ZGChen84 personal page - To The Moon

ZGChen84

No personal profile

11Follow

2Followers

0Topic

0Badge

2023-09-19

Share your opinion about this news…

Arm Falls After Bernstein Downplays Company’s AI Prospects

2023-05-04

Great ariticle, would you like to share it?

@HK窝轮女神Fifi:醫渡科技23財年1H收入同比下滑，中長期多元化增長趨勢不改

2023-05-04

Great ariticle, would you like to share it?

@Alice Arnault:Techical analysis 101: Valuation methods with cases

2023-05-04

Great ariticle, would you like to share it?

@ToughCoyote:My strategic plan to enter market in second half of 2023

2023-03-18

Great ariticle, would you like to share it?

@MillionaireTiger:When There is a Bank Run on SVB, Where does the Money Go?

2023-03-18

Great ariticle, would you like to share it?

@StarLuck:Grab Holdings retires US$600 mil in 2026 debt with extra cash

2023-03-18

Great ariticle, would you like to share it?

@Tiger_SG:🎁13 SG stocks' Dividend Yields Higher than Fixed Deposit Rates

2022-12-08

$Microsoft(MSFT)$

2022-12-05

$Microsoft(MSFT)$

2022-12-03

$Microsoft(MSFT)$

2022-11-30

$Microsoft(MSFT)$

2022-11-24

Up up

Alibaba: Big Money Is Pulling Out

2022-11-18

@trevor_t3 @zerohero @ zzzerooo power up

2022-11-03

[Surprised]

Apple Now Valued at More Than Amazon, Alphabet and Meta — Combined

2022-10-13

[Facepalm] [Facepalm] [Facepalm]

US STOCKS-Wall St Ends Volatile Day Lower After Fed Minutes, PPI

2022-09-27

$Alphabet(GOOG)$

2022-09-27

$Alphabet(GOOG)$

2022-09-16

Jitters

U.S. Stocks Extended Their Decline in Morning Trading; Dow Jones Slid Less Than 0.5%, S&P 500 Crashed Nearly 1% While Nasdaq Tumbled Over 1.5%

2022-09-16

[Facepalm]

US STOCKS-Wall St Tumbles Amid Fed Tightening Jitters, Economic Rumblings

2022-09-15

[Glance]

