As Shenzhen celebrated its 46th anniversary on August 26, the city marked the occasion with a striking display of technological prowess—a humanoid robot sprinting 100 meters in 8.64 seconds in Beijing, embodying what observers call the "new Shenzhen speed." From a small border town adjacent to Hong Kong to a global metropolis with a GDP exceeding 3.4 trillion yuan, Shenzhen has compressed centuries of Western industrialization into less than five decades. The city's journey raises a compelling question: as artificial intelligence reshapes global economics and great-power competition, why has Shenzhen emerged as the cradle and frontline of this fourth industrial revolution?
We now stand amid the fourth industrial revolution, centered on AI, which is fundamentally reshaping both the global economic landscape and the rules of great-power competition. This revolution stems from the convergence of information technology, the Internet of Things, big data, and cloud computing, with AI playing a decisive role. AI is not merely a single technological breakthrough; it functions as a "general purpose technology" with pervasive and disruptive characteristics, driving transformation across industries—from smart manufacturing to smart cities, from healthcare to financial services. By 2030, AI is projected to contribute up to $15 trillion to global GDP, yet it also exacerbates inequality, widens digital divides, and triggers shifts in labor markets and international power structures.
The strategic rivalry in the AI era is increasingly concentrated between China and the United States. America leverages its first-mover technological advantages, capital strength, and global innovation networks to maintain technological hegemony, while China rapidly catches up through national strategies such as the "Next Generation AI Development Plan" and its vast market scale. This competition extends beyond pure technology into standard-setting, data governance, and geopolitical arenas, potentially heralding a new "tech cold war" or "digital curtain." Internally, AI development in both nations shows pronounced regional clustering: in the US, innovation centers in Silicon Valley and the New York Bay Area; in China, the Greater Bay Area, the Yangtze River Delta, and the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region, each with distinct comparative advantages in hardware manufacturing, R&D, or strategic planning.
Understanding the fourth industrial revolution requires a global perspective, recognizing that AI's rise is not an isolated domestic phenomenon but part of a worldwide transformation. China must pursue open cooperation to absorb international expertise while simultaneously strengthening indigenous innovation to counter external containment and assert greater influence in global rule-making. Only through such a broad vision can China achieve sustainable development and contribute to global governance.
This book selects Shenzhen—the core engine of the Greater Bay Area—as its analytical case study, attempting to bridge the macro-level narrative of the fourth industrial revolution with the micro-level story of Shenzhen's development. This ambitious undertaking spans four analytical dimensions to achieve the effect of "seeing the autumn through one leaf." The first section, "New Era," establishes the historical backdrop by examining the global rise of the fourth industrial revolution, China's traditional growth model and its imperative to shift toward new quality productive forces, and the reshaping of great-power science and technology competition, particularly the emerging "two superpowers, multiple strong players" dynamic.
The second section, "New Understanding," constructs the theoretical framework connecting macro-level revolution with Shenzhen's micro-level innovation. It elaborates on a "new three magic weapons"—reform, opening up, and innovation—that drive high-quality development with new quality productive forces as the core. It further introduces the "new troika": open talent-education, enterprise, and financial systems as prerequisites for establishing the foundation for new quality productive forces. Finally, it conceptualizes Shenzhen as a "regionally embedded world-class economic platform," integral to the Greater Bay Area's development, drawing on comparative national experiences and addressing the region's current shortcomings.
The third section, "New Positioning," enters Shenzhen's concrete practices. Shenzhen's successful leap from border town to innovation engine lies in the integration of "competent government, effective market, and vibrant society." The analysis examines three policy positions: the "new era special economic zone," the "pilot demonstration zone for socialism with Chinese characteristics," and the "core city of the Greater Bay Area," each reflecting Shenzhen's evolving responsibilities and the spirit needed to synthesize its experience into broader national concepts.
The fourth section, "New Exploration," investigates how Shenzhen integrates governmental and market forces to achieve catch-up development. This involves seeking breakthroughs in institutional reform, treating institutions as vital factors that shape behavior, particularly in sci-tech industrial policy; seizing the "nose" of technological innovation by strengthening "hard power" through achievements in becoming a global AI innovation source, semiconductor cluster, biomedicine hub, "China's new energy vehicle capital," and a digitally governed smart city; building science-and-finance integrated systems with diversified funding, infrastructure support, and gradient service ecosystems; and consolidating development foundations through comprehensive talent strategies that attract and cultivate high-caliber professionals.
The concluding fifth section, "New Hope," presents a forward-looking picture of Shenzhen's innovative development. It envisions Shenzhen's AI ambitions, transitioning from "industry first city" to a base for embodied intelligence; outlines its city ecological construction paradigm integrating green industry and smart governance; and situates Shenzhen within Chinese modernization. Shenzhen exemplifies the "open source paradigm" that emphasizes comprehensiveness, coordination, sustainability, and shared peace, departing from exclusionary "closed source" models. Its modern industrial system—characterized by completeness, scale, density, and strength—constitutes the bedrock for high-quality development. Shenzhen's story serves as a model for Chinese modernization, demonstrating how extraordinary development vitality, industrial achievements, and institutional innovation can converge. As the proverb goes, "All the past is a prelude." Shenzhen's story highlights how its future chapters will be written by successive generations of innovators and citizens, drawing on lessons learned to forge paths toward inclusive and sustainable development.
Comments