From October 20-22, along the banks of Shanghai's Huangpu River, the 2026 Sustainable Global Leaders Conference returns once again. Nobel and Turing Award winners will take the stage to discuss the future and trends of technology, and the popular professor who "rescues" people from anxiety and the era of excessive competition, Michael McFarlane, will hold a live dialogue with Xiang Biao!
Limited seats available, first come first served. Let us embark together on this journey toward sustainability! [Click to register] Huitong Finance App News — The oil market initially treated the Iran conflict as a short-lived shock, believing that prices would rise and then return to a long-term bearish trajectory. Now traders have adjusted their expectations, betting that oil prices will remain elevated at least through 2028, forcing a reassessment of the global inflation outlook.
The war has now entered its eighth month. The inventory and shipping capacity buffers that initially cushioned the energy shock are rapidly narrowing, with onshore crude stockpiles particularly tight. The recovery of crude exports through the Strait of Hormuz remains fragile, global refining capacity has been damaged, and hopes for ending the conflict through credible diplomatic channels have further diminished. The market is now paying a premium for the possibility that supply disruptions could become the norm.
Forward Curve Signals Long-Term Risk Repricing
Brent crude oil futures clearly reflect this shift. The December 2027 contract has risen more than 13% since early September to $86 per barrel, a record high for that contract. The December 2026 contract has gained about 12% over the same period and recently traded in the $104-107 per barrel range. The forward curve is not a precise forecast, but it demonstrates that refiners, airlines, commodity traders, and asset management companies are willing to lock in elevated oil prices for months or even years ahead. Market participants are effectively paying an additional cost for the possibility that current supply disruptions will persist long-term.
Supply Expectations Clash Sharply With Market Bets
The industry had widely expected global oil supply to recover next year. The International Energy Agency's latest report shows that global oil supply in 2026 is projected to fall to 100.7 million barrels per day, down about 5.8 million barrels per day from the previous year, before recovering to approximately 108.4 million barrels per day in 2027, an increase of about 7.7 million barrels per day. On the demand side, 2026 is expected to see 102.4 million barrels per day, with a modest recovery in 2027 that still falls slightly below 2025 levels. Based on this balance, a significant supply surplus should have emerged next year, which under normal circumstances would cap oil prices. Yet the persistent rise in forward prices indicates that investors are increasingly doubtful that the anticipated supply recovery can be fully delivered, and even if it is, that it can be sustained.
The standoff between Washington and Tehran over control of the Strait of Hormuz continues, and the conflict has spilled over into the broader Gulf region. Against this backdrop, every barrel of oil shipped from the Gulf carries a higher security premium. Complex logistics, elevated freight rates, insurance costs, and military escort expenses now account for nearly one-third of total transportation costs, compared with only about 3% before the war. If the Strait issue cannot be resolved durably, these costs will continue to be reflected in oil prices for the foreseeable future.
Diesel Market Under Greater Pressure as Inflation Transmission Risk Rises
The strain in the diesel market is particularly pronounced. Supply disruptions in the Middle East and Russia have caused severe shortages, with the European diesel futures benchmark once surging to a record high of $1,480 per metric ton in mid-September, equivalent to about $210 per barrel. Forward contracts have also climbed, with the December 2027 delivery price breaking above $1,000 per metric ton for the first time this week, compared with pre-war levels of around $644. The repricing of fuel costs may carry greater macroeconomic significance than the rise in crude oil itself. Trucks, ships, factories, and farms rely heavily on diesel, and these sectors are critical pillars of global commercial activity. Historically, persistently high diesel prices gradually feed through to the broader economy by driving up transportation, manufacturing, and food costs. U.S. headline inflation stood at 3.7% in September, nearly double the Federal Reserve's 2% target, with core inflation also edging higher. Sustained high diesel prices remain a key concern for policymakers in the United States and globally.
