In the third quarter of 2026, CATL posted revenue of 165.221 billion yuan, up 58.58% year on year and a record quarterly high; net profit attributable to shareholders was 21.246 billion yuan, up 14.54% year on year but down 5.77% from 22.546 billion yuan in the second quarter. (Wind data)
The day after the quarterly report was released (October 21), CATL's A-shares closed down 12.03% at 227.90 yuan, its H-shares fell more than 10% intraday, and its combined A+H market capitalization retreated to 1.05 trillion yuan; compared with the high of 468.75 yuan on May 7, the stock has nearly halved in five months. What is the market worried about? What facts did the financial report reveal?
The 5.11-point gross margin drop needs to be split into two accounts
Start with the hardest piece of evidence. In the first three quarters, operating costs were 341.695 billion yuan, up 61.61% year on year, 5.4 percentage points higher than the 56.19% growth in operating revenue. In the third quarter alone, the gross margin was 20.69%, down 5.11 percentage points year on year and down 2.47 percentage points quarter on quarter, the lowest since the fourth quarter of 2022; the net margin attributable to shareholders was 12.86%, down 4.94 percentage points year on year. (Data: Market Value Fengyun)
Of the 5.11 percentage point year-on-year drop in gross margin, the first item that can be isolated is the export tax rebate. According to Announcement No. 2 of 2026 from the Ministry of Finance and the State Taxation Administration, the VAT export tax rebate rate for battery products was cut from 9% to 6% starting April 1, 2026, and will be canceled starting January 1, 2027. All three full months of the third quarter were subject to the 6% rate, 3 percentage points lower than 9% in the same period last year; with overseas revenue accounting for 31.46% in the first half, this alone is estimated to have reduced the quarterly gross margin by about 1 percentage point. This item falls directly into operating costs.
The second item is product mix. In the third quarter, combined sales of power and energy storage batteries exceeded 260GWh, with energy storage accounting for about one quarter and sales growth of nearly 60%. The company explicitly said that energy storage is shifting from selling cells and DC-side products to selling AC-side and system products. System products require externally purchased energy storage inverters, battery management systems and energy management systems; revenue per GWh rises, but the gross margin is naturally lower than that of cells.
There is another item that is easy to misbook: the consumption tax is not in gross margin, but it affects net margin. According to a July announcement from the Ministry of Finance, the General Administration of Customs and the State Taxation Administration, lithium-ion batteries have been subject to a 2% consumption tax since September 1, 2026, rising to 4% from September 1, 2027; exports continue to enjoy consumption tax refunds and exemptions, so this mainly falls on domestic sales. The consumption tax is an in-price tax and enters the "taxes and surcharges" line item—in the first three quarters, that item rose from 1.843 billion yuan to 3.539 billion yuan, nearly doubling. Whether the tax burden affects profit, however, depends on whether the company can pass the cost on, and that depends on whether pricing power lies with the cell maker or the automaker. In December 2024, the battery export tax rebate rate had just been cut from 13% to 9%, a sharper 4 percentage point reduction than this time, yet CATL's comprehensive gross margin in the first half of 2025 was 25.02% and did not collapse.
Expansion restarts, alongside a 64% debt ratio
Fixed assets were 184.126 billion yuan, up 25.77% from the end of last year; construction in progress was 43.032 billion yuan, up 44.73%; cash paid in the first three quarters for the purchase and construction of fixed assets, intangible assets and other long-term assets was 42.167 billion yuan, up 40.13% year on year. The three sets of numbers point to the same thing: the expansion pace that had been suppressed for two years has restarted.
Where did the money come from? Short-term borrowings rose from 12.935 billion yuan to 39.898 billion yuan, up 208.43%; bonds payable rose from 3.443 billion yuan to 52.738 billion yuan, up 1,431.55%, mainly due to newly issued medium-term notes and corporate bonds in the period; the debt-to-asset ratio rose from 61.94% to 64.23%, up 2.29 percentage points.
But this is not a cash shortage. At period-end, monetary funds were 369.814 billion yuan and financial assets held for trading were 62.780 billion yuan, totaling 432.594 billion yuan; interest-bearing debt was about 185.862 billion yuan, leaving net cash above 240 billion yuan. A more reasonable explanation is financial arrangement: the H-share placement increased capital reserves by 34.348 billion yuan, while lower-cost bonds and notes were used to replace other funds during the same period, extending debt duration.
