The recently released U.S. February Consumer Price Index (CPI) met expectations, showing a broad increase while core inflation eased. However, market focus is clearly not on this data, which covers the period up to the end of February. The surge in oil prices triggered by the sudden escalation of tensions involving Iran at the end of February is not yet reflected in this report and is likely to begin appearing gradually next month.
Furthermore, prices for core services such as hospital services, apparel, and hotels showed significant increases. Consequently, even though the data met expectations, both the U.S. dollar and Treasury yields edged higher after the release, indicating market concerns about the future.
Beyond the inherently unpredictable geopolitical situation, it is advisable to closely monitor the U.S. dollar's trajectory as an indicator of liquidity stress and to prepare corresponding strategies for different potential oil price paths.
Key observations from the report are as follows: The February CPI reading was in line with forecasts, exhibiting a general rise alongside a moderation in core inflation, which aligns almost exactly with prior predictions. Specifically: 1. The month-over-month change for used cars narrowed to -0.38%, consistent with the strengthening trend in the Manheim Used Vehicle Index. 2. Apparel prices rose by 1.28% month-over-month, potentially linked to retailers passing on tariff pressures through repricing at the start of the year. 3. Airfare prices declined by 1.36% month-over-month as expected, reverting from an extreme level to a more normal range. 4. The primary rent index unexpectedly fell by 0.13% month-over-month. This could be related to the previous reading of 0.29% being significantly above the trend level (as the rent sample rotates every six months, the previous sample was from August last year) and might also be connected to the weakening fundamentals indicated by the February non-farm payrolls report. 5. Retail gasoline prices drove the energy commodities category up by 1.10% month-over-month.
The impact of the recent Iran-related tensions is expected to be gradually reflected in next month's data. Analysis suggests that every 10% increase in oil prices would raise the U.S. headline CPI by 0.2 to 0.3 percentage points. Prior to the Iran tensions, the forecast was for U.S. CPI to peak at 2.8% year-over-year in the second quarter. Therefore: 1. If the average oil price settles around $80 per barrel, the peak CPI could rise to 3.1-3.2%. 2. If the average oil price reaches $100 per barrel, the peak CPI could climb to 3.5%, equaling the Federal Reserve's benchmark interest rate, which would make it very difficult for the Fed to implement rate cuts.
In other words, as long as oil prices remain below the $100 threshold, any Fed rate cuts are more likely to be delayed rather than canceled entirely (current CME FedWatch Tool projections indicate a delay until September). The future evolution depends critically on where the average oil price settles and for how long.
Earlier in the week, Brent crude prices approached $120 per barrel. Subsequently, prices retreated to around $90 following catalysts such as暗示 the conflict would end soon and reports that the International Energy Agency (IEA) was preparing a significant release of strategic petroleum reserves.
The commodities team forecasts that if the Strait of Hormuz is reopened promptly, the average price in the second quarter could be around $80-$90, gradually declining to near $70 in the third and fourth quarters.
Looking ahead, based on the aforementioned analysis: 1. If oil prices fluctuate around these levels, the Federal Reserve could likely "look through" the short-term disturbance and focus on longer-term growth pressures. Thus, rate cuts would be postponed, not reversed. Expectations for eventual cuts could return, and interest-rate-sensitive cyclical sectors could still recover, albeit later than initially anticipated. 2. If oil prices spike rapidly again and then fall back, the substantive impact on monetary policy might be limited. However, such volatility could cause transient shocks to financial assets and potentially trigger a liquidity crisis. In such a scenario, the U.S. dollar would likely strengthen significantly, putting pressure on all other assets, including traditional safe-havens like gold, similar to the market reactions observed recently related to the Iran tensions.
Therefore, aside from the difficult-to-predict geopolitical developments themselves, it is recommended to closely watch the U.S. dollar's performance as a gauge for liquidity pressure and to formulate appropriate response strategies for different potential oil price trajectories.
Comments