Participation in Shuibei's gold "pre-priced trading" platforms now requires identity verification and manual approval, a process that often takes a full day—a stark contrast to the simple registration previously needed.
Despite warnings from the Shenzhen Gold & Jewelry Association two months ago about potential illegal activities in these transactions, investigations reveal they have not ceased. Instead, they have evolved into more covert operations with complex rules and higher leverage.
A notable shift is the rebranding of "pre-priced trading" to "fixed-price settlement." Users pay a deposit to lock in gold prices and settle profits or losses based on real-time rates without physical delivery. Some platforms offer 100x leverage, allowing trades worth nearly 1 million yuan with just 10,000 yuan in margin.
The market's participants have also changed. Previously dominated by experienced local gold dealers, the sector now attracts inexperienced retail investors focused solely on electronic trading, bypassing physical gold entirely.
**Going Deeper Underground** Platforms have raised entry barriers, requiring ID photos, bank details, and manual verification. Smaller operators have moved from public-facing mini-programs to private apps, while fund transfers have become more opaque—some platforms direct users to deposit via private bank accounts with delayed balance updates.
Transactions display "tax-exclusive" prices. For example, one platform lists gold buyback at 941 yuan/gram and sales at 943 yuan/gram, excluding taxes. Users must complete physical withdrawals within 90 days, with no profit guarantees.
**Evolving Models** To avoid tax liabilities from physical delivery, some platforms now emphasize "fixed-price settlement," where users speculate on price movements without handling gold. For instance, a 300-yuan deposit on 5 grams of gold yields a 50-yuan profit if prices rise by 10 yuan/gram—a 15x leverage. Risk controls trigger margin calls or automatic liquidation if losses exceed thresholds.
Smaller platforms have adopted direct leveraged trading, offering 100x leverage. Traders profit from price swings in either direction, but high fees (e.g., 48 yuan per 100-gram trade) erode gains.
**Regulatory Gaps and Risks** Experts warn that platforms claiming offshore API hedging to reduce costs lack transparency. Unlike regulated gold futures requiring ~20% margin, these platforms allow 1-million-yuan trades with just 10,000 yuan—a 20x cost difference. Risks include unverified hedging, illegal cross-border fund flows, and potential Ponzi schemes if platforms mismanage client funds.
Legal experts note that non-delivery contracts complicate investor recourse if platforms default.
**New Players and Systemic Risks** The surge in gold prices and digital trading has attracted inexperienced operators running multiple platforms with shared backends. Some intentionally disrupt trading during volatility to exploit clients. Low setup costs (as little as 10,000 yuan for basic systems) enable small teams to manage billion-yuan volumes.
Regulators face challenges in classifying these "spot-like" derivative trades. Effective oversight requires cross-department collaboration to monitor technology providers, payment channels, and platform compliance. Despite growing platform numbers, the market is shrinking as wary investors and regulatory pressures curb expansion.
Comments