction in recent years, it is still primarily an ICE vehicle company, unlike Tesla, the current leader in the EV space. In this article, we will pitch these two companies against each other in order to find out what stock is more suitable for what type of investor.\nThe Auto Industry: Cyclical, But Having Good Times Right Now\nThere are industries that are very resilient versus all kinds of crises, such as software tech or healthcare, as their products are needed/required no matter what. The auto industry, on the other hand, is highly cyclical, as consumers only buy new cars when they have surplus liquidity and as long as they are not too worried about the future. On top of that, auto companies are also impacted to a significant degree by fluctuating prices for their end products and the commodities that are needed to build a vehicle.\n2020, not surprisingly, was a pretty bad year for most auto companies, as sales declined due to the impact of the pandemic. Tesla is somewhat of an outlier, as it did not report declining vehicle sales, thanks to ongoing market share gains for EVs in the US and globally. Nevertheless, even Tesla had a year of below-average growth in 2020. GM, for comparison, saw its revenue decline by around 10% in 2020.\nThanks to massive fiscal and monetary stimulus, coupled with an ongoing economic recovery, the near-term outlook for the whole industry is way better than what we saw in 2020, however. Consumers have also reduced their spending on things such as travel, dining out, etc. which results in more available cash that can be used for buying a vehicle. Vehicle prices, for used cars and new ones, have risen quite a lot in 2021 so far, and combined with higher deliveries, that should result in strong profit growth for the whole industry. Both Tesla and General Motors should benefit from recovering automobile markets in 2021.\nGM Stock Valuation\nGeneral Motors Company is, like most other legacy auto companies, trading at a pretty inexpensive valuation. This is the result of the cyclicality of the business, worries about the future, and generally relatively low growth rates for the industry. Based on current earnings per share estimates for 2021 and 2022, GM is valued at single-digit earnings multiples:\nData by YCharts\nGM trades for slightly less than 8x net profits, using 2021 estimates and 2022 estimates. The company is also looking very inexpensive on an enterprise value to EBITDA basis. The reading for this metric, which accounts for a company's debt, stands at just 6.7. Oftentimes, EV/EBITDA multiples of 10 and below are seen as inexpensive.\nWe can also look at the cash flows that GM generates in order to gauge its valuation.In 2020, which was a pretty weak year for the company, GM generated an operating cash flow of $7.5 billion, while free cash flow totaled $2.6 billion. GM thus trades at 11x 2020's operating cash flow, while the 2020 free cash flow multiple is 31. Since 2020 was a way weaker year compared to what we can expect from 2021 and 2022, it seems pretty clear that cash flows will rise considerably going forward.\nTSLA Stock Valuation\nTesla, unlike GM, is seen as a high-growth company deserving a significantly higher valuation than its legacy auto peers. This is, to some extent, certainly true -- Tesla has been delivering strong growth for years, and its business should continue to grow at a compelling pace going forward. Whether this does justify its current valuation is a different question, however.\nBased on current earnings per share estimates, Tesla is trading at the following earnings multiples:\nData by YCharts\nTesla, Inc. trades at 144x this year's expected EPS, and at 99x next year's net profits. Looking at the EV/EBITDA ratio, we see that the reading of 68 is very high as well -- almost exactly 10x as high as that of General Motors.\nIn 2020, Tesla has generated operating cash flows of $5.9 billion, while its free cash flow totaled $2.8 billion during the same time. This pencils out to an operating cash flow multiple of 105, while the free cash flow multiple is 220. In other words, Tesla trades at an extremely high valuation, both in absolute terms, and relative to how its auto peers are valued. It seems noteworthy that Tesla's free cash flow, in absolute terms, was slightlyhigherthan that of GM in 2020, which is certainly a feat for the EV pureplay. This is, however, partially the result of lower investments -- GM spent $5 billion on capital expenditures, while Tesla invested around $3 billion.\nIs GM A Better Stock Than Tesla?