The phrase, "You've only finished the college entrance exam, the family hasn't struck it rich," trended again in the summer of 2026, striking a chord with countless parents. In recent years, as the Gaokao concludes each June, a "post-Gaokao economy" fueled by graduating students rapidly heats up. Lists of "pre-freshman expenses" frequently top social media charts, growing longer and more expensive.
When "treating oneself" becomes a standard expectation, and "relaxation" gradually morphs into "keeping up with the Joneses," it's necessary to pause and ask: after students fight their own "battle," why has it turned into a tacitly accepted "bill" for parents to compensate them?
The Admission Ticket as a 'Universal Passport'
"Three years of junior high raising a lazy monarch, three years of senior high creating a tyrant, and after the exam, it's like ascending the throne to inherit the kingdom. I think a collapse is imminent." After the Gaokao, a parent's sharp comment during a discussion about "post-exam wish lists" was startling.
Upon deeper investigation, this isn't just an anecdote but a reflection of the self-deprecating humor and bitter smiles of many parents in recent years.
Recently, scenes of crowded electronics stores have gone viral. Parents queue with their freshly-examined children to buy the latest iPhone models, a scene rivaling holiday shopping frenzies. At counters, some parents spend tens of thousands to equip their children with a full "digital four-piece set"; some children covet new models, tugging at parents' sleeves in prolonged negotiations; others, having performed poorly, turn to social media to "seek advice" on how to get parents to pay up despite bad results.
Similar scenes play out nationwide, slowly permeating thousands of households. One mother shared her child's "post-exam list" online: a new phone, laptop, graduation trip, laser eye surgery, new clothes and shoes, and driver's license fees, totaling over 48,000 yuan. Her list resonated widely. Some lists even stretch to 70,000-80,000 yuan, with parents quipping, "The only thing left is to replace mom and dad."
That flimsy admission ticket has transformed into a "universal passport" in the summer consumer market. "Buy it right after the exam" has become the default move for a growing number of students.
Electronics are the absolute core of this spending. In recent years, orders for phones and tablets in the first week post-exam have increased nearly threefold, with foot traffic in physical stores doubling. Mid-to-high-end models are most popular, with average spending per customer typically between 12,000 and 18,000 yuan. Travel and cultural consumption have also surged. Data from Tongcheng shows search heat increasing over 300% month-on-month; Qunar data indicates a more than 30% month-on-month increase in air ticket bookings for 18-year-old travelers from June 10th to month-end. Additionally, driver training markets see peak enrollment, and medical aesthetics consumption has emerged as a new trend.
According to a joint forecast by the New Express Data Research Center and iiMedia Research, the average per capita spending for this year's incoming freshmen this summer is expected to reach 18,600 yuan, with the total market scale exceeding 380 billion yuan.
What does this figure mean? In May 2026, China's total retail sales of consumer goods fell by 0.6% year-on-year. This indicates that while adults tighten their belts, children are using their parents' wallets to prop up a "post-Gaokao consumption era" larger than the annual GDP of some provinces.
What Fuels This Consumption Frenzy?
When we piece these numbers together, a picture emerges: post-exam spending is no longer an individual choice but a collective societal behavior. When the desires of a few students evolve into a "standard package" for an increasing number, it ceases to be merely private consumption freedom and becomes a social issue requiring scrutiny.
It must be emphasized that not all post-Gaokao spending is problematic. Phones, driver's licenses, short trips—if done within means—are normal family expenditures and are not the focus here. The issue has never been "to buy or not," but "why buy" and "can the family afford it."
The "post-Gaokao economy" didn't form overnight. It results from multiple factors working in concert.
First, it's a concentrated rebound from three years of high-pressure life. For many students, high school life was confined to a loop of desk, cafeteria, and dormitory, with time measured to the minute. Watching a movie was a luxury, with everything deferred until "after the exam." One high schooler confessed to spending 59.9 yuan online to hire someone to report their school for weekend tutoring. They admitted that single-day, monthly, or even non-existent breaks had long led to "many desires festering in the dark."
Thus, once the Gaokao ends, that festering turns into a sprint. Three years of pent-up demand burst forth, which is essentially a normal psychological release. The problem is, this floodwaters have squarely entered the channel of consumerism, creating a sense that the years of hardship were wasted if not compensated by sufficient spending.
Second, it stems from some parents' "compensation logic" and the misconception of "rich upbringing in a poor family."
"Spoiled, isn't it normal for these things to happen?" a well-off parent remarked, noting that many parents view education as an "input-output" transaction, making post-exam revenge spending almost inevitable. However, their own child suggested "no need to upgrade," which they considered fortunate.
