Following the rejection of its $56 billion acquisition offer by eBay's board, GameStop is further increasing its stake in the online marketplace. Data shows that after raising its holding in eBay from 5.0% to 6.6% on May 20th, GameStop further increased its stake from 6.6% to 7.8% on Thursday. The company plans to fund the massive acquisition using its $9.4 billion cash and liquid investment reserves, supported by a high-confidence financing commitment for up to $20 billion in debt financing from Toronto-Dominion Bank.
GameStop CEO Ryan Cohen has publicly criticized eBay's long-term capital allocation strategy, suggesting that a merger could yield $2 billion in annual operating cost savings within the first 12 months post-transaction. On the operational front, GameStop intends to transform its remaining approximately 1,600 physical stores into localized hubs for eBay's collectibles business, handling physical receipt, order fulfillment, distribution, and serving as authentication centers for live-stream e-commerce.
This latest stake increase signals GameStop's strong commitment to driving significant change at the online platform, despite the board's rejection, and underscores CEO Ryan Cohen's determination to push for major structural adjustments at eBay. Furthermore, the continued accumulation of shares suggests a potential proxy fight for board seats may be imminent, aiming to advance the deal directly with eBay shareholders.
GameStop's ambitious attempt to acquire the much larger eBay was formally rejected. Earlier this month, Cohen presented an offer to eBay shareholders of $125 per share, consisting of 50% cash and 50% GameStop stock, representing an approximately 20% premium to eBay's share price at the time. However, a fundamental reality underpins these seemingly generous numbers: GameStop's market capitalization is just over $10 billion, less than a quarter of eBay's value. Analysts at Bernstein SocGen bluntly described the deal as "financially unrealistic," framing it not as a merger of equals but as a clear case of a smaller entity attempting to swallow a larger one.
Within a week of receiving the offer, eBay Chairman Paul Pressler explicitly stated in a letter to Cohen that the unsolicited proposal was "neither credible nor attractive," effectively shutting the door on negotiations. Beyond fundamental doubts about the financing structure, eBay's board directly pointed to the significant leverage and operational risks the combined entity would face, even expressing concerns about "GameStop's governance and executive incentives"—a veiled reference to Cohen's own series of controversial public actions over the past week.
The core financial arrangement supporting the deal is GameStop's plan to borrow $20 billion from Toronto-Dominion Bank. However, even this $20 billion debt financing leaves a massive gap to the total $56 billion consideration. Cohen has yet to detail plans for raising the remaining funds. When repeatedly pressed in prior interviews about the source of the money, Cohen responded with awkward silences, merely reiterating the "half cash, half stock" structure without providing any concrete financing pathway.
The market has cast a clear vote of no confidence in this financing plan. Michael Burry, the investor原型 of "The Big Short," announced shortly after the deal was disclosed that he had sold all his GameStop shares, writing on social media, "Never use debt for creativity." Another prominent investor, Steve Eisman, also known for his short positions during the financial crisis, sided with Burry, stating plainly, "Debt is the problem."
Adding a dramatic twist, Cohen attempted a performative fundraising effort by listing his own GameStop memorabilia on eBay—including athletic socks priced as high as $14,000—claiming the move was intended to "help fund the acquisition of eBay." Within hours, his eBay account was permanently suspended, with the platform citing activities that endangered community safety. While the incident sparked viral social media buzz, it further eroded the deal's seriousness. Critics have characterized the overall approach as a "greenmail" tactic aimed at garnering attention or forcing compromise, while eBay framed Cohen's actions as an unserious publicity stunt. A market observer noted, "In high-stakes M&A, stunts get clicks, but they don't convince lenders."
A key pillar of the deal's rationale in Cohen's vision is the transformation of GameStop's 1,600 U.S. retail stores into authentication centers for collectibles on eBay's platform and distribution points for e-commerce goods. Cohen also proposed converting some stores into live-stream sales studios, allowing sellers to broadcast products to buyers in a hybrid of QVC, TikTok, and Twitch.