\nThe answer depends on what you are looking for in an investment. Tesla clearly is the company that delivers higher relative growth, as it will grow sales by somewhere between 60%-80% this year, which is absolutely out of reach for all legacy auto companies, including GM. Tesla, on the other hand, is trading at an extremely high valuation - despite selling only around 500,000 vehicles last year, the company is valued at $620 billion, which is more than GM, Volkswagen (OTCPK:VWAGY), Stellantis (STLA), and Toyota (TM) combined - these sell around 30 million vehicles a year, however (combined).\nTesla is thus priced for massive growth right now, and its current market capitalization implies that the company will eventually sell 20 million, 30 million, or even more cars in a single year. There are bulls that believe that this will indeed come true, but I personally think that this is far from guaranteed. The legacy players, including GM, are ramping up their EV investments rapidly, and there is a large number of new EV startups, including companies such as NIO (NIO) or Lucid (LCID) that are looking to take market share from Tesla.\nI am convinced that Tesla will continue to see its sales rise in the coming years, but I doubt that Tesla will sell anything close to 10 million cars in 2025 -- one of the predictions by ARK(ARKK).\nTesla's shares are also pricing in a successful autonomous vehicle business, even though Tesla's FSD model is still stuck at Level 2 autonomous, even while some other companies have Level 4 tech on the road. An investment in Tesla is thus, I think, a bet on AV tech and massive business growth. This could pay off, as it cannot be ruled out that Tesla will eventually prevail with its AV approach. For now, however, it looks like others are ahead of the company, such as Alphabet's (GOOG)(NASDAQ:GOOGL)Waymo.\nGeneral Motors is much more of an old-school value investment right here - its growth prospects are less exciting, but its valuation is pretty inexpensive. GM plans to roll out around 30 electric vehicles by 2025, on top of that, the company also has a stated goal of becoming the leader in the North American EV space. Ambitious investments of around $27 billion through 2025 will certainly allow for the introduction of new, attractive, and capable EV models, but it still seems far from guaranteed that GM will sell more EVs than Ford and Tesla in North America in 2025. Even if that does not happen, however, that would not necessarily be a disaster. The good thing about a value stock like GM is that not too many things have to go right for the company to be a viable investment.\nWhereas Tesla is priced for massive growth, GM is currently priced as if it will eventually go out of business. If the company manages to stabilize its earnings around the current level or grow them by a couple of percentage points, that could be enough for very solid returns from the current price, thanks to a pretty low starting valuation. GM currently does not pay any dividends, but if the company gets back to paying out $0.38 per share per quarter, as it did before the pandemic, investors would get a solid yield of 2.8%.\nWhether you prefer GM or Tesla thus ultimately depends on your investment approach --do you prefer value or growth?-- and on your belief in Elon Musk. If you think he will be able to pull off AV in a big way, Tesla might be the better choice for you. But if you think that one should invest based on what we see today, and not based on what might happen in the future, GM might be the better choice for you among these two. There is, of course, also the option to invest in both, or in neither, as a case can be made for avoiding the automobile industry altogether, due to the aforementioned cyclicality and high competitive pressures.\nIs GM Or TSLA A Good Stock To Buy Now?\nTSLA has managed to grow quickly and the business is throwing off solid amounts of cash, which is certainly a feat. But the company is priced for perfection, and I doubt we will see Tesla sell 5, 10, or 20 million cars in the foreseeable future. I thus personally would avoid the stock due to its excessively high valuation, but others will disagree on that and see a lot of potential value in things like Tesla's AV endeavors.\nGM is looking way more reasonably valued in comparison, but its future is also far from certain. It remains to be seen whether the company will be successful with its massive EV investments -- so far, it isn't. Becoming the EV leader is an ambitious goal, but as everyone knows, announcing such a goal does not necessarily make it happen. GM looks like the better choice among the two from a risk-to-potential-reward perspective to me, but I do not find it extremely attractive at current prices, either. Whether any of these stocks is a good fit for your portfolio thus depends on your investment approach, and what you think the management teams at the two companies will be able to pull off in the coming years.