Amazon.com closed at 256.26 USD, down 1.54%.
Institutional options activity displayed a distinctly bearish tone, highlighted by a $9.72 million double-put sale and a $6.48 million put spread purchase. The largest trades centered on downside structures, with both legs of the put sale already in the money and the put spread buy targeting further weakness. The broader block flow reinforces positioning for continued downside rather than a sustained rebound.
>>>Start OPTIONS trading & earn up to SGD 200 in rewards!
Options Indicators
AMZN’s implied volatility is 30.86%, and with an IV percentile of 20.32%, current option volatility sits on the low side of its historical range, indicating that options are relatively cheaply priced rather than expensive. The IV/HV ratio of 0.53 also suggests implied volatility is running below realized volatility, reinforcing the view that the options market is not carrying a rich premium at the moment. The Call/Put volume ratio is 1.80.
Large Trades
A put spread sale collecting $9.72 million was the largest displayed trade, structured as a same-direction double-put sale using the August 28, 2026 expiration. The trader sold the 272.5 put and the 270.0 put, both of which were in the money versus the $256.26 reference stock price, creating a short put spread-style premium collection position with a net credit of $9.72 million. This type of trade typically expresses a view that downside risk will remain contained and that the stock will stabilize or trade in a range, but because both legs are put sales and already in the money, it also carries a neutral-to-bearish tone tied to downside exposure management and premium harvesting rather than outright upside conviction.
A put spread purchase costing $6.48 million was the second displayed trade, built as a same-direction double-put buy across two expirations: long the 300.0 put expiring September 18, 2026 and long the 272.5 put expiring August 28, 2026. Both puts were in the money relative to the current stock price, and the position was established for a net debit of $6.48 million, signaling a bearish directional wager on further downside or heightened volatility. Taken together with the broader block flow, the conclusion is clearly bearish: the largest premium outlays were concentrated in downside structures, and even where premium was collected, the dominant institutional activity remained centered on puts and synthetic downside expressions, indicating that large traders are positioning for weakness in AMZN rather than a sustained rebound.
Strategy Reference
For a low assignment probability, a seller could consider an out-of-the-money put at the 230.0 strike, while a bear put spread using the 255.0/235.0 strikes offers defined risk for those seeking to avoid heavy margin requirements.
Comments