The key to this recent US stock market pullback is not the index decline itself, but the rapid cooling of the most crowded megacap technology trades.
According to tracking of investor positioning, options, futures, and fund flows around June 11, the S&P 500 has retreated nearly 5% over the past two weeks. However, this was not a broad market decline: the Nasdaq 100 fell 7%, the 'Magnificent 7' group dropped 10%, while the rest of the S&P 500 and small-cap stocks instead climbed to record highs.
Strategists, including Parag Thatte, noted in an update that just a week ago, megacap tech positioning appeared crowded and demanding, but the situation has changed now that it has returned to neutral.
The positioning data shows a clear shift. Overall US equity positioning has fallen from the 66th historical percentile to the 34th, moving from a slight overweight to a slight underweight. Nearly all of this decline came from megacap tech, which plunged from the 97th percentile to the 48th. Positioning for the non-tech portion of the S&P 500 remains low and range-bound.
Fund flows tell another part of the story. Equity funds saw a weekly inflow of $31.5 billion, a two-month high. Technology sector funds attracted a record $12.3 billion inflow during the decline. This indicates the market is not broadly exiting stocks, but rather dispersing the previously most concentrated megacap tech positions. The path forward may still be bumpy, with variables concentrated around the June FOMC meeting, concerns over a wave of equity issuance, and headline risks related to the Iran conflict.
Pressure Concentrated on Megacaps, Small Caps Hold Firm
The shape of this correction has been narrow.
While the S&P 500 fell nearly 5% over two weeks—a typical magnitude for minor sell-offs occurring every few months—the internal structure diverged sharply. The Nasdaq 100 fell 7% and the Mag 7 fell 10%, while the S&P 500 Equal Weight Index, S&P 600 Small Caps, and Russell 2000 did not decline in sync and instead moved towards record highs.
This shows the pressure was primarily focused on large-cap technology and mega-cap growth stocks, not a broad collapse in overall market risk appetite.
Megacap Tech Positioning Plummets from Extreme Levels
The core data point of this adjustment is the cliff-like drop in megacap technology positioning.
Megacap tech positioning fell from the 97th historical percentile to the 48th. The 48th percentile is near the historical median, placing it around a neutral level. Meanwhile, overall US equity positioning fell from the 66th to the 34th percentile.
Large-cap positioning overall fell to the 45th percentile, slightly above neutral; small-cap positioning is at the 54th percentile, also only modestly above neutral. The truly dramatic change occurred in megacap tech, which was previously at the top of its historical range.
The relative performance of tech stocks versus the rest of the S&P 500 has also retreated from the top of its long-term trend channel to the middle. In other words, tech stocks had run too far, too fast with too-full positioning, and both were corrected over these two weeks.
Discretionary Investors Lead the Cooling, Options and Sentiment Weaken
Breaking down investor types, the cooling is more pronounced among discretionary funds.
Discretionary investor positioning has fallen to -0.34 standard deviations, at the 25th historical percentile, moving from a slight overweight to a clear underweight, reaching the bottom of its range over the past 15 months. Systematic strategy positioning also declined but remains around 0.14 standard deviations, near the 46th percentile, close to neutral.
The options market is also cooling. The 5-day moving average of the call/put volume ratio has fallen to the 41st percentile. Net call volumes for single stocks, indices, and ETFs are all declining. The basket of stocks with the highest net call volume the prior week significantly underperformed the market this week; a basket of high-short-interest stocks also underperformed, but to a lesser degree.
Investor sentiment has turned even faster. The AAII bull-bear spread has dropped to the 10th historical percentile, the most pessimistic level in ten weeks, and has been in bearish territory for four consecutive weeks. Bearish responses rose to the 93rd percentile, bullish responses fell to the 25th, and neutral responses fell to the 14th.
This data shows the positioning pullback is not just at the index level but is also occurring in options trading, sentiment surveys, and discretionary fund allocation.
Megacap Tech No Longer "Over-positioned Relative to Fundamentals"
The importance of megacap tech positioning stemmed from its previous extreme crowding.
Now that positioning is back to neutral, it aligns better with earnings growth in the "mid-teens" percent range. This growth rate is close to the long-term trend of 11% but significantly lower than the 44% earnings growth seen in Q1. The bottom-up consensus still expects robust Q2 earnings growth, but concerns about sustainability will persist.
