President Trump executed a dramatic pivot at the World Economic Forum in Davos, shifting within hours from threats of military force and new tariffs to pursuing a negotiated solution regarding Greenland. This sudden reversal resulted from days of behind-the-scenes mediation by European leaders, ultimately producing the framework for a potential agreement involving Arctic security, mineral resources, and military bases.
Upon arriving in the Swiss Alps on Wednesday afternoon, European leaders were still panicked that Trump's ambitions for Greenland could trigger a transatlantic conflict. However, by sunset, Trump had explicitly stated he would not use military force to acquire Greenland and rescinded his previously promised tariffs on European nations. Following a meeting with NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte, he announced that a "framework for a future agreement" concerning the world's largest island had been formed.
This shift provided significant relief for European leaders, who were facing economic instability and threats to NATO's cohesion. Just days earlier, Trump had refused to rule out using military means to obtain Greenland. Over the weekend, he had threatened to impose 10% tariffs on eight countries starting next month, rising to 25% in June, if a deal to acquire Greenland could not be reached.
According to reports, this change was the outcome of several days of private dialogue between Trump, his advisors, and European leaders. Europe maintained a unified front against Trump's acquisition efforts, employing incentives such as enhanced Arctic security commitments alongside warnings about the dangers to the US of a deeply fractured NATO.
A Framework Agreement Emerges According to European officials familiar with the discussions, negotiations are expected to focus on several core areas. These include a potential agreement between the US and Denmark for stationing troops at bases in Greenland, as well as Europe expanding its security efforts in the Arctic region. The US may secure a right of first refusal on mineral resource investments in Greenland—a veto power designed to prevent Russia from developing the island's wealth—in exchange for Trump withdrawing his tariff threats.
Trump described the framework as "really great" in remarks to reporters but offered few details. He indicated that Denmark, which governs Greenland, had been informed of the potential agreement. The White House Press Secretary stated in a declaration that if a deal is reached, the US would permanently achieve all its strategic objectives in Greenland at an extremely low cost.
The White House declined to comment on the specifics of the proposed framework, with one administration official noting the scope of negotiations was not yet finalized. A NATO spokesperson said Trump and Rutte had "discussed the critical importance of Arctic region security for the US and other NATO members." Negotiations on the proposed framework will focus on how NATO members can cooperate to ensure Arctic security, while more specific talks between Denmark, Greenland, and the US will aim to ensure "Russia can never gain an economic or military foothold in Greenland."
A 24-Hour Shift from Hardline to Compromise During his hour-long speech at the World Economic Forum on Wednesday, Trump signaled an early willingness to strike a deal. He stated he would not deploy the military to seize control of Greenland, a stark contrast to his position days earlier when he refused to rule out using force. "I don't have to use force," he said, "I don't want to use force. I will not use force."
However, Trump's speech also contained sharp criticism of longstanding allies. He described Europe as unrecognizable from earlier times and heading in the wrong direction, accused Denmark of ingratitude, suggested Switzerland wouldn't exist without US support, and mocked French President Macron for wearing aviator sunglasses at the event. He implied that NATO members had an obligation to support US efforts to acquire Greenland due to America's central role in upholding the transatlantic alliance. "We give so much and get so little," he said.
"We want a piece of ice to protect the world, and they won't give it," Trump said of the desire to acquire Greenland from Denmark. "You can say yes, and we will be very grateful. Or you can say no, and we will remember."
Trump's speech in the main hall, packed with global elites, received a tepid response, eliciting some light applause but also many blank stares and nervous laughter. On Wednesday evening, Trump posted on Truth Social that he would delay the imposition of tariffs to allow for negotiations on Greenland.
Divergent Interpretations from Various Parties US and European officials drew conflicting lessons from the Greenland episode. US officials believe Trump's hardline stance forced European leaders to the negotiating table after they had refused for months to accommodate his push for control of Greenland. European officials, conversely, believe that maintaining a unified front of opposition helped persuade Trump to accept a deal that does not involve acquiring the territory.
Some of Trump's advisors privately worried that his aggressive rhetoric made reaching a deal with Denmark more difficult. In recent days, administration officials had been discussing compromise proposals that would grant the US access to mineral resources and land for military bases. External allies of the president expressed concern after Tuesday's stock market plunge, which was triggered by Trump's Greenland-related tariff threats.
The Danish Foreign Minister remarked, "The ending today is better than the beginning." EU leaders are scheduled to hold an emergency summit in Brussels. While they no longer need an immediate plan to counter a trade war, they must now assess the damaged trans-Atlantic relationship.
Davos Tensions Spill Over In Davos, tensions occasionally surfaced behind the scenes. According to attendees, European Central Bank President Christine Lagarde left a Tuesday dinner during a speech by US Commerce Secretary, an act some interpreted as a sign of heightened transatlantic friction. The Commerce Secretary criticized European energy policies and what he described as the continent's declining competitiveness on the world stage during the invitation-only dinner.
Some dinner guests applauded the Secretary's remarks emphasizing US strength relative to Europe, while others booed. An ECB spokesperson declined to comment the following morning. A Commerce Department spokesperson stated that "no one rushed out during Secretary's three-minute speech. Only one person booed, and that was Al Gore." The former US Vice President responded that he had listened to the speech and "did not interrupt him in any way."
The Canadian Prime Minister said earlier in the week during his Davos speech, "We are reminded every day that we live in an era of great power competition. The rules-based order is receding. The strong can do what they will, and the weak must endure what they must."
Comments