Tesla Is Sued By Drivers Over Alleged False Autopilot, Full Self-Driving Claims

Go to Tiger App to see more news

{"i18n":{"language":"en_US"},"userPageInfo":{"id":4107323280915450,"uuid":"4107323280915450","gmtCreate":1644241057686,"gmtModify":1704447507731,"name":"ZGChen84","pinyin":"zgchen84","introduction":"","introductionEn":"","signature":"","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","hat":null,"hatId":null,"hatName":null,"vip":1,"status":2,"fanSize":2,"headSize":11,"tweetSize":28,"questionSize":0,"limitLevel":999,"accountStatus":4,"level":{"id":2,"name":"无畏虎","nameTw":"無畏虎","represent":"初生牛犊","factor":"发布3条非转发主帖,1条获得他人回复或点赞","iconColor":"3C9E83","bgColor":"A2F1D9"},"themeCounts":0,"badgeCounts":0,"badges":[],"moderator":false,"superModerator":false,"manageSymbols":null,"badgeLevel":null,"boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"favoriteSize":0,"symbols":null,"coverImage":null,"realNameVerified":"init","userBadges":[{"badgeId":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493-1","templateUuid":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493","name":"Debut Tiger","description":"Join the tiger community for 500 days","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0e4d0ca1da0456dc7894c946d44bf9ab","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0f2f65e8ce4cfaae8db2bea9b127f58b","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c5948a31b6edf154422335b265235809","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2023.06.23","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1001},{"badgeId":"44212b71d0be4ec88898348dbe882e03-1","templateUuid":"44212b71d0be4ec88898348dbe882e03","name":"Boss Tiger","description":"The transaction amount of the securities account reaches $100,000","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c8dfc27c1ee0e25db1c93e9d0b641101","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f43908c142f8a33c78f5bdf0e2897488","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/82165ff19cb8a786e8919f92acee5213","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2022.06.04","exceedPercentage":"60.34%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1101},{"badgeId":"972123088c9646f7b6091ae0662215be-1","templateUuid":"972123088c9646f7b6091ae0662215be","name":"Elite Trader","description":"Total number of securities or futures transactions reached 30","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ab0f87127c854ce3191a752d57b46edc","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c9835ce48b8c8743566d344ac7a7ba8c","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/76754b53ce7a90019f132c1d2fbc698f","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2022.05.19","exceedPercentage":"60.95%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100},{"badgeId":"7a9f168ff73447fe856ed6c938b61789-1","templateUuid":"7a9f168ff73447fe856ed6c938b61789","name":"Knowledgeable Investor","description":"Traded more than 10 stocks","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e74cc24115c4fbae6154ec1b1041bf47","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d48265cbfd97c57f9048db29f22227b0","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/76c6d6898b073c77e1c537ebe9ac1c57","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2022.05.11","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1102},{"badgeId":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84-1","templateUuid":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84","name":"Real Trader","description":"Completed a transaction","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e08a1cc2087a1de93402c2c290fa65b","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4504a6397ce1137932d56e5f4ce27166","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4b22c79415b4cd6e3d8ebc4a0fa32604","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2022.02.11","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100}],"userBadgeCount":5,"currentWearingBadge":null,"individualDisplayBadges":null,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"location":null,"starInvestorFollowerNum":0,"starInvestorFlag":false,"starInvestorOrderShareNum":0,"subscribeStarInvestorNum":0,"ror":null,"winRationPercentage":null,"showRor":false,"investmentPhilosophy":null,"starInvestorSubscribeFlag":false},"baikeInfo":{},"tab":"post","tweets":[{"id":221340053778432,"gmtCreate":1695081784463,"gmtModify":1695081788868,"author":{"id":"4107323280915450","authorId":"4107323280915450","name":"ZGChen84","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Share your opinion about this news…","listText":"Share your opinion about this news…","text":"Share your opinion about this news…","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/221340053778432","repostId":"1171258131","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"1171258131","pubTimestamp":1695080136,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1171258131?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2023-09-19 07:35","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Arm Falls After Bernstein Downplays Company’s AI Prospects","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1171258131","media":"Bloomberg","summary":"Arm Holdings Plc shares fell on Monday after Bernstein started coverage on the newly public chip designer with an underperform rating, suggesting it may not be the beneficiary of artificial intelligen","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Arm Holdings Plc shares fell on Monday after Bernstein started coverage on the newly public chip designer with an underperform rating, suggesting it may not be the beneficiary of artificial intelligence that some investors expect.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/599db1a8044115c7057b001025c47292\" tg-width=\"601\" tg-height=\"608\"/></p><p>The stock fell as much as 9.4% to $55.02, below the $56.10 price it opened at following its Thursday initial public offering. However, it pared much of that decline and ended down 4.5% to close at $58. Bernstein’s price target of $46 implies additional weakness.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">“While expectations that Arm will be a beneficiary from AI growth may be adding a premium to the share price, we believe it is too soon to declare them an AI winner,” wrote analyst Sara Russo. “With the mobile end market maturing, we think expectations for top line growth are too optimistic.”</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">Bernstein is only the third firm to start coverage on Arm, and so far ratings are evenly distributed. Aside from Bernstein’s sell-equivalent rating, New Street Research recommends buying the stock while Needham has a hold rating. Needham analyst Charles Shi wrote that the valuation “looks full.”</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">Arm’s Monday decline stood in contrast to the sector overall. The Philadelphia Stock Exchange Semiconductor Index rose 0.5%. Among notable gainers, Advanced Micro Devices Inc. added 0.9% and Lam Research Corp climbed 2%.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">Arm, majority owned by SoftBank Group Corp., sold $4.87 billion of shares to the public last week in the year’s biggest IPO.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">The Cambridge, UK-based company isn’t a traditional chipmaker. It provides semiconductor designs to tech companies and collects royalties from their use. It also licenses the fundamental technology governing how chips communicate with software.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">That means it’s a highly influential company with a foothold at every major technology company in the world. The challenge is turning that clout into greater revenue. “We remain more conservative on their ability to deliver increased royalty rates at the pace management is guiding,” Russo said.</p></body></html>","source":"lsy1584095487587","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Arm Falls After Bernstein Downplays Company’s AI Prospects</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nArm Falls After Bernstein Downplays Company’s AI Prospects\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2023-09-19 07:35 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://finance.yahoo.com/news/arm-falls-bernstein-downplays-boost-174559595.html><strong>Bloomberg</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Arm Holdings Plc shares fell on Monday after Bernstein started coverage on the newly public chip designer with an underperform rating, suggesting it may not be the beneficiary of artificial ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/arm-falls-bernstein-downplays-boost-174559595.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"ARM":"ARM Holdings Ltd"},"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/arm-falls-bernstein-downplays-boost-174559595.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1171258131","content_text":"Arm Holdings Plc shares fell on Monday after Bernstein started coverage on the newly public chip designer with an underperform rating, suggesting it may not be the beneficiary of artificial intelligence that some investors expect.The stock fell as much as 9.4% to $55.02, below the $56.10 price it opened at following its Thursday initial public offering. However, it pared much of that decline and ended down 4.5% to close at $58. Bernstein’s price target of $46 implies additional weakness.“While expectations that Arm will be a beneficiary from AI growth may be adding a premium to the share price, we believe it is too soon to declare them an AI winner,” wrote analyst Sara Russo. “With the mobile end market maturing, we think expectations for top line growth are too optimistic.”Bernstein is only the third firm to start coverage on Arm, and so far ratings are evenly distributed. Aside from Bernstein’s sell-equivalent rating, New Street Research recommends buying the stock while Needham has a hold rating. Needham analyst Charles Shi wrote that the valuation “looks full.”Arm’s Monday decline stood in contrast to the sector overall. The Philadelphia Stock Exchange Semiconductor Index rose 0.5%. Among notable gainers, Advanced Micro Devices Inc. added 0.9% and Lam Research Corp climbed 2%.Arm, majority owned by SoftBank Group Corp., sold $4.87 billion of shares to the public last week in the year’s biggest IPO.The Cambridge, UK-based company isn’t a traditional chipmaker. It provides semiconductor designs to tech companies and collects royalties from their use. It also licenses the fundamental technology governing how chips communicate with software.That means it’s a highly influential company with a foothold at every major technology company in the world. The challenge is turning that clout into greater revenue. “We remain more conservative on their ability to deliver increased royalty rates at the pace management is guiding,” Russo said.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":172,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9947237465,"gmtCreate":1683177220457,"gmtModify":1683177224086,"author":{"id":"4107323280915450","authorId":"4107323280915450","name":"ZGChen84","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Great ariticle, would you like to share it?","listText":"Great ariticle, would you like to share it?","text":"Great ariticle, would you like to share it?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9947237465","repostId":"9947691899","repostType":1,"repost":{"id":9947691899,"gmtCreate":1683022001912,"gmtModify":1683022182254,"author":{"id":"4144404336921072","authorId":"4144404336921072","name":"HK窝轮女神Fifi","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/aa3b977bf4ca81f89830a2bedec402db","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"themes":[],"title":"醫渡科技23財年1H收入同比下滑，中長期多元化增長趨勢不改","htmlText":"前言： <a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/02158\">$醫渡科技(02158)$</a> 是一家中國的醫療人工智能公司，致力於將人工智能技術應用於醫療領域，幫助醫療機構提高效率和準確性，提供更好的醫療服務。 醫渡科技的產品和服務涵蓋了醫療影像診斷、醫療智能助手、醫療大數據等多個領域。其中，醫療影像診斷是醫渡科技的核心業務之一，該公司開發了一系列基於深度學習技術的影像診斷產品，包括CT、MRI、DR等多個領域。 醫渡科技目前已經與多家國內外知名醫療機構建立了合作關係，包括北京協和醫院、上海交通大學醫學院附屬仁濟醫院等。同時，該公司還獲得了多項國內外榮譽和獎項，如2019年中國互聯網醫療大會“最具技術創新企業”獎等。 現在，我們根據基本面來分析一下醫渡科技（02158.HK）的個股走勢。 正文： （一）上市兩年多 股價一路下滑 （二）2023財年H1淨利潤同比增長19.48% （三）財務指標常年虧損狀態 （四）近五年營業收入逐年遞增 （五）近兩年虧損減少 （六）收益質量高 資產負債率極低 各項指標平穩健康 （七）同業比較整體居中 （八）目前估值相對合理 總結： 醫渡科技23財年1H收入同比下滑，中長期多元化增長趨勢不改。 醫渡科技 “平臺+人財稅+生態” 策略指引完善產品佈局，全面推進中大企業市場戰略以及產品覆蓋面，單客戶價值深入挖掘； 公司未來收入增長引擎由雲業務接替，催化SaaS訂閱付費模式逐漸成熟； 大企業市場國產化替代能力有望推動公司業務持續高成長； 星空標準版和企業版的下沉疊加疫情催化，中小企業上雲與訂閱意願高增。 考慮到大企業數字化轉型、國產替代需求旺盛，雲轉型升級下毛利率有望改善，以及降本增效穩步推進，看好該股今後發展。 但同時，我們應注意以下風險： 1，","listText":"前言： <a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/02158\">$醫渡科技(02158)$</a> 是一家中國的醫療人工智能公司，致力於將人工智能技術應用於醫療領域，幫助醫療機構提高效率和準確性，提供更好的醫療服務。 醫渡科技的產品和服務涵蓋了醫療影像診斷、醫療智能助手、醫療大數據等多個領域。其中，醫療影像診斷是醫渡科技的核心業務之一，該公司開發了一系列基於深度學習技術的影像診斷產品，包括CT、MRI、DR等多個領域。 醫渡科技目前已經與多家國內外知名醫療機構建立了合作關係，包括北京協和醫院、上海交通大學醫學院附屬仁濟醫院等。同時，該公司還獲得了多項國內外榮譽和獎項，如2019年中國互聯網醫療大會“最具技術創新企業”獎等。 現在，我們根據基本面來分析一下醫渡科技（02158.HK）的個股走勢。 正文： （一）上市兩年多 股價一路下滑 （二）2023財年H1淨利潤同比增長19.48% （三）財務指標常年虧損狀態 （四）近五年營業收入逐年遞增 （五）近兩年虧損減少 （六）收益質量高 資產負債率極低 各項指標平穩健康 （七）同業比較整體居中 （八）目前估值相對合理 總結： 醫渡科技23財年1H收入同比下滑，中長期多元化增長趨勢不改。 醫渡科技 “平臺+人財稅+生態” 策略指引完善產品佈局，全面推進中大企業市場戰略以及產品覆蓋面，單客戶價值深入挖掘； 公司未來收入增長引擎由雲業務接替，催化SaaS訂閱付費模式逐漸成熟； 大企業市場國產化替代能力有望推動公司業務持續高成長； 星空標準版和企業版的下沉疊加疫情催化，中小企業上雲與訂閱意願高增。 考慮到大企業數字化轉型、國產替代需求旺盛，雲轉型升級下毛利率有望改善，以及降本增效穩步推進，看好該股今後發展。 但同時，我們應注意以下風險： 1，","text":"前言： $醫渡科技(02158)$ 是一家中國的醫療人工智能公司，致力於將人工智能技術應用於醫療領域，幫助醫療機構提高效率和準確性，提供更好的醫療服務。 醫渡科技的產品和服務涵蓋了醫療影像診斷、醫療智能助手、醫療大數據等多個領域。其中，醫療影像診斷是醫渡科技的核心業務之一，該公司開發了一系列基於深度學習技術的影像診斷產品，包括CT、MRI、DR等多個領域。 醫渡科技目前已經與多家國內外知名醫療機構建立了合作關係，包括北京協和醫院、上海交通大學醫學院附屬仁濟醫院等。同時，該公司還獲得了多項國內外榮譽和獎項，如2019年中國互聯網醫療大會“最具技術創新企業”獎等。 現在，我們根據基本面來分析一下醫渡科技（02158.HK）的個股走勢。 正文： （一）上市兩年多 股價一路下滑 （二）2023財年H1淨利潤同比增長19.48% （三）財務指標常年虧損狀態 （四）近五年營業收入逐年遞增 （五）近兩年虧損減少 （六）收益質量高 資產負債率極低 各項指標平穩健康 （七）同業比較整體居中 （八）目前估值相對合理 總結： 醫渡科技23財年1H收入同比下滑，中長期多元化增長趨勢不改。 醫渡科技 “平臺+人財稅+生態” 策略指引完善產品佈局，全面推進中大企業市場戰略以及產品覆蓋面，單客戶價值深入挖掘； 公司未來收入增長引擎由雲業務接替，催化SaaS訂閱付費模式逐漸成熟； 大企業市場國產化替代能力有望推動公司業務持續高成長； 星空標準版和企業版的下沉疊加疫情催化，中小企業上雲與訂閱意願高增。 考慮到大企業數字化轉型、國產替代需求旺盛，雲轉型升級下毛利率有望改善，以及降本增效穩步推進，看好該股今後發展。 