Structurally High Costs May Become the New Normal
For most of this year, the energy market still compared the Iran war to previous geopolitical crises — intense but brief disruptions followed by a rapid return to normal. A growing number of investors have reached a different conclusion: the question is no longer simply how much oil can pass through the Strait of Hormuz, but whether the global energy system can quickly rebuild the inventories, refining capacity, and supply chains damaged by months of conflict. Until then, the world may find itself in a situation of structurally high energy costs, one that could persist for a long time even after the fighting eventually stops.
Editor's Summary
The Iran conflict has lasted far longer than initially expected, evolving from a short-term supply shock into a structural factor that could influence medium- to long-term oil price and inflation trajectories. The simultaneous rise in forward crude and diesel prices shows the market lacks confidence in a full supply recovery. Narrowing onshore inventory buffers, rising security premiums through the Strait, and damaged refining capacity are all pushing up transportation and production costs. Although the International Energy Agency forecasts a significant supply recovery in 2027, the persistent geopolitical stalemate increases uncertainty about whether those expectations will materialize. If high oil prices persist, they will gradually pass through energy-intensive industries to broader price levels, making it harder for global policymakers to stabilize inflation. Current market pricing has already permanently embedded some of this risk, and future moves will depend on whether a credible path to resolving the conflict emerges and on the actual pace of supply recovery. (Brent crude December futures daily chart, source: Yihuitong)
Frequently Asked Questions
Q: Why did the market initially believe the Iran war would only briefly push oil prices higher? A: Historically, most Middle East geopolitical conflicts have had only short-term effects on oil prices, with supply recovering afterward through increased output from other producing regions, inventory releases, or diplomatic de-escalation. The market initially judged that this conflict would also end quickly, with long-term supply and demand fundamentals still tilted toward surplus, keeping the forward curve relatively mild. As the war entered its eighth month without a diplomatic breakthrough, investors reassessed the durability of supply disruptions.
Q: What does the more than 13% rise in the Brent crude December 2027 contract mean? A: The contract's rise to $86 and record high reflects market participants' willingness to pay a premium for supply risk more than a year out. It is not a precise forecast of a specific price, but rather a reflection of the willingness of refiners, airlines, and funds to lock in higher costs. This shows that concerns about supply disruptions becoming normalized have become deeply embedded in pricing, rather than remaining at the level of short-term fluctuations.
Q: The IEA forecasts a significant supply increase in 2027, so why are forward oil prices still rising? A: The IEA expects supply to fall to 100.7 million barrels per day in 2026 and recover by about 7.7 million barrels per day in 2027, with demand recovering modestly but still below 2025 levels, which theoretically should produce a surplus. However, the market doubts the sustainability of the Strait of Hormuz export recovery, the pace of refining capacity repairs, and the risk of conflict spillover. Even if supply data improves, security premiums and logistics costs may remain embedded in prices long-term, driving forward contracts higher.
Q: Why is the surge in diesel prices drawing more attention than crude oil? A: Diesel is a core fuel for road transportation, shipping, industry, and agriculture. Rising diesel prices directly push up logistics and production costs and ultimately feed through to food and consumer goods. European diesel futures once hit a record $1,480 per metric ton, with forward contracts also breaking above $1,000, far exceeding pre-war levels. The inflation impact of this structural tightness tends to be more persistent and broader than that of crude oil.
Q: How do current security premiums and inventory conditions affect future oil prices? A: Before the war, security-related costs accounted for only about 3% of transportation costs; now they approach one-third, including freight, insurance, and escort expenses. Onshore crude inventory buffers are rapidly narrowing, further weakening the ability to respond to shocks. If the Strait issue cannot be durably resolved, these additional costs will continue to be reflected in oil prices. Even if nominal supply recovers, actual landed costs may remain elevated, extending the period during which high oil prices weigh on the economy and inflation.
As of 15:07 Beijing time, the Brent crude December futures contract was quoted at $104.61 per barrel. Sina partner platform futures account opening — safe, fast, and guaranteed.
Comments