ZHONGSHENG HLDG recently released its 2025 financial results, which showed significant pressure. Annual revenue reached 164.403 billion yuan, a decrease of 2.2% year-on-year. The company reported a net loss attributable to shareholders of 1.673 billion yuan, a sharp reversal from the 3.212 billion yuan profit recorded in the same period last year. Judging solely by the income statement, this appears to be a challenging report. However, concluding that this signifies a failure of the traditional dealership model or a collapse of fundamentals would be an oversimplification.
The market reaction following the report's release was noteworthy. On the day after the loss was announced, the company's stock price rose by 8.07%. Within the following week, several institutions, including Citi, UBS, Jefferies, and CICC, maintained or issued "Buy" ratings, projecting a profit recovery for 2026. This divergence in market opinion suggests the debate is not solely about the poor performance in 2025, but rather centers on whether a significant shift in the company's profit drivers is underway, warranting a reassessment.
The first key to analysis is acknowledging that while the loss is real, it should not be linearly equated with an operational collapse. A common misinterpretation is to directly link ZHONGSHENG's 2025 loss to a simultaneous failure in operational capability, but the reality is more complex. Internal and external analysis indicates that the profit pressure stemmed from at least three overlapping factors. Firstly, widespread price wars led to inverted pricing, where purchase costs for new cars exceeded their final selling prices, resulting in an expanded gross loss of 3.709 billion yuan from new vehicle sales. Secondly, tightened policies on automotive financial rebates caused commission income to fall by 38.7% year-on-year. Thirdly, impairments on goodwill and intangible assets amounting to 2.291 billion yuan amplified the volatility on the income statement. In essence, the loss reflects both genuine operational pressures and a concentrated accounting-level clearance. Reducing this complex situation to a simplistic verdict of "the company is failing" is an emotional judgment, not a rational analysis.
What truly deserves attention is whether the company retains adjustment capabilities amidst this profit pressure. According to the annual report, in 2025, ZHONGSHENG HLDG generated 9.405 billion yuan in net cash flow from operating activities, an increase of 5.966 billion yuan year-on-year. Free cash flow stood at 5.931 billion yuan. The company ended the year with total cash of 20.438 billion yuan and had already completed repayments for its convertible bonds and 2026 bonds. This should not be exaggerated as "cash covering everything," as that is not the case, but it does indicate that, against a backdrop of industry-wide pressure and tighter liquidity, ZHONGSHENG still maintains strong inventory management, working capital allocation, and financial flexibility. For a dealership, this capability may not immediately translate into profit recovery, but it determines whether a company is passively enduring pressure during a downturn or retains room for proactive adjustment.
The second key to analysis involves a long-term perspective, focusing on how the profit center is shifting. If the new vehicle business reflects the most brutal aspect of industry competition, the after-sales segment is the part of ZHONGSHENG's report that should not be overlooked. In 2025, the company's after-sales service revenue was 22.911 billion yuan, an increase of 4.1% year-on-year. The gross profit from after-sales services reached 11.050 billion yuan, growing 8.2% year-on-year, with gross profit growth outpacing revenue growth. More importantly, while the total number of service visits increased only marginally by 0.2%, the volume of accident vehicle repairs grew by nearly 10%. This indicates that the improvement in the after-sales segment is not merely reliant on "more visits," but rather on an increase in higher-value, higher-margin services. For an automotive dealer, this is more significant than simple growth, as it points directly to a change in the profit structure.
Even more telling is the shift in customer sources. The annual report disclosed that in 2025, customers who did not purchase their vehicles from ZHONGSHENG contributed 41.9% of accident repair visits. This figure signifies that ZHONGSHENG's maintenance services are gradually evolving beyond their role as an "ancillary service post-sale" towards a platform capability that serves all brands and the broader market. This suggests that the market might be underestimating ZHONGSHENG's value restructuring in the aftermarket if it continues to view the company solely through the old lens of a "luxury car dealer." The true reassessment should focus not just on its ability to sell cars, but on whether it is developing the capability to transform a one-time vehicle purchase into a long-term, full-lifecycle service relationship.
The third key to analysis is the dual-wheel strategy of luxury and new energy, which is not just about the number of stores but about future profit channels. Faced with the reality of increasing new energy vehicle penetration and compressed profit margins for traditional luxury brands, the critical question for a luxury dealer is not merely "do they have a new energy layout?" but "can new energy bring new traffic channels and subsequent service relationships?" From this perspective, ZHONGSHENG has made progress over the past year. In 2025, the company sold 497,000 new vehicles, a 2.5% year-on-year increase. Sales of luxury brands reached 311,400 units, growing 6.2% year-on-year, with the luxury brand sales mix rising to 62.6%. The AITO brand contributed 8.2% to new energy sales. Concurrently, the company plans to further expand its presence with Huawei's smart selection car ecosystem brands, based on its AITO partnership, and to enhance strategic cooperation with Geely, targeting a multiplicative increase in the number of new energy stores by the end of 2026.
The direction of the network adjustment is even more crucial. ZHONGSHENG is not simply "shrinking" but is undergoing a structural transformation. Since the second half of 2024, the company has closed, merged, or relocated 50 underperforming or redundant stores in the same city. Simultaneously, it opened 104 new facilities, including 84 dealerships and 20 collision repair centers. By the end of 2025, the network comprised 453 branded stores and 46 collision repair centers. Observing only the store closures can easily lead to pessimistic conclusions. However, considering the closures, optimizations, and new openings together paints a more accurate picture: ZHONGSHENG is clearing out its old network and reallocating resources towards more efficient nodes that are better aligned with the aftermarket and new energy structure.
In summary, what valuation should the market assign to ZHONGSHENG? The key lies not in "whether it is cheap," but in "whether the market's perspective is too narrow." The current low valuation certainly has a basis in reality. The dealership industry has faced immense pressure over the past year. Data from the China Automobile Dealers Association shows that 55.7% of Chinese auto dealers recorded losses in 2025, only 44.3% achieved their sales targets, and 81.9% experienced price inversions. Furthermore, regulators introduced additional rules in February 2026 to curb price wars and misleading promotions in the auto industry. Therefore, the market's pessimism towards the auto dealership sector is not unfounded.
The issue, however, is that current market pricing may have sufficiently reflected the pressures of the old profit model, but might not be fully accounting for the pace at which new profit pillars are forming. The divergence among analysts underscores this point. Optimistic institutions are betting on improvements in new vehicle gross margins, continued growth in after-sales gross profit, and the expansion of new energy sales in 2026. Conversely, conservative institutions worry that the decline in financial rebates and pressure on new vehicle profitability are not short-term phenomena. In other words, the market's real debate is not about whether ZHONGSHENG is "worth watching," but about whether its recovery will be slow, weak, or non-existent.
At least for now, ZHONGSHENG presents three key threads worth monitoring: whether new vehicle gross margins can gradually approach breakeven, whether after-sales gross profit can continue to outpace revenue growth, and whether the new energy store network and customer operations can genuinely transform into new service traffic channels. If these three aspects prove successful, the current valuation might not just reflect pessimism but could be underestimating the significance of the profit center shift. If they fail, the market's caution would be justified. Nonetheless, simply categorizing ZHONGSHENG HLDG as an example of a "traditional dealer reaching its end" appears, at least for the time being, premature.
Comments