Sanz13 8 personal page - To The Moon

Sanz13 8

Sanz13 8

No personal profile

24Follow

1Followers

1Topic

0Badge

2023-06-30

Telaser

Every one [Spurting]" draggable="false [Angry]" draggable="false

2023-05-24

All the best ways for

Sorry, the original content has been removed

2023-05-24

Share your opinion about this news…

Google Vs. Meta: Which Is The Better Choice For Investors?

2023-04-16

$AUST BANKING(ANZ.AU)$

Apple Said to Be Testing New Macs With Processors Similar to M2

2023-03-23

[Cry] [Cry] [Cool] [Grin]

Sorry, the original content has been removed

2023-02-26

Share your opinion about this news…

Sorry, the original content has been removed

Go to Tiger App to see more news

{"i18n":{"language":"en_US"},"userPageInfo":{"id":4128031068075382,"uuid":"4128031068075382","gmtCreate":1664927978741,"gmtModify":1677407287065,"name":"Sanz13 8","pinyin":"sanz138sanz138","introduction":"","introductionEn":"","signature":"","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/2d76b14dbabd0a8eab48c97801bef4a7","hat":null,"hatId":null,"hatName":null,"vip":1,"status":2,"fanSize":1,"headSize":24,"tweetSize":6,"questionSize":0,"limitLevel":999,"accountStatus":4,"level":{"id":1,"name":"萌萌虎","nameTw":"萌萌虎","represent":"呱呱坠地","factor":"评论帖子3次或发布1条主帖（非转发）","iconColor":"3C9E83","bgColor":"A2F1D9"},"themeCounts":1,"badgeCounts":0,"badges":[],"moderator":false,"superModerator":false,"manageSymbols":null,"badgeLevel":null,"boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"favoriteSize":1,"symbols":null,"coverImage":null,"realNameVerified":"init","userBadges":[{"badgeId":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493-1","templateUuid":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493","name":"Debut Tiger","description":"Join the tiger community for 500 days","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0e4d0ca1da0456dc7894c946d44bf9ab","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0f2f65e8ce4cfaae8db2bea9b127f58b","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c5948a31b6edf154422335b265235809","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2024.02.19","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1001},{"badgeId":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84-1","templateUuid":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84","name":"Real Trader","description":"Completed a transaction","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e08a1cc2087a1de93402c2c290fa65b","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4504a6397ce1137932d56e5f4ce27166","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4b22c79415b4cd6e3d8ebc4a0fa32604","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2023.08.11","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100}],"userBadgeCount":2,"currentWearingBadge":null,"individualDisplayBadges":null,"crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"location":null,"starInvestorFollowerNum":0,"starInvestorFlag":false,"starInvestorOrderShareNum":0,"subscribeStarInvestorNum":0,"ror":null,"winRationPercentage":null,"showRor":false,"investmentPhilosophy":null,"starInvestorSubscribeFlag":false},"baikeInfo":{},"tab":"post","tweets":[{"id":192899408724104,"gmtCreate":1688124097946,"gmtModify":1688124102505,"author":{"id":"4128031068075382","authorId":"4128031068075382","name":"Sanz13 8","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/2d76b14dbabd0a8eab48c97801bef4a7","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"themes":[],"title":"Telaser","htmlText":"Every one&nbsp;[Spurting]\" draggable=\"false&nbsp;[Angry]\" draggable=\"false&nbsp;","listText":"Every one&nbsp;[Spurting]\" draggable=\"false&nbsp;[Angry]\" draggable=\"false&nbsp;","text":"Every one [Spurting]\" draggable=\"false [Angry]\" draggable=\"false","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":2,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/192899408724104","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":139,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9970708694,"gmtCreate":1684914517019,"gmtModify":1684914533865,"author":{"id":"4128031068075382","authorId":"4128031068075382","name":"Sanz13 8","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/2d76b14dbabd0a8eab48c97801bef4a7","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"themes":[],"htmlText":"All the best ways for","listText":"All the best ways for","text":"All the best ways for","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9970708694","repostId":"2337733918","repostType":2,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":218,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9970708891,"gmtCreate":1684914436014,"gmtModify":1684914477196,"author":{"id":"4128031068075382","authorId":"4128031068075382","name":"Sanz13 8","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/2d76b14dbabd0a8eab48c97801bef4a7","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Share your opinion about this news…","listText":"Share your opinion about this news…","text":"Share your opinion about this news…","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9970708891","repostId":"2337733918","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"2337733918","pubTimestamp":1684913946,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2337733918?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2023-05-24 15:39","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Google Vs. Meta: Which Is The Better Choice For Investors?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2337733918","media":"Seekingalpha","summary":"SummaryBoth Alphabet and Meta currently have an attractive Valuation: while Meta’s P/E [FWD] Ratio s","content":"<html><head></head><body><h2 style=\"text-align: left;\">Summary</h2><ul><li><p>Both Alphabet and Meta currently have an attractive Valuation: while Meta’s P/E [FWD] Ratio stands at 20.74, Alphabet’s is 22.75.</p></li><li><p>However, I consider one to be superior in terms of Profitability and Growth while also coming with less risks attached.</p></li><li><p>In this comparative analysis, I will show you which of the two companies I believe is the better pick in terms of risk and reward.</p></li></ul><h2>Investment Thesis</h2><p>Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOG, NASDAQ:GOOGL) and <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/META\">Meta</a> currently have a Valuation that appears to be appealing for investors. Alphabet&#39;s P/E [FWD] Ratio stands at 22.75 while Meta&#39;s is even lower (20.74).</p><p>However, I believe that Alphabet is clearly the more attractive choice for investors in comparison to Meta when investing over the long term.</p><p>In the following, I will summarize why I believe Alphabet is superior to Meta in terms of risk and reward:</p><ul><li><p>Alphabet has stronger financial health than Meta: while Alphabet has a Total Cash Position of $115.10B, Meta&#39;s stands at $37.44B.</p></li><li><p>I see Alphabet as being ahead of Meta when it comes to Profitability: the company has a higher Return on Equity (22.76% when compared to 17.29%) and a higher Net Income Margin (20.58% compared to 18.27%).</p></li><li><p>I think Alphabet is superior to Meta when it comes to Growth: Alphabet&#39;s Revenue Growth Rate [FWD] is 9.00% while Meta&#39;s is 5.82%.</p></li><li><p>At the companies&#39; current price levels, my DCF Model indicates an Internal Rate of Return of 9% for Alphabet and 8% for Meta, thus indicating that the reward should be higher for Alphabet investors.</p></li><li><p>In addition to that, I consider the risk factors for Alphabet investors to be lower than for those who invest in Meta. This is also reflected in Alphabet&#39;s 24M Beta Factor of 1.22, which is below Meta&#39;s (1.32).</p></li><li><p>I believe that Alphabet has a higher economic moat when compared to Meta, to which Alphabet&#39;s higher brand value and stronger financial health have contributed.</p></li><li><p>While Alphabet receives my strong buy rating, Meta only receives my hold rating at its current price level.</p></li><li><p>Furthermore, I recommend overweighting the Alphabet stock in a long-term investment portfolio while I recommend underweighting the Meta stock.</p></li></ul><h2>The Companies&#39; Competitive Position within their Industry</h2><p>Both Alphabet and Meta have a strong competitive position within the Interactive Media and Services Industry, which is reflected in their high EBIT Margins: while Alphabet&#39;s is 25.35%, Meta&#39;s is 28.46%.</p><p>However, I believe that Alphabet has even stronger competitive advantages than Meta, which I will now discuss in more detail.</p><p>While Alphabet maintained the third position in the ranking of the most valuable brands in the world according to Brand Finance (with an estimated brand value of $281,382M), Meta is listed 14th (it was ranked 7th in 2022). In my opinion, Alphabet&#39;s higher brand value reflects the company&#39;s stronger competitive position when compared to its rival.