Option Focus | SpaceX's $28.31 Million Synthetic Short via Selling 2029 $295 Calls and Buying $135 Puts Signals Institutional Bearish Stance

Option Witch10-06 07:00

SpaceX closed at 171.09 USD, up 7.63% from the previous session.

The options tape showed heavy institutional positioning, led by a $28.31 million synthetic short and a $470,400 bear call spread. The largest trade combined selling 2029 $295 calls and buying 2029 $135 puts for a net credit of $1.47 million, signaling a clear bearish stance on SpaceX. Overall flow leaned toward downside exposure and upside capping, with only scattered bullish call purchases outside the dominant bearish bulk prints.

>>>Start OPTIONS trading & earn up to SGD 200 in rewards!

Options Indicators

SpaceX currently has an implied volatility (IV) of 54.99%, and with an IV percentile of 72.99%, its options sit in an elevated volatility regime where contracts are priced expensively relative to their own recent history. The IV/HV ratio of 1.17 further suggests implied volatility is running above realized volatility, indicating the options market is assigning a richer premium to future movement than what has recently been observed. In this setup, long option positions face a higher premium burden, while premium-selling structures or defined-risk spread strategies may offer a more efficient way to express a view. The Call/Put volume ratio is 1.64.

Large Trades

A bearish synthetic put position with a net credit of $1.47 million stood out as the largest displayed trade. This combination was built by selling 10,000 Jan. 19, 2029 $295.0 calls for $28.31 million and buying 10,000 Jan. 19, 2029 $135.0 puts for $26.84 million, with both legs out of the money versus the $171.09 reference stock price. Structurally, this is a synthetic short setup that profits from downside in the underlying, while the net credit further reinforces a bearish stance and suggests the trader was willing to cap upside participation in exchange for premium intake and long-dated downside exposure.

A bear call spread with a net credit of $470,400 was the other highlighted large trade. The position sold 1,200 Oct. 30, 2026 $172.5 calls for $692,400 and bought 1,200 Oct. 30, 2026 $190.0 calls for $222,000, with both strikes out of the money relative to spot. As a call spread opened for a net credit, the strategy reflects premium collection tied to a bearish view that SPCX is unlikely to rally materially above the short strike, while the long $190.0 call defines risk and limits upside loss if the stock rises sharply.

Overall, the large-trade flow points clearly bearish. The dominant prints were long-dated synthetic short structures and a credit call spread, showing that the biggest institutional-sized positioning leaned toward downside exposure or upside capping rather than aggressive upside participation. Even though there were some bullish call purchases elsewhere in the tape, the bulk-order profile was overwhelmingly skewed toward bearish positioning, indicating cautious to negative expectations for SPCX and a market bias that favors weakness or at least restrained upside ahead.

Strategy Reference

For traders aligned with the bearish flow, selling the Oct. 30, 2026 $190.0 call against a long $210.0 call can collect premium with a defined risk profile, while a more conservative put debit spread using the $150.0/$135.0 puts offers downside participation with minimal margin exposure.

Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

Comments

We need your insight to fill this gap
Leave a comment