For the stock market, processing the risks of conflict in the Middle East appears to have been the easy first step. The market must now confront a series of severe technical and macro challenges: a potentially hawkish new Federal Reserve Chair, disruptive intervention from Washington in AI transactions, and the largest wave of new stock supply in market history.
However, geopolitical tail risks have at least diminished significantly. The US and Iran are expected to sign an interim peace agreement around June 19th, which could lead to the full reopening of the Strait of Hormuz. The benchmark Brent crude price has already recovered roughly 80% of its gains since the conflict began. This is positive news, and the market has largely priced it in. The issue, however, is that no one should mistake this agreement for a lasting peace: the ceasefire from April faltered within days, traffic through the Strait of Hormuz may only be partially restored, and the document is not yet formally signed. The war risk has shrunk, not vanished—which is precisely why market attention is shifting back to the stock market's own inherent problems.
Initial Market Positioning
The market's summer rally was built on technical fund flows, not strong fundamental conviction. Brian Garrett, a derivatives expert at Goldman Sachs' trading desk, noted, "Macro short-covering set the tone for early summer 2026, with crowded one-delta hedges being unwound, as the market continues to search for conviction and direction." Garrett pointed out that trading desks are frequently seeing "market style rotation/catch-up" trades as participants look for the next opportunity. Once-hot AI concept stocks have suddenly fallen to the bottom of short-term performance rankings, while more defensive broad strategies have fared better.
Beneath the surface, the momentum for buying stocks persists, but last week's buying pattern seemed off. Garrett stated, "Hedge funds have been buying US equity risk for four consecutive weeks, but this week's focus was less about adding alpha exposure and more about cutting beta shorts. Global prime brokerage accounts showed net buying, with a short-covering to long-buying ratio as high as 4.7 to 1." A market rising due to short capitulation rather than strong long conviction may be on thin ice.
Federal Reserve's Hawkish Stance
It is against this backdrop that Kevin Warsh takes the stage, set to chair his first Federal Open Market Committee meeting on June 16-17. He has publicly criticized the Fed's past communication approach and hinted at a "regime change in forward guidance." His debut comes under severe circumstances: inflation remains stubborn, energy prices are an unknown, and investors are increasingly betting the Fed may have to raise rates before December. Warsh must sound convincingly independent, while the White House, which championed his appointment, scrutinizes his every word.
Unpredictable AI Regulation
Meanwhile, the valuation models for AI trades have become more unpredictable. Last Friday, the US Commerce Department ordered Anthropic to block foreign nationals from accessing its latest models—Claude Fable 5 and Mythos 5. To comply, the company simply shut down access to these platforms for everyone. This marks the US government's first direct restriction on an AI model itself, rather than the chips used to train it. This move turns "who is leading in cutting-edge AI" from a technical question into a political one. Investors must now consider how to reprice this political escalation alongside other drivers of the AI trade.
The long-term outlook is equally murky. Overlaying the 1996-2003 Nasdaq 100 bull-bear supercycle onto the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index since 2022—a comparison appearing with increasing frequency—shows a striking similarity in the scale of gains. But this similarity depends on when one starts the clock and whether the market believes chip stocks are destined to repeat the internet bubble's boom-and-bust cycle. The picture becomes even fuzzier if a government order can now cut off model access.
Record IPO Supply Pressure
Finally, there is the shift in stock supply and demand. SpaceX finally priced at $135 and began trading on June 12th, with a valuation of approximately $1.77 trillion, becoming the largest IPO in market history—roughly three times the size of the previous record. So far, this is exhilarating. However, this single IPO raised more capital than all US IPOs in 2024 and 2025 combined, with Anthropic and OpenAI still waiting in line to follow suit. The real test is not the debut, but whether the market can sustainably absorb such massive new supply over the coming months.
Equity issuance is projected to grow at its fastest pace since at least 1999. Peter Chir, Head of Macro Strategy at Academy Securities, said, "The details on the market's long-term direction are key; the follow-through performance of large-cap IPOs will be a more significant driver for the market."
The current market script is roughly this: if the ongoing short-covering can successfully pass the baton to genuine alpha buying, then market rotation and catch-up will be supported, and the massive new supply will be absorbed. Stocks could grind higher, making the de-escalation with Iran look like the first domino falling in the right direction. But if market conviction remains scarce, Warsh strikes a hawkish tone, and the leadership landscape in AI becomes overly politicized, then this wall of record IPO supply will meet a market that has only solved the "easy problem" of unwinding positions and remains ill-equipped for the host of difficult challenges that remain.
Comments