</p><p>In addition, I see Alphabet as being financially stronger than Meta: the reason for that is Alphabet&#39;s current Total Cash Position of $115.10B when compared to Meta&#39;s ($37.44B). Furthermore, it can be highlighted that Alphabet has a slightly better credit rating than its competitor: while Alphabet has an Aa2 credit rating from Moody&#39;s, Meta&#39;s is A1, once again confirming Alphabet&#39;s financial superiority.</p><p>I believe that Alphabet and Meta have collected an enormous amount of data within the past decade, which will help them to maintain a strong competitive position within their industry.</p><p>However, I believe that Alphabet&#39;s economic moat is even stronger than Meta&#39;s. This opinion is particularly based on the fact that Alphabet has a higher brand value and possesses even stronger financial health than Meta.</p><p>Alphabet&#39;s stronger competitive position is one of the reasons why I suggest overweighting its stock in an investment portfolio while I suggest to underweight the Meta stock.</p><h2>The Companies&#39; Valuation</h2><p>Alphabet currently has the higher P/E [FWD] Ratio when compared to Meta: while Alphabet&#39;s P/E [FWD] Ratio stands at 22.75, Meta&#39;s is at 20.74. In addition to that, it can be highlighted that Alphabet&#39;s Price / Sales [TTM] Ratio lies slightly above the one of Meta: Alphabet&#39;s Price / Sales [TTM] Ratio is 5.50 while Meta&#39;s is 5.48.</p><h3>Discounted Cash Flow Model for Alphabet</h3><p>My DCF Model indicates an intrinsic value of $115.18 for Alphabet. At the company&#39;s current stock price of $121, this implies a downside of 4.8%.</p><h3>Internal Rate of Return for Alphabet</h3><p>Below you can find the calculations of the Internal Rate of Return for Alphabet when assuming different purchase prices for the company&#39;s stock. At Alphabet&#39;s current stock price of $121, my DCF Model indicates an Internal Rate of Return of 9% for the company.</p><table style=\"border-collapse:collapse;\"><tbody><tr><td style=\"text-align:left;\"><p><strong>Purchase Price of the Alphabet Stock</strong></p></td><td style=\"text-align:left;\"><p><strong>Internal Rate of Return</strong> <strong>as according to my DCF Model</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td style=\"text-align:left;\"><p>$100.00</p></td><td style=\"text-align:left;\"><p>15%</p></td></tr><tr><td style=\"text-align:left;\"><p>$105.00</p></td><td style=\"text-align:left;\"><p>13%</p></td></tr><tr><td style=\"text-align:left;\"><p>$110.00</p></td><td style=\"text-align:left;\"><p>12%</p></td></tr><tr><td style=\"text-align:left;\"><p>$115.00</p></td><td style=\"text-align:left;\"><p>11%</p></td></tr><tr><td style=\"text-align:left;\"><p>$120.00</p></td><td style=\"text-align:left;\"><p>10%</p></td></tr><tr><td style=\"text-align:left;\"><p><strong>$121.00</strong></p></td><td style=\"text-align:left;\"><p><strong>9%</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td style=\"text-align:left;\"><p>$125.00</p></td><td style=\"text-align:left;\"><p>9%</p></td></tr><tr><td style=\"text-align:left;\"><p>$130.00</p></td><td style=\"text-align:left;\"><p>8%</p></td></tr><tr><td style=\"text-align:left;\"><p>$135.00</p></td><td style=\"text-align:left;\"><p>7%</p></td></tr><tr><td style=\"text-align:left;\"><p>$140.00</p></td><td style=\"text-align:left;\"><p>6%</p></td></tr><tr><td style=\"text-align:left;\"><p>$145.00</p></td><td style=\"text-align:left;\"><p>5%</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p>Source: The Author</p><h3>Discounted Cash Flow Model for Meta</h3><p>My DCF Model currently shows an intrinsic value of $220.24 for Meta. At the company&#39;s current stock price of $247, this implies a downside of 10.8%.</p><h3>Internal Rate of Return for Meta</h3><p>Below you can find the Internal Rate of Return for Meta when assuming different purchase prices for the company&#39;s stock. At Meta&#39;s current price level of $247, my DCF Model indicates an Internal Rate of Return of 8%.</p><table style=\"border-collapse:collapse;\"><tbody><tr><td style=\"text-align:left;\"><p><strong>Purchase Price</strong> <strong>of the Meta Stock</strong></p></td><td style=\"text-align:left;\"><p><strong>Internal Rate of Return</strong> <strong>as according to my DCF Model</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td style=\"text-align:left;\"><p>$225.00</p></td><td style=\"text-align:left;\"><p>11%</p></td></tr><tr><td style=\"text-align:left;\"><p>$230.00</p></td><td style=\"text-align:left;\"><p>10%</p></td></tr><tr><td style=\"text-align:left;\"><p>$235.00</p></td><td style=\"text-align:left;\"><p>10%</p></td></tr><tr><td style=\"text-align:left;\"><p>$240.00</p></td><td style=\"text-align:left;\"><p>9%</p></td></tr><tr><td style=\"text-align:left;\"><p>$245.00</p></td><td style=\"text-align:left;\"><p>9%</p></td></tr><tr><td style=\"text-align:left;\"><p><strong>$247.00</strong></p></td><td style=\"text-align:left;\"><p><strong>8%</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td style=\"text-align:left;\"><p>$250.00</p></td><td style=\"text-align:left;\"><p>8%</p></td></tr><tr><td style=\"text-align:left;\"><p>$255.00</p></td><td style=\"text-align:left;\"><p>8%</p></td></tr><tr><td style=\"text-align:left;\"><p>$260.00</p></td><td style=\"text-align:left;\"><p>7%</p></td></tr><tr><td style=\"text-align:left;\"><p>$265.00</p></td><td style=\"text-align:left;\"><p>7%</p></td></tr><tr><td style=\"text-align:left;\"><p>$270.00</p></td><td style=\"text-align:left;\"><p>6%</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p>Source: The Author</p><p>At the companies&#39; current stock prices of $121 (Alphabet) and $247 (Meta), my DCF Models indicate an Internal Rate of Return of 9% for Alphabet and 8% for Meta, thus strengthening my confidence in selecting Alphabet over its competitor.</p><h2>The Companies&#39; Profitability</h2><p>In terms of Profitability, I believe that Alphabet is ahead of Meta. There are a variety of metrics that support this theory. Alphabet has a higher Return on Equity when compared to Meta: while Alphabet&#39;s Return on Equity stands at 22.76%, Meta&#39;s is 17.29%.</p><p>The same is confirmed when taking a look at the companies&#39; Return on Assets: while Alphabet&#39;s is 17.47%, Meta&#39;s is 15.37%. In addition to that, Alphabet&#39;s Net Income Margin of 20.58% stands above the one of Meta (18.27%).</p><p>All of these metrics support my theory that Alphabet is superior to Meta when it comes to Profitability and has contributed to my decision to select the company over its competitor.</p><p></p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c1b3ba7aed4a40aab5d91b2994eb2ce4\" alt=\"Source: Seeking Alpha\" title=\"Source: Seeking Alpha\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"502\"/><span>Source: Seeking Alpha</span></p><h2>The Companies&#39; Growth Perspectives</h2><p>In terms of Growth, I also believe that Alphabet is in front of Meta: Alphabet&#39;s Revenue Growth Rate [CAGR] over the past 3 years is at 19.53% while Meta&#39;s is at 16.95%.</p><p>In addition to that, it can be highlighted that both Alphabet&#39;s Revenue Growth Rate [FWD] (9.00% when compared to Meta&#39;s of 5.81%) and its Revenue Growth Rate [YoY] (5.28% compared to -1.94%) are higher than Meta&#39;s.</p><p>Furthermore, Alphabet&#39;s EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] over the past 3 years is clearly above the one of Meta. This indicates that Alphabet has increased its profits at higher growth rates than its rival: while Alphabet&#39;s 3 Year EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] is 25.91%, Meta&#39;s is significantly lower (5.36%).</p><p>Alphabet&#39;s superiority in terms of Growth is further confirmed when taking into consideration the EPS Diluted Growth Rate [CAGR] of both companies over the past 3 years: while Alphabet&#39;s is 21.97%, Meta&#39;s is 3.38%.</p><p></p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/35fa5044b86be8a6e16ef72b8a19f615\" alt=\"Source: Seeking Alpha\" title=\"Source: Seeking Alpha\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"591\"/><span>Source: Seeking Alpha</span></p><h2>Risk Factors</h2><p>In terms of risks, I believe that Alphabet is the company that comes with less risks attached.</p><p>Alphabet has a higher Total Cash Position (115.10B compared to Meta&#39;s, which is 37.44B) and a lower Total Debt to Equity Ratio (11.30% compared to 22.65%). Both of these factors indicate that Alphabet is the lower risk investment between the two picks.</p><p>This is further confirmed when looking at the companies&#39; Beta Factors: while Alphabet&#39;s 24M and 60M Beta Factor are 1.22 and 1.10, Meta&#39;s are 1.32 and 1.20 respectively. This once again confirms my theory that Alphabet is the company with the lower risk factors attached.