Green liquid fuels, a key driver for decarbonization in shipping, aviation, and chemical industries, are entering a rapid growth phase, supported by carbon tax policies and cost reductions. Over the next five years, the sector is projected to grow nearly tenfold, with long-term market potential reaching trillions. Domestic manufacturers, leveraging abundant low-cost green power resources and robust supply chains, are accelerating their green liquid fuel industry layouts and business models to achieve leapfrog development. Key focus areas include: 1) integrated green hydrogen-ammonia-methanol producers, and 2) core equipment suppliers such as electrolyzers.
CITIC SEC highlights the following insights: **Policy Support Strengthens as Green Fuels Flourish** Green liquid fuels—including green methanol, green ammonia, and sustainable aviation fuel (SAF)—offer zero or ultra-low carbon emissions, high energy density, and ease of storage and transport, making them vital for decarbonizing multiple industries. With global clean energy policies maturing and initiatives like Europe’s shipping carbon tax, demand is shifting from "potential" to "essential." The firm estimates global demand for green methanol, ammonia, and SAF could reach 3/2.5/2.5 million tons by 2025, surging to 36/23/11 million tons by 2030—an 11x, 9.2x, and 3.5x increase, respectively.
**Supply-Demand Imbalance Looms Amid Rapid Expansion** While production technologies (e.g., biomass/electrolysis for methanol, improved Haber-Bosch for ammonia, HEFA/PtL/FT for SAF) are maturing, most projects remain in planning phases. Current global planned capacities stand at 56/32/18 million tons for methanol/ammonia/SAF, but CITIC SEC forecasts 2025 effective capacities at just 0.5/1.3/4.4 million tons. By 2030, supplies may reach 26/24/17 million tons, with methanol facing prolonged tightness, ammonia balancing supply-demand, and SAF expanding steadily.
**"Green Premium" Shrinks, Cost Parity Nears** Green fuels currently cost 70%-120% more than conventional "grey" alternatives, primarily due to green power, equipment, and carbon sourcing premiums. For green methanol (production cost: ¥4,500/ton), electricity (52%) and equipment depreciation (27%) are key cost drivers. With wind/solar power costs declining (potentially to ¥0.15/kWh) and electrolyzer advancements (e.g., proton exchange membrane tech), green hydrogen could achieve cost parity by 2030, slashing methanol costs by 20%-35% (¥2,900-3,700/ton) and narrowing the grey-green cost gap to ~50%.
**Industry Chain Matures with Strong Commercial Prospects** The value chain spans upstream (green power/biomass/equipment), midstream (integrated producers), and downstream (storage/transport/end-users). Power giants are vertically integrating into fuel production to enhance grid flexibility and capture higher margins. High-quality methanol projects may deliver 8%-10% IRR with international offtake agreements. Green ammonia/methanol’s lower transport costs versus hydrogen also address storage challenges, with further savings expected from pipeline infrastructure.
Driven by carbon neutrality and energy transition goals, the green hydrogen-ammonia-methanol sector is transitioning from pilot projects to large-scale commercialization, unlocking diverse applications.
**Risks**: Policy delays, supply-demand imbalances, technology bottlenecks, cost overruns, infrastructure gaps, and geopolitical tensions.
Comments