但同時，我們應注意以下風險： 1，","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/28c797beaa07fcd9d456962209401068","width":"1125","height":"1259"},{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/a481093c87490af6b3d020eac577b4a2","width":"1125","height":"1186"},{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/960da700f9adf3879bfac3645e05f442","width":"1125","height":"971"}],"top":1,"highlighted":2,"essential":2,"paper":2,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9947691899","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":0,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":8,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":125,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9947237506,"gmtCreate":1683177208305,"gmtModify":1683177212083,"author":{"id":"4107323280915450","authorId":"4107323280915450","name":"ZGChen84","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Great ariticle, would you like to share it?","listText":"Great ariticle, would you like to share it?","text":"Great ariticle, would you like to share it?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9947237506","repostId":"9947645696","repostType":1,"repost":{"id":9947645696,"gmtCreate":1683119849716,"gmtModify":1683119861598,"author":{"id":"4127523291683312","authorId":"4127523291683312","name":"Alice Arnault","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/d4c33c5460824e1c5ea146fa27a62b02","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"themes":[],"title":"Techical analysis 101: Valuation methods with cases","htmlText":"Follow me at <a href=\"https://ttm.financial/U/4127523291683312\">@Alice Arnault&nbsp;</a>to learn more&nbsp; Saw quite a number of news stories which talk about valuation, so hope to share a bit on this Relative Valuation - estimates the value of an asset by looking at the pricing of assets relative to a common variable like earnings, cash flows, book value or sales. • Most common multiples: P/E, EV/EBITDA, Price/Book Value, EV/Sales, PEG ratio, free cash flow yield, dividend yield Case: In 2020, the average P/E ratio of the S&amp;P 500 index was around 22x, while the historical average is about 15x. This suggested that the market might have been overvalued at that time. • Historical analysis: how does current pricing compare to history Quant:&nbsp;In 2007, just before the financial crisis","listText":"Follow me at <a href=\"https://ttm.financial/U/4127523291683312\">@Alice Arnault&nbsp;</a>to learn more&nbsp; Saw quite a number of news stories which talk about valuation, so hope to share a bit on this Relative Valuation - estimates the value of an asset by looking at the pricing of assets relative to a common variable like earnings, cash flows, book value or sales. • Most common multiples: P/E, EV/EBITDA, Price/Book Value, EV/Sales, PEG ratio, free cash flow yield, dividend yield Case: In 2020, the average P/E ratio of the S&amp;P 500 index was around 22x, while the historical average is about 15x. This suggested that the market might have been overvalued at that time. • Historical analysis: how does current pricing compare to history Quant:&nbsp;In 2007, just before the financial crisis","text":"Follow me at @Alice Arnault to learn more Saw quite a number of news stories which talk about valuation, so hope to share a bit on this Relative Valuation - estimates the value of an asset by looking at the pricing of assets relative to a common variable like earnings, cash flows, book value or sales. • Most common multiples: P/E, EV/EBITDA, Price/Book Value, EV/Sales, PEG ratio, free cash flow yield, dividend yield Case: In 2020, the average P/E ratio of the S&P 500 index was around 22x, while the historical average is about 15x. This suggested that the market might have been overvalued at that time. • Historical analysis: how does current pricing compare to history Quant: In 2007, just before the financial crisis","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/e55ed0a73d447268a7448f01d67b0141","width":"1080","height":"2337"}],"top":1,"highlighted":2,"essential":2,"paper":2,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9947645696","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":0,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":99,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9947237201,"gmtCreate":1683177193403,"gmtModify":1683177197106,"author":{"id":"4107323280915450","authorId":"4107323280915450","name":"ZGChen84","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Great ariticle, would you like to share it?","listText":"Great ariticle, would you like to share it?","text":"Great ariticle, would you like to share it?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9947237201","repostId":"9947603913","repostType":1,"repost":{"id":9947603913,"gmtCreate":1683004517434,"gmtModify":1683029709835,"author":{"id":"4098573842489750","authorId":"4098573842489750","name":"ToughCoyote","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/58563f63b7e52669e57762bb4ebee968","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"themes":[],"title":"My strategic plan to enter market in second half of 2023","htmlText":"The strategic entry plan in second half of 2023: Yesterday, US20Y reached the level of more than 3.9% again, and the factors causing the short-term sharp rise in colonial interest rates are nothing more than inflation and the upper limit of U.S. bonds and performance key market indicators like&nbsp;<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/XPEV\">$XPeng Inc.(XPEV)$&nbsp;</a><v-v data-views=\"1\"></v-v><a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/SQQQ\">$Nasdaq100 Bear 3X ETF(SQQQ)$&nbsp;</a><v-v data-views=\"1\"></v-v><a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/SOXL\">$Semiconductor Bull 3X Shares(SOXL)$&nbsp;</a><v-v data-views=\"1\"></v-v><a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/TQQQ\">$Nasdaq100 Bull 3X ETF(TQQQ)$&nbsp;</a><v-v data-views=\"1\"></v-v>&nbsp; These two types of problems, as previously evaluated, may have a very short-term","listText":"The strategic entry plan in second half of 2023: Yesterday, US20Y reached the level of more than 3.9% again, and the factors causing the short-term sharp rise in colonial interest rates are nothing more than inflation and the upper limit of U.S. bonds and performance key market indicators like&nbsp;<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/XPEV\">$XPeng Inc.(XPEV)$&nbsp;</a><v-v data-views=\"1\"></v-v><a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/SQQQ\">$Nasdaq100 Bear 3X ETF(SQQQ)$&nbsp;</a><v-v data-views=\"1\"></v-v><a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/SOXL\">$Semiconductor Bull 3X Shares(SOXL)$&nbsp;</a><v-v data-views=\"1\"></v-v><a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/TQQQ\">$Nasdaq100 Bull 3X ETF(TQQQ)$&nbsp;</a><v-v data-views=\"1\"></v-v>&nbsp; These two types of problems, as previously evaluated, may have a very short-term","text":"The strategic entry plan in second half of 2023: Yesterday, US20Y reached the level of more than 3.9% again, and the factors causing the short-term sharp rise in colonial interest rates are nothing more than inflation and the upper limit of U.S. bonds and performance key market indicators like $XPeng Inc.(XPEV)$ $Nasdaq100 Bear 3X ETF(SQQQ)$ $Semiconductor Bull 3X Shares(SOXL)$ $Nasdaq100 Bull 3X ETF(TQQQ)$ These two types of problems, as previously evaluated, may have a very short-term","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":2,"essential":2,"paper":2,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9947603913","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":0,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":139,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9943335381,"gmtCreate":1679110664444,"gmtModify":1679110668164,"author":{"id":"4107323280915450","authorId":"4107323280915450","name":"ZGChen84","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Great ariticle, would you like to share it?","listText":"Great ariticle, would you like to share it?","text":"Great ariticle, would you like to share it?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9943335381","repostId":"9949127849","repostType":1,"repost":{"id":9949127849,"gmtCreate":1678449006682,"gmtModify":1678449045739,"author":{"id":"3527667618821228","authorId":"3527667618821228","name":"MillionaireTiger","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/dc558bf32e48ad6ed6d057026ef55af7","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"themes":[],"title":"When There is a Bank Run on SVB, Where does the Money Go?","htmlText":"Shares of <a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/SIVB\">$SVB Financial Group(SIVB)$</a> plunged 60% on Thursday, the biggest one-day drop on record.Another crypto bank Silvergate Capital&nbsp;gave&nbsp;another&nbsp;hit&nbsp;- shut down its banking operations, causing the S&amp;P 500 Banks Index to fall about 6% on Thursday.What&nbsp;happened&nbsp;on&nbsp;SVB?Technology Boom - Total Deposits SkyrocketSVB is Silicon Valley Bank, and like the name, it provides banking services to many startups in Silicon Valley. It also&nbsp;means many startups have their bank accounts in SVB, which is the capital that SVB relies on. The second half of 2020 has seen a global funding boom for technology companies, and the rapid growth in startups loans and venture capital funding has led to a huge amount of cash and","listText":"Shares of <a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/SIVB\">$SVB Financial Group(SIVB)$</a> plunged 60% on Thursday, the biggest one-day drop on record.Another crypto bank Silvergate Capital&nbsp;gave&nbsp;another&nbsp;hit&nbsp;- shut down its banking operations, causing the S&amp;P 500 Banks Index to fall about 6% on Thursday.What&nbsp;happened&nbsp;on&nbsp;SVB?Technology Boom - Total Deposits SkyrocketSVB is Silicon Valley Bank, and like the name, it provides banking services to many startups in Silicon Valley. It also&nbsp;means many startups have their bank accounts in SVB, which is the capital that SVB relies on. The second half of 2020 has seen a global funding boom for technology companies, and the rapid growth in startups loans and venture capital funding has led to a huge amount of cash and","text":"Shares of $SVB Financial Group(SIVB)$ plunged 60% on Thursday, the biggest one-day drop on record.Another crypto bank Silvergate Capital gave another hit - shut down its banking operations, causing the S&P 500 Banks Index to fall about 6% on Thursday.What happened on SVB?Technology Boom - Total Deposits SkyrocketSVB is Silicon Valley Bank, and like the name, it provides banking services to many startups in Silicon Valley. It also means many startups have their bank accounts in SVB, which is the capital that SVB relies on. The second half of 2020 has seen a global funding boom for technology companies, and the rapid growth in startups loans and venture capital funding has led to a huge amount of cash and","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/3c3b3586743bfa9995693d3a380099c4","width":"-1","height":"-1"},{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/6d0afb8552e4d779ca8a110f3ddcfe82","width":"-1","height":"-1"},{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/6b98a820699c71f4ce400fa77a516448","width":"-1","height":"-1"}],"top":1,"highlighted":2,"essential":2,"paper":2,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9949127849","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":0,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":3,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":101,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9943335946,"gmtCreate":1679110653586,"gmtModify":1679110657271,"author":{"id":"4107323280915450","authorId":"4107323280915450","name":"ZGChen84","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Great ariticle, would you like to share it?","listText":"Great ariticle, would you like to share it?","text":"Great ariticle, would you like to share it?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9943335946","repostId":"9940764453","repostType":1,"repost":{"id":9940764453,"gmtCreate":1678188706074,"gmtModify":1678189017546,"author":{"id":"4096861291958630","authorId":"4096861291958630","name":"StarLuck","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/68dadbe13922423705b61d7955659ae4","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":1},"themes":[],"title":"Grab Holdings retires US$600 mil in 2026 debt with extra cash","htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/GRAB\">$Grab Holdings(GRAB)$&nbsp;</a><v-v data-views=\"1\"></v-v>Grab Holdings Ltd. on Monday said it prepaid US$600 million ($806.6 million) in debt ahead of a 2026 maturity, taking advantage of excess cash on its balance sheet. The Singapore-based ride-hailing and delivery company completed the transaction last week, bringing its debt under an outstanding term loan to US$517 million, down from the previous balance of US$1.117 billion. Grab also has about US$200 million in other bank debt. “Grab is taking advantage of our healthy cash position to reduce our gross debt balance and generate interest savings, given the macroeconomic environment,” said Chief Financial Officer Peter Oey. Grab in November bought back about US$750 million in debt - part of its US$2","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/GRAB\">$Grab Holdings(GRAB)$&nbsp;</a><v-v data-views=\"1\"></v-v>Grab Holdings Ltd. on Monday said it prepaid US$600 million ($806.6 million) in debt ahead of a 2026 maturity, taking advantage of excess cash on its balance sheet. The Singapore-based ride-hailing and delivery company completed the transaction last week, bringing its debt under an outstanding term loan to US$517 million, down from the previous balance of US$1.117 billion. Grab also has about US$200 million in other bank debt. “Grab is taking advantage of our healthy cash position to reduce our gross debt balance and generate interest savings, given the macroeconomic environment,” said Chief Financial Officer Peter Oey. Grab in November bought back about US$750 million in debt - part of its US$2","text":"$Grab Holdings(GRAB)$ Grab Holdings Ltd. on Monday said it prepaid US$600 million ($806.6 million) in debt ahead of a 2026 maturity, taking advantage of excess cash on its balance sheet. The Singapore-based ride-hailing and delivery company completed the transaction last week, bringing its debt under an outstanding term loan to US$517 million, down from the previous balance of US$1.117 billion. Grab also has about US$200 million in other bank debt. “Grab is taking advantage of our healthy cash position to reduce our gross debt balance and generate interest savings, given the macroeconomic environment,” said Chief Financial Officer Peter Oey. Grab in November bought back about US$750 million in debt - part of its US$2","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/de64c2b8ee393d8510e03cc44085a9e1","width":"1200","height":"801"}],"top":1,"highlighted":2,"essential":2,"paper":2,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9940764453","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":0,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":76,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9943335095,"gmtCreate":1679110627518,"gmtModify":1679110631142,"author":{"id":"4107323280915450","authorId":"4107323280915450","name":"ZGChen84","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Great ariticle, would you like to share it?","listText":"Great ariticle, would you like to share it?","text":"Great ariticle, would you like to share it?