</p><p></p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b1a1d78db68ed3a97d1eb56bd87cd29c\" alt=\"Source: Seeking Alpha\" title=\"Source: Seeking Alpha\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"232\"/><span>Source: Seeking Alpha</span></p><p>Alphabet&#39;s higher brand value further contributes to the fact that I believe it&#39;s the lower risk investment when compared to Meta.</p><p>In addition to that, it can be highlighted that Alphabet has a Free Cash Flow Yield [TTM] of 3.95% while Meta&#39;s is 2.68%. This serves as an additional indicator that an investment in Alphabet comes with less risks attached compared to an investment in Meta.</p><p>Furthermore, I would like to add that Alphabet&#39;s Current Ratio (2.35 compared to 2.07) and its Quick Ratio (2.20 compared to 1.91) are superior to Meta&#39;s, once again confirming my investment thesis.</p><p>My opinion to consider Alphabet as the lower risk investment has contributed significantly to the fact that I suggest overweighting Alphabet in a long-term investment portfolio while I would only underweight the Meta stock.</p><h2>Conclusion</h2><p>There are a variety of reasons why I believe that Alphabet is currently the more attractive pick for investors when compared to its competitor Meta.</p><p>First, Alphabet is ahead of Meta when it comes to Profitability, which is underlined by the company&#39;s higher Return on Equity (22.76% when compared to 17.29%).</p><p>Second, I believe that Alphabet is superior to Meta when it comes to Growth: Alphabet&#39;s Revenue Growth Rate [FWD] stands at 9.00% while Meta&#39;s is 5.82%.</p><p>Third, I believe that Alphabet has a higher economic moat than its rival (to which its higher brand value and stronger financials have contributed).</p><p>Fourth, Alphabet has a significantly higher Total Cash Position when compared to Meta: Alphabet&#39;s Total Cash Position stands at $115.10B while Meta&#39;s is $37.44B.</p><p>Fifth, I believe that the risk factors are lower for Alphabet investors than for Meta investors: while Alphabet&#39;s 24M Beta Factor is 1.22, Meta&#39;s is 1.32.</p><p>Sixth, my DCF Models indicate an Internal Rate of Return of 9% for Alphabet and 8% for Meta. Thus demonstrating that the reward for Alphabet investors should be superior in comparison to Meta investors.</p><p>Summarizing, I believe that Alphabet is the better pick when compared to Meta in terms of risk and reward, which has contributed to the fact that Alphabet receives my strong buy rating while Meta receives my hold rating.</p><p>In addition to that, it has led me to recommend overweighting the Alphabet stock in an investment portfolio while underweighting the Meta stock.</p></body></html>","source":"seekingalpha","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Google Vs. Meta: Which Is The Better Choice For Investors?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nGoogle Vs. Meta: Which Is The Better Choice For Investors?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2023-05-24 15:39 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/article/4606556-google-vs-meta-which-is-the-better-choice-for-investors><strong>Seekingalpha</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>SummaryBoth Alphabet and Meta currently have an attractive Valuation: while Meta’s P/E [FWD] Ratio stands at 20.74, Alphabet’s is 22.75.However, I consider one to be superior in terms of Profitability...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4606556-google-vs-meta-which-is-the-better-choice-for-investors\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"META":"Meta Platforms","GOOG":"谷歌","GOOGL":"谷歌A"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4606556-google-vs-meta-which-is-the-better-choice-for-investors","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/5a36db9d73b4222bc376d24ccc48c8a4","article_id":"2337733918","content_text":"SummaryBoth Alphabet and Meta currently have an attractive Valuation: while Meta’s P/E [FWD] Ratio stands at 20.74, Alphabet’s is 22.75.However, I consider one to be superior in terms of Profitability and Growth while also coming with less risks attached.In this comparative analysis, I will show you which of the two companies I believe is the better pick in terms of risk and reward.Investment ThesisAlphabet (NASDAQ:GOOG, NASDAQ:GOOGL) and Meta currently have a Valuation that appears to be appealing for investors. Alphabet's P/E [FWD] Ratio stands at 22.75 while Meta's is even lower (20.74).However, I believe that Alphabet is clearly the more attractive choice for investors in comparison to Meta when investing over the long term.In the following, I will summarize why I believe Alphabet is superior to Meta in terms of risk and reward:Alphabet has stronger financial health than Meta: while Alphabet has a Total Cash Position of $115.10B, Meta's stands at $37.44B.I see Alphabet as being ahead of Meta when it comes to Profitability: the company has a higher Return on Equity (22.76% when compared to 17.29%) and a higher Net Income Margin (20.58% compared to 18.27%).I think Alphabet is superior to Meta when it comes to Growth: Alphabet's Revenue Growth Rate [FWD] is 9.00% while Meta's is 5.82%.At the companies' current price levels, my DCF Model indicates an Internal Rate of Return of 9% for Alphabet and 8% for Meta, thus indicating that the reward should be higher for Alphabet investors.In addition to that, I consider the risk factors for Alphabet investors to be lower than for those who invest in Meta. This is also reflected in Alphabet's 24M Beta Factor of 1.22, which is below Meta's (1.32).I believe that Alphabet has a higher economic moat when compared to Meta, to which Alphabet's higher brand value and stronger financial health have contributed.While Alphabet receives my strong buy rating, Meta only receives my hold rating at its current price level.Furthermore, I recommend overweighting the Alphabet stock in a long-term investment portfolio while I recommend underweighting the Meta stock.The Companies' Competitive Position within their IndustryBoth Alphabet and Meta have a strong competitive position within the Interactive Media and Services Industry, which is reflected in their high EBIT Margins: while Alphabet's is 25.35%, Meta's is 28.46%.However, I believe that Alphabet has even stronger competitive advantages than Meta, which I will now discuss in more detail.While Alphabet maintained the third position in the ranking of the most valuable brands in the world according to Brand Finance (with an estimated brand value of $281,382M), Meta is listed 14th (it was ranked 7th in 2022). In my opinion, Alphabet's higher brand value reflects the company's stronger competitive position when compared to its rival.In addition, I see Alphabet as being financially stronger than Meta: the reason for that is Alphabet's current Total Cash Position of $115.10B when compared to Meta's ($37.44B). Furthermore, it can be highlighted that Alphabet has a slightly better credit rating than its competitor: while Alphabet has an Aa2 credit rating from Moody's, Meta's is A1, once again confirming Alphabet's financial superiority.I believe that Alphabet and Meta have collected an enormous amount of data within the past decade, which will help them to maintain a strong competitive position within their industry.However, I believe that Alphabet's economic moat is even stronger than Meta's. This opinion is particularly based on the fact that Alphabet has a higher brand value and possesses even stronger financial health than Meta.Alphabet's stronger competitive position is one of the reasons why I suggest overweighting its stock in an investment portfolio while I suggest to underweight the Meta stock.The Companies' ValuationAlphabet currently has the higher P/E [FWD] Ratio when compared to Meta: while Alphabet's P/E [FWD] Ratio stands at 22.75, Meta's is at 20.74. In addition to that, it can be highlighted that Alphabet's Price / Sales [TTM] Ratio lies slightly above the one of Meta: Alphabet's Price / Sales [TTM] Ratio is 5.50 while Meta's is 5.48.Discounted Cash Flow Model for AlphabetMy DCF Model indicates an intrinsic value of $115.18 for Alphabet. At the company's current stock price of $121, this implies a downside of 4.8%.Internal Rate of Return for AlphabetBelow you can find the calculations of the Internal Rate of Return for Alphabet when assuming different purchase prices for the company's stock. At Alphabet's current stock price of $121, my DCF Model indicates an Internal Rate of Return of 9% for the company.Purchase Price of the Alphabet StockInternal Rate of Return as according to my DCF Model$100.0015%$105.0013%$110.0012%$115.0011%$120.0010%$121.009%$125.009%$130.008%$135.007%$140.006%$145.005%Source: The AuthorDiscounted Cash Flow Model for MetaMy DCF Model currently shows an intrinsic value of $220.24 for Meta. At the company's current stock price of $247, this implies a downside of 10.8%.Internal Rate of Return for MetaBelow you can find the Internal Rate of Return for Meta when assuming different purchase prices for the company's stock. At Meta's current price level of $247, my DCF