\nI personally think that growing competition in the EV space, coming from all sides (legacy auto, EV pure-plays, and tech companies), could spell trouble for the whole industry, as competition could pressure margins for all players. I thus do not want to invest in either of these companies right here, even though they could be very successful if management teams can pull off what they are indicating they want to do.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":73,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":896033970,"gmtCreate":1628528836190,"gmtModify":1703507684838,"author":{"id":"4088814878354060","authorId":"4088814878354060","name":"LynnNg","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5f569eb8b2a3f73cf3debc58ec85b953","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4088814878354060","authorIdStr":"4088814878354060"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ooo","listText":"Ooo","text":"Ooo","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/896033970","repostId":"2158447506","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2158447506","pubTimestamp":1628522130,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2158447506?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-08-09 23:15","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Boeing assessing launch dates in August for Starliner space capsule","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2158447506","media":"Reuters","summary":"Aug 9 (Reuters) - Boeing Co said on Monday it was assessing multiple dates this month for the launch","content":"<p>Aug 9 (Reuters) - Boeing Co said on Monday it was assessing multiple dates this month for the launch of its CST-100 Starliner space capsule to the International Space Station.</p>\n<p>The company last week postponed the capsule's much awaited launch after discovering a glitch in its propulsion system valves during pre-launch checks.</p>\n<p>Boeing said on Monday it fixed problems over the weekend on more of its 13 CST-100 Starliner propulsion system valves and inspections showed no signs of damage or external corrosion.</p>\n<p>\"Seven of the 13 valves are now operating as designed, with inspection and remediation of the remaining affected valves to be performed in the days ahead,\" the company said.</p>\n<p>Boeing said it was working with NASA and United Launch Alliance, its partnership with Lockheed Martin Corp, to confirm launch dates when the spacecraft is ready.</p>\n<p>The CST-100 Starliner will take people to and from low-earth orbit and Boeing has said a manned mission will take place no earlier than December, as it competes with Elon Musk's SpaceX to be the first to return NASA astronauts to the space station from U.S. soil in nearly a decade. </p>","source":"yahoofinance","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Boeing assessing launch dates in August for Starliner space capsule</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nBoeing assessing launch dates in August for Starliner space capsule\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-08-09 23:15 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://finance.yahoo.com/news/boeing-assessing-launch-dates-august-150730278.html><strong>Reuters</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Aug 9 (Reuters) - Boeing Co said on Monday it was assessing multiple dates this month for the launch of its CST-100 Starliner space capsule to the International Space Station.\nThe company last week ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/boeing-assessing-launch-dates-august-150730278.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"BA":"波音"},"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/boeing-assessing-launch-dates-august-150730278.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/5f26f4a48f9cb3e29be4d71d3ba8c038","article_id":"2158447506","content_text":"Aug 9 (Reuters) - Boeing Co said on Monday it was assessing multiple dates this month for the launch of its CST-100 Starliner space capsule to the International Space Station.\nThe company last week postponed the capsule's much awaited launch after discovering a glitch in its propulsion system valves during pre-launch checks.\nBoeing said on Monday it fixed problems over the weekend on more of its 13 CST-100 Starliner propulsion system valves and inspections showed no signs of damage or external corrosion.\n\"Seven of the 13 valves are now operating as designed, with inspection and remediation of the remaining affected valves to be performed in the days ahead,\" the company said.