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9943335095","repostId":"9940432414","repostType":1,"repost":{"id":9940432414,"gmtCreate":1678103134438,"gmtModify":1678256126095,"author":{"id":"4106547232749330","authorId":"4106547232749330","name":"Tiger_SG","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/9eb57a835b72d997d1941fb6605d80a4","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"themes":[],"title":"🎁13 SG stocks' Dividend Yields Higher than Fixed Deposit Rates","htmlText":"Hi&nbsp;Tigers,Welcome&nbsp;to&nbsp;check&nbsp;the latest High&nbsp;Dividend Yields lists&nbsp;of 13 SGX&nbsp;companies whose Yields exceed the 12 months Fixed Deposit Rates of most SG banks.&nbsp;Welcome&nbsp;to&nbsp;find&nbsp;and&nbsp;share&nbsp;your&nbsp;most&nbsp;bullished&nbsp;one.Best Fixed Deposit Rates(MAR 2023)Notes: Fixed deposit interest rates listed here are mostly promotional interest rates that change monthly, and some might not even have a specific expiry date.The 13 High Dividend Yeilds stocks are as belowCompanyMarket Value (SGD)Current Price (SGD)Dividend YieldYTD 2023Industry<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/E5H.SI\">$GOLDEN AGRI-RESOURCES LTD(E5H.SI)$</a>3.61 B0.286.70%14.00%Agriculture Products<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/BN4.SI\">$KEPP</a>","listText":"Hi&nbsp;Tigers,Welcome&nbsp;to&nbsp;check&nbsp;the latest High&nbsp;Dividend Yields lists&nbsp;of 13 SGX&nbsp;companies whose Yields exceed the 12 months Fixed Deposit Rates of most SG banks.&nbsp;Welcome&nbsp;to&nbsp;find&nbsp;and&nbsp;share&nbsp;your&nbsp;most&nbsp;bullished&nbsp;one.Best Fixed Deposit Rates(MAR 2023)Notes: Fixed deposit interest rates listed here are mostly promotional interest rates that change monthly, and some might not even have a specific expiry date.The 13 High Dividend Yeilds stocks are as belowCompanyMarket Value (SGD)Current Price (SGD)Dividend YieldYTD 2023Industry<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/E5H.SI\">$GOLDEN AGRI-RESOURCES LTD(E5H.SI)$</a>3.61 B0.286.70%14.00%Agriculture Products<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/BN4.SI\">$KEPP</a>","text":"Hi Tigers,Welcome to check the latest High Dividend Yields lists of 13 SGX companies whose Yields exceed the 12 months Fixed Deposit Rates of most SG banks. Welcome to find and share your most bullished one.Best Fixed Deposit Rates(MAR 2023)Notes: Fixed deposit interest rates listed here are mostly promotional interest rates that change monthly, and some might not even have a specific expiry date.The 13 High Dividend Yeilds stocks are as belowCompanyMarket Value (SGD)Current Price (SGD)Dividend YieldYTD 2023Industry$GOLDEN AGRI-RESOURCES LTD(E5H.SI)$3.61 B0.286.70%14.00%Agriculture Products$KEPP","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/cffdb8901d5680044b9fb30c156f8628","width":"1037","height":"564"},{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/2942a2228f6312087b62db01057925ab","width":"-1","height":"-1"},{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/7a7567bb83b3467b5630a65e606a569e","width":"-1","height":"-1"}],"top":1,"highlighted":2,"essential":2,"paper":2,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9940432414","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":0,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":3,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":212,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9920858770,"gmtCreate":1670467515491,"gmtModify":1676538374563,"author":{"id":"4107323280915450","authorId":"4107323280915450","name":"ZGChen84","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/MSFT\">$Microsoft(MSFT)$&nbsp;</a><v-v data-views=\"1\"></v-v>","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/MSFT\">$Microsoft(MSFT)$&nbsp;</a><v-v data-views=\"1\"></v-v>","text":"$Microsoft(MSFT)$","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9920858770","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":248,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9964709679,"gmtCreate":1670203812791,"gmtModify":1676538319154,"author":{"id":"4107323280915450","authorId":"4107323280915450","name":"ZGChen84","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/MSFT\">$Microsoft(MSFT)$&nbsp;</a><v-v data-views=\"1\"></v-v>","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/MSFT\">$Microsoft(MSFT)$&nbsp;</a><v-v data-views=\"1\"></v-v>","text":"$Microsoft(MSFT)$","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9964709679","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":98,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9964040245,"gmtCreate":1670039354188,"gmtModify":1676538293999,"author":{"id":"4107323280915450","authorId":"4107323280915450","name":"ZGChen84","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/MSFT\">$Microsoft(MSFT)$&nbsp;</a><v-v data-views=\"1\"></v-v>","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/MSFT\">$Microsoft(MSFT)$&nbsp;</a><v-v data-views=\"1\"></v-v>","text":"$Microsoft(MSFT)$","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9964040245","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":156,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9962647419,"gmtCreate":1669774000632,"gmtModify":1676538240392,"author":{"id":"4107323280915450","authorId":"4107323280915450","name":"ZGChen84","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/MSFT\">$Microsoft(MSFT)$&nbsp;</a><v-v data-views=\"1\"></v-v>","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/MSFT\">$Microsoft(MSFT)$&nbsp;</a><v-v data-views=\"1\"></v-v>","text":"$Microsoft(MSFT)$","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9962647419","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":395,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9968572220,"gmtCreate":1669269087760,"gmtModify":1676538176996,"author":{"id":"4107323280915450","authorId":"4107323280915450","name":"ZGChen84","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Up up","listText":"Up up","text":"Up up","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9968572220","repostId":"1158455916","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1158455916","pubTimestamp":1669262331,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1158455916?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2022-11-24 11:58","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Alibaba: Big Money Is Pulling Out","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1158455916","media":"Seeking Alpha","summary":"SummaryInstitutional investors dumped over 25 million of Alibaba's shares recently, despite the decl","content":"<html><head></head><body><p><b>Summary</b></p><ul><li>Institutional investors dumped over 25 million of Alibaba&#39;s shares recently, despite the declining stock price.</li><li>Their fire sales seem to be driven by muddy prospects and heightened regulatory uncertainty.</li><li>Risk-averse investors may want to avoid the stock for the time being.</li></ul><p>Alibaba&#39;s (NYSE: BABA) (OTCPK: BABAF) shares are down 45% over the past year but don&#39;t be tempted to call it a bottom just yet. Latest data reveals that institutional investors have collectively sold off over 25 million of Alibaba&#39;sshares in the last 13F reporting cycle on a net basis. Clearly, these sophisticated investors feel the stock still has ample downside potential from the current levels, despite its recent correction, which should encourage investors to remain on the sidelines for the time being at least and reconsider their long-side thesis for the name. Let&#39;s take a closer look to gain a better understanding of it all.</p><p><b>Tracking Institutional Activity</b></p><p>Let me start by saying that institutional investors have certain resources at their disposal - such as research teams, cutting-edge research tools, and access to company managements - that provide them with an edge over retail investors. So, tracking the trading activity of these sophisticated investors reveals how their sentiment pertaining to any given stock is evolving with time, and if it aligns with our trade direction.</p><p>Coming to Alibaba, a group of 437institutionscollectively bought 51.4 million shares, while another group of 704 institutions sold off 76.7 million of the ecommerce company&#39;s shares in the last 13F cycle. This means that institutional investors sold off 25.3 million of Alibaba&#39;s shares last quarter on a net basis. To put things in perspective, this selloff amounts to nearly 1% of the company&#39;s total shares outstanding at the time of this writing.</p><p>To make matters worse, note how the number of institutions that sold off Alibaba&#39;s shares (704), greatly outnumbered those that increased their positions (437) in the company. This is a clear indication that the selloff wasn&#39;t concentrated across a few entities and was actually driven by a broad swath of institutions that grew bearish on the name.</p><p>What&#39;s particularly interesting here is that Alibaba&#39;s shares were on a constant decline during the last 13F reporting cycle, when these entities were trimming their positions in the internet giant. These entities clearly did not perceive the stock to be attractive in the $80 and $120 price band, meaning it&#39;s likely to act as a resistance/upper ceiling for the stock should it rally in the coming weeks.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8a72a2cb30f16a90ea8dba6ba6dbe788\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"431\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>BusinessQuant.com</p><p>For the record, the last 13F reporting cycle spanned from July through September and the data was fully disseminated only last week. This means the data being referenced in this article is still fresh and relevant to our discussion here.</p><p>Moving on, I also wanted to check if institutional investors were bearish on Alibaba in particular, or if they were bearish on the entire e-commerce industry. If these entities were bearish on the entire industry, then Alibaba wouldn&#39;t stand out and our discussion would end right here. So, I compiled the institutional ownership data relating to 40 internet retail companies that are currently listed on US bourses.</p><p>Interestingly, there wasn&#39;t any dominating bullish or bearish sentiment in the internet retail industry as a whole. But note in the table below that these investors were bearish on internet retail stocks from China in particular, such as Alibaba, JD.com (JD), and Baozun (BZUN) amongst others. So, it seems like a deliberate effort to cut exposure to Chinese internet retail stocks.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8862a07e3f934754694328dc2678569b\" tg-width=\"506\" tg-height=\"752\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>BusinessQuant.com</p><p>We cannot argue that Alibaba is better than JD or Baozun just because institutions sold off only 1% of its shares while its mentioned peers saw a 1.3% selloff. First, there&#39;s only a marginal difference in both the selloff figures due to which we cannot speculate that institutions have different approach towards any of these mentioned stocks. Secondly, a selloff is a selloff, and the data indicates institutional bearishness towards Chinese internet retail stocks. So, I&#39;d say, all three mentioned stocks are in the same boat.</p><p>This establishes the fact that institutional investors grew bearish on Alibaba in the last 13F cycle. But this leads us to an important question - what&#39;s the underlying reason for this widespread bearishness?</p><p><b>Reasons for Exercising Caution</b></p><p>First of all, there&#39;s the common misconception that Alibaba&#39;s shares are undervalued at current levels. The stock is trading at just 1.7 times its trailing twelve-month sales, which seems quite low and attractive on a standalone basis. But low valuation multiples aren&#39;t the sole determinant of how attractive an investment might be.</p><p>It&#39;s important to remember that Alibaba&#39;s trailing twelve-month revenue is down 5.5% per its latest earnings release. In contrast, there are several other internet retail companies that are trading at similar Price-to-Sales (or P/S) multiples whilst still posting elevated levels of revenue growth, going as high as 47% in certain cases. This means Alibaba makes for a really poor investment on a relative basis.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/aaa221e920fb7acd909aad5c57bc079f\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"349\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>BusinessQuant.com</p><p>Secondly, Alibaba won&#39;t be able to turn the tide anytime soon, and it&#39;s likely to remain revenue challenged in the coming quarters as well. I say this because COVID-19 cases have spiked in China this week, and the country&#39;s regulators are now intensifying their lockdowns to prevent the infection from spreading further.