Model indicates an Internal Rate of Return of 8%.Purchase Price of the Meta StockInternal Rate of Return as according to my DCF Model$225.0011%$230.0010%$235.0010%$240.009%$245.009%$247.008%$250.008%$255.008%$260.007%$265.007%$270.006%Source: The AuthorAt the companies' current stock prices of $121 (Alphabet) and $247 (Meta), my DCF Models indicate an Internal Rate of Return of 9% for Alphabet and 8% for Meta, thus strengthening my confidence in selecting Alphabet over its competitor.The Companies' ProfitabilityIn terms of Profitability, I believe that Alphabet is ahead of Meta. There are a variety of metrics that support this theory. Alphabet has a higher Return on Equity when compared to Meta: while Alphabet's Return on Equity stands at 22.76%, Meta's is 17.29%.The same is confirmed when taking a look at the companies' Return on Assets: while Alphabet's is 17.47%, Meta's is 15.37%. In addition to that, Alphabet's Net Income Margin of 20.58% stands above the one of Meta (18.27%).All of these metrics support my theory that Alphabet is superior to Meta when it comes to Profitability and has contributed to my decision to select the company over its competitor.Source: Seeking AlphaThe Companies' Growth PerspectivesIn terms of Growth, I also believe that Alphabet is in front of Meta: Alphabet's Revenue Growth Rate [CAGR] over the past 3 years is at 19.53% while Meta's is at 16.95%.In addition to that, it can be highlighted that both Alphabet's Revenue Growth Rate [FWD] (9.00% when compared to Meta's of 5.81%) and its Revenue Growth Rate [YoY] (5.28% compared to -1.94%) are higher than Meta's.Furthermore, Alphabet's EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] over the past 3 years is clearly above the one of Meta. This indicates that Alphabet has increased its profits at higher growth rates than its rival: while Alphabet's 3 Year EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] is 25.91%, Meta's is significantly lower (5.36%).Alphabet's superiority in terms of Growth is further confirmed when taking into consideration the EPS Diluted Growth Rate [CAGR] of both companies over the past 3 years: while Alphabet's is 21.97%, Meta's is 3.38%.Source: Seeking AlphaRisk FactorsIn terms of risks, I believe that Alphabet is the company that comes with less risks attached.Alphabet has a higher Total Cash Position (115.10B compared to Meta's, which is 37.44B) and a lower Total Debt to Equity Ratio (11.30% compared to 22.65%). Both of these factors indicate that Alphabet is the lower risk investment between the two picks.This is further confirmed when looking at the companies' Beta Factors: while Alphabet's 24M and 60M Beta Factor are 1.22 and 1.10, Meta's are 1.32 and 1.20 respectively. This once again confirms my theory that Alphabet is the company with the lower risk factors attached.Source: Seeking AlphaAlphabet's higher brand value further contributes to the fact that I believe it's the lower risk investment when compared to Meta.In addition to that, it can be highlighted that Alphabet has a Free Cash Flow Yield [TTM] of 3.95% while Meta's is 2.68%. This serves as an additional indicator that an investment in Alphabet comes with less risks attached compared to an investment in Meta.Furthermore, I would like to add that Alphabet's Current Ratio (2.35 compared to 2.07) and its Quick Ratio (2.20 compared to 1.91) are superior to Meta's, once again confirming my investment thesis.My opinion to consider Alphabet as the lower risk investment has contributed significantly to the fact that I suggest overweighting Alphabet in a long-term investment portfolio while I would only underweight the Meta stock.ConclusionThere are a variety of reasons why I believe that Alphabet is currently the more attractive pick for investors when compared to its competitor Meta.First, Alphabet is ahead of Meta when it comes to Profitability, which is underlined by the company's higher Return on Equity (22.76% when compared to 17.29%).Second, I believe that Alphabet is superior to Meta when it comes to Growth: Alphabet's Revenue Growth Rate [FWD] stands at 9.00% while Meta's is 5.82%.Third, I believe that Alphabet has a higher economic moat than its rival (to which its higher brand value and stronger financials have contributed).Fourth, Alphabet has a significantly higher Total Cash Position when compared to Meta: Alphabet's Total Cash Position stands at $115.10B while Meta's is $37.44B.Fifth, I believe that the risk factors are lower for Alphabet investors than for Meta investors: while Alphabet's 24M Beta Factor is 1.22, Meta's is 1.32.Sixth, my DCF Models indicate an Internal Rate of Return of 9% for Alphabet and 8% for Meta. Thus demonstrating that the reward for Alphabet investors should be superior in comparison to Meta investors.Summarizing, I believe that Alphabet is the better pick when compared to Meta in terms of risk and reward, which has contributed to the fact that Alphabet receives my strong buy rating while Meta receives my hold rating.In addition to that, it has led me to recommend overweighting the Alphabet stock in an investment portfolio while underweighting the Meta stock.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":134,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9945744274,"gmtCreate":1681609431798,"gmtModify":1681613341686,"author":{"id":"4128031068075382","authorId":"4128031068075382","name":"Sanz13 8","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/2d76b14dbabd0a8eab48c97801bef4a7","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/ANZ.AU\">$AUST BANKING(ANZ.AU)$&nbsp;</a>","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/ANZ.AU\">$AUST BANKING(ANZ.AU)$&nbsp;</a>","text":"$AUST BANKING(ANZ.AU)$","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9945744274","repostId":"2327083177","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2327083177","pubTimestamp":1681517106,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2327083177?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2023-04-15 08:05","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Apple Said to Be Testing New Macs With Processors Similar to M2","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2327083177","media":"Seekingalpha","summary":"Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL) may be dealing with a significant decline in Mac sales, but the tech giant is re","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Apple (<span>NASDAQ:AAPL</span>) may be dealing with a significant decline in Mac sales, but the tech giant is reportedly working on new Macs in an effort to boost sales.</p> <p>The company is currently testing a MacBook Air with a larger screen with<span> third-party apps from the App Store, Bloomberg </span>reported<span>. The new machine is using chips similar to the current M2 line of processors that Apple (</span>AAPL<span>) unveiled in 2022, the news outlet added.</span></p> <p>Earlier this year, Apple (AAPL) unveiled new a MacBook Pro and Mac mini, along with M2 Pro and M2 Max chips.</p> <p>It&#39;s possible that the new machine, which would have a larger display than the 13.6-inch MacBook Air computers that use M1 or M2 chips, could be unveiled in the summer, the news outlet added. </p> <p>In addition to the larger MacBook Air, the company is working on an updated version of the 13.6-inch Air, a new 24-inch iMac and a new entry-level MacBook Pro, Bloomberg added.</p> <p>Cupertino, California-based Apple (AAPL) is also said to be working on its M3 chip, which will use 3-nanometer technology as opposed to the current 5-nanometer. The M3 chip may be used in future Macs to be unveiled next year.</p> <p>Apple (AAPL) did not immediately respond to a request for comment from Seeking Alpha.</p> <p>The new MacBook Air, one of Apple&#39;s (AAPL) most popular devices, could help stem a sales decline that the company has dealt with for the past few quarters.</p> <p>According to recent data from research firm IDC, Mac sales dropped 40.5% year-over-year to 4.1M units during the first-quarter. </p> <p>Conversely, overall PC sales declined 29% year-over-year to 56.9M units in the period, as weak demand, excess inventory and the continued deterioration of the global economy continued to weigh on consumer electronics.</p> <p>Apple (AAPL) and other PC makers benefited in 2021 and the first-part of 2022 as the surge in remote work, caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, led to workers and businesses refreshing their machines.</p> <p>In the tech giant&#39;s most recent quarter, Apple (AAPL) said it generated $7.7B in Mac-related revenue, down from $10.85B in the year-ago period. Apple (AAPL) does not break out unit sales in its quarterly filings.</p> <p>Apple (AAPL) is slated to discuss its second fiscal quarter results on May 4, 2023.</p> <p>On Thursday, Apple (AAPL) confirmed that its AppleTV+ streaming service would be coming to France&#39;s Canal Plus.