\nBoeing said it was working with NASA and United Launch Alliance, its partnership with Lockheed Martin Corp, to confirm launch dates when the spacecraft is ready.\nThe CST-100 Starliner will take people to and from low-earth orbit and Boeing has said a manned mission will take place no earlier than December, as it competes with Elon Musk's SpaceX to be the first to return NASA astronauts to the space station from U.S. soil in nearly a decade.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":276,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":800391999,"gmtCreate":1627275929611,"gmtModify":1703486547277,"author":{"id":"4088814878354060","authorId":"4088814878354060","name":"LynnNg","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5f569eb8b2a3f73cf3debc58ec85b953","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4088814878354060","authorIdStr":"4088814878354060"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Comment&nbsp;","listText":"Comment&nbsp;","text":"Comment","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/800391999","repostId":"1172308187","repostType":2,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":97,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9965994693,"gmtCreate":1669867600713,"gmtModify":1676538260142,"author":{"id":"4088814878354060","authorId":"4088814878354060","name":"LynnNg","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5f569eb8b2a3f73cf3debc58ec85b953","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4088814878354060","authorIdStr":"4088814878354060"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/AAPL\">$Apple(AAPL)$&nbsp;</a><v-v data-views=\"1\"></v-v>Gogogo","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/AAPL\">$Apple(AAPL)$&nbsp;</a><v-v data-views=\"1\"></v-v>Gogogo","text":"$Apple(AAPL)$ Gogogo","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/dfa35be011c45fbfadd9614f1a157c86","width":"1125","height":"2000"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9965994693","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":582,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9932115713,"gmtCreate":1662894257932,"gmtModify":1676537159053,"author":{"id":"4088814878354060","authorId":"4088814878354060","name":"LynnNg","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5f569eb8b2a3f73cf3debc58ec85b953","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4088814878354060","authorIdStr":"4088814878354060"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/CFA.SI\">$NikkoAM-STC Asia REIT(CFA.SI)$</a>Raise","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/CFA.SI\">$NikkoAM-STC Asia REIT(CFA.SI)$</a>Raise","text":"$NikkoAM-STC Asia REIT(CFA.SI)$Raise","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/3926b813ce5d3d0381b32fc3ecfdaa85","width":"1170","height":"2205"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9932115713","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":148,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9084397916,"gmtCreate":1650808153406,"gmtModify":1676534796145,"author":{"id":"4088814878354060","authorId":"4088814878354060","name":"LynnNg","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5f569eb8b2a3f73cf3debc58ec85b953","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4088814878354060","authorIdStr":"4088814878354060"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/CFA.SI\">$NikkoAM-STC Asia REIT(CFA.SI)$</a>Dun","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/CFA.SI\">$NikkoAM-STC Asia REIT(CFA.SI)$</a>Dun","text":"$NikkoAM-STC Asia REIT(CFA.SI)$Dun","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/357bb2e410cd2bd3f12238c9b8b31528","width":"1242","height":"1968"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9084397916","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":92,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9005416171,"gmtCreate":1642380706106,"gmtModify":1676533705837,"author":{"id":"4088814878354060","authorId":"4088814878354060","name":"LynnNg","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5f569eb8b2a3f73cf3debc58ec85b953","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4088814878354060","authorIdStr":"4088814878354060"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Svdhks","listText":"Svdhks","text":"Svdhks","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9005416171","repostId":"2203192728","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2203192728","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in markets, business, politics, entertainment and technology","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Reuters","id":"1036604489","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868"},"pubTimestamp":1642375676,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2203192728?