</p><p>I believe this development will have a two-fold effect. First, it will cripple China&#39;s logistics operations as the movement of goods will be restricted across cities. Secondly, Chinese citizens won&#39;t be able to go to their workplaces, and they&#39;re likely to face mass layoffs/pay cuts all over again, which will limit their purchasing power. For Alibaba and its shareholders, this means Alibaba&#39;s ecommerce operations in China will post a yet another revenue decline next quarter.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f0d9ac33d5ff34652d1c79f8984c3ed7\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"636\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>BusinessQuant.com</p><p>Lastly, Regulatory interventions limit Alibaba&#39;s growth potential and add uncertainty to its growth prospects, essentially souring the investment sentiment.</p><p><b>Final Thoughts</b></p><p>There&#39;s no denying that Alibaba has grown at a spectacular pace in the past decade and has been extremely rewarding for its shareholders. But those days seem to be over and in the past. The company is now mired with regulatory uncertainty, its growth prospects are limited, and the stock isn&#39;t appealing when looking at industry comparables.</p><p>As the valuation comparison chart above indicates, there are several other stocks in the internet retail industry that are trading at low P/S multiples but growing their revenue at a rapid rate. This, in my opinion, is another major reason why a broad swathe of institutional investors has been dumping Alibaba&#39;s shares of late.</p><p>Considering these issues, I believe it&#39;s best to avoid Alibaba for the time being and have a &#34;Hold&#34; rating for the name. This, however, should not be construed as a call to sell the stock. Good Luck!</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Alibaba: Big Money Is Pulling Out</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nAlibaba: Big Money Is Pulling Out\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-11-24 11:58 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/article/4560058-alibaba-big-money-is-pulling-out><strong>Seeking Alpha</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>SummaryInstitutional investors dumped over 25 million of Alibaba's shares recently, despite the declining stock price.Their fire sales seem to be driven by muddy prospects and heightened regulatory ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4560058-alibaba-big-money-is-pulling-out\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"BABA":"阿里巴巴","09988":"阿里巴巴-SW"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4560058-alibaba-big-money-is-pulling-out","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1158455916","content_text":"SummaryInstitutional investors dumped over 25 million of Alibaba's shares recently, despite the declining stock price.Their fire sales seem to be driven by muddy prospects and heightened regulatory uncertainty.Risk-averse investors may want to avoid the stock for the time being.Alibaba's (NYSE: BABA) (OTCPK: BABAF) shares are down 45% over the past year but don't be tempted to call it a bottom just yet. Latest data reveals that institutional investors have collectively sold off over 25 million of Alibaba'sshares in the last 13F reporting cycle on a net basis. Clearly, these sophisticated investors feel the stock still has ample downside potential from the current levels, despite its recent correction, which should encourage investors to remain on the sidelines for the time being at least and reconsider their long-side thesis for the name. Let's take a closer look to gain a better understanding of it all.Tracking Institutional ActivityLet me start by saying that institutional investors have certain resources at their disposal - such as research teams, cutting-edge research tools, and access to company managements - that provide them with an edge over retail investors. So, tracking the trading activity of these sophisticated investors reveals how their sentiment pertaining to any given stock is evolving with time, and if it aligns with our trade direction.Coming to Alibaba, a group of 437institutionscollectively bought 51.4 million shares, while another group of 704 institutions sold off 76.7 million of the ecommerce company's shares in the last 13F cycle. This means that institutional investors sold off 25.3 million of Alibaba's shares last quarter on a net basis. To put things in perspective, this selloff amounts to nearly 1% of the company's total shares outstanding at the time of this writing.To make matters worse, note how the number of institutions that sold off Alibaba's shares (704), greatly outnumbered those that increased their positions (437) in the company. This is a clear indication that the selloff wasn't concentrated across a few entities and was actually driven by a broad swath of institutions that grew bearish on the name.What's particularly interesting here is that Alibaba's shares were on a constant decline during the last 13F reporting cycle, when these entities were trimming their positions in the internet giant. These entities clearly did not perceive the stock to be attractive in the $80 and $120 price band, meaning it's likely to act as a resistance/upper ceiling for the stock should it rally in the coming weeks.BusinessQuant.comFor the record, the last 13F reporting cycle spanned from July through September and the data was fully disseminated only last week. This means the data being referenced in this article is still fresh and relevant to our discussion here.Moving on, I also wanted to check if institutional investors were bearish on Alibaba in particular, or if they were bearish on the entire e-commerce industry. If these entities were bearish on the entire industry, then Alibaba wouldn't stand out and our discussion would end right here. So, I compiled the institutional ownership data relating to 40 internet retail companies that are currently listed on US bourses.Interestingly, there wasn't any dominating bullish or bearish sentiment in the internet retail industry as a whole. But note in the table below that these investors were bearish on internet retail stocks from China in particular, such as Alibaba, JD.com (JD), and Baozun (BZUN) amongst others. So, it seems like a deliberate effort to cut exposure to Chinese internet retail stocks.BusinessQuant.comWe cannot argue that Alibaba is better than JD or Baozun just because institutions sold off only 1% of its shares while its mentioned peers saw a 1.3% selloff. First, there's only a marginal difference in both the selloff figures due to which we cannot speculate that institutions have different approach towards any of these mentioned stocks. Secondly, a selloff is a selloff, and the data indicates institutional bearishness towards Chinese internet retail stocks. So, I'd say, all three mentioned stocks are in the same boat.This establishes the fact that institutional investors grew bearish on Alibaba in the last 13F cycle. But this leads us to an important question - what's the underlying reason for this widespread bearishness?Reasons for Exercising CautionFirst of all, there's the common misconception that Alibaba's shares are undervalued at current levels. The stock is trading at just 1.7 times its trailing twelve-month sales, which seems quite low and attractive on a standalone basis. But low valuation multiples aren't the sole determinant of how attractive an investment might be.It's important to remember that Alibaba's trailing twelve-month revenue is down 5.5% per its latest earnings release. In contrast, there are several other internet retail companies that are trading at similar Price-to-Sales (or P/S) multiples whilst still posting elevated levels of revenue growth, going as high as 47% in certain cases. This means Alibaba makes for a really poor investment on a relative basis.BusinessQuant.comSecondly, Alibaba won't be able to turn the tide anytime soon, and it's likely to remain revenue challenged in the coming quarters as well. I say this because COVID-19 cases have spiked in China this week, and the country's regulators are now intensifying their lockdowns to prevent the infection from spreading further.I believe this development will have a two-fold effect. First, it will cripple China's logistics operations as the movement of goods will be restricted across cities. Secondly, Chinese citizens won't be able to go to their workplaces, and they're likely to face mass layoffs/pay cuts all over again, which will limit their purchasing power. For Alibaba and its shareholders, this means Alibaba's ecommerce operations in China will post a yet another revenue decline next quarter.BusinessQuant.comLastly, Regulatory interventions limit Alibaba's growth potential and add uncertainty to its growth prospects, essentially souring the investment sentiment.Final ThoughtsThere's no denying that Alibaba has grown at a spectacular pace in the past decade and has been extremely rewarding for its shareholders. But those days seem to be over and in the past. The company is now mired with regulatory uncertainty, its growth prospects are limited, and the stock isn't appealing when looking at industry comparables.As the valuation comparison chart above indicates, there are several other stocks in the internet retail industry that are trading at low P/S multiples but growing their revenue at a rapid rate. This, in my opinion, is another major reason why a broad swathe of institutional investors has been dumping Alibaba's shares of late.Considering these issues, I believe it's best to avoid Alibaba for the time being and have a \"Hold\" rating for the name. This, however, should not be construed as a call to sell the stock. Good Luck!","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":241,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9963785173,"gmtCreate":1668759759492,"gmtModify":1676538109396,"author":{"id":"4107323280915450","authorId":"4107323280915450","name":"ZGChen84","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"themes":[],"htmlText":"@trevor_t3 @zerohero @ zzzerooo power up","listText":"@trevor_t3 @zerohero @ zzzerooo power up","text":"@trevor_t3 @zerohero @ zzzerooo power up","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9963785173","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":99,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9985405182,"gmtCreate":1667435739746,"gmtModify":1676537917089,"author":{"id":"4107323280915450","authorId":"4107323280915450","name":"ZGChen84","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"themes":[],"htmlText":"[Surprised]&nbsp;","listText":"[Surprised]&nbsp;","text":"[Surprised]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9985405182","repostId":"1124568203","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1124568203","pubTimestamp":1667433606,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1124568203?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2022-11-03 08:00","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Apple Now Valued at More Than Amazon, Alphabet and Meta — Combined","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1124568203","media":"MarketWatch","summary":"Apple Inc. shares have held up far better than those of its Big Tech peers over the past month, and ","content":"<html><head></head><body><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f49e61e893d9c472d02d149b2fa866b5\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"466\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>Apple Inc. shares have held up far better than those of its Big Tech peers over the past month, and that’s helped the company to a staggering feat: The smartphone giant is now worth more than Alphabet Inc., Amazon.com Inc. and Meta Platforms Inc. combined.</p><p>Apple finished Wednesday’s session with a $2.307 trillion market capitalization, according to Dow Jones Market Data. Alphabet, Amazon and Meta were worth a combined $2.306 trillion.</p><p>The comparison was flagged on Twitter by financial YouTuber Joseph Carlson.</p><p>The contrast illustrates the sharp comedown in technology shares this year. Apple was worth $2.913 trillion to close out 2021, according to Dow Jones Market Data. The grouping of Alphabet, Amazon and Meta was worth $4.410 trillion at that time.</p><p>Apple’s stock has outperformed those of its three tech peers over both the past month and the course of 2022.</p><p>Shares of Apple are up 4.9% in the past month, while shares of Alphabet are down 9.1%, shares of Amazon are off 18.5% and shares of Meta are down 33.3%. On a year-to-date basis, Apple’s stock has lost 18.3%, while Alphabet’s has declined 40.5%, Amazon’s has fallen 44.7% and Meta’s has plunged 73.1%.</p><p>Apple’s stock has also had a better start to the week than any of those other three Big Tech names, though all four are down.</p><p>The four companies each reported earnings last week, and only Apple’s numbers were met with a positive stock reaction. Since then, Meta fell below a $300 billion valuation for the first time since February 2016. It was valued at $240 billion as of Wednesday’s close.</p><p>Meanwhile, Amazon’s stock has declined in each of the past six trading sessions, and the company on Tuesday fell out of trillion-dollar territory for the first time since April 2020.</p><p>Bernstein analyst Mark Shmulik recently highlighted the challenges facing the big internet companies in what he called an “autopsy” of their latest results. He noted that Alphabet, Amazon and Meta now have to show “perfection” as they all have diversified businesses and investors are more prone to nitpicking signs of weakness in any one of those area amid this choppy market climate.</p></body></html>","source":"lsy1603348471595","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Apple Now Valued at More Than Amazon, Alphabet and Meta — Combined</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nApple Now Valued at More Than Amazon, Alphabet and Meta — Combined\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-11-03 08:00 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.marketwatch.com/story/apple-now-valued-at-more-than-amazon-alphabet-and-meta-combined-11667430617?mod=mw_latestnews><strong>MarketWatch</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Apple Inc. shares have held up far better than those of its Big Tech peers over the past month, and that’s helped the company to a staggering feat: The smartphone giant is now worth more than Alphabet...