</p></body></html>","source":"seekingalpha","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Apple Said to Be Testing New Macs With Processors Similar to M2</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nApple Said to Be Testing New Macs With Processors Similar to M2\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2023-04-15 08:05 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/news/3956691-apple-testing-new-macs-with-processors-similar-to-m2><strong>Seekingalpha</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL) may be dealing with a significant decline in Mac sales, but the tech giant is reportedly working on new Macs in an effort to boost sales. The company is currently testing a MacBook...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/news/3956691-apple-testing-new-macs-with-processors-similar-to-m2\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AAPL":"苹果"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/news/3956691-apple-testing-new-macs-with-processors-similar-to-m2","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/5a36db9d73b4222bc376d24ccc48c8a4","article_id":"2327083177","content_text":"Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL) may be dealing with a significant decline in Mac sales, but the tech giant is reportedly working on new Macs in an effort to boost sales. The company is currently testing a MacBook Air with a larger screen with third-party apps from the App Store, Bloomberg reported. The new machine is using chips similar to the current M2 line of processors that Apple (AAPL) unveiled in 2022, the news outlet added. Earlier this year, Apple (AAPL) unveiled new a MacBook Pro and Mac mini, along with M2 Pro and M2 Max chips. It's possible that the new machine, which would have a larger display than the 13.6-inch MacBook Air computers that use M1 or M2 chips, could be unveiled in the summer, the news outlet added.  In addition to the larger MacBook Air, the company is working on an updated version of the 13.6-inch Air, a new 24-inch iMac and a new entry-level MacBook Pro, Bloomberg added. Cupertino, California-based Apple (AAPL) is also said to be working on its M3 chip, which will use 3-nanometer technology as opposed to the current 5-nanometer. The M3 chip may be used in future Macs to be unveiled next year. Apple (AAPL) did not immediately respond to a request for comment from Seeking Alpha. The new MacBook Air, one of Apple's (AAPL) most popular devices, could help stem a sales decline that the company has dealt with for the past few quarters. According to recent data from research firm IDC, Mac sales dropped 40.5% year-over-year to 4.1M units during the first-quarter.  Conversely, overall PC sales declined 29% year-over-year to 56.9M units in the period, as weak demand, excess inventory and the continued deterioration of the global economy continued to weigh on consumer electronics. Apple (AAPL) and other PC makers benefited in 2021 and the first-part of 2022 as the surge in remote work, caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, led to workers and businesses refreshing their machines. In the tech giant's most recent quarter, Apple (AAPL) said it generated $7.7B in Mac-related revenue, down from $10.85B in the year-ago period. Apple (AAPL) does not break out unit sales in its quarterly filings. Apple (AAPL) is slated to discuss its second fiscal quarter results on May 4, 2023. On Thursday, Apple (AAPL) confirmed that its AppleTV+ streaming service would be coming to France's Canal Plus.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":142,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9943560220,"gmtCreate":1679562309960,"gmtModify":1679564637074,"author":{"id":"4128031068075382","authorId":"4128031068075382","name":"Sanz13 8","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/2d76b14dbabd0a8eab48c97801bef4a7","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"themes":[],"htmlText":"[Cry]&nbsp;[Cry]&nbsp;[Cool]&nbsp;[Grin]&nbsp;","listText":"[Cry]&nbsp;[Cry]&nbsp;[Cool]&nbsp;[Grin]&nbsp;","text":"[Cry] [Cry] [Cool] [Grin]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9943560220","repostId":"2321197619","repostType":2,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":167,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9957561112,"gmtCreate":1677406037237,"gmtModify":1677407337356,"author":{"id":"4128031068075382","authorId":"4128031068075382","name":"Sanz13 8","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/2d76b14dbabd0a8eab48c97801bef4a7","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Share your opinion about this news…","listText":"Share your opinion about this news…","text":"Share your opinion about this news…","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":11,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9957561112","repostId":"2314104357","repostType":2,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":133,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"hots":[{"id":9957561112,"gmtCreate":1677406037237,"gmtModify":1677407337356,"author":{"id":"4128031068075382","authorId":"4128031068075382","name":"Sanz13 8","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/2d76b14dbabd0a8eab48c97801bef4a7","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Share your opinion about this news…","listText":"Share your opinion about this news…","text":"Share your opinion about this news…","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":11,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9957561112","repostId":"2314104357","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"2314104357","pubTimestamp":1677379035,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2314104357?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2023-02-26 10:37","market":"us","language":"en","title":"3 Bargain Stocks Worth Buying at These 52-Week Lows","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2314104357","media":"InvestorPlace","summary":"Finding stocks trading at 52-week lows can be a profitable strategy for risk-tolerant traders.TFF Ph","content":"<html><head></head><body><ul><li>Finding stocks trading at 52-week lows can be a profitable strategy for risk-tolerant traders.</li><li><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TFFP\">TFF Pharmaceuticals</a></b> (<b><u>TFFP</u></b>): If this clinical-stage biopharma company can find a partner before it runs out of cash, its runway could be long. </li><li><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/STKH\">Steakholder Foods</a></b> (<b><u>STKH</u></b>): The company has multiple patents aimed at innovation and disruption in food. </li><li><b>Real Good Food</b> (<b><u>RGF</u></b>): Their line of healthy frozen food is competing in the right channels.</li></ul><p><img src=\"https://investorplace.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/cheap-bargain-stock-tickers-768x432.jpg\" tg-width=\"768\" tg-height=\"432\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p>Source: Shutterstock</p><p>Who doesn’t love a bargain? We look for deals in many places. And when it comes to investing, we look for bargain stocks. This can mean different things to different investors. Some investors will consider a stock a bargain if it’s undervalued.</p><p>But this is no ordinary market. You’ve heard of hard landings and soft landings. But right now, there are growing concerns about stagflation which is the scenario of no immediate landing. That would be bad news for even the “safest” of stocks. That’s why it may be time to try something new.</p><p>In coming up with the stocks for this article, I’m looking at stocks that are trading at or near 52-week lows and have some analyst support.</p><p>While no strategy is foolproof, finding stocks trading at 52-week lows in a market like this can make for a profitable trade. If nothing else, these bargain stocks aren’t overvalued. And if they have the support of an analyst or a handful of analysts, it can signal that the 52-week low will serve as support.</p><p>With that in mind, every stock on this list is a penny stock. Penny stocks carry a tremendous risk and the possibility of an outsized reward. And while each stock has a story that could send it much higher, each of these bargain stocks may never deliver on its promise.</p><table border=\"1\"><tbody><tr><td><b>TFFP</b></td><td>TFF Pharmaceuticals</td><td>$0.73</td></tr><tr><td><b>STKH</b></td><td>Steakholder Foods</td><td>$0.80</td></tr><tr><td><b>RGF</b></td><td>Real Good Food</td><td>$4.23</td></tr></tbody></table><h2></h2><h2>TFF Pharmaceuticals (TFFP) </h2><p><img src=\"https://investorplace.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/biotech_bigpharma1600-300x169.png\" tg-width=\"300\" tg-height=\"169\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p>Source: Hernan E. Schmidt / Shutterstock.com</p><p><b>TFF Pharmaceuticals</b> (NASDAQ:<b>TFFP</b>) is a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company that has developed its proprietary Thin Film Freezing technology. The technology attempts to “transform medicines into elegant and potent dry powders for better efficacy, safety, and stability.”