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-01-17 07:27","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Wall St Week Ahead-Earnings to Test Growth Stocks after Rocky Start to Year","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2203192728","media":"Reuters","summary":"A rough start to 2022 for U.S. tech and growth stocks is raising stakes for upcoming earnings reports, as investors seek reasons to keep faith in the shares while bracing for U.S. interest rate hikes.The S&P 500 information technology sector   , which accounts for nearly 29% of the broader index’s weight, is down 5.5% year-to-date, including steep declines in shares of heavyweights such as Microsoft    and Nvidia   , both off roughly 9%. The overall S&P 500    has fallen 2.7%.Tech bulls hope a s","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>A rough start to 2022 for U.S. tech and growth stocks is raising stakes for upcoming earnings reports, as investors seek reasons to keep faith in the shares while bracing for U.S. interest rate hikes.</p><p>The S&amp;P 500 information technology sector   , which accounts for nearly 29% of the broader index’s weight, is down 5.5% year-to-date, including steep declines in shares of heavyweights such as Microsoft    and Nvidia   , both off roughly 9%. The overall S&amp;P 500    has fallen 2.7%.</p><p>Tech bulls hope a strong earnings season can blunt some of the pain, which many pin on rising Treasury yields and expectations that the Federal Reserve will tighten monetary policy and hike rates aggressively to fight inflation.</p><p>As the Fed increases short-term rates, investors will keep an eye on how high longer-term U.S. Treasury yields rise. Higher yields more steeply discount the value of future profits, which can especially pressure growth stocks.</p><p>&#34;Given the performance of these tech names here recently, will earnings be a savior for them?&#34; said Walter Todd, chief investment officer at Greenwood Capital. &#34;Over the next month,  seeing how some of these tech names respond to their numbers ... will be interesting.&#34;</p><p>Fourth-quarter results season kicks into high gear this week, with overall S&amp;P 500 earnings expected to climb 23.1%, according to Refinitiv IBES. Technology sector earnings are expected to rise by 15.6%, as other groups have benefited more from the economy&#39;s rebound from pandemic lockdowns in 2020.</p><p>Companies in the S&amp;P 500 growth index   , which is replete with tech stocks, are expected to increase earnings 16%, compared to a 26% rise for the S&amp;P 500 value index   , more heavily weighted in banks, industrials and other economically sensitive companies, according to Credit Suisse.</p><p>Higher interest rates could pressure the stretched valuations of tech stocks, so companies need to deliver impressive numbers in coming weeks, said Kim Forrest, chief investment officer at Bokeh Capital Partners.</p><p>&#34;To have the (stock) price go up even in a rising rate/falling multiple environment, you have to show demand for the product,&#34; she said.</p><p>The tech sector is trading at about 27 times earnings estimates for the next 12 months, near its highest in 18 years, compared to 21 times for the overall S&amp;P 500, according to Refinitiv Datstream.</p><p>Netflix   , whose shares have slumped over 14% to start the year, reports on Thursday, the first results from the closely watched &#34;FAANG&#34; group of large growth companies. Investors will watch the streaming giant&#39;s plans for generating content and its outlook for subscribers.</p><p>“If they can surprise to the upside on the number of subscribers, I think that is going to be great for the stock price,” said King Lip, chief strategist at Baker Avenue Asset Management, which owns Netflix shares.</p><p>Among the tech and growth names that have struggled in January are <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ADBE\">Adobe</a>    and <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/CRM\">Salesforce</a>.com   , both down about 9%, and DocuSign   , which has dropped about 15%.</p><p>The <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ARKK\">ARK Innovation ETF</a>   , which is filled with growth stocks and was the top-performing U.S. equity fund tracked by Morningstar in 2020, is down over 16% so far this year.</p><p>Yet not everyone is convinced Treasury yields will rise much more, or that investors should flee tech shares as the Fed raises rates.</p><p>Analysts at Goldman Sachs see the 10-year Treasury yield rising to 2% by the end of the year, &#34;suggesting only a modest further move in longer-term yields,&#34; while &#34;the likelihood of slowing economic growth in 2022 is an argument in favor of growth stocks.