In the context of the automotive industry facing homogenized competition and profit margin compression, excess returns may stem from business model transformations driven by autonomous driving and the provision of personalized driving experiences, with the latter appearing more certain in the medium term.
It is believed that three foundational elements—scale, operational efficiency, and (powertrain) diversification—will form the base for automakers to navigate industry cycles. Meanwhile, product personalization will be the key lever to break through homogenization and realize excess profits. It is recommended to focus on Chinese brand groups that possess or are developing these four major characteristics.
Key Points of the Analysis:
Automotive industry profit margins are under continuous pressure, with future excess returns likely coming from model upgrades and driving experience creation enabled by technological change. Against the backdrop of slowing domestic retail sales growth and intensifying competition in the new energy vehicle sector, automotive industry profit margins continue to be squeezed. The analysis posits that industry value will concentrate in two main directions: first, transitioning to mobility services, advancing the business model through autonomous driving; second, creating high-value-added niche markets characterized by supply-demand mismatch, a growth path potentially highly similar to that of large-displacement motorcycles. In the medium term, with autonomous driving not yet widely adopted, personalized products may be the key focus area. In the long term, when robotaxi services become ubiquitous and the utility value of private cars is systematically replaced, the "tool value" of automobiles may weaken. However, demand for driving pleasure, performance experience, identity, and emotional belonging is expected to be further amplified. Personalized products that deliver such driving experiences could still consistently capture excess returns.
Reviewing the development of medium-to-large-displacement motorcycles and global performance cars reveals common success factors: brand building, technological heritage, and group empowerment. For motorcycles, domestic sales of large-displacement models have shown a rising trend as a percentage of total motorcycle sales. Domestic brands like CFMOTO have accurately targeted the core demands for driving pleasure, community belonging, and mass consumption in the medium-to-large-displacement market, maintaining a CR3 market share above 50% since 2024 and achieving a systematic rise for domestic motorcycle brands. Regarding global performance cars, their enduring appeal across fuel, hybrid, and electric vehicle cycles can be attributed to a foundation of large corporate groups, a skeleton of irreplicable core technologies, a soul of strong cultural communities, and product genes that can be iterated across energy transitions.
Scale, operational efficiency, and structural diversification are important foundations for automaker survival, while product personalization is a key source of excess returns. The analysis concludes that automakers capable of securing long-term excess profits typically exhibit four core characteristics: scale, operational efficiency, structural (powertrain) diversification, and product personalization. It is argued that scale, efficiency, and diversification constitute the survival foundation for navigating industry cycles, ensuring stable operations, and establishing a foothold in the industry—the core guarantee for "survival and stability." Product personalization and differentiation are seen as the key levers to break through homogenized price wars and realize excess profits.
Risk warnings include changes in regulations and policies, the risk that product differentiation may not materialize effectively, and a decline in industry prosperity.
Comments