</p><p>Although the company does not have a product through clinical trials, there’s no evidence that the technology doesn’t work. But to date, the company has not found a partner that would provide the necessary funding.</p><p>And, like all biotechs, that’s the real issue. The company said in December that it was capitalized through 2023. But they won’t have a product through clinical trials until 2024. So that could mean another round of share dilution unless they find a partner.</p><p>One thing that may help that process is that the company has appointed an interim CEO. The leadership of former CEO Glenn Mattes was called into question by shareholders.</p><p>Analysts do not widely cover the company. But it does have the support of the analysts that do cover the stock. It has a consensus buy rating and a price target of $20, a gain of over 2,900%.</p><h2></h2><h2>Steakholder Foods (STKH) </h2><p><img src=\"https://investorplace.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/fake_meat_1600-300x169.jpg\" tg-width=\"300\" tg-height=\"169\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p>Source: barmalini/Shutterstock.com</p><p><b>Steakholder Foods</b> (NASDAQ:<b>STKH</b>) was formerly known as MeaTech 3D. The new name, however, fits into their mission of being a leader in the emerging field of structured or cultivated meat. And the play on the word “stakeholder” can’t hurt when you’re a company bound to be looked upon favorably by investors who prioritize ESG (environmental, sustainability, and corporate governance) standards.</p><p>The company is using 3D bioprinting to make meat from animal cells. The goal is to feed a growing population while protecting the environment and the welfare of animals. The company has applied for 18 patents and has received and been granted four.</p><p>Numerous analysts suggest cultivated meat will have a large addressable market between now and 2050. That makes STKH stock a long-term play. However, as the company’s recent $6.5 million securities offering reminds investors, this will still be volatile.</p><h2></h2><h2>Real Good Food (RGF) </h2><p><img src=\"https://investorplace.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/bakery-bread-1600-300x169.jpg\" tg-width=\"300\" tg-height=\"169\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p>Source: shutterstock.com/ampersandphoto</p><p>The last of our bargain stocks is another play on the future of food is <b>The Real Good Food Company</b> (NASDAQ:<b>RGF</b>). But this company is generating revenue today. And the company’s gluten-free and grain-free products are in several notable channels, such as <b>Costco</b> (NASDAQ:<b>COST</b>) and Sam’s Club.</p><p>The marketing message is that the company offers products that have more protein with fewer carbs and without sacrificing taste.</p><p>The company was profitable GAAP-based in two out of the last three quarters. But the company went from a GAAP profit of 49 cents a share to a loss of 51 cents a share in the previous quarter. And with revenue jumping over 20% sequentially, the company may have difficulty passing inflation-related costs along to its customers.</p><p>Revenue and earnings are expected to grow at 38% and 34% in the next five years. Eight analysts give RGF stock a $14.28 mean price target. That’s a gain of over 230% from its current price.</p></body></html>","source":"investorplace","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>3 Bargain Stocks Worth Buying at These 52-Week Lows</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n3 Bargain Stocks Worth Buying at These 52-Week Lows\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2023-02-26 10:37 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://investorplace.com/2023/02/3-bargain-stocks-worth-buying-at-these-52-week-lows/><strong>InvestorPlace</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Finding stocks trading at 52-week lows can be a profitable strategy for risk-tolerant traders.TFF Pharmaceuticals (TFFP): If this clinical-stage biopharma company can find a partner before it runs out...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://investorplace.com/2023/02/3-bargain-stocks-worth-buying-at-these-52-week-lows/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"LU1551013425.SGD":"Allianz Income and Growth Cl AMg2 DIS H2-SGD","PSQ":"纳指反向ETF","LU0256863811.USD":"ALLIANZ US EQUITY \"A\" INC","LU1571399168.USD":"ALLSPRING GLOBAL LONG/SHORT EQUITY \"IP\" (USD) ACC","QQQ":"纳指100ETF","QLD":"纳指两倍做多ETF","LU0943347566.SGD":"安联收益及增长平衡基金AM H2-SGD","TQQQ":"纳指三倍做多ETF",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite","STKH":"Steakholder Foods","LU0417517546.SGD":"Allianz US Equity Cl AT Acc SGD","BK4212":"包装食品与肉类","LU2360032135.SGD":"ALLSPRING GLOBAL EQUITY ENHANCED INCOME \"A\" (SGDHDG) INC","LU0079474960.USD":"联博美国增长基金A","BK4504":"桥水持仓","LU1551013342.USD":"Allianz Income and Growth Cl AMg2 DIS USD","BK4155":"大卖场与超市","LU2095319765.USD":"Natixis Thematics Subscription Economy R/A USD","BK4585":"ETF&股票定投概念","LU2125154778.USD":"ALLSPRING GLOBAL EQUITY ENHANCED INCOME \"A\" (USD) INC","BK4533":"AQR资本管理(全球第二大对冲基金)","LU2210150020.SGD":"Natixis Thematics Subscription Economy R/A SGD","BK4007":"制药","LU0820561909.HKD":"ALLIANZ INCOME AND GROWTH \"AM\" (HKD) INC","SQQQ":"纳指三倍做空ETF","LU2210149790.SGD":"Natixis Thematics Subscription Economy R/A SGD-H","LU0820561818.USD":"安联收益及增长平衡基金Cl AM DIS","RGF":"The Real Good Food Company, Inc.","LU2125154935.USD":"ALLSPRING (LUX) WF GLOBAL EQUITY ENHANCED INCOME \"I\" (USD) INC","COST":"好市多","IE00BZ1G4Q59.USD":"LEGG MASON CLEARBRIDGE US EQUITY SUSTAINABILITY LEADER \"A\"(USD) INC (A)","TFFP":"TFF Pharmaceuticals","BK4550":"红杉资本持仓","BK4588":"碎股","LU0689472784.USD":"安联收益及增长基金Cl AM AT Acc","QID":"纳指两倍做空ETF","BK4581":"高盛持仓","IE00BKVL7J92.USD":"Legg Mason ClearBridge - US Equity Sustainability Leaders A Acc USD"},"source_url":"https://investorplace.com/2023/02/3-bargain-stocks-worth-buying-at-these-52-week-lows/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2314104357","content_text":"Finding stocks trading at 52-week lows can be a profitable strategy for risk-tolerant traders.TFF Pharmaceuticals (TFFP): If this clinical-stage biopharma company can find a partner before it runs out of cash, its runway could be long. Steakholder Foods (STKH): The company has multiple patents aimed at innovation and disruption in food. Real Good Food (RGF): Their line of healthy frozen food is competing in the right channels.Source: ShutterstockWho doesn’t love a bargain? We look for deals in many places. And when it comes to investing, we look for bargain stocks. This can mean different things to different investors. Some investors will consider a stock a bargain if it’s undervalued.But this is no ordinary market. You’ve heard of hard landings and soft landings. But right now, there are growing concerns about stagflation which is the scenario of no immediate landing. That would be bad news for even the “safest” of stocks. That’s why it may be time to try something new.In coming up with the stocks for this article, I’m looking at stocks that are trading at or near 52-week lows and have some analyst support.While no strategy is foolproof, finding stocks trading at 52-week lows in a market like this can make for a profitable trade. If nothing else, these bargain stocks aren’t overvalued. And if they have the support of an analyst or a handful of analysts, it can signal that the 52-week low will serve as support.With that in mind, every stock on this list is a penny stock. Penny stocks carry a tremendous risk and the possibility of an outsized reward. And while each stock has a story that could send it much higher, each of these bargain stocks may never deliver on its promise.TFFPTFF Pharmaceuticals$0.73STKHSteakholder Foods$0.80RGFReal Good Food$4.23TFF Pharmaceuticals (TFFP) Source: Hernan E. Schmidt / Shutterstock.comTFF Pharmaceuticals (NASDAQ:TFFP) is a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company that has developed its proprietary Thin Film Freezing technology. The technology attempts to “transform medicines into elegant and potent dry powders for better efficacy, safety, and stability.”Although the company does not have a product through clinical trials, there’s no evidence that the technology doesn’t work. But to date, the company has not found a partner that would provide the necessary funding.And, like all biotechs, that’s the real issue. The company said in December that it was capitalized through 2023. But they won’t have a product through clinical trials until 2024. So that could mean another round of share dilution unless they find a partner.One thing that may help that process is that the company has appointed an interim CEO. The leadership of former CEO Glenn Mattes was called into question by shareholders.Analysts do not widely cover the company. But it does have the support