Worth mentioning separately is provisions, which rose from 85.324 billion yuan to 104.111 billion yuan. This is mainly after-sales comprehensive service fees and warranty accruals, accumulating as the installed base grows; it is a visible but rarely discussed after-sales cost pool on the books. It will not suddenly erupt, but it will keep rising along with the installed base.
Share still rising—the most easily overlooked counterevidence
The evidence chain on the demand side is actually complete. According to SNE Research, from January to August 2026, global power battery installations were 844.2GWh, up 19.7% year on year; CATL accounted for 333.0GWh, up 25.2% year on year, with a global market share of 39.4%, up 1.7 percentage points year on year. According to the China Automotive Battery Innovation Alliance, domestic installations from January to September were 576.3GWh, up 16.7% year on year, and CATL took a 44.16% share with 253.68GWh, up 1.41 percentage points year on year. Its growth outpaced the industry, and its share is still expanding.
Energy storage is the real main battlefield for incremental growth. According to InfoLink, global lithium battery energy storage shipments from January to August grew 86% year on year; CATL's energy storage sales in the third quarter rose nearly 60% year on year, with its share rising to about one quarter. On the product side, it is iterating from 314Ah to 587Ah large cells, reducing unit investment and adapting to longer duration; its Tianheng sodium-ion energy storage system has signed multiple European customers. The company is also accelerating energy storage capacity construction and improving system integration capabilities, with the share of AC-side shipments rising rapidly.
Its ecosystem layout is also becoming denser. More than 2,500 chocolate battery-swap stations have been built cumulatively, covering more than 200 cities in 31 provinces and compatible with more than 30 models, with more than 3,000 expected for the full year; it signed strategic cooperation with Yinwang and Shidai Dianfu to connect the battery-swap network with Qiankun intelligent driving; through equity investment, it became the largest shareholder of Qiyuan Core Power, completing the heavy-truck energy replenishment network.
The capacity and demand narrative is equally clear. Management said capacity utilization in the first half was "very saturated," and as new capacity comes on stream this year the tightness has eased somewhat, but it "will remain at a relatively high level" going forward. As for the market's concerns about 2027, the company's exact words were that it "can still be anticipated"—domestic passenger vehicle volume is declining, but electrification rates and battery capacity per vehicle are rising; Europe's electrification has continuity; the potential of other markets may be underestimated; and overseas energy storage demand is strong. Since the demand side holds up, the profit pressure in the third-quarter report cannot be attributed to demand. It can only be attributed to two places: product mix and taxes.
Four core points to watch in the future
First, whether unit gross profit and net profit can be defended. Beyond offsetting the negative impact of taxes, the more important question is whether the company can prove that it can defend market share and profitability under price competition from second-tier manufacturers.
Second, when cash flow will recover. Operating cash flow in the third quarter was only 1.4 billion yuan, down more than 90% from 22 billion yuan in the same period last year. The company said the profit concession "may last for some time," and the future question is whether cash flow has truly bottomed.
Third, whether goods shipped in inventory can be converted into revenue. Inventory of 144.770 billion yuan against quarterly revenue of 165.221 billion yuan is already a high ratio. If revenue moves together with inventory in the fourth quarter, it suggests recognition was delayed; if inventory keeps rising while revenue does not move, then the delivery capability of energy storage systemization must be reexamined.
Fourth, the ramp-up pace of overseas capacity. A zero export tax rebate is the same knife for all Chinese battery exporters, while local production is unaffected. CATL's Hungary plant Phase I has officially entered trial production, and its Spain plant is advancing steadily; in the first half, the gross margin of overseas business was 29.97%, nearly 9 percentage points higher than the 21.16% domestic margin. Whoever gets overseas capacity running first will be the first to step out from under that knife.
In addition, policy has actually given a second hint: sodium-ion batteries, solid-state batteries and fuel cells are exempt from consumption tax during the window from September 1, 2026 to December 31, 2028—it does not reward exports, it rewards localization and new technologies.
A share price of 227.90 yuan, a market capitalization of 1.05 trillion yuan and a price-earnings ratio of just over 12 times are a temporary answer from the market. Whether that answer is right depends on changes in the company's gross margin over the next two quarters. A company's moat is ultimately not reflected in how many GWh of batteries it can sell, but in whether it can withstand the impact of tax rates and competition while defending market share and profit space.
Comments