&#34;</p><p>The yield on the 10-year Treasury note    stood at 1.76% on Friday, after topping 1.8% earlier in the week.</p><p>A study by the Wells Fargo Investment Institute, meanwhile, found the tech sector appreciated an average of 48.1% during five periods of rising interest rates since the 1990s.</p><p><b>Week ahead</b></p><p>U.S. markets are closed in observance of the Martin Luther King Jr. holiday on Monday.</p><p><b>Notable U.S. corporate earnings</b></p><p><b>TUESDAY:</b></p><p>Goldman Sachs Group GS, Truist Financial Corp. TFC, Signature Bank SBNY, PNC Financial PNC, J.B. Hunt Transport Services JBHT, Interactive Brokers Group Inc. IBKR</p><p><b>WEDNESDAY:</b></p><p>Morgan Stanley MS, Bank of America BAC, U.S. Bancorp. USB, State Street Corp. STT, UnitedHealth Group Inc. UNH, Procter &amp; Gamble PG, Kinder Morgan KMI, Fastenal Co. FAST</p><p><b>THURSDAY:</b></p><p>Netflix NFLX, United Airlines Holdings UAL, American Airlines AAL, Baker Hughes BKR, Discover Financial Services DFS, CSX Corp. CSX, Union Pacific Corp. UNP, The Travelers Cos. Inc. TRV, Intuitive Surgical Inc. ISRG, KeyCorp. KEY</p><p><b>FRIDAY:</b></p><p>Schlumberger SLB, Huntington Bancshares Inc. HBAN</p><p>U.S. economic reports</p><p><b>Tuesday</b></p><p>Empire State manufacturing index for January due at 8:30 a.m. ET</p><p>NAHB home builders index for January at 10 a.m.</p><p><b>Wednesday</b></p><p>Building permits and starts for December at 8:30 a.m.</p><p>Philly Fed Index for January at 8:30 a.m.</p><p><b>Thursday</b></p><p>Initial jobless claims for the week ended Jan. 15 (and continuing claims for Jan. 8) at 8:30 a.m.</p><p>Existing home sales for December at 10 a.m.</p><p>The Wells Fargo institute has a favorable rating on the tech sector, along with communication services, industrials and financials.</p><p>&#34;This is all a very recent thing where people have almost talked themselves into tech as being rate sensitive,” said Sameer Samana, senior global market strategist at the Wells Fargo institute.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Wall St Week Ahead-Earnings to Test Growth Stocks after Rocky Start to Year</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWall St Week Ahead-Earnings to Test Growth Stocks after Rocky Start to Year\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1036604489\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Reuters </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-01-17 07:27</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>A rough start to 2022 for U.S. tech and growth stocks is raising stakes for upcoming earnings reports, as investors seek reasons to keep faith in the shares while bracing for U.S. interest rate hikes.</p><p>The S&amp;P 500 information technology sector   , which accounts for nearly 29% of the broader index’s weight, is down 5.5% year-to-date, including steep declines in shares of heavyweights such as Microsoft    and Nvidia   , both off roughly 9%. The overall S&amp;P 500    has fallen 2.7%.</p><p>Tech bulls hope a strong earnings season can blunt some of the pain, which many pin on rising Treasury yields and expectations that the Federal Reserve will tighten monetary policy and hike rates aggressively to fight inflation.</p><p>As the Fed increases short-term rates, investors will keep an eye on how high longer-term U.S. Treasury yields rise. Higher yields more steeply discount the value of future profits, which can especially pressure growth stocks.</p><p>&#34;Given the performance of these tech names here recently, will earnings be a savior for them?&#34; said Walter Todd, chief investment officer at Greenwood Capital. &#34;Over the next month,  seeing how some of these tech names respond to their numbers ... will be interesting.&#34;</p><p>Fourth-quarter results season kicks into high gear this week, with overall S&amp;P 500 earnings expected to climb 23.1%, according to Refinitiv IBES. Technology sector earnings are expected to rise by 15.6%, as other groups have benefited more from the economy&#39;s rebound from pandemic lockdowns in 2020.</p><p>Companies in the S&amp;P 500 growth index   , which is replete with tech stocks, are expected to increase earnings 16%, compared to a 26% rise for the S&amp;P 500 value index   , more heavily weighted in banks, industrials and other economically sensitive companies, according to Credit Suisse.</p><p>Higher interest rates could pressure the stretched valuations of tech stocks, so companies need to deliver impressive numbers in coming weeks, said Kim Forrest, chief investment officer at Bokeh Capital Partners.