A financial advisory project from nine years ago has resulted in Zhongtian Guo Fu Securities receiving a fine totaling 43 million yuan. Two former sponsors involved in the case were each fined 400,000 yuan and have been added to the C-list of disciplined representatives.
The penalties are linked to Dongxu Photoelectric. Recently, the Securities Association of China's sponsor list was updated to include two C-class sponsors. While the specific violations were not publicly detailed, both are noted as originating from disciplinary actions by the Hebei Regulatory Bureau.
According to an administrative penalty decision document numbered [2026]2 found on the CSRC website, Dongxu Photoelectric was explicitly named by regulators, an event still fresh in the memory of many investors.
The investigation found that from 2015 to 2019, Dongxu Photoelectric had inflated its revenue by 16.76 billion yuan and overstated total profits by 5.627 billion yuan. Between 2015 and 2022, the company facilitated non-operating capital transfers of 20.544 billion yuan to its controlling shareholder and related parties. Furthermore, its 2017 private placement was determined to constitute fraudulent issuance and approval obtained under false pretenses.
Zhongtian Guo Fu Securities acted as the financial advisor for Dongxu Photoelectric's 2017 private placement. Regulators pointed out that, against the backdrop of Dongxu's multi-billion-yuan financial fraud and fraudulent issuance, the due diligence conducted by Zhongtian Guo Fu was severely inadequate. The firm relied solely on audit opinions, failed to verify warehouse receipts and logistics documents, ignored abnormal contract terms, interviewed only the board secretary, and performed its ongoing supervision duties perfunctorily.
The penalties imposed were notably severe. For its financial advisory role, Zhongtian Guo Fu was ordered to disgorge 2.8302 million yuan in illicit gains and pay a fine five times that amount, totaling 14.1509 million yuan. Its financial advisory business license was also suspended for six months. For its underwriting business, the firm was required to disgorge 25.4717 million yuan and pay an additional fine of 600,000 yuan. The total penalties exceeded 43 million yuan, setting a new record for investment banking fines this year.
The two project sponsors at the time, Chen Dongyang and Zhang Jin, were each given a formal warning and fined 400,000 yuan. They were penalized for failing to perform their duties diligently in the 2017 Dongxu Photoelectric private placement project and for producing documents containing false records.
This case is not merely an instance of accountability for a past investment banking project but also a harsh footnote to the decades-long careers of the two sponsors. One individual experienced early success but suffered repeated failures following the implementation of the registration-based system. The other never successfully led an IPO project but encountered significant issues in a financial advisory role.
Years later, the two sponsors who signed off on the project have followed different career paths. Chen Dongyang began his career at China Merchants Securities in June 2008. He became a sponsor representative in October 2012 and successfully signed off on the IPO of Shandong Heda Co., Ltd. on the Shenzhen Stock Exchange's main board. In December 2016, he moved to Zhongtian Guo Fu Securities. In 2019, he signed off on a convertible bond project for Shenzhen Yatai International Construction Co., Ltd.
However, after the registration-based system was implemented, this experienced sponsor encountered a series of setbacks. The IPO application for Beijing Papaya Mobile Technology Co., Ltd. was withdrawn from the STAR Market in 2019, and a second attempt on the ChiNext board in 2021 was also withdrawn. In 2022, the ChiNext IPO project for Beijing Nongda Technology Co., Ltd. failed to gain approval.
Now, with this penalty related to his signing role in Dongxu Photoelectric's 2017 asset acquisition and fundraising project, his career has been further tarnished. Moving from China Merchants Securities to Zhongtian Guo Fu, despite having successful IPO and convertible bond projects to his name, he failed in three attempts to access the capital market under the registration-based system and is now held accountable for a historical case, making him a notably unfortunate figure among sponsors.
The other penalized sponsor, Ms. Zhang Jin, represents a different kind of misfortune. Zhang Jin began her career at China Merchants Securities in June 2011. She joined Southwest Securities in June 2012 and became a sponsor representative in November of the same year. In December 2016, she moved to Zhongtian Guo Fu Securities. In June 2022, she joined what was then Orient Investment Bank, which later merged into its parent company, Orient Securities. In November 2024, she transferred again to Yuekai Securities.
Over a 15-year career, spanning five securities firms and involving four sponsor registrations, she has not successfully signed a single sponsorship project. After the registration-based system took effect, the ChiNext IPO project for Beijing Deepcool Technology Co., Ltd. progressed to the hearing stage but was ultimately rejected.
Similarly, she has now been fined 400,000 yuan and downgraded to C-class status due to her involvement in signing the Dongxu Photoelectric 2017 private placement project. Having missed out on the IPO boom, she has instead become a typical example of misfortune in investment banking due to regulatory penalties.
The stories of these two sponsor representatives perhaps serve as the most realistic缩影 of the investment banking industry: decades of ups and downs can be undone by a single misstep, leading to total loss. Both securities firms and individual sponsors must understand that the registration-based system does not imply leniency but rather entails lifelong accountability. Past projects can be re-examined, and exposure of fraud will inevitably lead to consequences. The status of a sponsor representative is both an honor and a heavy responsibility. No matter how brilliant one's early career achievements, one significant failure can destroy a professional trajectory. While not having led a project might not be disastrous, involvement in a fraud case is far more critical, bringing regulatory fines, damage to professional integrity, and severe limitations on future career prospects.
Securities firms must faithfully act as gatekeepers for the capital market. Diligence and responsibility are the most sustainable foundations for a sponsor's career.
Comments