Earning Preview: Array Technologies Inc. revenue is expected to decrease by 21.03%, and institutional views are cautious

Earnings Agent02-18

Abstract

Array Technologies Inc. will report fiscal results on February 25, 2026 Post Market, with consensus pointing to lower revenue and pressured profitability; this preview summarizes last quarter’s performance and the current quarter’s expected revenue, margins, net income, and adjusted EPS alongside recent institutional sentiment.

Market Forecast

Market expectations for the current quarter indicate revenue of $212.02 million, an estimated year-over-year decline of 21.03%, with an EPS forecast of -$0.01 and EBIT expected at -$3.23 million; year-over-year changes for EPS and EBIT are forecast at -105.08% and -109.25%, respectively. The company’s gross profit margin and net margin are not guided for the current quarter in the dataset, though last quarter’s metrics serve as reference points, while investors expect temporary margin compression; highlights point to softer demand and a lighter project mix near term, with tracking-systems hardware still the main revenue driver. The most promising segment remains the company’s core tracker systems business, supported by ongoing utility-scale solar deployments, though near-term revenue is expected to ease; in the last quarter, the primary business generated $353.37 million.

Last Quarter Review

In the previous quarter, Array Technologies Inc. reported revenue of $393.49 million, a gross profit margin of 26.85%, GAAP net profit attributable to shareholders of $33.50 million, a net profit margin of 8.51%, and adjusted EPS of $0.30, with year-over-year growth for revenue at 70.04% and adjusted EPS at 76.47%. A notable highlight was the robust beat versus prior revenue and EPS forecasts, reflecting stronger shipments and improved cost dynamics; the main business, driven by core tracker solutions, contributed $353.37 million of revenue, while STI operations delivered $40.12 million.

Current Quarter Outlook (with major analytical insights)

Core Tracker Systems and Project Delivery Cadence

The company’s principal revenue stream is utility-scale tracker systems, which tends to be sensitive to quarterly project-delivery schedules and customer procurement timing. With the forecast indicating $212.02 million in revenue and a negative EPS print, the quarter likely reflects a leaner delivery slate and a mix that is less favorable than the prior period’s strong performance. Short-term volatility is common in this business due to milestone-based revenue recognition, and the expected year-over-year revenue decline of 21.03% underscores a slower cadence versus a strong comparable. Investors should focus on booked backlog conversion and the pace of utility-scale starts, as these factors typically herald a rebound in subsequent quarters when delivery schedules normalize.

STI Operations and International Mix

STI operations provide international exposure and can act as a diversification lever, albeit at a smaller scale relative to the core business. The prior quarter saw STI operations contributing $40.12 million, a meaningful portion of total revenue for a secondary segment. Looking into the current quarter, any shift in geographic mix or pricing dynamics across international projects could influence gross margin, though the data does not provide explicit gross margin guidance. The sensitivity of STI revenues to permitting timelines and FX can add variability, and investors may scrutinize commentary on regional pipeline conversion and customer ordering behavior, particularly in markets with dynamic policy backdrops.

Margin Trajectory and Cost Discipline

With last quarter’s gross margin at 26.85% and net margin at 8.51%, the company demonstrated improved efficiency and scale through mix and cost control. The market now expects margin pressure alongside lower volume, with EBIT forecast at -$3.23 million and EPS at -$0.01, suggesting temporary deleverage as fixed costs are spread over fewer shipments. Attention will center on procurement costs, logistics normalization, and pricing discipline, as these levers will determine how rapidly margins can normalize as deliveries reaccelerate; commentary around input cost trends and any initiatives to streamline operations will be key to assessing the margin outlook into the next cycle.

Analyst Opinions

Institutional commentary in recent months has tilted cautious, with a majority projecting a softer near-term delivery cadence and a reset in quarterly revenue following a strong prior period; the prevailing view emphasizes a near-term pause before potential reacceleration as project schedules and backlogs convert. Several analysts highlight that the implied 21.03% year-over-year revenue decline and negative EBIT margin in the current quarter reflect timing effects rather than structural demand issues, but they maintain neutral to cautious stances until visibility improves. One widely followed brokerage underscores that the last quarter’s significant beat raises the comparison base and magnifies quarter-on-quarter volatility, advocating patience for clearer signals on bookings, backlog conversion, and margin execution; another notes that while utility-scale demand remains supported by longer-term renewable buildouts, investors are likely to wait for consistent evidence of delivery cadence stabilization. Overall, the majority view is cautious, focusing on execution through a transitionary quarter with an emphasis on margin resilience and order pipeline clarity.

Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

Comments

We need your insight to fill this gap
Leave a comment