Federal Reserve Chair Kevin Warsh quickly demonstrated his governing style at this week's inaugural policy meeting, marking a return to the leaner, more efficient central banking model of the 1990s. This shift comes after crises earlier this century placed the Fed at the center of economic management and turned its leaders into chief comforters for both Wall Street and Main Street.
The question now is whether the diminished role he seeks for the Fed—and, in effect, for himself—is compatible with an increasingly complex world, a more intense and polarized information environment, and markets accustomed to a steady stream of commentary from top policymakers.
Whether by design or not, Warsh's emphasis on inflation during Wednesday's press conference, without providing more nuanced detail on the conditions that might meet the threshold for rate hikes, led investors to conclude that increases were imminent, pushing bond yields higher.
"The market reaction was greatly amplified by Warsh's press conference, where he emphasized the need to achieve price stability with a near 'single-mandate' hawkishness, yet offered no moderating discussion on Fed strategy or reaction function," wrote Krishna Guha, a former senior communications official at the New York Fed and now Vice Chairman and Head of Economics and Central Bank Strategy at Evercore ISI. "Discussion of the reaction function and strategy... aids more effective central banking," a key tenet of current central bank practice.
At his first meeting as chair, the Fed held rates steady in the 3.50% to 3.75% range—unchanged since last December—and issued a brief policy statement reminiscent of the style favored by former 1990s Chair Alan Greenspan, who was famously reluctant to reveal his decision-making process to the public. The subsequent evolution in Fed chair communication involved less time 'behind the curtain,' and a current communication tool released Wednesday—the 'dot plot' of rate projections—precisely illustrated what Warsh was unwilling to discuss: a widespread view among policymakers that rate hikes may be needed this year.
Raising New Questions
A concise statement does not necessarily mean clarity, and some of the changes answered as many questions about the Fed's new era as they raised.
For instance, unlike the simple factual statement "inflation is elevated" used under former Chair Jerome Powell, Warsh's first statement was conditional, stating inflation was elevated "relative to the Committee's 2 percent objective." This phrasing could imply inflation is not considered too high in an absolute sense. While reaffirming the 2% goal, Warsh also suggested the specific decimal point was not critical, hinting at a degree of tolerance for inflation levels near the target.
In describing job growth, the new statement avoided a simple "modest earlier this year but has strengthened recently," again using comparative language that growth was "keeping pace with the size of the labor force." This phrasing seemed to sidestep the 'odd' balance the Fed under Powell had grappled with as it contended with the effects of Trump-era immigration curbs on the number of jobs needed to keep the unemployment rate stable—an issue Warsh did not delve into.
Regarding overall economic growth, the statement highlighted aspects Warsh deems critical for the future and currently vibrant—labor productivity and capital investment—while omitting a detailed list of GDP components, including consumption with its tricky debate over 'K-shaped' growth (benefiting only the wealthy); net exports with its tricky debate over tariffs; and government spending with its tricky debate over debt.
An assessment of the relative risks to the Fed's inflation and employment goals was omitted entirely, replaced by a final assertion: "The Committee will achieve price stability."
Diane Swonk, Chief Economist and Managing Director at KPMG US, called the statement a "gift" to the new Fed chair, embedding his priorities—including the focus on inflation—into a document that secured the Federal Open Market Committee's first unanimous vote in a year.
Execution and Follow-Through
Whether this new style endures will depend on several factors, including how markets react over time, and, more importantly, how world events unfold—Fed leaders often find that resolute 'first principles' are difficult to sustain during crises.
Similarly, Warsh announced the creation of five task forces aimed at advancing Fed reform, but JPMorgan Chief Economist Michael Feroli noted it remains in question whether these groups "will become catalysts for institutional change or just another committee to rehash old debates." He cited last year's discussions on reforming communication mechanisms, which ended in a stalemate despite a high-level analysis by former Chair Ben Bernanke and deep concern from Powell.
After more than a decade of sharp criticism of the Fed, Warsh had previously pledged to "sober some people up," and he will likely have to deliver on that promise in some form.
A former governor under Bernanke, he left in 2011 partly in opposition to the Fed's continued bond buying after the 2007-2009 financial crisis. The three task forces under his purview—covering communication, the balance sheet, and the inflation framework—all address areas profoundly altered by that deep recession, the subsequent weak growth, and Washington's growing political gridlock, which arguably made the Fed the primary driver of economic policy.
The COVID-19 pandemic further expanded the Fed's role through trillions in economic support programs, with Powell playing a central role in prime-time media appearances aimed at explaining policy to reassure anxious households and volatile markets.
In signaling potential adjustments to these approaches, Warsh is not merely battling ghosts of the past. The other two task forces—focusing on productivity issues and the use of real-time alternative data in policymaking—address topics many inside the Fed are grappling with, and researchers welcome the exploration.
"With the massive amount of data circulating in the world and such strong data processing capabilities, we must be able to glean some insights," said Paula Tkac, Research Director at the Atlanta Fed, in a mid-May interview as Warsh prepared to take over. During the pandemic, some promising new data sets proved less useful over time, giving Fed researchers a keen appreciation that the challenge with new approaches is "understanding how it fits with other indicators we've used for a long time."
Comments