On Tuesday, tech billionaire Elon Musk testified for the first time in his lawsuit against OpenAI. The world's wealthiest individual reportedly informed a nine-member jury that artificial intelligence "could destroy us all," referencing the dystopian future portrayed in James Cameron's "The Terminator" and the more optimistic vision seen in "Star Trek."
Musk also attributed the genesis of OpenAI to an insult he once received from Google co-founder Larry Page, who allegedly labeled him a "speciesist."
The trial, expected to last four weeks, centers on a lawsuit Musk filed in 2024. He alleges that OpenAI betrayed its founding mission as a non-profit organization dedicated to "benefiting humanity." Musk co-founded the OpenAI lab with Sam Altman in 2015, following weeks of discussions about their shared concerns regarding AI falling into the hands of profit-driven corporate giants, particularly Google. By 2017, however, they recognized that the funding required to build advanced AI far exceeded what a non-profit could raise, leading to discussions about transforming OpenAI into a for-profit entity. Having donated at least $38 million to OpenAI, Musk expressed his desire to become CEO and secure a controlling stake. After a power struggle with Altman over the position, Musk felt betrayed and subsequently left OpenAI in 2018.
Following the major success of ChatGPT, launched by OpenAI in late 2022, the company's valuation has soared to approximately $730 billion. Musk's lawsuit accuses Altman and OpenAI President Greg Brockman of hijacking a charitable institution and seeks over $150 billion in damages from OpenAI and Microsoft.
OpenAI's legal team presented a slightly different narrative. Lead attorney William Savitt told the jury in his opening statement that Musk is simply a disgruntled former partner who lost a power struggle, especially aggrieved now that he runs his own for-profit AI lab, xAI. "My clients had the courage to move forward without him and succeed," Savitt stated. "Mr. Musk is not happy about that."
On the witness stand, Musk took the jury back a decade, to a time when he and Altman conspired on how to keep AI away from "the bad guys." He testified that his AI concerns crystallized during a 2015 meeting with Page, where the Google co-founder predicted a utopian AI future. Musk was worried Page was not taking the risks seriously, and according to Musk, Page accused him of being a "speciesist"—someone who favors humans over potential future digital lifeforms.
"OpenAI exists because Larry Page called me a 'speciesist,'" Musk declared in court.
Drawing from popular culture, he painted a relatively binary vision of AI's potential future. "We don't want a 'Terminator' outcome," he said. "We want a future like Gene Roddenberry's 'Star Trek,' not James Cameron's 'Terminator.'"
Musk also discussed his brain-computer interface startup Neuralink, stating its goal is "AI safety" through "AI symbiosis with humans," and described SpaceX as "life insurance for life as we know it."
Despite portraying himself in court as a final bastion of American philanthropy, public filings indicate that his foundation, the Musk Foundation, has failed for four consecutive years to donate the legally required 5% of its assets. The jury has been instructed to set aside personal impressions of Musk and adjudicate the case fairly.
Musk is scheduled to return to the witness stand on Wednesday morning for cross-examination by OpenAI's attorneys.
Comments