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/apple-now-valued-at-more-than-amazon-alphabet-and-meta-combined-11667430617?mod=mw_latestnews\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"GOOGL":"谷歌A","META":"Meta Platforms","AAPL":"苹果","AMZN":"亚马逊"},"source_url":"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/apple-now-valued-at-more-than-amazon-alphabet-and-meta-combined-11667430617?mod=mw_latestnews","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1124568203","content_text":"Apple Inc. shares have held up far better than those of its Big Tech peers over the past month, and that’s helped the company to a staggering feat: The smartphone giant is now worth more than Alphabet Inc., Amazon.com Inc. and Meta Platforms Inc. combined.Apple finished Wednesday’s session with a $2.307 trillion market capitalization, according to Dow Jones Market Data. Alphabet, Amazon and Meta were worth a combined $2.306 trillion.The comparison was flagged on Twitter by financial YouTuber Joseph Carlson.The contrast illustrates the sharp comedown in technology shares this year. Apple was worth $2.913 trillion to close out 2021, according to Dow Jones Market Data. The grouping of Alphabet, Amazon and Meta was worth $4.410 trillion at that time.Apple’s stock has outperformed those of its three tech peers over both the past month and the course of 2022.Shares of Apple are up 4.9% in the past month, while shares of Alphabet are down 9.1%, shares of Amazon are off 18.5% and shares of Meta are down 33.3%. On a year-to-date basis, Apple’s stock has lost 18.3%, while Alphabet’s has declined 40.5%, Amazon’s has fallen 44.7% and Meta’s has plunged 73.1%.Apple’s stock has also had a better start to the week than any of those other three Big Tech names, though all four are down.The four companies each reported earnings last week, and only Apple’s numbers were met with a positive stock reaction. Since then, Meta fell below a $300 billion valuation for the first time since February 2016. It was valued at $240 billion as of Wednesday’s close.Meanwhile, Amazon’s stock has declined in each of the past six trading sessions, and the company on Tuesday fell out of trillion-dollar territory for the first time since April 2020.Bernstein analyst Mark Shmulik recently highlighted the challenges facing the big internet companies in what he called an “autopsy” of their latest results. He noted that Alphabet, Amazon and Meta now have to show “perfection” as they all have diversified businesses and investors are more prone to nitpicking signs of weakness in any one of those area amid this choppy market climate.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":137,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9980948280,"gmtCreate":1665636593040,"gmtModify":1676537640516,"author":{"id":"4107323280915450","authorId":"4107323280915450","name":"ZGChen84","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"themes":[],"htmlText":"[Facepalm]&nbsp;[Facepalm]&nbsp;[Facepalm]&nbsp;","listText":"[Facepalm]&nbsp;[Facepalm]&nbsp;[Facepalm]&nbsp;","text":"[Facepalm] [Facepalm] [Facepalm]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":9,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9980948280","repostId":"2275566046","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2275566046","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in markets, business, politics, entertainment and technology","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Reuters","id":"1036604489","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868"},"pubTimestamp":1665614340,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2275566046?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2022-10-13 06:39","market":"us","language":"en","title":"US STOCKS-Wall St Ends Volatile Day Lower After Fed Minutes, PPI","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2275566046","media":"Reuters","summary":"* U.S. producer prices rise more than expected in September* Consumer price data due Thursday* Index","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>* U.S. producer prices rise more than expected in September</p><p>* Consumer price data due Thursday</p><p>* Indexes: Dow down 0.1%, S&amp;P 500 down 0.3%, Nasdaq down 0.1%</p><p>NEW YORK, Oct 12 (Reuters) - U.S. stocks ended a choppy session slightly lower on Wednesday after minutes from the last Federal Reserve meeting showed policymakers agreed they needed to maintain a more restrictive policy stance.</p><p>The September meeting minutes also showed many Fed officials stressed the cost of not doing enough to bring down inflation.</p><p>Recent market weakness has been tied in part to increasing fears among investors that aggressive rate hikes by the Fed could tip the world&#39;s largest economy into a recession.</p><p>Rate-sensitive utilities were down 3.4% while real estate fell 1.4%. They led percentage declines among S&amp;P sectors for the day.</p><p>Fed officials in the recent speeches have come out &#34;in unison regarding the Fed&#39;s commitment toward curtailing inflation and staying the course,&#34; said Quincy Krosby, chief global strategist at LPL Financial in Charlotte, North Carolina.</p><p>&#34;There&#39;s an understanding now the Fed is going to keep going. The question for the market is where is the transition from 75 basis points to 50 and 25. That is what the market is focused on I think.&#34;</p><p>At the September meeting, Fed officials raised interest rates by three-quarters of a percentage point for the third straight time in an effort to drive inflation down from 40-year highs.</p><p>The market bounced around just after the open, with data earlier showing a surprise rise in September producer prices. The Labor Department&#39;s producer prices index rose 8.5% in the 12 months through September, slightly higher than an estimated 8.4% rise. Still, the reading was lower than an 8.7% increase in August.</p><p>The Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 28.34 points, or 0.1%, to 29,210.85, the S&amp;P 500 lost 11.81 points, or 0.33%, to 3,577.03 and the Nasdaq Composite dropped 9.09 points, or 0.09%, to 10,417.10.</p><p>Thursday&#39;s report on U.S. consumer prices is considered even more key and has been anxiously awaited by investors, along with the start of third-quarter U.S. earnings, which kick off with results from some of the big U.S. banks on Friday.</p><p>The S&amp;P 500 financial index ended down 0.3%.</p><p>Among gainers, PepsiCo Inc rose 4.2% after the soft-drinks maker raised its annual revenue and profit forecasts on firm demand for its sodas and snacks despite multiple price increases.</p><p>Alcoa Corp jumped 5.3%. The Biden administration is weighing restricting imports of Russian aluminum as it charts possible responses to Moscow&#39;s military escalation in Ukraine, a person briefed on the conversations told Reuters.</p><p>Declining issues outnumbered advancing ones on the NYSE by a 1.64-to-1 ratio; on Nasdaq, a 1.15-to-1 ratio favored decliners.</p><p>The S&amp;P 500 posted no new 52-week highs and 78 new lows; the Nasdaq Composite recorded 20 new highs and 433 new lows.</p><p>Volume on U.S. exchanges was 10.01 billion shares, compared with the 11.68 billion average for the full session over the last 20 trading days.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ee931f83d91ff70a9be72012d9185e74\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"1920\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>US STOCKS-Wall St Ends Volatile Day Lower After Fed Minutes, PPI</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nUS STOCKS-Wall St Ends Volatile Day Lower After Fed Minutes, PPI\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1036604489\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Reuters </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-10-13 06:39</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>* U.S. producer prices rise more than expected in September</p><p>* Consumer price data due Thursday</p><p>* Indexes: Dow down 0.1%, S&amp;P 500 down 0.3%, Nasdaq down 0.1%</p><p>NEW YORK, Oct 12 (Reuters) - U.S. stocks ended a choppy session slightly lower on Wednesday after minutes from the last Federal Reserve meeting showed policymakers agreed they needed to maintain a more restrictive policy stance.</p><p>The September meeting minutes also showed many Fed officials stressed the cost of not doing enough to bring down inflation.</p><p>Recent market weakness has been tied in part to increasing fears among investors that aggressive rate hikes by the Fed could tip the world&#39;s largest economy into a recession.</p><p>Rate-sensitive utilities were down 3.4% while real estate fell 1.4%. They led percentage declines among S&amp;P sectors for the day.</p><p>Fed officials in the recent speeches have come out &#34;in unison regarding the Fed&#39;s commitment toward curtailing inflation and staying the course,&#34; said Quincy Krosby, chief global strategist at LPL Financial in Charlotte, North Carolina.</p><p>&#34;There&#39;s an understanding now the Fed is going to keep going. The question for the market is where is the transition from 75 basis points to 50 and 25. That is what the market is focused on I think.&#34;</p><p>At the September meeting, Fed officials raised interest rates by three-quarters of a percentage point for the third straight time in an effort to drive inflation down from 40-year highs.</p><p>The market bounced around just after the open, with data earlier showing a surprise rise in September producer prices. The Labor Department&#39;s producer prices index rose 8.5% in the 12 months through September, slightly higher than an estimated 8.4% rise. Still, the reading was lower than an 8.7% increase in August.</p><p>The Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 28.34 points, or 0.1%, to 29,210.85, the S&amp;P 500 lost 11.81 points, or 0.33%, to 3,577.03 and the Nasdaq Composite dropped 9.09 points, or 0.09%, to 10,417.10.</p><p>Thursday&#39;s report on U.S. consumer prices is considered even more key and has been anxiously awaited by investors, along with the start of third-quarter U.S. earnings, which kick off with results from some of the big U.S. banks on Friday.</p><p>The S&amp;P 500 financial index ended down 0.3%.</p><p>Among gainers, PepsiCo Inc rose 4.2% after the soft-drinks maker raised its annual revenue and profit forecasts on firm demand for its sodas and snacks despite multiple price increases.</p><p>Alcoa Corp jumped 5.3%. The Biden administration is weighing restricting imports of Russian aluminum as it charts possible responses to Moscow&#39;s military escalation in Ukraine, a person briefed on the conversations told Reuters.</p><p>Declining issues outnumbered advancing ones on the NYSE by a 1.64-to-1 ratio; on Nasdaq, a 1.15-to-1 ratio favored decliners.</p><p>The S&amp;P 500 posted no new 52-week highs and 78 new lows; the Nasdaq Composite recorded 20 new highs and 433 new lows.</p><p>Volume on U.S. exchanges was 10.01 billion shares, compared with the 11.68 billion average for the full session over the last 20 trading days.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ee931f83d91ff70a9be72012d9185e74\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"1920\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".DJI":"道琼斯","AA":"美国铝业",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite","PEP":"百事可乐",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2275566046","content_text":"* U.S. producer prices rise more than expected in September* Consumer price data due Thursday* Indexes: Dow down 0.1%, S&P 500 down 0.3%, Nasdaq down 0.1%NEW YORK, Oct 12 (Reuters) - U.S. stocks ended a choppy session slightly lower on Wednesday after minutes from the last Federal Reserve meeting showed policymakers agreed they needed to maintain a more restrictive policy stance.The September meeting minutes also showed many Fed officials stressed the cost of not doing enough to bring down inflation.Recent market weakness has been tied in part to increasing fears among investors that aggressive rate hikes by the Fed could tip the world's largest economy into a recession.Rate-sensitive utilities were down 3.4% while real estate fell 1.4%. They led percentage declines among S&P sectors for the day.Fed officials in the recent speeches have come out \"in unison regarding the Fed's commitment toward curtailing inflation and staying the course,\" said Quincy Krosby, chief global strategist at LPL Financial in Charlotte, North Carolina.\"There's an understanding now the Fed is going to keep going. The question for the market is where is the transition from 75 basis points to 50 and 25. That is what the market is focused on I think.\"At the September meeting, Fed officials raised interest rates by three-quarters of a percentage point for the third straight time in an effort to drive inflation down from 40-year highs.The market bounced around just after the open, with data earlier showing a surprise rise in September producer prices. The Labor Department's producer prices index rose 8.5% in the 12 months through September, slightly higher than an estimated 8.4% rise. Still, the reading was lower than an 8.7% increase in August.The Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 28.34 points, or 0.1%, to 29,210.85, the S&P 500 lost 11.81 points, or 0.33%, to 3,577.03 and the Nasdaq Composite dropped 9.09 points, or 0.09%, to 10,417.10.Thursday's report on U.S. consumer prices is considered even more key and has been anxiously awaited by investors, along with the start of third-quarter U.S. earnings, which kick off with results from some of the big U.S. banks on Friday.The S&P 500 financial index ended down 0.3%.Among gainers, PepsiCo Inc rose 4.2% after the soft-drinks maker raised its annual revenue and profit forecasts on firm demand for its sodas and snacks despite multiple price increases.Alcoa Corp jumped 5.3%. The Biden administration is weighing restricting imports of Russian aluminum as it charts possible responses to Moscow's military escalation in Ukraine, a person briefed on the conversations told Reuters.Declining issues outnumbered advancing ones on the NYSE by a 1.64-to-1 ratio; on Nasdaq, a 1.15-to-1 ratio favored decliners.The S&P 500 posted no new 52-week highs and 78 new lows; the Nasdaq Composite recorded 20 new highs and 433 new lows.Volume on U.S. exchanges was 10.01 billion shares, compared with the 11.68 billion average for the full session over the last 20 trading days.