Most investors still talk about Broadcom as if it were simply another beneficiary of the AI boom, a sort of well-positioned tenant riding Nvidia’s coattails. I think that framing is not just lazy, it is structurally wrong. Broadcom is no longer competing for floorspace inside the AI data centre. It increasingly owns the land, writes the zoning laws, and collects rent whether the buildings are fashionable or not. That distinction matters enormously when valuations start to feel uncomfortable. Broadcom isn’t renting space — it’s writing the zoning laws What makes $Broadcom(AVGO)$ interesting in 2026 is not raw compute performance but architectural control. This is an infrastructure story masquerading as a chip story, and the market is only just begi