But can we blame the children presenting lists entirely? From a young age, many families operate on this logic: from kindergarten to Gaokao, every step is driven by fear of "falling behind." Family life devolves into a logistical support system centered on grades, and emotional companionship degrades into performance assessment. A toy for top-ten ranking, a red envelope for a few places gained, and the promise of "big rewards for getting into a good university" repeated for over a decade. This "effort = reward" logic, used for so long, naturally leads children to expect a "final grand prize" at the finish line. Some even threaten parents before the exam: "No new phone, no serious effort." This isn't a joke; it's a transaction.
Meanwhile, topics like "only after the Gaokao did I learn mom couldn't afford ten thousand yuan" or "only after the exam did I realize I'm not a rich second generation" circulate on youth-focused platforms. This reflects the hidden tragedy of "rich upbringing in a poor family": parents who've never traveled themselves pay tens of thousands for their child's study tours; munching on cheap steamed buns in the car while waiting, yet able to afford 300-yuan-per-hour tutoring. The result? Children raised with modest means develop the appetites of the wealthy. Long-term imbalanced material provision makes some children take parental sacrifice for granted, with no concept of living costs.
Many parents, while striving to provide, fear their child falling behind and心疼 their exhaustion, thus using material goods to "repay a debt"—to compensate for a "deprived" childhood and to reassure themselves as "qualified parents." This very sense of indebtedness hands capital its sharpest blade.
Third, it's fueled by "comparison resonance" within peer social circles.
Social media is flooded with content like "must-buy lists for incoming freshmen" and "I upgraded to a full Apple suite after Gaokao." Students commiserate in comments: "Why does everyone else have it, but not me?" This sentiment breeds the twisted logic that "money shows where love is."
Some, seeing classmates flaunt high-end Apple collections or media stories of fathers rewarding children with lavish digital gifts, feel aggrieved and "judge" their own families, thinking "if you can't afford it, don't have kids" or "birth isn't a favor, support is."
Some even threaten parents: "If you don't give it to me now, and I take shortcuts in university, don't blame me later." The "shortcuts" they mention might be illegal, and the fallout often lands back on the parents. These comparisons and grievances seem like battles among the youth, but looking upstream—the hands pushing them aren't just their peers'.
Fourth, it's a systematic "setup" by capital—from creating "necessity" to fostering "indispensability."
Capital's first move is to "label" products. A phone is no longer a communication tool but the "first social名片" upon entering university; a high-end computer isn't for studying but an "admission ticket" to keep up with peers' entertainment.
After labeling comes building the "ecosystem" chain. Got a phone? Shouldn't you have a tablet? What about headphones, a watch? The term "Apple全家桶" (Apple全家桶) itself is a capital invention—creating an illusion that owning one item is incomplete, and only the full set is whole. Thus, a 6,000-yuan budget easily inflates to 20,000 yuan under the rhetoric of an "ecosystem." The timeline is precisely engineered: sell electronics in summer, subscriptions after enrollment, and "dorm essentials" during back-to-school season. Every milestone for the examinee is precisely priced.
The most intriguing step is riding the algorithm wave. Instead of direct sales pitches, it first peddles a "sense of indebtedness." Through精准算法, brand ads infiltrate年轻人' endless social feeds. Xiaohongshu homepages, the next TikTok video, B站推荐位 all uniformly proclaim: "How wonderful is the youth that拥有它" and "How understanding are parents who buy the four-piece set, acknowledging 12 years of hardship." When "buying" is packaged as "self-love" and parental spending as "loving your child,"消费 is gilded. Who dares refuse?
The Hidden Worries Behind the Frenzy
Students have desires, parents want to compensate, platforms chase traffic, and capital wields the sickle. The problems from this skewed消费狂潮 extend far beyond "how much families spend."
The first thing透支 is the family's financial foundation. Most examinees are not economically independent and rely heavily on parental support. A survey of 131 samples in Pukou District, Nanjing, showed over 60% of families spend more than 20% of their total支出 on their child's summer消费, with nearly 30% exceeding 40%. 85.5% of this money comes from savings. To "not let the child feel deprived," working-class families grit their teeth to keep up. Many students think they're rewarding their youth, but they're actually eroding the family's ability to withstand risks like illness or失业.
More dangerous than emptying wallets is eroding children's消费 judgment. Reasonable self-investment and freshman necessities deserve a place, but when "others have it so I must" becomes the rule, and "flaunting hauls" becomes social currency, it becomes increasingly hard for youth to distinguish "needs" from "wants." It's not "needing a电脑 for university," but "wanting a电脑 that makes others exclaim." Not "taking a trip during summer," but "going somewhere worthy of a nine-grid炫耀朋友圈."