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":236,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9911733318,"gmtCreate":1664255805434,"gmtModify":1676537420114,"author":{"id":"4107323280915450","authorId":"4107323280915450","name":"ZGChen84","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/GOOG\">$Alphabet(GOOG)$</a>","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/GOOG\">$Alphabet(GOOG)$</a>","text":"$Alphabet(GOOG)$","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/c87b4623b67c4a5d22a75706779aa12a","width":"1125","height":"1717"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9911733318","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":239,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9911739426,"gmtCreate":1664255741265,"gmtModify":1676537420104,"author":{"id":"4107323280915450","authorId":"4107323280915450","name":"ZGChen84","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/GOOG\">$Alphabet(GOOG)$</a>","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/GOOG\">$Alphabet(GOOG)$</a>","text":"$Alphabet(GOOG)$","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/32000fc3cabd39876689c857167ae1aa","width":"1125","height":"1717"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9911739426","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":166,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9934475333,"gmtCreate":1663294773523,"gmtModify":1676537246373,"author":{"id":"4107323280915450","authorId":"4107323280915450","name":"ZGChen84","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Jitters&nbsp;","listText":"Jitters&nbsp;","text":"Jitters","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9934475333","repostId":"1172173059","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1172173059","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1663255067,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1172173059?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2022-09-15 23:17","market":"us","language":"en","title":"U.S. Stocks Extended Their Decline in Morning Trading; Dow Jones Slid Less Than 0.5%, S&P 500 Crashed Nearly 1% While Nasdaq Tumbled Over 1.5%","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1172173059","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"U.S. stocks extended their decline in morning trading; Dow Jones slid 0.39%, S&P 500 crashed 0.99% w","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>U.S. stocks extended their decline in morning trading; Dow Jones slid 0.39%, S&amp;P 500 crashed 0.99% while Nasdaq tumbled 1.51%.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0d91c0f166fe2240f30bfd42eb7d8635\" tg-width=\"623\" tg-height=\"120\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>U.S. Stocks Extended Their Decline in Morning Trading; Dow Jones Slid Less Than 0.5%, S&P 500 Crashed Nearly 1% While Nasdaq Tumbled Over 1.5%</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nU.S. Stocks Extended Their Decline in Morning Trading; Dow Jones Slid Less Than 0.5%, S&P 500 Crashed Nearly 1% While Nasdaq Tumbled Over 1.5%\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-09-15 23:17</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>U.S. stocks extended their decline in morning trading; Dow Jones slid 0.39%, S&amp;P 500 crashed 0.99% while Nasdaq tumbled 1.51%.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0d91c0f166fe2240f30bfd42eb7d8635\" tg-width=\"623\" tg-height=\"120\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".DJI":"道琼斯",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1172173059","content_text":"U.S. stocks extended their decline in morning trading; Dow Jones slid 0.39%, S&P 500 crashed 0.99% while Nasdaq tumbled 1.51%.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":247,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9934472610,"gmtCreate":1663294621930,"gmtModify":1676537246347,"author":{"id":"4107323280915450","authorId":"4107323280915450","name":"ZGChen84","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"themes":[],"htmlText":"[Facepalm]&nbsp;","listText":"[Facepalm]&nbsp;","text":"[Facepalm]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9934472610","repostId":"2267301676","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2267301676","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in markets, business, politics, entertainment and technology","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Reuters","id":"1036604489","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868"},"pubTimestamp":1663273972,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2267301676?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2022-09-16 04:32","market":"us","language":"en","title":"US STOCKS-Wall St Tumbles Amid Fed Tightening Jitters, Economic Rumblings","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2267301676","media":"Reuters","summary":"(Reuters) - Wall Street ended sharply lower on Thursday, extending its losses in late afternoon trad","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>(Reuters) - Wall Street ended sharply lower on Thursday, extending its losses in late afternoon trading as a raft of economic data failed to alter the expected course of aggressive tightening by the Federal Reserve amid growing warnings of global recession.</p><p>The sell-off gathered momentum toward the end of the session, with market leaders including <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MSFT\">Microsoft Corp</a>, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AAPL\">Apple Inc</a> and <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AMZN\">Amazon.com Inc</a> hitting the tech-laden Nasdaq hardest.</p><p>The benchmark S&amp;P 500 closed a hair above 3,900, seen by many analysts as a key technical support level that has been tested several times over the past two weeks.</p><p>Interest rate-sensitive banks helped soften the blue-chip Dow&#39;s decline.</p><p>&#34;It&#39;s been a difficult year and investors are wary,&#34; said Matthew Keator, managing partner in the Keator Group, a wealth management firm in Lenox, Massachusetts. &#34;Until something changes the tie’s going to go the runner and that’s been the bear.&#34;</p><p>That scale tipped further to the bear side after the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund (IMF) warned of an impending global economic slowdown.</p><p>A mixed bag of economic data, led by better-than-expected retail sales, cemented the likelihood of another 75 basis-point interest rate hike from the Fed at the conclusion of next week&#39;s monetary policy meeting, as uncertainties simmered over where the central bank will go from there.</p><p>&#34;The question is what’s going to happen in November?&#34; said Robert Pavlik, senior portfolio manager at Dakota Wealth in Fairfield, Connecticut. &#34;If the Fed really wants to handle it properly, it will be 50 basis-point drop in November, a 25 basis-point cut in December, and then they&#39;ll reassess.&#34;</p><p>While the retail print surprised to the upside, declining jobless claims reaffirmed the labor market&#39;s strength, and a drop in import prices supported the past-peak inflation narrative.</p><p>But a surprise drop in industrial production and a contraction of Atlantic region manufacturing provided fodder for economic pessimists.</p><p>None of the data appeared to change the calculus regarding Fed expectations. Financial markets have now fully priced in an interest rate increase of at least 75 basis points next Wednesday, with a one-in-five chance of a super-sized, 100-basis-point hike, according to CME&#39;s FedWatch tool.</p><p>U.S. railroads remained open after the Biden administration helped broker a tentative deal with unions to avert a strike, thereby avoiding a rail shutdown which would add to supply-chain pressures at the core of hot inflation.</p><p>Shares of railroad operators Union Pacific and Norfolk Southern outperformed the broader market.</p><p>Adobe Inc tumbled after the company said it would buy Figma in a deal valued at about $20 billion.</p><p>The Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 173.27 points, or 0.56%, to 30,961.82, the S&amp;P 500 lost 44.66 points, or 1.13%, to 3,901.35 and the Nasdaq Composite dropped 167.32 points, or 1.43%, to 11,552.36.</p><p>Nine the 11 major sectors of the S&amp;P 500 ended the session in negative territory. Energy shares showed the largest percentage drop as the tentative rail agreement and demand concerns sent crude prices tumbling.</p><p>Healthcare posted the biggest advance with an assist from health insurer Humana Inc, whose 8.4% surge following its strong earnings forecast made it the top gainer in the S&amp;P 500.</p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ADBE\">Adobe Inc</a> was the S&amp;P 500&#39;s biggest percentage loser, tumbling 16.8% after the company said it would buy Figma in a cash-and-stock deal that valued the online design startup at about $20 billion.</p><p>Declining issues outnumbered advancing ones on the NYSE by a 2.79-to-1 ratio; on Nasdaq, a 1.35-to-1 ratio favored decliners.</p><p>The S&amp;P 500 posted no new 52-week highs and 21 new lows; the Nasdaq Composite recorded 16 new highs and 206 new lows.</p><p>Volume on U.S. exchanges was 11.11 billion shares, compared with the 10.35 billion average over the last 20 trading days.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>US STOCKS-Wall St Tumbles Amid Fed Tightening Jitters, Economic Rumblings</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nUS STOCKS-Wall St Tumbles Amid Fed Tightening Jitters, Economic Rumblings\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1036604489\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Reuters </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-09-16 04:32</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>(Reuters) - Wall Street ended sharply lower on Thursday, extending its losses in late afternoon trading as a raft of economic data failed to alter the expected course of aggressive tightening by the Federal Reserve amid growing warnings of global recession.</p><p>The sell-off gathered momentum toward the end of the session, with market leaders including <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MSFT\">Microsoft Corp</a>, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AAPL\">Apple Inc</a> and <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AMZN\">Amazon.com Inc</a> hitting the tech-laden Nasdaq hardest.</p><p>The benchmark S&amp;P 500 closed a hair above 3,900, seen by many analysts as a key technical support level that has been tested several times over the past two weeks.</p><p>Interest rate-sensitive banks helped soften the blue-chip Dow&#39;s decline.</p><p>&#34;It&#39;s been a difficult year and investors are wary,&#34; said Matthew Keator, managing partner in the Keator Group, a wealth management firm in Lenox, Massachusetts. &#34;Until something changes the tie’s going to go the runner and that’s been the bear.&#34;</p><p>That scale tipped further to the bear side after the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund (IMF) warned of an impending global economic slowdown.</p><p>A mixed bag of economic data, led by better-than-expected retail sales, cemented the likelihood of another 75 basis-point interest rate hike from the Fed at the conclusion of next week&#39;s monetary policy meeting, as uncertainties simmered over where the central bank will go from there.</p><p>&#34;The question is what’s going to happen in November?&#34; said Robert Pavlik, senior portfolio manager at Dakota Wealth in Fairfield, Connecticut. &#34;If the Fed really wants to handle it properly, it will be 50 basis-point drop in November, a 25 basis-point cut in December, and then they&#39;ll reassess.&#34;</p><p>While the retail print surprised to the upside, declining jobless claims reaffirmed the labor market&#39;s strength, and a drop in import prices supported the past-peak inflation narrative.</p><p>But a surprise drop in industrial production and a contraction of Atlantic region manufacturing provided fodder for economic pessimists.</p><p>None of the data appeared to change the calculus regarding Fed expectations. Financial markets have now fully priced in an interest rate increase of at least 75 basis points next Wednesday, with a one-in-five chance of a super-sized, 100-basis-point hike, according to CME&#39;s FedWatch tool.</p><p>U.S. railroads remained open after the Biden administration helped broker a tentative deal with unions to avert a strike, thereby avoiding a rail shutdown which would add to supply-chain pressures at the core of hot inflation.</p><p>Shares of railroad operators Union Pacific and Norfolk Southern outperformed the broader market.</p><p>Adobe Inc tumbled after the company said it would buy Figma in a deal valued at about $20 billion.</p><p>The Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 173.27 points, or 0.56%, to 30,961.82, the S&amp;P 500 lost 44.66 points, or 1.13%, to 3,901.35 and the Nasdaq Composite dropped 167.32 points, or 1.43%, to 11,552.36.</p><p>Nine the 11 major sectors of the S&amp;P 500 ended the session in negative territory. Energy shares showed the largest percentage drop as the tentative rail agreement and demand concerns sent crude prices tumbling.</p><p>Healthcare posted the biggest advance with an assist from health insurer Humana Inc, whose 8.4% surge following its strong earnings forecast made it the top gainer in the S&amp;P 500.</p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ADBE\">Adobe Inc</a> was the S&amp;P 500&#39;s biggest percentage loser, tumbling 16.8% after the company said it would buy Figma in a cash-and-stock deal that valued the online design startup at about $20 billion.