California asks appeals court to rehear Amazon airport hub challenge

Reuters2022-01-04

(Reuters) - California Attorney General Rob Bonta on Monday asked a federal appeals court to reconsider a failed petition that challenged the Federal Aviation Administration's approval of an Amazon air-cargo facility in the state.

Bonta asked the full 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to rehear claims that the FAA botched an environmental impact study before it approved the Eastgate Air Cargo Facility at southern California's San Bernardino International Airport.

A 9th Circuit panel denied Bonta's petition in November, but U.S. Circuit Judge Johnnie Rawlinson in a dissent suggested that the FAA would not have approved the project in 2019 had residents of the nearby San Bernardino-Muscoy community not been mostly poor people of color. The "case reeks of environmental racism," she wrote.

The majority opinion called her assertions "unfair" to FAA employees.

On Monday, Bonta echoed the concern that air pollution from the facility could disproportionately harm the San Bernardino-Muscoy community, which has a high incidence of asthma-related illness, his office said in a press release.

Amazon in April launched the San Bernardino air hub, where workers load and unload aircrafts and sort packages for regional delivery, according to the company. The Seattle-based e-commerce giant did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Neither did the FAA.

Bonta and green groups separately petitioned the court in 2020 to oppose the FAA's approval of Amazon's hub. The court consolidated their complaints into a single case.

The plaintiffs claimed, among other things, that the FAA should have studied more broadly the facility's air quality impacts stemming from daily trips by planes and trucks.

The 9th Circuit's Nov. 18 ruling noted that the petitioners had not claimed that "racial animus" helped guide FAA approval.

President Joe Biden has promised to focus resources on environmental justice, which posits that minority communities face disproportionate environmental hazards.

The case is Center for Community Action and Environmental Justice v. FAA, 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, No. 20-70272.

For State of California: Yuting Chi with the Office of the Attorney General of California

For Center for Community Action, et al: Adriano Martinez of Earthjustice

For FAA: Rebecca Jaffe with the U.S. Department of Justice

For intervenor San Bernardino International Airport Authority: Ronald Scholar of Cole Huber

For intervenor Eastgate Bldg 1 LLC: Michael Carroll of Latham & Watkins

Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

Comments

  • DenToh
    2022-01-04
    DenToh
    Thanks
  • LOHYEE
    2022-01-04
    LOHYEE
    Like please. Thanks 
  • Wafu
    2022-01-04
    Wafu
    Please like
  • TC93
    2022-01-04
    TC93
    Yow
  • STSL
    2022-01-04
    STSL
    Pls like
  • 7united
    2022-01-04
    7united
    Morning 
Leave a comment
6