Since November 1st, the revised "Shanghai Elderly Rights Protection Regulations" have officially taken effect, with the newly introduced "paid elderly care leave" drawing significant attention. However, interviews reveal that due to the absence of detailed implementation rules, both employees and employers face operational challenges.
**Employee Dilemma: Leave Requests Denied Amid Policy Ambiguity** Public discussion has shifted from policy adoption to practical execution. Ms. Chai, an employee at a large Shanghai-based company, sought help via a TV hotline after her request for leave to care for her hospitalized father was denied by HR, citing "no such leave policy." Approval was only granted after legal intervention. A lawyer consulted by the program noted that companies await clear procedural guidelines to expedite approvals, as elderly care emergencies are time-sensitive—delays could render the leave meaningless.
**HR Challenges: Unclear Documentation and Scope** Interviews with multiple HR departments highlight confusion. A state-owned enterprise HR manager confirmed willingness to approve requests but raised questions about required documentation: How to verify guardian relationships or single-child status (household registry? tax app records?), whether hospitalization or discharge summaries are needed (the latter only available post-discharge), and how to handle stepparent cases. A private tech firm HR representative added that the regulation’s applicability to non-local employees remains unclear. Temporary solutions include deducting from annual leave, with promises to reinstate it once rules are clarified—though exhausted leave balances force ad-hoc approvals prioritizing urgent family needs.
**Field Observations: Patchwork Approvals Amid System Gaps** Over two weeks post-implementation, some employees in hospitals reported employers granting leave informally, with plans to retroactively process paperwork. Many cited HR’s own uncertainty about procedures. Others noted that workplace software lacks the "elderly care leave" option, blocking digital applications entirely. "The system fails at step one—we need a temporary channel," one employee urged.
**Legal Perspective: Proactive Corporate Policy Updates** Liu Bin, a labor law expert and partner at Jiangsan Law Firm, advised companies to revise internal policies preemptively. Recommendations include: - Updating employee handbooks to list "elderly care leave" as a distinct category alongside annual/sick leave. - Standardizing application materials and workflows with template forms. - Limiting verification to "documentary checks" without overreach. Notably, some firms like Yuyuan Garden Co. have already amended collective contracts to include the leave, setting a precedent.
**Expert Calls: Flexible Solutions and Multi-Stakeholder Coordination** He Yongqiang of the Shanghai Labor and Social Security Association proposed allowing couples to split leave days to ease operational impacts. He also suggested expanding eligibility to spouses if children cannot provide care. For effective implementation, he emphasized: 1. Designating oversight bodies (e.g., labor authorities/unions) to enforce compliance and penalize non-compliance. 2. Linking corporate policy adoption to social responsibility incentives, reducing compliance burdens.
The road to seamless policy execution remains long, requiring clearer guidelines and collaborative efforts.
*What are your suggestions? Share your thoughts in the comments.*
Comments