</p><p>&#34;To have the (stock) price go up even in a rising rate/falling multiple environment, you have to show demand for the product,&#34; she said.</p><p>The tech sector is trading at about 27 times earnings estimates for the next 12 months, near its highest in 18 years, compared to 21 times for the overall S&amp;P 500, according to Refinitiv Datstream.</p><p>Netflix   , whose shares have slumped over 14% to start the year, reports on Thursday, the first results from the closely watched &#34;FAANG&#34; group of large growth companies. Investors will watch the streaming giant&#39;s plans for generating content and its outlook for subscribers.</p><p>“If they can surprise to the upside on the number of subscribers, I think that is going to be great for the stock price,” said King Lip, chief strategist at Baker Avenue Asset Management, which owns Netflix shares.</p><p>Among the tech and growth names that have struggled in January are <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ADBE\">Adobe</a>    and <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/CRM\">Salesforce</a>.com   , both down about 9%, and DocuSign   , which has dropped about 15%.</p><p>The <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ARKK\">ARK Innovation ETF</a>   , which is filled with growth stocks and was the top-performing U.S. equity fund tracked by Morningstar in 2020, is down over 16% so far this year.</p><p>Yet not everyone is convinced Treasury yields will rise much more, or that investors should flee tech shares as the Fed raises rates.</p><p>Analysts at Goldman Sachs see the 10-year Treasury yield rising to 2% by the end of the year, &#34;suggesting only a modest further move in longer-term yields,&#34; while &#34;the likelihood of slowing economic growth in 2022 is an argument in favor of growth stocks.&#34;</p><p>The yield on the 10-year Treasury note    stood at 1.76% on Friday, after topping 1.8% earlier in the week.</p><p>A study by the Wells Fargo Investment Institute, meanwhile, found the tech sector appreciated an average of 48.1% during five periods of rising interest rates since the 1990s.</p><p><b>Week ahead</b></p><p>U.S. markets are closed in observance of the Martin Luther King Jr. holiday on Monday.</p><p><b>Notable U.S. corporate earnings</b></p><p><b>TUESDAY:</b></p><p>Goldman Sachs Group GS, Truist Financial Corp. TFC, Signature Bank SBNY, PNC Financial PNC, J.B. Hunt Transport Services JBHT, Interactive Brokers Group Inc. IBKR</p><p><b>WEDNESDAY:</b></p><p>Morgan Stanley MS, Bank of America BAC, U.S. Bancorp. USB, State Street Corp. STT, UnitedHealth Group Inc. UNH, Procter &amp; Gamble PG, Kinder Morgan KMI, Fastenal Co. FAST</p><p><b>THURSDAY:</b></p><p>Netflix NFLX, United Airlines Holdings UAL, American Airlines AAL, Baker Hughes BKR, Discover Financial Services DFS, CSX Corp. CSX, Union Pacific Corp. UNP, The Travelers Cos. Inc. TRV, Intuitive Surgical Inc. ISRG, KeyCorp. KEY</p><p><b>FRIDAY:</b></p><p>Schlumberger SLB, Huntington Bancshares Inc. HBAN</p><p>U.S. economic reports</p><p><b>Tuesday</b></p><p>Empire State manufacturing index for January due at 8:30 a.m. ET</p><p>NAHB home builders index for January at 10 a.m.</p><p><b>Wednesday</b></p><p>Building permits and starts for December at 8:30 a.m.</p><p>Philly Fed Index for January at 8:30 a.m.</p><p><b>Thursday</b></p><p>Initial jobless claims for the week ended Jan. 15 (and continuing claims for Jan. 8) at 8:30 a.m.</p><p>Existing home sales for December at 10 a.m.</p><p>The Wells Fargo institute has a favorable rating on the tech sector, along with communication services, industrials and financials.</p><p>&#34;This is all a very recent thing where people have almost talked themselves into tech as being rate sensitive,” said Sameer Samana, senior global market strategist at the Wells Fargo institute.</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"ADBE":"Adobe","NVDA":"英伟达","NFLX":"奈飞","AAPL":"苹果","MSFT":"微软","DOCU":"Docusign","TSLA":"特斯拉","CRM":"赛富时"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2203192728","content_text":"A rough start to 2022 for U.S. tech and growth stocks is raising stakes for upcoming earnings reports, as investors seek reasons to keep faith in the shares while bracing for U.S. interest rate hikes.The S&P 500 information technology sector   , which accounts for nearly 29% of the broader index’s weight, is down 5.5% year-to-date, including steep declines in shares of heavyweights such as Microsoft    and Nvidia   , both off roughly 9%. The overall S&P 500    has fallen 2.7%.Tech bulls hope a strong earnings season can blunt some of the pain, which many pin on rising Treasury yields and expectations that the Federal Reserve will tighten monetary policy and hike rates aggressively to fight inflation.As the Fed increases short-term rates, investors will keep an eye on how high longer-term U.S. Treasury yields rise. Higher yields more steeply discount the value of future profits, which can especially pressure growth stocks.