The Federal Reserve is set to conclude its policy meeting on Wednesday, but a crucial element may be missing—a single "dot." The Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) will release its quarterly update, outlining officials' projections for interest rates this year and through 2028 and beyond. Markets closely parse this chart, commonly known as the "dot plot," to glean insights into how Fed officials view the economy and its implications for monetary policy. However, most Fed watchers on Wall Street anticipate that new Chair Kevin Warsh will not submit his forecast. This could be due to his recent appointment on May 22, leading him to feel unprepared, or simply because he dislikes the dot plot and its influence on "forward guidance." Refusing to submit a dot plot forecast would break a 14-year post-financial crisis convention at the Fed and could alienate FOMC members who support this tool, believing it aids public communication. Yet, for a central bank leader committed to fundamental reform of the Fed's operational approach, this could serve as an effective first step. Bill English, former Fed Director of Monetary Affairs and now a professor at Yale University, stated, "In my view, he likely doesn't want to submit an interest rate forecast. There may be others on the Committee who also aren't fond of the dot plot and might be willing to follow suit."
"The Fed is Human Too"
Warsh opposes the dot plot and other forms of forward guidance because he believes they constrain the Fed's decision-making capacity. The dot plot is part of a broader data set—the Summary of Economic Projections (SEP)—which also includes outlooks for unemployment, inflation, and GDP. The SEP is updated quarterly and contains median projections for various indicators; it is not an official forecast but rather the median of the range of predictions from FOMC meeting participants. Aditya Bhave, an economist at Bank of America, similarly expects Warsh not to submit a dot plot forecast. David Mericle, an economist at Goldman Sachs, noted in a report, "Given Warsh's past criticism of forward guidance, we assume he will not submit a dot plot forecast, though we are not certain." During his confirmation hearing in April, Warsh listed the SEP as part of the Fed's problem with excessive communication. Specifically, he referenced the Fed's misjudgment from 2021 to 2022, incorrectly labeling inflation as "transitory," a mistake that ultimately led to aggressive consecutive rate hikes in response to the worst inflation surge in four decades. Warsh stated at the time, "The Fed told the world what their dot plot forecast was, what their predictions were. But the Fed is human too. As a result, they often clung to these forecasts longer than they should have. I believe that if the Fed waited until the meeting to make decisions, this additional deliberation could prevent the central bank from amplifying its own errors further. I consider this an important reform that needs to happen."
Market Attention Persists
Nevertheless, markets remain highly reliant on the dot plot and other elements of the SEP. If Warsh holds firm to his stance, markets may have to learn to function without this information. Liz Ann Sonders, Chief Investment Strategist at Charles Schwab, commented, "In my view, it's not entirely rational that the SEP sometimes moves markets, as its accuracy is, at best, modest. But it is a channel through which the Fed expresses its views, and markets often react to those views." However, Claudia Sahm, Chief Economist at New Century Advisors, warned that if Warsh and other officials refrain from submitting projections, it could send the wrong signal to markets. She suggested investors might perceive Warsh as attempting to "conceal a shift toward a more hawkish stance within the Committee," meaning maintaining higher rates to combat inflation. Sahm wrote, "Diminishing the importance of the SEP this week might address some of Warsh's concerns, but it would almost certainly create new problems. A Fed that appears to be masking internal debates could give the impression of being complacent about inflation, precisely the credibility it can least afford to lose." This meeting is expected to be a significant test of Warsh's new communication strategy. Beyond his views on the dot plot and SEP, markets will watch for any changes in the post-meeting statement and whether he will continue holding press conferences after each meeting. Pimco, the world's largest fixed-income investment giant, stated last week that bond investors will closely monitor next week's Fed policy meeting and all of Warsh's remarks during the press conference for signs of how quickly the new chair will imprint his mark on the central bank. Pimco believes Warsh will alter the Fed's signaling or communication with markets but not silence it entirely. However, he may shift from the relatively high-transparency, strong forward-guidance communication model of the Powell era to one featuring shorter statements, fewer commitments, less reliance on the dot plot, and greater emphasis on policy flexibility. Richard Clarida, former Fed Vice Chair and Pimco's global economic advisor, noted that investors are still trying to gauge how Warsh will handle the Fed's communication mechanism with markets. If Warsh firmly removes the interest rate dot plot and forward guidance as part of his "path to Fed transformation," the direct implication for financial markets is clear: investors can no longer overly rely on the Fed using clear language to "anchor expectations." Instead, they must increasingly price assets based on factors like inflation, employment, oil prices, fiscal supply, term premiums, and the balance sheet path themselves.
Comments