While this online-merge-offline (OMO) concept possesses a surface-level strategic appeal, deeper contradictions exist. As Wedbush analysts highlighted, GameStop's revenue relies primarily on game hardware and collectibles sales, with trailing twelve-month revenue of just $3.6 billion. In contrast, eBay operates a light-asset, high-margin online marketplace. Their economic models reside in nearly different commercial universes. The synergy from a merger resembles an uncolored sketch more than a viable business plan. Market analysis also points out that GameStop's accelerated store closure strategy itself carries execution risks. Layering the operational demands of a global e-commerce platform onto this already transforming retail network introduces complexity far beyond the demonstrated capabilities of the current management team.
Credit rating agency Moody's stated the proposed transaction would be "credit negative," noting it would increase eBay's debt from $7 billion to $31 billion. If Cohen achieves his stated goal of cutting approximately $2 billion in costs within the first 12 months post-deal, some financing risks might be mitigated. Unlike traditional mergers, these cuts would not come from combining operations. Instead, Cohen indicated he would reduce spending in areas like sales and marketing, replicating efficiencies he identified at GameStop.
eBay's confidence in rejecting the offer stems partly from its independent transformation strategy showing rare positive momentum in recent years. Under CEO Jamie Iannone, eBay has been strategically pivoting towards higher-value categories like collectibles, fashion, and electronics in its consumer-to-consumer business, which now represents about 70% of Gross Merchandise Volume (GMV) and is experiencing double-digit growth.
First-quarter 2024 earnings provide strong evidence: revenue reached $3.1 billion, a 19% year-over-year increase; GMV hit $22.2 billion, up 18%. The active buyer base held steady at 136 million, with U.S. active buyers growing 6% and enthusiast buyers increasing 8%. Advertising revenue grew 27% year-over-year to $581 million, and the AI-powered seller tool "Magical Listing" has generated over 500 million AI-powered listings.
The light-asset model and approximately $80 billion in annual platform transaction volume mean eBay can anticipate stable cash flows with fewer variables than a cobbled-together business hybrid. The company's full-year revenue reached $11.6 billion with GMV around $80 billion. Against these solid numbers, Cohen's accusations of "wasteful marketing spend" by eBay management appear weak and unsupported. Chairman Pressler emphasized in his letter, "eBay's standalone plan is working, and a merger would jeopardize growth and profitability."
Furthermore, eBay's stock has risen 24% year-to-date as the company successfully shifted its business towards younger consumers. Mixing these shares with the more volatile stock of GameStop is a risk eBay shareholders may be unwilling to take.
With eBay's board firmly rejecting the offer, market attention has swiftly turned to the next potential phase: a proxy fight. Cohen revealed his strategy from the outset—if the board refused, he would bypass it and take the offer directly to eBay shareholders, seeking to force the deal by replacing the board. GameStop's continued increase in its eBay stake suggests this proxy contest may arrive soon.
This path is not easy. eBay's shareholder structure means that to win a proxy fight, Cohen must convince a group of institutional shareholders vastly different from GameStop's retail investor fan base. These investors are voting with the stock price. Since the acquisition offer was disclosed on May 4th, eBay's stock has seen a modest increase, while GameStop's shares have fallen nearly 20%. The market has delivered its verdict with real money: investors do not believe Cohen can complete the financing or acquisition at the proposed price, and they have rewarded eBay for resisting the disruption.
Don Bilson, head of event-driven research at Gordon Haskett, a Morgan Stanley company, offered a succinct summary: "Suffice it to say, Cohen's first attempt to sell this deal did not go well." The market's voice is clear—the financing plan remains unsecured, and the probability of a deal is still low, but this does not preclude the arrival of a potential proxy storm. For this Wall Street acquisition drama, the coming weeks will be critical: Will Cohen formally initiate a proxy solicitation process? Can he present a concrete financing plan persuasive enough for skeptical institutional investors? Will eBay deploy more aggressive defense tactics like a poison pill?
Comments