Palantir Technologies closed at 171.04 USD, down 2.23 percent.
In a session marked by a stark divergence in large options bets, a massive $8.99 million deep-in-the-money put purchase overshadowed all other activity. While a notable $3.49 million bullish call buy also crossed the tape, the sheer scale of the bearish put block, representing a conviction bet on longer-term weakness, drove overall large-trade sentiment firmly to the bearish side.
>>>Click to claim your commission-free cards before trading!
Options Indicators
PLTR’s implied volatility stands at 49.94%, while its IV percentile is just 9.16%, which indicates that, relative to its own recent range, volatility is on the low side and options are currently cheaply priced rather than expensive. With an IV/HV ratio of 0.46, implied volatility is also running below historical realized volatility, suggesting the options market is not demanding a particularly rich premium at the moment. The Call/Put volume ratio is 1.11.
Large Trades
A PUT buy worth $8.99 million was the largest single-leg trade of the day, with 1,500 contracts purchased at the 200.0 strike expiring on 2028-01-21. With PLTR referenced at 171.04, this put was already in the money, making it a high-delta bearish position with meaningful downside protection or speculative downside exposure. The use of a long-dated in-the-money put suggests the buyer was willing to pay substantial premium for a durable bearish view, either as a hedge against a longer-horizon drawdown or as a conviction trade that the stock could weaken materially over time.
An in-the-money CALL buy worth $3.49 million was the second major trade, consisting of 7,710 contracts purchased at the 170.0 strike expiring on 2026-08-21. Because the strike sat just below the 171.04 reference price, this was an in-the-money bullish position that offered immediate directional sensitivity to further upside. Strategically, this kind of outright call purchase points to a clear upside bet, with the trader paying premium to secure leveraged participation in continued strength while limiting risk to the premium spent.
Overall large-trade sentiment leaned bearish, with total bullish flow at $3.75 million versus total bearish flow at $9.74 million, leaving a net difference of $6.00 million to the bearish side. The directional judgment is therefore clearly bearish. That conclusion is driven mainly by the dominance of the very large long-dated in-the-money put purchase, which outweighed the notable but smaller in-the-money call buying, while the broader large-trade mix also included additional downside-oriented flow and only limited bullish spread activity. Together, the large orders suggest investors were more focused on protecting against or positioning for downside than expressing outright confidence in sustained upside.
Strategy Reference
With IV percentile at a subdued 9.16%, outright premium selling offers limited reward. A bearish trader anticipating a pullback could consider a put debit spread, such as buying the 170.0 strike put and selling a lower strike against it, to reduce the cost of entry into the bearish flow identified in the large trades.
Comments