When a retailer known for "high style, low prices" in daily goods starts selling coffee, is it a bold disruption or a natural business progression? The news of MINISO Group Holding Limited (MNSO) entering the coffee market has created significant ripples across the retail industry. This giant, often called a "ten-dollar store," with over 7,000 stores globally, is attempting to redefine its business boundaries with a single cup of coffee.
From Traffic Pool to Retention Pool: The Strategic Logic Behind MINISO's Coffee Move
MINISO's foray into coffee is not a whim but a carefully calculated strategic move. To understand this, one must first see MINISO's current business position. By 2025, MINISO's global store count exceeded 7,000, with over 2,500 overseas stores across 107 countries and regions. This vast network is MINISO's core asset and the physical foundation for any cross-industry attempt. However, sheer store expansion can no longer support capital market growth narratives. More pressing goals now include improving per-store sales efficiency, increasing average transaction value, and extending customer dwell time. The coffee business precisely targets these three pain points.
From a traffic perspective, MINISO's core customer base is young women aged 18-35, who are also the primary consumers of new-style teas and specialty coffee. Embedding a coffee counter within a store transforms low-frequency household goods purchases into high-frequency coffee consumption. A consumer might visit MINISO once a month, but they could buy a coffee every day. This leap in consumption frequency is a "traffic amplifier" that retailers dream of.
From a retention standpoint, coffee has a natural "staying effect." The average visit to a traditional MINISO store lasts 15-20 minutes—efficient but impersonal. Coffee consumption naturally invites scenarios like "sitting down" or "chatting," which can extend a customer's stay to 40 minutes or more. Longer dwell times lead to more browsing, more touchpoints, and a higher likelihood of additional purchases.
A deeper strategic intent lies in reshaping the brand's identity. MINISO has long been labeled as a "ten-dollar store" synonymous with cheap goods. Despite founder Ye Guofu's insistence that MINISO is not just that, consumer perception is hard to change quickly. Coffee, as a lifestyle product, naturally conveys quality and sophistication. When a customer strolls through a store holding a latte with the MINISO logo, the brand image subtly shifts—from a "hub for cheap goods" towards a "lifestyle collection store for young people."
Furthermore, MINISO's aggressive IP licensing strategy provides a unique competitive edge for its coffee business. From Disney and Sanrio to Barbie and Loopy, MINISO has aggressively pursued IP partnerships. By infusing these IP elements into coffee products—like co-branded cups, limited-edition flavors, or themed pop-ups—MINISO's coffee becomes more than just a drink; it becomes a "drinkable IP derivative." This premium pricing power from IP is hard for pure coffee chains to replicate.
Financially, the high margins of the coffee business are also highly attractive. Industry data shows that a freshly brewed coffee costing $2-4 has raw material costs of only $0.40-0.70, resulting in gross margins of 70-80%. For a company like MINISO, built on a model of low margins and high turnover, the coffee business represents a significant profit opportunity. Even if pricing is initially conservative for customer acquisition, the marginal profit contribution is substantial.
Supply Chains, Competition, and Business Model: The Real-World Tests of Coffee Ambitions
No matter how perfect the strategic logic, execution is the real test. MINISO's coffee venture faces considerable challenges, arguably as significant as entering any entirely new category.
The supply chain is the first major hurdle. MINISO's core strength lies in integrating the supply chain for daily goods through bulk purchasing, cutting out middlemen, and extreme cost compression to achieve "good quality, low price." However, coffee operates on a completely different logic. Sourcing coffee beans involves expertise in origin, roasting, and quality control. Milk and syrups require a stable cold chain. Coffee machine procurement, maintenance, and barista training are entirely new capabilities. While MINISO can leverage its scale for purchasing leverage, building these new competencies will require time and significant trial-and-error costs.
More critically, the synergy between coffee's "economies of scale" and MINISO's existing supply chain is limited. A retail giant with 7,000 stores has a logistics network for general goods that doesn't align with the delivery network for coffee beans and fresh milk. This means MINISO will likely need to build a separate, at least partially independent, supply chain infrastructure for coffee—an initial investment that will significantly eat into the coffee business's profits.
The competitive landscape is the second harsh reality. The Chinese coffee market is no longer a blue ocean. Luckin Coffee has built formidable barriers with its "10,000-store scale" and "$1.40 price war," followed closely by Cudi Coffee using a similar pricing strategy. Starbucks commands the high end with its brand premium and "third place" concept, while brands like Manner and Lucky Coffee occupy regional and niche segments. MINISO is entering a fiercely contested red ocean.
What is MINISO's path to differentiation? Competing on low price is a losing battle against Luckin and Cudi, who have already anchored the $1.40 price point in consumer minds. A new entrant at the same price would only trigger an endless price war. Competing on quality would mean challenging Starbucks and numerous specialty coffee brands with deep brand moats. MINISO, with its image as a "department store selling coffee," is at a natural disadvantage in quality perception.
The only potential differentiator is the "IP + Coffee" route—getting consumers to pay for the IP, not the coffee itself. However, the sustainability of this model is questionable. IP popularity has cycles. Relying on IP-driven coffee sales essentially makes it an IP business, not a coffee business, which conflicts with MINISO's original goal of building a high-frequency, stable consumption scenario.
The choice of business model is the third key question. Will MINISO adopt a store-within-a-store model (embedding coffee counters in existing stores) or a standalone store model? Both have pros and cons. The store-within-a-store model benefits from low marginal costs—shared rent, shared foot traffic, shared brand power—and low initial investment. However, it suffers from limited space, where a coffee counter could crowd out merchandise display and potentially harm the core business. Additionally, the coffee experience is constrained by the store environment, making it difficult to create a true "third place" ambiance.
The standalone store model offers a complete coffee experience and a clearer brand identity, but it requires heavy investment and carries higher risk. Synergies with existing MINISO stores would also be weaker. More importantly, standalone stores would force MINISO to compete directly with Luckin and Starbucks on their own turf, losing the competitive advantage of the store-within-a-store approach.
Based on limited public information, MINISO is likely to adopt a gradual strategy: starting with store-within-a-store tests, followed by pilot standalone stores. This would allow them to test the coffee business's per-store efficiency and customer reception before scaling. While this approach is relatively cautious, it also means coffee sales won't significantly impact overall revenue in the short term.
A deeper question is whether MINISO's organizational capabilities can support this cross-industry move. MINISO's core team has deep experience in product selection, supply chain, and global operations for daily goods. But coffee is a different arena. Competition involves not just product and price, but also store operations efficiency, digital capabilities, and brand marketing. Luckin's success showed that coffee is a "system war," not a "single-product war." Whether MINISO has the commitment and capability to build a professional coffee business team—rather than running it as an "accessory" to its main business—will determine the venture's success or failure.
MINISO selling coffee is essentially a recalculation of "space efficiency": how to generate higher per-store sales, longer dwell times, and stronger user stickiness within the same physical space. This logic itself is sound and even a natural direction for retail evolution. From Muji's Café MUJI to IKEA's restaurants, from Eslite Bookstore's coffee corners to Tsutaya Books' TSUTAYA BOOKSTORE, the boundary between retail and food & beverage is fading. However, MINISO's unique challenge lies in its price-sensitive core customers, its brand identity anchored in value, and its organizational genes focused on product operations rather than space creation. Selling coffee tests not only supply chain and capital strength but also the courage for brand elevation and the resolve for organizational change. One cup of coffee might not change a company's fate, but a thousand, ten thousand, or a hundred million cups can reshape the relationship between a brand and its consumers. MINISO's coffee venture—this "ten-dollar store's" gamble on consumption upgrade—has only just begun.
Comments