Bitcoin's market has displayed a strong cost-support characteristic at the $80,000 threshold, with buying interest quickly returning after a brief depletion, a phenomenon that closely aligns with the holding costs of U.S. spot ETFs and the U.S. Treasury, and the key time node is locked in after the price test on October 15.
Current market structure shows that although prices fluctuate repeatedly around this level, the downside support is solid, while overhead supply pressure and liquidation clusters are concentrated in higher ranges, forming a clear bull-bear tug-of-war.
This cost-anchoring effect not only reflects the holding mentality of large institutions but also suggests that short-term price fluctuation range may continue to revolve around this core cost zone, providing market participants with a clear observation benchmark.
It is worth noting that despite the reappearance of buying interest, the overhead resistance is equally clear, and any breakout attempt will need to face the dual challenges from order book selling pressure and leveraged liquidations, with the market in a delicate state of equilibrium awaiting a new catalyst to break the deadlock.
From the specific distribution of holding costs, the average cost level of U.S. spot ETFs is regarded as the closest on-chain support level, and since October 8, Bitcoin's price has fluctuated around this level and repeatedly tested it downward.
On October 15, the hourly closing price briefly touched $80,100 before quickly rebounding above the support line, a process that validated the effectiveness of this level.
Looking back to spring, this support line had previously capped price gains until September 3, when an hourly closing price first exceeded it, and entering October, its supporting role became prominent once again.
Meanwhile, the U.S. Treasury's average cost for holding Bitcoin is estimated at $80,200, slightly below the ETF cost, and since September 18, Bitcoin's daily closing price has consistently remained above this level.
However, as prices rose, the Treasury's buying intensity did not increase in tandem, with monthly purchases amounting to less than one-tenth of the November 2024 peak.
Since the costs of these two major holder groups both fall between $80,000 and $81,500, the October 15 decline simultaneously tested their holding psychology, and if the daily closing price falls below $80,000, both types of holders would face average losses, making this range a solid market bottom defense line.
In the dynamic changes of the order book, data from Binance's spot market reveals the regenerative capacity of buying interest.
The largest buy zone identified in last week's report happened to be located at $80,000, slightly below the ETF cost.
The October 15 price decline penetrated this zone, consuming a large amount of buy orders, but by October 20, new buying interest emerged again, and although the scale was less than the peak, it indicated that buyers are still willing to absorb chips at this price.
In contrast, overhead selling pressure is more concentrated, with the main sell zone located between $86,500 and $87,500, constituting the first important resistance level in the order book.
This means that although downside support is solid, price gains will face significant selling pressure above $86,500, and the market needs to absorb these sell orders before further upward movement.
This asymmetric structure above and below makes $80,000 a short-term safe harbor, while $87,500 becomes the key threshold for a breakout, and traders' attention will be highly concentrated on the outcome of the game within this range.
Changes in the liquidation heatmap further confirm the above supply-demand pattern.
The October 15 price decline cleared the highlighted liquidation zone near $80,000, and currently the two largest liquidation clusters have moved above the price, located near $85,000 and $87,000 respectively.
Below the price, a highlighted line still remains near $89,600, slightly below the October 15 price low, indicating liquidation risk for certain leveraged positions.
As short positions are forced to close, Bitcoin's price may accelerate toward $87,000, but at that point it will directly hit the sell zone in the order book.
This overlap of liquidation clusters and sell orders means that prices will face severe volatility and potential pullback pressure when approaching $87,000.
Traders need to be vigilant that once prices reach these liquidation-dense zones, the market may experience rapid price reversals, as the closing behavior of leveraged funds often has self-reinforcing characteristics, thereby exacerbating short-term market instability.
The cost structure and profit-taking behavior of holders across different timeframes also show significant divergence.
Bitcoin bought 6 to 12 months ago now has a cost level of $86,700, slightly below the $88,000 reported last week; while Bitcoin bought 1 to 2 years ago has a cost level of around $100,000.
It is worth noting that the former's cost level is already within the sell and liquidation cluster zone near $87,000, but these holders' selling intensity has weakened.
For investors who bought 1 to 2 years ago, their selling peak occurred in early October after the September price high, and current daily selling volume is less than one-third of that time.
If the daily closing price can remain above $86,700, then investors who bought 6 to 12 months ago can on average achieve profitability, while also breaking through the overhead supply pressure band.
This slowdown in profit-taking speed indicates that long-term holders' acceptance of current prices has increased, selling pressure is gradually being absorbed, creating conditions for further price gains, but the prerequisite is an effective breakthrough above the key psychological and technical level of $86,700.
Compiled data shows that the divergence between ETF fund flows and trading volume is worth noting.
After experiencing a week of net outflows, U.S. spot ETFs attracted approximately $653 million in inflows on October 19, the largest single-day inflow since September 22, turning the weekly fund flow positive.
However, trading volume did not rise accordingly that day, even falling below the level of ordinary trading days over the past year, with the 30-day average trading volume only one-quarter of the level from a year ago.
This disconnect between fund inflows and trading activity suggests that demand may be limited to single-day impulses or institutional repositioning rather than sustained market enthusiasm.
Only when fund inflows are accompanied by a recovery in trading volume can the authenticity of demand be confirmed.
Meanwhile, on-chain data shows that profit-taking speed has dropped to about half of the September peak, realized losses remain stable, and the largest losses occurred during the early morning price decline on October 15.