of the analysts that do cover the stock. It has a consensus buy rating and a price target of $20, a gain of over 2,900%.Steakholder Foods (STKH) Source: barmalini/Shutterstock.comSteakholder Foods (NASDAQ:STKH) was formerly known as MeaTech 3D. The new name, however, fits into their mission of being a leader in the emerging field of structured or cultivated meat. And the play on the word “stakeholder” can’t hurt when you’re a company bound to be looked upon favorably by investors who prioritize ESG (environmental, sustainability, and corporate governance) standards.The company is using 3D bioprinting to make meat from animal cells. The goal is to feed a growing population while protecting the environment and the welfare of animals. The company has applied for 18 patents and has received and been granted four.Numerous analysts suggest cultivated meat will have a large addressable market between now and 2050. That makes STKH stock a long-term play. However, as the company’s recent $6.5 million securities offering reminds investors, this will still be volatile.Real Good Food (RGF) Source: shutterstock.com/ampersandphotoThe last of our bargain stocks is another play on the future of food is The Real Good Food Company (NASDAQ:RGF). But this company is generating revenue today. And the company’s gluten-free and grain-free products are in several notable channels, such as Costco (NASDAQ:COST) and Sam’s Club.The marketing message is that the company offers products that have more protein with fewer carbs and without sacrificing taste.The company was profitable GAAP-based in two out of the last three quarters. But the company went from a GAAP profit of 49 cents a share to a loss of 51 cents a share in the previous quarter. And with revenue jumping over 20% sequentially, the company may have difficulty passing inflation-related costs along to its customers.Revenue and earnings are expected to grow at 38% and 34% in the next five years. Eight analysts give RGF stock a $14.28 mean price target. That’s a gain of over 230% from its current price.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":133,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9970708694,"gmtCreate":1684914517019,"gmtModify":1684914533865,"author":{"id":"4128031068075382","authorId":"4128031068075382","name":"Sanz13 8","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/2d76b14dbabd0a8eab48c97801bef4a7","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"themes":[],"htmlText":"All the best ways for","listText":"All the best ways for","text":"All the best ways for","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9970708694","repostId":"2337733918","repostType":2,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":218,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9970708891,"gmtCreate":1684914436014,"gmtModify":1684914477196,"author":{"id":"4128031068075382","authorId":"4128031068075382","name":"Sanz13 8","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/2d76b14dbabd0a8eab48c97801bef4a7","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Share your opinion about this news…","listText":"Share your opinion about this news…","text":"Share your opinion about this news…","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9970708891","repostId":"2337733918","repostType":2,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":134,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9943560220,"gmtCreate":1679562309960,"gmtModify":1679564637074,"author":{"id":"4128031068075382","authorId":"4128031068075382","name":"Sanz13 8","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/2d76b14dbabd0a8eab48c97801bef4a7","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"themes":[],"htmlText":"[Cry]&nbsp;[Cry]&nbsp;[Cool]&nbsp;[Grin]&nbsp;","listText":"[Cry]&nbsp;[Cry]&nbsp;[Cool]&nbsp;[Grin]&nbsp;","text":"[Cry] [Cry] [Cool] [Grin]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9943560220","repostId":"2321197619","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"2321197619","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Dow Jones publishes the world’s most trusted business news and financial information in a variety of media.","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Dow Jones","id":"106","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99"},"pubTimestamp":1679559843,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2321197619?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2023-03-23 16:24","market":"us","language":"en","title":"This Is Why U.S. Stocks Tumbled After Fed’s Powell Signaled Only One More Rate Hike in 2023","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2321197619","media":"Dow Jones","summary":"Investors got the \"dovish\" rate hike that they had been hoping for on Wednesday.But why did the Dow ","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Investors got the &#34;dovish&#34; rate hike that they had been hoping for on Wednesday.</p><p>But why did the Dow Jones Industrial Average  fall more than 500 points after Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell hiked rates by 25 basis points and signaled that only one more hike would follow?</p><p>The answer, according to several market strategists, is because Powell, in his afternoon news conference, left investors with little certainty and plenty to worry about.</p><p>On the one hand, the Fed chair played up expectations for a worsening credit crunch that would essentially do the Fed&#39;s job for it by hurting the economy and labor market, while helping to combat inflation.</p><p>But while Powell assured reporters and the public that U.S. banks were well-capitalized and &#34;sound,&#34; Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen told a Senate committee that &#34;blanket&#34; deposit insurance hadn&#39;t been considered or discussed by her department, helping to drive stocks lower, market strategists said</p><p>That appeared to be a disappointment to investors after news reports said authorities were studying ways to expand insurance to all deposits if the banking worries spawned by the failure earlier this month of Silicon Valley Bank grow.</p><p>By the time markets closed, the S&amp;P 500 financial services sector had fallen by 2.4%, making it the worst performer on the S&amp;P 500 , which shed 65.90 points, or 1.7%, to 3,936.97. The Nasdaq Composite  fell 190.15 points, or 1.6%, to 11,669.96, according to FactSet.</p><p>By comparison, stocks had rallied on Tuesday as investors bid up stocks in anticipation of Powell expressing a less-aggressive outlook for interest rates.</p><p>Unfortunately for stock investors, that&#39;s exactly what they got.</p><p>Expectations for a lower Fed terminal, or peak, rate should benefit stocks, at least in theory.</p><p>But when such expectations are informed by fears about a potentially serious economic downturn, which is what happened on Wednesday, the outlook can be more complicated, said Steve Sosnick, chief market strategist at Interactive Brokers, in a phone interview.</p><p>Although Powell ruled out rate cuts before the end of 2023, both Fed funds futures and Treasury yields appear to be pricing in as many as three rate cuts later this year, Sosnick said.</p><p>Hopes for rate cuts benefited stocks in the recent past. But now, &#34;investors need to be careful what they wish for,&#34; Sosnick said.</p><p>&#34;Most scenarios that get you to that level of interest rates are not stock-market friendly,&#34; he added.</p><p>The yield on the 2-year note BX:TMUBMUSD02Y fell by more than 20 basis points to 3.960% on Wednesday, according to FactSet.</p><p>Concerns that the Fed risked leaving its battle against inflation unfinished helped to compound the market&#39;s losses.</p><p>Chris Zaccarelli, chief investment officer for Independent Advisor Alliance, said in emailed comments that Fed officials are &#34;potentially losing their nerve in fighting inflation&#34; which could create more issues for markets and the economy down the road.</p><p>All things considered, Powell&#39;s news conference was decidedly market-negative, according to Peter Boockvar, chief investment officer of Bleakley Financial Group, who said that Powell confronted markets with a &#34;trifecta of trouble.&#34;</p><p>&#34;Powell acknowledges the credit crunch ahead, says inflation and price stability are still a big focus and that they don&#39;t foresee cutting interest rates this year...no wonder why the stock market closed at the lows,&#34; he said in a note emailed to reporters.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>This Is Why U.S. Stocks Tumbled After Fed’s Powell Signaled Only One More Rate Hike in 2023</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nThis Is Why U.S. Stocks Tumbled After Fed’s Powell Signaled Only One More Rate Hike in 2023\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Dow Jones </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2023-03-23 16:24</p>\n</div>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>Investors got the &#34;dovish&#34; rate hike that they had been hoping for on Wednesday.