The Federal Reserve's primary inflation measure is poised for its yearly update, with preliminary economic analysis indicating the revisions could lower core inflation readings. This adjustment may tip the scales in the delicate debate over whether to raise interest rates again this year.
On July 9, Bloomberg reported that the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA) plans to release its annual revisions to the Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) price index in September. Several economists have modeled the potential changes, suggesting that if applied to the latest data, the core PCE reading could be reduced by approximately 0.1 to 0.3 percentage points. While the magnitude is limited, with Fed officials nearly evenly split on the need for a 2026 rate hike, this downward revision might be just enough to bolster the case for newly appointed Fed Chair Warsh and dovish policymakers to maintain the current pause on rate increases.
Stephanie Roth, Chief Economist at Wolfe Research, noted that the rationale for the Fed holding rates steady has strengthened considerably. She believes that, alongside the planned PCE revisions, recent pullbacks in oil prices and indications that labor market momentum reflected in the latest jobs report may have been overestimated provide further support for inaction.
Approaching PCE Revisions and Market Bets on Steady Rates
The BEA is scheduled to publish its annual revisions to the PCE price index this September. Current data shows the headline PCE rose 4.1% year-over-year in May, the highest since April 2023 and still well above the Fed's 2% target. The core PCE, which excludes food and energy and is a key benchmark for policymakers, increased 3.4% over the same period.
While the annual revisions are not expected to fundamentally alter the overall inflation picture, the potential for even a marginal downward adjustment in the readings could have a tangible impact on policy direction, given the heightened internal divisions at the Fed. According to Bloomberg, Fed officials at their June meeting largely agreed that inflation risks are tilted to the upside, but were clearly split on whether another rate hike would be necessary in 2026.
This delicate internal divide makes the timing of the September revisions particularly critical. If the data revises core inflation lower as anticipated, it would furnish Warsh and dovish officials with additional arguments to fortify their stance for keeping rates unchanged, helping them resist pressure for hikes in the internal policy debate.
Comments