\"Given the performance of these tech names here recently, will earnings be a savior for them?\" said Walter Todd, chief investment officer at Greenwood Capital. \"Over the next month,  seeing how some of these tech names respond to their numbers ... will be interesting.\"Fourth-quarter results season kicks into high gear this week, with overall S&P 500 earnings expected to climb 23.1%, according to Refinitiv IBES. Technology sector earnings are expected to rise by 15.6%, as other groups have benefited more from the economy's rebound from pandemic lockdowns in 2020.Companies in the S&P 500 growth index   , which is replete with tech stocks, are expected to increase earnings 16%, compared to a 26% rise for the S&P 500 value index   , more heavily weighted in banks, industrials and other economically sensitive companies, according to Credit Suisse.Higher interest rates could pressure the stretched valuations of tech stocks, so companies need to deliver impressive numbers in coming weeks, said Kim Forrest, chief investment officer at Bokeh Capital Partners.\"To have the (stock) price go up even in a rising rate/falling multiple environment, you have to show demand for the product,\" she said.The tech sector is trading at about 27 times earnings estimates for the next 12 months, near its highest in 18 years, compared to 21 times for the overall S&P 500, according to Refinitiv Datstream.Netflix   , whose shares have slumped over 14% to start the year, reports on Thursday, the first results from the closely watched \"FAANG\" group of large growth companies. Investors will watch the streaming giant's plans for generating content and its outlook for subscribers.“If they can surprise to the upside on the number of subscribers, I think that is going to be great for the stock price,” said King Lip, chief strategist at Baker Avenue Asset Management, which owns Netflix shares.Among the tech and growth names that have struggled in January are Adobe    and Salesforce.com   , both down about 9%, and DocuSign   , which has dropped about 15%.The ARK Innovation ETF   , which is filled with growth stocks and was the top-performing U.S. equity fund tracked by Morningstar in 2020, is down over 16% so far this year.Yet not everyone is convinced Treasury yields will rise much more, or that investors should flee tech shares as the Fed raises rates.Analysts at Goldman Sachs see the 10-year Treasury yield rising to 2% by the end of the year, \"suggesting only a modest further move in longer-term yields,\" while \"the likelihood of slowing economic growth in 2022 is an argument in favor of growth stocks.\"The yield on the 10-year Treasury note    stood at 1.76% on Friday, after topping 1.8% earlier in the week.A study by the Wells Fargo Investment Institute, meanwhile, found the tech sector appreciated an average of 48.1% during five periods of rising interest rates since the 1990s.Week aheadU.S. markets are closed in observance of the Martin Luther King Jr. holiday on Monday.Notable U.S. corporate earningsTUESDAY:Goldman Sachs Group GS, Truist Financial Corp. TFC, Signature Bank SBNY, PNC Financial PNC, J.B. Hunt Transport Services JBHT, Interactive Brokers Group Inc. IBKRWEDNESDAY:Morgan Stanley MS, Bank of America BAC, U.S. Bancorp. USB, State Street Corp. STT, UnitedHealth Group Inc. UNH, Procter & Gamble PG, Kinder Morgan KMI, Fastenal Co. FASTTHURSDAY:Netflix NFLX, United Airlines Holdings UAL, American Airlines AAL, Baker Hughes BKR, Discover Financial Services DFS, CSX Corp. CSX, Union Pacific Corp. UNP, The Travelers Cos. Inc. TRV, Intuitive Surgical Inc. ISRG, KeyCorp. KEYFRIDAY:Schlumberger SLB, Huntington Bancshares Inc. HBANU.S. economic reportsTuesdayEmpire State manufacturing index for January due at 8:30 a.m. ETNAHB home builders index for January at 10 a.m.WednesdayBuilding permits and starts for December at 8:30 a.m.Philly Fed Index for January at 8:30 a.m.ThursdayInitial jobless claims for the week ended Jan. 15 (and continuing claims for Jan. 8) at 8:30 a.m.Existing home sales for December at 10 a.m.The Wells Fargo institute has a favorable rating on the tech sector, along with communication services, industrials and financials.\"This is all a very recent thing where people have almost talked themselves into tech as being rate sensitive,” said Sameer Samana, senior global market strategist at the Wells Fargo institute.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":358,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"lives":[]}