The key here is not that earnings are risk-free, but that positioning no longer requires fundamentals to continue exceeding expectations. The previous problem was that positioning was already very high, requiring earnings to keep delivering strong data. That pressure has now eased.
A similar dynamic exists for the S&P 500 ex-megacap tech. Non-tech positioning remains low, below the level implied by improving macro data and earnings growth.
Money Not Fleeing Equities, Tech Funds See Record Inflows
Fund flows do not support a "broad retreat" narrative.
In the most recent week, equity funds saw inflows of $31.5 billion, the highest in two months. The main flows were into US equity funds, with a $17.4 billion weekly inflow, and global broad allocation funds, with $11.9 billion inflows.
Ex-Japan Asia equity funds saw inflows of $7.9 billion, with $5.9 billion into South Korea. Emerging market equity funds saw inflows of $4.5 billion for the first time in two months. However, China equity funds continued to see outflows of $2.1 billion, marking the 11th consecutive week of outflows, though the pace slowed this week. European equity funds saw outflows of $3.9 billion, under pressure for a second month.
Among sector funds, technology was the most prominent. Technology sector funds saw a record $12.3 billion inflow during the decline. Telecom saw inflows of $1.1 billion, Financials $1.0 billion, Healthcare $0.7 billion, and Industrials $0.3 billion. Consumer Discretionary saw outflows of $1.4 billion, Materials outflows of $1.0 billion, with Energy, Utilities, and Real Estate also seeing minor outflows.
Bond fund inflows remained strong at $20.8 billion, though only about half the record inflow from the prior week. Gold funds saw outflows of $2.6 billion for the fourth consecutive week. Money market funds saw outflows of $2.5 billion, the first outflow in six weeks.
Non-Tech Positioning Remains Low, Rotation Potential Intact
The return of megacap tech to neutral does not mean positioning in other sectors has already risen.
Broad technology positioning is at -0.15 standard deviations, the 37th percentile, indicating a slight underweight; megacap tech itself is at the 48th percentile, near neutral.
Cyclical sector positioning is even lower. Overall cyclical positioning is at the 11th percentile, with the cyclical vs. defensive positioning spread at the 8th percentile. Financials positioning is only at the 6th percentile, Materials at the 1st, Industrial cyclicals at the 15th, and Consumer cyclicals at the 30th. Energy has retreated from overweight to near neutral but is still at the 67th percentile.
Defensive sectors are relatively higher. Real Estate positioning is at the 89th percentile, still overweight; Utilities at the 58th, slightly above neutral; Healthcare at the 49th, near neutral; and Consumer Staples at the 36th, a slight underweight.
This means that if the market continues to rotate from megacap tech to other sectors, positioning is not crowded. The areas that are truly low are Financials, Materials, and Industrial cyclicals.
Prerequisites for Gradual Gains Remain, But Path Gets Bumpier
With positioning back to neutral, the market's upside resistance has indeed diminished somewhat, but short-term disturbances are also concentrated.
Next week's June FOMC meeting could push interest rate volatility higher. The framework suggests this meeting carries above-average uncertainty, involving potential policy framework changes and a higher likelihood of removing forward guidance. Rising rate volatility typically acts as a short-term headwind for stocks.
The second disturbance is equity issuance. The market remains concerned that a wave of issuance could crowd out capital and weigh on broader equities. Historically, however, rising issuance cycles often coincide with strong equity market returns.
The third variable is the Iran conflict. The market currently prices in a fairly mild outcome, so headline risk is skewed to the downside. If the situation is resolved, sectors and regions that lagged during the April-May rally could see further rotation.
Systematic funds are also not fully loaded on one side. Volatility-controlled fund equity allocation has fallen to the 43rd percentile, no longer fully allocated, theoretically leaving room for adding exposure; however, they are more sensitive to volatility and declines. Risk parity fund equity allocation has fallen to the 20th percentile, the lowest since Liberation Day. CTA overall equity longs remain in the upper half of their historical range, around the 57th-58th percentile, with net long positions in Europe, the US, and Emerging Markets, and a more moderate stance in Japan.
Therefore, the post-correction market is no longer as crowded as it was two weeks ago, but the path is not a straight line. A more accurate description is: the pressure valve on megacap tech has been released, money is still flowing into equities, non-tech positioning remains low; simultaneously, interest rate volatility, geopolitical headlines, and issuance concerns will cause the market to fluctuate.
Comments