</p><p>But why did the Dow Jones Industrial Average  fall more than 500 points after Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell hiked rates by 25 basis points and signaled that only one more hike would follow?</p><p>The answer, according to several market strategists, is because Powell, in his afternoon news conference, left investors with little certainty and plenty to worry about.</p><p>On the one hand, the Fed chair played up expectations for a worsening credit crunch that would essentially do the Fed&#39;s job for it by hurting the economy and labor market, while helping to combat inflation.</p><p>But while Powell assured reporters and the public that U.S. banks were well-capitalized and &#34;sound,&#34; Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen told a Senate committee that &#34;blanket&#34; deposit insurance hadn&#39;t been considered or discussed by her department, helping to drive stocks lower, market strategists said</p><p>That appeared to be a disappointment to investors after news reports said authorities were studying ways to expand insurance to all deposits if the banking worries spawned by the failure earlier this month of Silicon Valley Bank grow.</p><p>By the time markets closed, the S&amp;P 500 financial services sector had fallen by 2.4%, making it the worst performer on the S&amp;P 500 , which shed 65.90 points, or 1.7%, to 3,936.97. The Nasdaq Composite  fell 190.15 points, or 1.6%, to 11,669.96, according to FactSet.</p><p>By comparison, stocks had rallied on Tuesday as investors bid up stocks in anticipation of Powell expressing a less-aggressive outlook for interest rates.</p><p>Unfortunately for stock investors, that&#39;s exactly what they got.</p><p>Expectations for a lower Fed terminal, or peak, rate should benefit stocks, at least in theory.</p><p>But when such expectations are informed by fears about a potentially serious economic downturn, which is what happened on Wednesday, the outlook can be more complicated, said Steve Sosnick, chief market strategist at Interactive Brokers, in a phone interview.</p><p>Although Powell ruled out rate cuts before the end of 2023, both Fed funds futures and Treasury yields appear to be pricing in as many as three rate cuts later this year, Sosnick said.</p><p>Hopes for rate cuts benefited stocks in the recent past. But now, &#34;investors need to be careful what they wish for,&#34; Sosnick said.</p><p>&#34;Most scenarios that get you to that level of interest rates are not stock-market friendly,&#34; he added.</p><p>The yield on the 2-year note BX:TMUBMUSD02Y fell by more than 20 basis points to 3.960% on Wednesday, according to FactSet.</p><p>Concerns that the Fed risked leaving its battle against inflation unfinished helped to compound the market&#39;s losses.</p><p>Chris Zaccarelli, chief investment officer for Independent Advisor Alliance, said in emailed comments that Fed officials are &#34;potentially losing their nerve in fighting inflation&#34; which could create more issues for markets and the economy down the road.</p><p>All things considered, Powell&#39;s news conference was decidedly market-negative, according to Peter Boockvar, chief investment officer of Bleakley Financial Group, who said that Powell confronted markets with a &#34;trifecta of trouble.&#34;</p><p>&#34;Powell acknowledges the credit crunch ahead, says inflation and price stability are still a big focus and that they don&#39;t foresee cutting interest rates this year...no wonder why the stock market closed at the lows,&#34; he said in a note emailed to reporters.</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".DJI":"道琼斯",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite","BK4096":"电气部件与设备"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2321197619","content_text":"Investors got the \"dovish\" rate hike that they had been hoping for on Wednesday.But why did the Dow Jones Industrial Average  fall more than 500 points after Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell hiked rates by 25 basis points and signaled that only one more hike would follow?The answer, according to several market strategists, is because Powell, in his afternoon news conference, left investors with little certainty and plenty to worry about.On the one hand, the Fed chair played up expectations for a worsening credit crunch that would essentially do the Fed's job for it by hurting the economy and labor market, while helping to combat inflation.But while Powell assured reporters and the public that U.S. banks were well-capitalized and \"sound,\" Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen told a Senate committee that \"blanket\" deposit insurance hadn't been considered or discussed by her department, helping to drive stocks lower, market strategists saidThat appeared to be a disappointment to investors after news reports said authorities were studying ways to expand insurance to all deposits if the banking worries spawned by the failure earlier this month of Silicon Valley Bank grow.By the time markets closed, the S&P 500 financial services sector had fallen by 2.4%, making it the worst performer on the S&P 500 , which shed 65.90 points, or 1.7%, to 3,936.97. The Nasdaq Composite  fell 190.15 points, or 1.6%, to 11,669.96, according to FactSet.By comparison, stocks had rallied on Tuesday as investors bid up stocks in anticipation of Powell expressing a less-aggressive outlook for interest rates.Unfortunately for stock investors, that's exactly what they got.Expectations for a lower Fed terminal, or peak, rate should benefit stocks, at least in theory.But when such expectations are informed by fears about a potentially serious economic downturn, which is what happened on Wednesday, the outlook can be more complicated, said Steve Sosnick, chief market strategist at Interactive Brokers, in a phone interview.Although Powell ruled out rate cuts before the end of 2023, both Fed funds futures and Treasury yields appear to be pricing in as many as three rate cuts later this year, Sosnick said.Hopes for rate cuts benefited stocks in the recent past. But now, \"investors need to be careful what they wish for,\" Sosnick said.\"Most scenarios that get you to that level of interest rates are not stock-market friendly,\" he added.The yield on the 2-year note BX:TMUBMUSD02Y fell by more than 20 basis points to 3.960% on Wednesday, according to FactSet.Concerns that the Fed risked leaving its battle against inflation unfinished helped to compound the market's losses.Chris Zaccarelli, chief investment officer for Independent Advisor Alliance, said in emailed comments that Fed officials are \"potentially losing their nerve in fighting inflation\" which could create more issues for markets and the economy down the road.All things considered, Powell's news conference was decidedly market-negative, according to Peter Boockvar, chief investment officer of Bleakley Financial Group, who said that Powell confronted markets with a \"trifecta of trouble.\"\"Powell acknowledges the credit crunch ahead, says inflation and price stability are still a big focus and that they don't foresee cutting interest rates this year...no wonder why the stock market closed at the lows,\" he said in a note emailed to reporters.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":167,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":192899408724104,"gmtCreate":1688124097946,"gmtModify":1688124102505,"author":{"id":"4128031068075382","authorId":"4128031068075382","name":"Sanz13 8","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/2d76b14dbabd0a8eab48c97801bef4a7","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"themes":[],"title":"Telaser","htmlText":"Every one&nbsp;[Spurting]\" draggable=\"false&nbsp;[Angry]\" draggable=\"false&nbsp;","listText":"Every one&nbsp;[Spurting]\" draggable=\"false&nbsp;[Angry]\" draggable=\"false&nbsp;","text":"Every one [Spurting]\" draggable=\"false [Angry]\" draggable=\"false","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":2,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/192899408724104","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":139,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9945744274,"gmtCreate":1681609431798,"gmtModify":1681613341686,"author":{"id":"4128031068075382","authorId":"4128031068075382","name":"Sanz13 8","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/2d76b14dbabd0a8eab48c97801bef4a7","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/ANZ.AU\">$AUST BANKING(ANZ.AU)$&nbsp;</a>","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/ANZ.AU\">$AUST BANKING(ANZ.AU)$&nbsp;</a>","text":"$AUST BANKING(ANZ.AU)$","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9945744274","repostId":"2327083177","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":142,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"lives":[]}