Observing another set of data reveals that if this trend continues unchecked, it hides a ticking time bomb. The "pre-freshman bill" might not be the终点 of three years of desire;相反, it could be a conveyor belt leading a generation,裹挟 by欲望, towards becoming a "debt-laden群体."
A 2025 report by the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences金融研究所 dropped a bombshell: among 175 million Chinese born in the 1990s, only 13.4% are free of mortgage, consumer loan, or online lending debt. The post-00s generation is catching up—combined data from the central bank and Nielsen shows an average annual growth rate of 5.2 percentage points in debt规模 for younger post-00s, with the speed of debt年轻化 exceeding that of the earlier post-90s generation. In other words, "debt-free" youth today are rarer than giant pandas.
Now, juxtapose these two pictures: the child who righteously demands a "four-piece set" after Gaokao, and the young adult graduating four years later with tens of thousands in consumer debt, could be the same person. Never having calculated the family cost behind their "gains," their psychological防线 might be easier to breach when faced with精准围猎 by "interest-free installments" and "consumer loans" later.
But the most painful impact is the corrosion of values and the二次绞杀 of students from disadvantaged backgrounds. If the终点 of over a decade of hard study is waiting for parents to "cash out" their youth, then this rite of passage is misaligned from the start. Treating父母' hardship as a "debt" and one's own insatiable desires as "collecting payment." If the meaning of奋斗 is entirely tied to external rewards, one never learns self-responsibility. Accustomed to measuring everything materially and to a sense of entitlement after付出, such "adult婴儿" values, once formed, will only intensify in university and society.
Simultaneously, this消费狂潮 is a二次绞杀 for impoverished students. While social media debates "buying the iPhone 17" or "attending动漫展," vast numbers from poor families worry about tuition fees and financial aid. The psychological sense of剥夺 from this so-called "post-exam standard"舆论 cannot be ignored. During the post-exam break, some work hard to earn tuition, others wish to spend more time with family before leaving for university. These respectable, meaningful "coming-of-age" acts are贬低 and overshadowed by the绑架 of "no purchase means no love."
In the Ledger of Study, the Biggest Creditor Is Oneself
Amid this flood, some are swept away, while others stand firm with clarity.
As a large group of youth sink deeper into debt, another group is turning back. The number of credit cards in circulation peaked at 807 million in mid-2022 and had fallen to 696 million by the end of 2025—a reduction of 111 million over three years. More post-90s and post-00s are proactively closing credit cards,卸载 lending apps, saving first upon receiving工资, and spending according to plan.
They've grasped a simple truth: true freedom isn't buying whatever you want, but having the choice not to be负债. Debt-free youth aren't理财 geniuses; they merely hold one底线: not spending for面子, not paying for others' opinions.
Similarly, faced with the recent clamor over "lavish coming-of-age ceremonies" or "post-exam standards," another group of examinees acts differently: some work at烧烤店 for their first pocket money; others buy cheap染发剂, rent礼服 with friends for affordable photoshoots, and happily post in "money-saving groups" about "saving eight thousand yuan."
When a reporter wanted to interview Luo Qirebu, who scored 620分 (history) from Mabian Yi Autonomous County Middle School in Leshan, he requested on WeChat: "I need to feed the pigs, can you wait a moment?"
Observers have noted that the "post-Gaokao economy"本质上 is an爆发 of "identity-reconstruction消费." Students attempt to transition from "student" to "准社会人" through travel, electronics purchases,医美, etc. But some have realized: identity should never be built solely on material accumulation. A classmate getting a new phone, attending a different university—what does that matter to me? Friends晒旅行—how does that relate to my life?
Ask them if高三 was hard? Yes. Tiring? Yes. But they clearly know that in the ledger of study, the biggest creditor is themselves. They fought the battle, and the greatest spoils belong to them. Every problem solved, every word memorized, every late night endured ultimately transformed into their own scores, university, and future.
Even if a reward for good performance is due, it should be moderate. What general returns from the front line only to burn through the后勤 (parents') supplies?
These choices might lack the shine of an "Apple全家桶," but they give these年轻人 something more valuable. This isn't losing at the starting line; it's winning in terms of消费观 and values. When material overindulgence becomes the trend, they first learn intellectual independence.
The "post-Gaokao economy" is a grand social experiment. On stage, merchants count money, media造势, parents grit their teeth swiping cards, and some children狂欢 and compare. Offstage lie emptied family savings, distorted youth values, and a future held hostage by consumerism.
The true "coming-of-age" ritual in life is never about collecting a "new digital four-piece set." It's about看清 your family's存款余额, understanding the weight of every penny, and pressing pause on欲望 amidst the algorithm-fed狂欢.
The Gaokao is over, but the real battle of life has just begun.
Comments