Does the China-US AI Dialogue Mechanism Lean Toward the US Approach? The Foreign Ministry Responds

Deep News15:51

On September 28, Foreign Ministry spokesperson Guo Jiakun presided over a regular press conference.

A foreign media journalist asked: One of the outcomes of the China-US summit was that both sides agreed to establish an AI dialogue mechanism, which includes a communication channel for AI-related emergencies. Prior to China's recent establishment of an international AI cooperation organization, China had consistently supported multilateral cooperation in the AI field, advocating a more comprehensive approach that includes formulating ethical guidelines, establishing relevant processes, and ensuring that AI remains under human control. The US position, by contrast, leans toward a limited approach focused solely on AI safety and early warning mechanisms between specific entities. Currently, this new China-US mechanism appears to reflect the US approach more. The spokesperson was asked whether China is adjusting its position on international AI governance, and whether this bilateral mechanism is sufficient to serve as a framework for global AI governance.

Guo Jiakun stated that China has always participated in global AI governance with a constructive and responsible attitude, continuously contributing Chinese solutions. China has consistently maintained that the primary role of the United Nations should be upheld to build a just and reasonable global AI governance system.

"At the same time, we are also willing to maintain communication and exchanges with the US through channels such as the AI intergovernmental dialogue. This is not only an important path to promote the beneficial and inclusive development of global AI, but also an essential part of building a constructive China-US strategic stability relationship based on respect, fairness, and reciprocity," said Guo Jiakun.

Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

Comments

We need your insight to fill this gap
Leave a comment