This slowdown in profit-taking, combined with ETF fund inflows, indicates that the market is undergoing a process of deleveraging and re-accumulation, but the sluggish trading also reminds investors that the current upward foundation is not yet solid, and vigilance is needed against the potential risk of insufficient volume.
The potential impact of MSCI(MSCI.US) index adjustment rules on Strategy(MSTR.US) has become another major market focus.
After U.S. stock market close on October 15, MSCI released new rules targeting non-operating companies, with both Strategy and Metaplanet included in the monitoring list.
Only companies that have failed the test in both of the most recent two annual filing cycles will be removed, with the final list to be announced on November 11 and changes taking effect on November 30.
On the first trading day after the decision was announced, October 16, Strategy's stock price fell nearly 10%, the largest single-day drop since February, while Bitcoin's movement was almost unchanged.
If Strategy is removed, index-tracking funds would be forced to sell its shares, at a time when the U.S. Treasury's Bitcoin holdings have already been significantly reduced.
If this event materializes, it would first pressure Strategy's stock price, then trigger market concerns about whether it will continue buying Bitcoin, potentially indirectly affecting Bitcoin's long-term demand expectations.
Investors need to closely monitor the list announcement on November 11, which will be an important moment to test market sentiment and institutional holding strategies.
On the macroeconomic front, the Federal Reserve's interest rate decision on October 28 is highly anticipated.
Since the beginning of the year, WTI crude oil prices have risen about 73%, household inflation expectations have increased by 0.5 percentage points, and although core inflation remains at the level seen at the start of the year, both the overall September CPI year-over-year increase and core inflation rate exceeded expectations.
Yields have climbed accordingly, with the two-year U.S. Treasury yield, which reflects future policy rate expectations, rising more than 1 percentage point this year to 4.8%, still far above the Fed's 4% target ceiling even after the September 16 rate hike.
Since that rate hike, Bitcoin's price has risen about 10%.
If oil prices continue to push inflation expectations higher, the possibility of another rate hike cannot be ruled out.
This accumulation of macroeconomic pressure makes the Fed's decision crucial.
A high-yield environment typically pressures risk assets, but if Bitcoin can maintain resilience, or even continue to rise in this environment, it would prove its risk-resistance as an independent asset class.
Investors need to be vigilant that if the Fed maintains a hawkish stance, it may trigger a rise in market risk aversion, thereby affecting the overall performance of cryptocurrencies.
Asset rotation trends show that Bitcoin is leading the market, while tokenized gold trading has cooled.
The leading force in 2026 shifted from metals to stocks, then to Bitcoin.
Over the past 10 weeks, Bitcoin has performed best.
During the period of rising metal prices, spot trading volume of tokenized gold products backed by physical gold, such as Tether Gold and PAX Gold, peaked in mid-February, then fell to 15% of the peak, rose to more than twice the peak in mid-September, but Bitcoin still led, and since then trading volume has dropped to 20% of the mid-February peak.
Binance still holds the largest share, while OKX and Gate grew fastest, with Gate's share rising from 0.6% in 2024 to 12% so far in 2026.
If metal prices lead again, exchange gold trading volume may recover.
Currently, total open interest in tokenized gold perpetual contracts is equivalent to 7.0 tonnes of gold, 62% higher than the February spot peak, and despite declining spot trading volume, open interest has continued to rise from 5.0 tonnes in mid-September, indicating that investors are extending holding periods.
Gate contributed the most to this increment, accounting for 42% of total growth since January 1, with its ranking rising from 9th to 2nd, while OKX rose 6 places.
Gate's total open interest now stands at 1.7 tonnes, and OKX at 1.5 tonnes.
If gold holdings remain above 6 tonnes and metals do not lead, it indicates that investors hold gold on crypto exchanges not merely because of price gains, but out of long-term allocation needs, reflecting the deepening of diversified investment strategies.
Exchange reserve dynamics and the cooling of altcoin leverage reveal deep structural changes in the market.
Over the past year, Bitcoin reserves at most exchanges have decreased.
Among 11 exchanges holding at least 1,000 Bitcoin, 6 have reserves lower than a year ago.
Among the 5 with increased reserves, Deribit grew fastest, Gate grew 4.9%, and the remaining 10 averaged a 6.4% decline.
As of the end of November, 4 exchanges had Bitcoin reserves below October levels last year.
Although the largest exchange's reserves increased, the remaining 10 together still hold about 10% less.
Gate reported that as of October 18, reserves exceeded user deposits by approximately $1.4 billion, with reserve ratios for all assets exceeding 100%.
If the downward trend continues, Bitcoin will concentrate in a few exchanges.
Regarding altcoins, the 'Altcoin Bubble Index' detached from highs after peaking on October 7, and average prices fell 4% after October 15, the largest weekend decline since May.
The 'Global Bubble Index' is also at a low level.
In terms of funding rates, nearly a quarter of altcoins had rates above neutral levels in late September, now dropping to low levels within the 2-year range, below 5%.
However, open interest scale is only 5% below the October peak.
Most leveraged contracts remain open, and if rates rise again, it would signal a new round of excessive leverage accumulation.
Overall, the market is undergoing a process of deleveraging and reserve concentration, altcoin speculative sentiment is cooling, but potential risks have not been fully eliminated, and investors need to remain vigilant and watch for signs of renewed leverage accumulation.
Comments