A scenario analysis of potential US-Iran negotiation outcomes reveals critical implications for energy and chemical markets. The negotiations focus on three key issues: control of the Strait of Hormuz, ceasefire terms coupled with sanctions relief for Iran, and nuclear concerns. Control of the Strait of Hormuz holds paramount importance as it underpins the petrodollar system. If the US loses control over this shipping lane, it would effectively lose influence over nearly 50% of global oil reserves, 30% of crude production, and 40 of refined product trade, signaling a decline for the petrodollar. Iran currently holds de facto control of the strait, providing significant leverage in negotiations.
Scenario One: Successful Negotiations Should negotiations succeed, with Iran gaining formal control and the Strait of Hormuz reopening by late April, long-term structural shifts are expected. A "supply security premium" would become entrenched. Iran may implement a "mandatory approval system" and "designated shipping lanes," requiring all tankers to obtain prior permission, embedding a persistent "geopolitical risk premium" in oil prices. Transit costs are likely to rise due to potential Iranian fees or higher insurance, increasing landed crude costs. The global energy market would pivot from "efficiency first" to "security first," ushering in a new normal of higher costs and volatility for the chemical industry.
Scenario Two: Failed Negotiations If talks fail, leading to continued military stalemate and prolonged Strait of Hormuz closure beyond May, geopolitical risk premiums would swiftly return. International oil prices, particularly Brent crude, could rebound rapidly towards $100 per barrel. For chemicals, cost pressures would intensify amid sustained supply tightness. Import-dependent products like methanol, ethylene glycol, and liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) would see the strongest performance due to constrained global supply.
The conflict's impact on chemicals follows a clear transmission path. Direct effects include cost-push inflation from higher crude and disrupted transportation. Data shows a dramatic 94% decline in March vessel traffic through the Strait of Hormuz compared to February and the previous year. In 2025, the strait handled 18.67 million barrels per day of crude and refined products, accounting for 27.1% of global exports, with 70% destined for Asia, of which China comprised 30.6%. Alternative pipeline capacity is limited, and storage constraints have forced production cuts estimated at over 10 million barrels per day since the conflict began. Refinery outages in the Gulf region have reached 62.6% of capacity, severely impacting exports of refined products and chemical feedstocks like naphtha, ethylene, and propylene.
Chemical facilities have also suffered direct attacks, notably a major strike on Iran's largest petrochemical complex and an attack on a SABIC facility in Saudi Arabia. Products like MEG, MA, PE, and PP are significantly affected. Domestically, Chinese refineries have reduced operating rates due to feedstock shortages, with a policy shift towards "reducing chemicals, increasing oil output" to ensure stable fuel supply for basic needs.
The import-export landscape is shifting. Disruptions to Middle Eastern supply have caused operational cuts at plants in Japan and South Korea, limiting China's imports of PX, benzene, and styrene. Conversely, Chinese exports are filling gaps in Asian markets. PVC and caustic soda exports are rising as Chinese production, less reliant on ethylene, remains stable. Polyolefin (PE/PP) exports to Southeast Asia are increasing, and products like PET chips are seeing significant export growth. Ethylene glycol has shifted to a net export position due to competitive domestic coal-based production.
Trading strategies vary by scenario. In a successful negotiation outcome where Brent crude corrects below $80 per barrel, buying undervalued chemicals is recommended. If negotiations fail and oil surges above $110 per barrel, selling deferred chemical contracts is advised. Calendar spreads are favored for buying on dips across both scenarios due to anticipated inventory drawdowns. Cross-product strength rankings differ: for Scenario One, benzene/styrene lead, followed by PX/PTA, methanol/EG, PP/PE, PVC, and urea. For Scenario Two, methanol/EG are strongest, followed by benzene/styrene, PX/PTA, PP/PE, PVC, and urea.
Comments