</p><p>Declining issues outnumbered advancing ones on the NYSE by a 2.79-to-1 ratio; on Nasdaq, a 1.35-to-1 ratio favored decliners.</p><p>The S&amp;P 500 posted no new 52-week highs and 21 new lows; the Nasdaq Composite recorded 16 new highs and 206 new lows.</p><p>Volume on U.S. exchanges was 11.11 billion shares, compared with the 10.35 billion average over the last 20 trading days.</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".DJI":"道琼斯"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2267301676","content_text":"(Reuters) - Wall Street ended sharply lower on Thursday, extending its losses in late afternoon trading as a raft of economic data failed to alter the expected course of aggressive tightening by the Federal Reserve amid growing warnings of global recession.The sell-off gathered momentum toward the end of the session, with market leaders including Microsoft Corp, Apple Inc and Amazon.com Inc hitting the tech-laden Nasdaq hardest.The benchmark S&P 500 closed a hair above 3,900, seen by many analysts as a key technical support level that has been tested several times over the past two weeks.Interest rate-sensitive banks helped soften the blue-chip Dow's decline.\"It's been a difficult year and investors are wary,\" said Matthew Keator, managing partner in the Keator Group, a wealth management firm in Lenox, Massachusetts. \"Until something changes the tie’s going to go the runner and that’s been the bear.\"That scale tipped further to the bear side after the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund (IMF) warned of an impending global economic slowdown.A mixed bag of economic data, led by better-than-expected retail sales, cemented the likelihood of another 75 basis-point interest rate hike from the Fed at the conclusion of next week's monetary policy meeting, as uncertainties simmered over where the central bank will go from there.\"The question is what’s going to happen in November?\" said Robert Pavlik, senior portfolio manager at Dakota Wealth in Fairfield, Connecticut. \"If the Fed really wants to handle it properly, it will be 50 basis-point drop in November, a 25 basis-point cut in December, and then they'll reassess.\"While the retail print surprised to the upside, declining jobless claims reaffirmed the labor market's strength, and a drop in import prices supported the past-peak inflation narrative.But a surprise drop in industrial production and a contraction of Atlantic region manufacturing provided fodder for economic pessimists.None of the data appeared to change the calculus regarding Fed expectations. Financial markets have now fully priced in an interest rate increase of at least 75 basis points next Wednesday, with a one-in-five chance of a super-sized, 100-basis-point hike, according to CME's FedWatch tool.U.S. railroads remained open after the Biden administration helped broker a tentative deal with unions to avert a strike, thereby avoiding a rail shutdown which would add to supply-chain pressures at the core of hot inflation.Shares of railroad operators Union Pacific and Norfolk Southern outperformed the broader market.Adobe Inc tumbled after the company said it would buy Figma in a deal valued at about $20 billion.The Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 173.27 points, or 0.56%, to 30,961.82, the S&P 500 lost 44.66 points, or 1.13%, to 3,901.35 and the Nasdaq Composite dropped 167.32 points, or 1.43%, to 11,552.36.Nine the 11 major sectors of the S&P 500 ended the session in negative territory. Energy shares showed the largest percentage drop as the tentative rail agreement and demand concerns sent crude prices tumbling.Healthcare posted the biggest advance with an assist from health insurer Humana Inc, whose 8.4% surge following its strong earnings forecast made it the top gainer in the S&P 500.Adobe Inc was the S&P 500's biggest percentage loser, tumbling 16.8% after the company said it would buy Figma in a cash-and-stock deal that valued the online design startup at about $20 billion.Declining issues outnumbered advancing ones on the NYSE by a 2.79-to-1 ratio; on Nasdaq, a 1.35-to-1 ratio favored decliners.The S&P 500 posted no new 52-week highs and 21 new lows; the Nasdaq Composite recorded 16 new highs and 206 new lows.Volume on U.S. exchanges was 11.11 billion shares, compared with the 10.35 billion average over the last 20 trading days.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":235,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9934837746,"gmtCreate":1663214109785,"gmtModify":1676537229847,"author":{"id":"4107323280915450","authorId":"4107323280915450","name":"ZGChen84","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"themes":[],"htmlText":"[Glance]&nbsp;","listText":"[Glance]&nbsp;","text":"[Glance]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9934837746","repostId":"2267180525","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2267180525","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in markets, business, politics, entertainment and technology","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Reuters","id":"1036604489","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868"},"pubTimestamp":1663207485,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2267180525?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2022-09-15 10:04","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Tesla Is Sued By Drivers Over Alleged False Autopilot, Full Self-Driving Claims","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2267180525","media":"Reuters","summary":"(Reuters) - Tesla Inc was sued on Wednesday in a proposed class action accusing Elon Musk's electric","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>(Reuters) - <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TSLA\">Tesla Inc</a> was sued on Wednesday in a proposed class action accusing Elon Musk&#39;s electric car company of misleading the public by falsely advertising its Autopilot and Full Self-Driving features.</p><p>The complaint accused Tesla and Musk of having since 2016 deceptively advertised the technology as fully functioning or &#34;just around the corner&#34; despite knowing that the technology did not work or was nonexistent, and made vehicles unsafe.</p><p>Briggs Matsko, the named plaintiff, said Tesla did this to &#34;generate excitement&#34; about its vehicles, attract investments, boost sales, avoid bankruptcy, drive up its stock price and become a &#34;dominant player&#34; in electric vehicles.</p><p>&#34;Tesla has yet to produce anything even remotely approaching a fully self-driving car,&#34; Matsko said.</p><p>The lawsuit filed in federal court in San Francisco seeks unspecified damages for people who since 2016 bought or leased Tesla vehicles with Autopilot, Enhanced Autopilot and Full Self-Driving features.</p><p>Tesla did not immediately respond to requests for comment. It disbanded its media relations department in 2020.</p><p>The lawsuit followed complaints filed on July 28 by California&#39;s Department of Motor Vehicles accusing Tesla of overstating how well its advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS) worked.</p><p>Remedies there could include suspending Tesla&#39;s license in California, and requiring restitution to drivers.</p><p>Tesla has said Autopilot enables vehicles to steer, accelerate and brake within their lanes, while Full Self-Driving lets vehicles obey traffic signals and change lanes.</p><p>It has also said both technologies &#34;require active driver supervision,&#34; with a &#34;fully attentive&#34; driver whose hands are on the wheel, &#34;and do not make the vehicle autonomous.&#34;</p><p>Matsko, of Rancho Murieta, California, said he paid a $5,000 premium for his 2018 Tesla Model X to obtain Enhanced Autopilot.</p><p>He also said Tesla drivers who receive software updates &#34;effectively act as untrained test engineers&#34; and have found &#34;myriad problems,&#34; including that vehicles steer into oncoming traffic, run red lights, and fail to make routine turns.</p><p>The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration has since 2016 opened 38 special investigations of Tesla crashes believed to involve ADAS. Nineteen deaths were reported in those crashes.</p><p>The case is Matsko v Tesla Inc et al, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California, No. 22-05240.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Tesla Is Sued By Drivers Over Alleged False Autopilot, Full Self-Driving Claims</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nTesla Is Sued By Drivers Over Alleged False Autopilot, Full Self-Driving Claims\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1036604489\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Reuters </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-09-15 10:04</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>(Reuters) - <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TSLA\">Tesla Inc</a> was sued on Wednesday in a proposed class action accusing Elon Musk&#39;s electric car company of misleading the public by falsely advertising its Autopilot and Full Self-Driving features.</p><p>The complaint accused Tesla and Musk of having since 2016 deceptively advertised the technology as fully functioning or &#34;just around the corner&#34; despite knowing that the technology did not work or was nonexistent, and made vehicles unsafe.</p><p>Briggs Matsko, the named plaintiff, said Tesla did this to &#34;generate excitement&#34; about its vehicles, attract investments, boost sales, avoid bankruptcy, drive up its stock price and become a &#34;dominant player&#34; in electric vehicles.</p><p>&#34;Tesla has yet to produce anything even remotely approaching a fully self-driving car,&#34; Matsko said.</p><p>The lawsuit filed in federal court in San Francisco seeks unspecified damages for people who since 2016 bought or leased Tesla vehicles with Autopilot, Enhanced Autopilot and Full Self-Driving features.</p><p>Tesla did not immediately respond to requests for comment. It disbanded its media relations department in 2020.</p><p>The lawsuit followed complaints filed on July 28 by California&#39;s Department of Motor Vehicles accusing Tesla of overstating how well its advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS) worked.</p><p>Remedies there could include suspending Tesla&#39;s license in California, and requiring restitution to drivers.</p><p>Tesla has said Autopilot enables vehicles to steer, accelerate and brake within their lanes, while Full Self-Driving lets vehicles obey traffic signals and change lanes.</p><p>It has also said both technologies &#34;require active driver supervision,&#34; with a &#34;fully attentive&#34; driver whose hands are on the wheel, &#34;and do not make the vehicle autonomous.&#34;</p><p>Matsko, of Rancho Murieta, California, said he paid a $5,000 premium for his 2018 Tesla Model X to obtain Enhanced Autopilot.</p><p>He also said Tesla drivers who receive software updates &#34;effectively act as untrained test engineers&#34; and have found &#34;myriad problems,&#34; including that vehicles steer into oncoming traffic, run red lights, and fail to make routine turns.</p><p>The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration has since 2016 opened 38 special investigations of Tesla crashes believed to involve ADAS. Nineteen deaths were reported in those crashes.</p><p>The case is Matsko v Tesla Inc et al, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California, No. 22-05240.</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"TSLA":"特斯拉"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2267180525","content_text":"(Reuters) - Tesla Inc was sued on Wednesday in a proposed class action accusing Elon Musk's electric car company of misleading the public by falsely advertising its Autopilot and Full Self-Driving features.The complaint accused Tesla and Musk of having since 2016 deceptively advertised the technology as fully functioning or \"just around the corner\" despite knowing that the technology did not work or was nonexistent, and made vehicles unsafe.Briggs Matsko, the named plaintiff, said Tesla did this to \"generate excitement\" about its vehicles, attract investments, boost sales, avoid bankruptcy, drive up its stock price and become a \"dominant player\" in electric vehicles.\"Tesla has yet to produce anything even remotely approaching a fully self-driving car,\" Matsko said.The lawsuit filed in federal court in San Francisco seeks unspecified damages for people who since 2016 bought or leased Tesla vehicles with Autopilot, Enhanced Autopilot and Full Self-Driving features.Tesla did not immediately respond to requests for comment. It disbanded its media relations department in 2020.The lawsuit followed complaints filed on July 28 by California's Department of Motor Vehicles accusing Tesla of overstating how well its advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS) worked.Remedies there could include suspending Tesla's license in California, and requiring restitution to drivers.Tesla has said Autopilot enables vehicles to steer, accelerate and brake within their lanes, while Full Self-Driving lets vehicles obey traffic signals and change lanes.It has also said both technologies \"require active driver supervision,\" with a \"fully attentive\" driver whose hands are on the wheel, \"and do not make the vehicle autonomous.\"Matsko, of Rancho Murieta, California, said he paid a $5,000 premium for his 2018 Tesla Model X to obtain Enhanced Autopilot.He also said Tesla drivers who receive software updates \"effectively act as untrained test engineers\" and have found \"myriad problems,\" including that vehicles steer into oncoming traffic, run red lights, and fail to make routine turns.The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration has since 2016 opened 38 special investigations of Tesla crashes believed to involve ADAS. Nineteen deaths were reported in those crashes.The case is Matsko v Tesla Inc et al, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California, No. 22-05240.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":158,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"hots":[],"lives":[]}