After Tesla released stronger-than-expected third-quarter delivery figures, Oppenheimer maintained its Market-Perform rating on the stock, declining to turn more bullish just because sales surpassed expectations.
Tesla delivered 486,500 vehicles in the third quarter, above the company-compiled consensus estimate of 462,000 and above the FactSet market estimate of roughly 461,000. Of that total, Model 3 and Model Y deliveries reached 478,200, well above the company-compiled estimate of 450,700 and the FactSet forecast of about 435,000.
Third-quarter vehicle production totaled 464,400 units, including 457,400 Model 3 and Model Y vehicles and about 7,000 other models. Deliveries exceeded production, meaning the company not only absorbed all newly built vehicles in the quarter but also drew down some inventory.
Judged purely on vehicle delivery data, the results were clearly better than prior market expectations, which explains why Tesla shares strengthened after the figures were released. Other business segments, however, did not outperform to the same degree.
Tesla deployed 13.7 GWh of energy storage products in the third quarter, below the market expectation of 15.9 GWh. For an energy business that has become increasingly important in recent years, this means the strength in vehicle deliveries was not fully replicated in the storage segment. That is also why Oppenheimer kept its Market-Perform rating after the data instead of directly upgrading the stock.
What the market truly needs to confirm now is whether delivery growth can translate into better profitability. Higher vehicle sales do not automatically mean profits will grow in tandem. If that growth still depends on price cuts, financing incentives or other promotional measures, average selling prices and automotive gross margins could remain under pressure.
Therefore, the third-quarter earnings report due on October 21 will be more critical than the delivery numbers alone. At that point, the market will focus on automotive gross margin, average selling price, free cash flow and energy storage performance to judge whether this round of better-than-expected sales reflects a genuine improvement in demand or mainly reflects delivery timing and inventory changes.
Meanwhile, Tesla has recently established new debt financing arrangements, including a US$20 billion three-year delayed draw term loan, a US$8 billion five-year revolving credit facility and a US$2 billion 364-day revolving credit facility, bringing the total scale to US$30 billion.
Overall, the third-quarter delivery data was indeed clearly better than expected, but Oppenheimer's decision not to upgrade the stock in response to the sales figures shows that the market's focus on Tesla is no longer just how many cars it sold, but whether those additional deliveries can genuinely translate into earnings and cash flow growth without further sacrificing prices and profit margins.
Comments