Maritime industry unions and employer groups have jointly declared that, despite a ceasefire agreement between the United States and Iran, the Strait of Hormuz will continue to be designated a war zone, a status set to remain in effect until at least July 9, 2026.
The International Transport Workers' Federation and the Joint Negotiating Group representing employers explained in a statement: "This decision acknowledges the significant and ongoing threat to seafarer safety in the region, while also considering its rapidly evolving situation."
Scope of Application and Seafarer Rights
This war zone designation applies specifically to vessels owned by companies that are signatories to the International Bargaining Forum collective bargaining agreement. According to the organizations, the IBF agreement covers approximately 15,000 ships globally.
Under the agreement's provisions, seafarers protected by the collective agreement who work in the designated area are entitled to double their normal wages, have the right to refuse to sail, and can demand repatriation at the company's expense.
Context of Conflict and Casualty Statistics
The Strait of Hormuz was first declared a war zone by the International Maritime Bureau on March 5, just four days after the first commercial ship attack in the area.
Since March 1, commercial shipping has been heavily impacted by conflict in the Middle East, with Iran imposing military threats on the strait in retaliation for US and Israeli airstrikes. Prior to the conflict, approximately 20% of global petroleum product trade transited through the Strait of Hormuz; its outbreak triggered a sharp spike in international energy prices.
During the conflict, at least 14 crew members have been killed and over 40 ships have been attacked. A recent series of attacks prompted the International Maritime Organization to suspend a plan to evacuate some 11,000 crew members still stranded in the Gulf region.
Review Process: Weekly Assessments and Negotiation Outlook
Discussions regarding the war zone designation began the previous week, preceding a cargo ship attack that occurred last Thursday.
A source close to the discussions revealed to media: "Had there not been two consecutive ship attacks after last Thursday, and had commercial ship traffic continued normally, the assessment this week might have been different."
The joint committee responsible for the war zone designation decision will review the situation weekly. The source added that the related regular meetings were suspended in early May, at which point it was clear the situation in the Strait of Hormuz had not improved.
An Uncertain Future Under Ceasefire
The current ceasefire stems directly from a memorandum of understanding signed between the US and Iran on June 17, initiating a 60-day period aimed at reaching a final peace agreement.
Negotiations are centered on the future status of the Strait of Hormuz, Iran's nuclear program, the lifting of sanctions, and the return of Iran's frozen overseas assets.
However, recent attacks launched by both sides, along with Israel's ongoing military operations against Hezbollah in Lebanon—a group Tehran requested be included in the ceasefire—pose a threat to the dialogue process.
Frequently Asked Questions
Q1: What specific rights does the Strait of Hormuz war zone designation grant to crew members?
A: Under the IBF agreement, seafarers working in the designated area are eligible for double wage compensation, have the right to refuse to sail without penalty, and can request repatriation at company expense. These measures apply to approximately 15,000 contracted vessels and aim to balance commercial needs with personal safety. In practice, shipping companies must conduct risk assessments and provide adequate information.
Q2: Why hasn't the ceasefire agreement immediately canceled the war zone designation?
A: Although the US and Iran signed an MoU on June 17 and entered a 60-day negotiation period, the situation in the Strait of Hormuz continues to evolve rapidly, with recent attacks still occurring. Based on independent security assessments, the ITF and JNG determined the threat has not subsided, hence extending the designation until July 9 with weekly reviews. This reflects labor organizations' cautious protection of seafarer lives, rather than relying entirely on political agreements.
Q3: What have been the casualty and economic impacts on the Strait of Hormuz since the conflict began?
A: Since early March, at least 14 crew members have died and over 40 ships have been attacked, leading the IMO to suspend a large-scale evacuation operation. The strait handles about 20% of global oil trade; the conflict caused energy prices to surge, led to ship detentions (thousands at its peak), and disrupted global supply chains. Even after the ceasefire, transit volumes remain far below pre-conflict levels, highlighting the difficulty of long-term recovery.
Q4: How do the roles of the IBF war zone designation and the International Maritime Organization differ?
A: The IBF designation is a joint decision by the ITF and employers, focusing on seafarer rights under labor agreements (e.g., wages, right to refuse). The IMO is responsible for global maritime safety standards, condemning attacks and coordinating evacuations. The two are complementary: the IBF provides direct economic safeguards, while the IMO promotes diplomatic and rescue frameworks.
Q5: What is the outlook for future negotiations and their impact on the shipping industry?
A: Negotiations center on the strait's status, nuclear programs, and sanctions, facing external disruptions such as the Israel-Hezbollah conflict. If successful, the waterway could gradually reopen and risks could decrease. Conversely, the war zone designation may be extended, leading to increased insurance premiums, shipping capacity shortages, and higher energy costs. Shipping firms need to diversify routes, enhance security, and closely monitor weekly review outcomes to manage uncertainty.
Comments