Recent sharp fluctuations in gold and silver prices have shocked investors, with this market anomaly reinforcing an investment chief's viewpoint: commodities are essentially just speculative wagers. Despite a 12% plunge last Friday, gold has still gained 70% over the past year. Silver, although down 30% recently, maintains a staggering 160% increase over the last twelve months. However, Hank Smith, Chief Investment Officer of Haverford Trust, which manages assets exceeding $15 billion, advises investors to approach precious metals, and indeed all commodity categories, with caution. "In our view, despite last Friday's sharp decline, the rally from Q4 2025 into 2026 has been driven more by momentum investing," Smith told Business Insider on Tuesday. He quipped, "Put simply, we're buying this asset because it's going up." Gold's impressive performance last year is partly why some financial experts recommend allocating a portion of an investment portfolio to gold or other alternative assets, such as oil futures. This perspective suggests such assets can either act as stores of value—providing safety or appreciation during recessions or inflationary periods—or generate returns uncorrelated with stock market movements. Smith disagrees with this philosophy. He believes capital is better allocated to income-generating assets like high-dividend stocks. His managed portfolios hold no commodities, including precious metals, wheat, or oil. In recent decades, the emergence of futures and spot-traded ETFs has significantly lowered the barrier to entry for commodity trading. Investors no longer need to physically hold and store assets like gold bars or crude oil; they can simply buy products like the SPDR Gold Trust or the United States Oil Fund to track price movements. "These are purely speculative activities, not genuine investments," Smith stated. "Because physical commodities generate no earnings, have no income statement or balance sheet, and pay no dividends or interest. The only reason to buy them is the expectation that someone else will pay a higher price later; that's the only way you make money." Smith also noted that the core participants in commodity markets were historically businesses needing to hedge physical asset risks or those holding the actual assets. Today, however, most investors are simply betting on price direction. "Looking back 30 or 40 years, the vast majority of traders buying crude oil futures contracts were linked to the physical asset," he continued. "Airlines hedging, or other oil-dependent companies protecting themselves from risk. But now, those participants are the minority; the market is dominated by hedge funds." Another mainstream argument for holding gold is its role as an inflation hedge to protect against asset erosion. While this might hold true in a general sense, over the long term, gold has consistently underperformed the stock market, especially when dividends are reinvested. "I also disagree with the common view that gold is an inflation hedge," Smith said. "Frankly, if you held gold for 100 years, your ultimate gain would be minimal, potentially yielding less than short-term Treasury bills or even a checking account."
Comments