The United Arab Emirates (UAE) announced on April 28 that it will withdraw from the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC), effective May 1. This unexpected decision has shocked fellow members of the 60-year-old alliance. As OPEC's third-largest oil producer, the UAE's departure not only highlights long-standing tensions with Saudi Arabia but also deals a significant blow to the organization's influence over global markets. This move is expected to reshape the structure of the global oil market and introduce prolonged uncertainty to crude prices.
The announcement came without warning, leaving other OPEC member officials surprised on the day of the revelation. The decision reflects the culmination of long-simmering tensions between Abu Dhabi and Saudi Arabia, OPEC's de facto leader. According to informed sources, strategic differences have persisted for years between the UAE, a core member second only to Saudi Arabia within the group. The UAE aims to maximize returns from its oil and gas resources by expanding production capacity before global energy transition reaches a tipping point. In contrast, Saudi Arabia prefers a more cautious approach to managing crude output and prices to maintain global market stability—a fundamental conflict in strategy that has remained unresolved.
UAE Energy Minister Suhail Al Mazrouei stated in an interview that the closure of the Strait of Hormuz due to regional conflict was the immediate trigger for the withdrawal. Data from the International Energy Agency (IEA) indicates that the effective closure of the Strait of Hormuz, a vital passage linking the Persian Gulf to international markets, has forced regional producers including Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Iraq, and Kuwait to shut in at least 10 million barrels per day of production capacity, accounting for 10% of global supply. Al Mazrouei noted that the current capacity constraints minimize the immediate market disruption from the UAE's exit. Once withdrawn, the country will be free to adjust its output without OPEC quota restrictions, particularly in anticipation of a post-conflict rebound in fuel demand.
The UAE has invested heavily in recent years to boost its crude production capacity, targeting an increase to 5 million barrels per day by 2027. However, OPEC production quotas have severely limited its ability to utilize this capacity, preventing the recovery of substantial investments. The UAE has previously exceeded its quota on multiple occasions, drawing rare public criticism from Saudi Arabia and even prompting earlier, unacted-upon threats to leave the alliance. Dissatisfaction with OPEC+ quota restrictions, long voiced by Abu Dhabi National Oil Company CEO Sultan Al Jaber, has also significantly influenced the UAE's decision.
The departure deals a heavy blow to OPEC. Jorge León, Head of Geopolitical Analysis at Rystad Energy, highlighted that the UAE and Saudi Arabia jointly control over 4 million barrels per day of global spare capacity—production that can be quickly brought online to address supply crises—representing the bulk of the world's idle capacity and serving as a core pillar of OPEC's market management capabilities. León stated in a recent report that the UAE's exit "removes one of the central pillars supporting OPEC's ability to manage the market," leaving the organization "structurally weaker." Eurasia Group analyst Greg Brew concurred, noting that losing the UAE, a key component of OPEC's production capacity, will undermine the group's credibility and further erode its market influence.
In terms of market impact, the immediate effect on oil prices is limited in the short term due to the production constraints caused by the Strait of Hormuz closure. Crude futures showed little reaction on the day of the announcement. However, the long-term implications are substantial. John Kilduff, Founder of Again Capital, suggested that the exit undermines cohesion among producers, making it harder to collectively stabilize prices during future supply gluts. Clayton Seigle, Senior Fellow at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, warned, "If capacity is leaving OPEC's control, that is a bearish factor over a three- to five-year timeframe. It doesn't mean OPEC+ can't successfully manage the market, but the obvious concern we have to imagine is contagion—other alliance members following the UAE's lead. That is the number one question in my mind."
OPEC's influence has been declining in recent years. The influx of new supply, such as U.S. shale oil, has weakened its ability to control global prices, and several smaller members have left over the past decade. The exit of a core member like the UAE further narrows the coordination scope of the OPEC+ alliance, shifting more responsibility for balancing future market supply and demand onto Saudi Arabia and Russia. While Saudi Arabia still possesses significant spare capacity and market management tools, cooperation from allies like Iraq and Kazakhstan on production adjustments has diminished. Saudi Arabia itself faces challenges related to market share loss, having led OPEC+ last year to abandon a long-term price-support strategy in favor of increasing supply.
Opinions are divided regarding the UAE's potential for production growth. IEA data shows the UAE's actual production reached 3.64 million barrels per day in February, significantly exceeding officially reported figures. Many analysts and traders believe the country's output was near maximum capacity even before the recent conflict. However, the UAE has clearly stated its intention to proceed with capacity expansion plans post-exit and fully utilize its spare capacity to meet market demand. Andy Lipow, President of Lipow Oil Associates, predicts that once the Strait of Hormuz reopens, the UAE will likely maximize production, free from quota constraints.
For now, other OPEC+ members have indicated they will not immediately follow the UAE's exit, suggesting no large-scale breakup of the alliance in the near term. However, industry observers widely believe the true test for OPEC will come during its next market intervention. The impact of the regional conflict means global markets will continue facing crude shortages for some time; even if the Strait of Hormuz reopens, tight supply conditions may persist. Bob McNally, President of Rapidan Energy Group and a former White House official, noted, "It's unclear when the next supply surplus will arrive; it could be many years away." David Goldwyn, who served as U.S. State Department Special Envoy for International Energy Affairs from 2009 to 2011, cautioned that if future oil demand weakens and significant oversupply emerges, markets may miss Saudi Arabia's ability to put a floor under prices. "This decision raises the risk of significantly increased price volatility," he added, "but ultimately, when market conditions require cooperation, the UAE's exit from OPEC does not preclude it from coordinating with the organization."
Comments