Wei Jianjun on "EVs Replacing Gas Cars" Debate: Each Technology Has Suitable Scenarios, Must Meet Every User's Needs

Deep News01-05

Recently, automotive industry commentator and journalist Li Anding commented on the "electric vehicles replacing fuel vehicles" viewpoint on Weibo, describing it as "a deliberate move by clever people." He stated their objectives are threefold: first, to brainwash the general public, reinforcing the perception that pure electric is the future, thereby comprehensively blocking consumers' choice of fuel vehicles; second, to send a strong signal of a positive future for the pure electric industry to the capital markets through radical and confident statements, aiming to secure more financial investment; third, to grab attention through public opinion, increasing traffic and visibility for individuals and brands.

However, he believes that currently, due to low battery energy density, electric vehicles struggle to compete comprehensively with fuel vehicles. Despite rapid development driven by capital, their sales volume still lags behind fuel vehicles, making a complete victory uncertain.

In response, Great Wall Motor Company Limited Chairman Wei Jianjun reposted Li Anding's Weibo on January 5th, stating: Mr. Li Anding's analysis demonstrates high strategic vision and foresight; it is very insightful and worth listening to. While the industry fiercely debates "who will replace whom," what users actually want is "who can better satisfy me" and a reliable solution: commuting to work, long-distance travel, hauling goods, or mountain driving... Because the usage scenarios are entirely different, we are developing pure electric, hybrid, fuel, and hydrogen energy technologies. The reasoning is simple: each technology has its most suitable application scenario, and our mission is to meet the needs of every single user.

Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

Comments

We need your insight to fill this gap
Leave a comment