An aerial view of the Iranian coast and Qeshm Island in the Strait of Hormuz. "America hardly imports any oil through the Strait of Hormuz, and we won't in the future. We don't need to. We didn't need to in the past, and we don't need to now." This was part of a primetime national address delivered by U.S. President Donald Trump from the White House last Wednesday. "Open the damn Strait now, you maniacs, or you'll live in hell — just watch!" This was a post made by Trump on Sunday on the Truth Social platform. What changed? First and foremost, the price of oil. On Thursday, the day after Trump's address, the price of U.S. crude oil surged over 11%, closing above $111 per barrel — a four-year high and one of the largest single-day gains in history. Prior to Trump's speech, West Texas Intermediate crude was around $100 per barrel; before the conflict began, it was under $70. Trump is correct that the United States has minimal reliance on Middle Eastern oil shipped via the Strait of Hormuz. This narrow waterway handles about 20% of global oil shipments. The U.S. consumes approximately 20 million barrels of crude per day, with only about 500,000 barrels coming through the Strait — a negligible percentage that could easily be substituted with oil from other regions. However, Trump's recent profanity-laced threat highlights a stark reality: the health of the U.S. economy is far more dependent on the Strait of Hormuz than the President acknowledges. Supply and Demand Dynamics Over the past 15 years, thanks to the rise of hydraulic fracturing and horizontal drilling (particularly in Texas's Permian Basin), the U.S. has achieved a remarkable transformation in its energy sector. The U.S. now produces roughly 22 million barrels of oil per day, double the output of Saudi Arabia, the world's second-largest producer, and slightly more than its own daily consumption. The U.S. has largely achieved energy independence. The U.S. still imports over 6 million barrels of crude per day, about one-third of its consumption, while simultaneously exporting approximately 4 million barrels of oil per day. The reason is that not all crude oil is the same. The U.S. produces light, sweet crude, which is excellent for refining into gasoline but less suitable for producing heavier distillates like heating oil, asphalt, and diesel. Therefore, the U.S. needs to import heavier, sour crude from regions like Venezuela and the Middle East. Furthermore, the oil market is global. A supply reduction in one region affects all regions. Dan Pickering, Founder and Chief Investment Officer of Pickering Energy Partners, notes that during tight supply periods like the present, oil-importing nations compete for all available barrels, driving up prices for all essential buyers. Consequently, U.S. oil supplies have remained, and will likely continue to remain, ample during the Iran conflict. That is not the primary concern. The real danger is that the U.S. cannot insulate itself from price shocks in the global oil market. Impact on the Energy Economy The direct consequence of the U.S. initiating conflict and Iran effectively blockading the Strait of Hormuz is high energy prices. On Monday, following Trump's threats to destroy Iranian power plants and bridges, oil prices remained elevated, hovering around $110 per barrel. The U.S. national average price for gasoline has climbed to $4.12 per gallon. High crude and gasoline prices are already beginning to strain the U.S. economy. Many low- and middle-income households, already weary of high prices, are struggling with costly fuel; some small businesses, unable to pass on further price increases, are being forced to make difficult staffing decisions. A more severe risk is that high prices could destroy demand for gasoline and oil. Prices might subsequently fall, but if fuel becomes so expensive that Americans cannot afford to drive or fly, it would pose serious problems for the economy. It is not easy to derail the $30 trillion U.S. economy. Although eight of the past nine recessions were triggered by oil price shocks, this conflict is just over five weeks old. It might need to persist for months to inflict recession-level damage on the U.S. economy. Wall Street analysts estimate that every $10 per barrel increase in oil prices shaves 0.1 to 0.4 percentage points off U.S. GDP growth, the broadest measure of the economy. Therefore, the cumulative $40 price increase could potentially reduce GDP growth by about 1 percentage point — a significant, though not yet catastrophic, impact. However, the situation could deteriorate rapidly if oil prices surge much higher. And oil is not the only factor: soaring diesel prices make all goods transported by truck more expensive; other imports shipped through the Strait of Hormuz, such as aluminum, helium, and fertilizer, also push up costs for construction materials, chips, and food. U.S. annual consumer inflation for March is projected to surge to around 3.5%, effectively wiping out the average wage gains American workers achieved last year. "The U.S. economy can withstand $100 oil in the short term," said Joe Brusuelas, Chief Economist at RSM US. "But if it goes to $150 or even $200 a barrel, that's a different story." The Reality of the Strait This is likely a key reason Trump has become wary of the Strait of Hormuz again. Since the conflict began, Trump has been inconsistent on the Strait issue. His administration pledged naval escorts for tankers transiting the Strait and offered guarantees for vessels losing maritime insurance. He has also stated that tankers should muster the courage to use the waterway, and that countries more reliant on Middle Eastern oil should assist in reopening the Strait themselves. "Go get your own oil!" Trump posted on Truth Social on Tuesday. Trump's day-to-day shifting rhetoric has caused significant volatility in oil prices, but the overall trend has been upward — because it is increasingly clear that Iran holds the initiative regarding the Strait, and a U.S. troop withdrawal may not necessarily lead to the reopening of this crucial waterway to tankers. Over the weekend, traders grew more concerned: Trump failed to outline an exit strategy for the U.S.-Iran war, and fears mounted that his escalatory threats could further damage crude supplies. Meanwhile, Iran announced it would charge a transit fee for vessels passing safely through the Strait — a fee many Gulf nations would likely refuse to pay. Anthony Yuen, Global Energy Strategist at Citi, calculated that even a partial reopening of the Strait would still leave the global market short by 4.4 to 8 million barrels of oil per day. Trump set a deadline of 8 PM ET Tuesday for Iran to reopen the Strait. It remains unclear how Iran will respond, or if and how the U.S. can persuade Iran to lift the blockade.
Comments