On the morning of May 21, 2026, a dramatic scene unfolded in the Hong Kong stock market.
Over the following three trading sessions,
What is the background of this company?
In 2025, the company reported operating revenue of RMB 219 million, a year-on-year decrease of 21.46%. Net profit attributable to shareholders was a mere RMB 15.336 million, down 23.85% year-on-year. Net cash flow from operating activities was negative for the second consecutive year, deteriorating further to -RMB 19.788 million in 2025. As of the end of 2025, cash and cash equivalents stood at only about RMB 54.9 million, with basic earnings per share of just RMB 0.015.
This is a traditional telecom service provider facing pressure across revenue, profit, and cash flow, experiencing operational cash outflows for two consecutive years.
A Capital Frenzy Ignited by Inclusion Expectations
The stock's meteoric rise began with the anticipation of Stock Connect eligibility. On March 9, 2026,
Catalyzed by this expectation, the company's share price experienced a frenzied rally over two months. Starting from March 10, the price climbed to a high of approximately HK$7.085 on April 20, representing a cumulative increase of 167% during that period. With an extremely scarce free float, a small amount of capital was able to drive significant price increases, completely detaching the stock price from its fundamentals. During this time, the company took advantage of the momentum to implement a 1-for-4 stock split, increasing the total number of issued shares from 1 billion to 4 billion. Following the split, the share price trend reversed sharply, halving in a single day on April 24.
Why Couldn't the AI Narrative Support the Skyrocketing Valuation?
Just one week before the crash,
However, computing power leasing is a capital-intensive industry with high demands on cash flow. The feasibility of a company with negative operating cash flow in 2025 and only about RMB 54.9 million in cash on its books trying to compete in this sector was inherently questionable to the market. More critically, by the day before the crash, the company's trailing twelve-month P/E ratio had soared to 1,274.5 times, with a price-to-book ratio of approximately 90.99 times, while its full-year net profit was only RMB 15.336 million. The valuation bubble had long detached from any reasonable range.
In its announcement, the company also admitted that its AI strategic transformation was still in its early stages, with progress subject to multiple uncertainties including technology, market, policy, and operational risks.
Why Does the "Inclusion Leads to Collapse" Pattern Persist?
The crash of
The underlying logic of this phenomenon is highly consistent: some stocks have an extremely small free float before inclusion, allowing a small amount of capital to generate multi-fold rallies. Upon official inclusion, southbound capital flows in passively, while short-term speculative capital takes profits at elevated levels. The extremely thin liquidity cannot absorb the selling pressure, triggering a cliff-like crash.
Looking at fund flows, despite the stock price crash, southbound capital purchased HK$1.24 billion worth of shares on the day of the plunge. Such high-volume turnover further validates the market behavior pattern of "old capital fleeing, new capital stepping in."
A noteworthy detail is that on May 11—just 10 days before the crash—the company adjusted the use of its raised capital. It reallocated RMB 11 million originally planned for expanding the project management team to RMB 8 million for ICT integration project working capital and RMB 3 million for repaying bank loans. Against the backdrop of continuous cash outflow, this "robbing Peter to pay Paul" maneuver with raised funds objectively heightened market concerns about liquidity pressure.
An Inevitable Valuation Correction
There's an old saying in capital markets: "Speculation can ignore fundamentals, but it cannot ultimately escape them." A traditional telecom network service company with declining revenue and net profit in 2025 and consistently negative cash flow saw its share price skyrocket over 700% in a few months, driven solely by the combination of blockchain and AI narratives and Stock Connect inclusion expectations. Such a rally was, in itself, a classic valuation bubble.
Neither the hasty pivot to AI computing power nor technical maneuvers like stock splits could provide solid support for such a distortedly high valuation. Before the crash, the static P/E ratio had exceeded 1,600 times. After the crash, nearly 84% of the market cap evaporated. Yet, based on this, the valuation of a company with an annual net profit of only RMB 15.336 million still lacks earnings support.
The cliff-like plunge on May 21, while seemingly sudden, was an inevitable valuation reckoning waiting to happen. For both the Stock Connect constituent selection mechanism and investor risk education, the case of
Comments