Option Focus | Tesla’s $22 Million Bear Put Spread and $22 Million Bull Put Spread Collide, Revealing a Cautiously Bearish Tilt

Option Witch07-31 15:57

Tesla closed at USD 308.85, rising 3.53%.

A clash of mammoth options trades surfaced in TSLA, headlined by a $22.18 million bear put spread and a $21.65 million bull put spread. While the bullish structure appears to balance the tape, a deeper look at aggregate flow and additional bearish positioning reveals a cautious, defensively negative tilt among large traders rather than outright conviction.

>>>Unlock Earnings Insights & Commission-Free Trading Benefits!

Options Indicators

TSLA’s implied volatility is 50.64%, and with an IV percentile of 38.65%, current option pricing sits in a neutral historical range rather than an unusually cheap or expensive one. At the same time, the IV/HV ratio of 0.73 suggests implied volatility is running below realized volatility, indicating the market is not assigning an aggressive premium to near-term option prices despite TSLA’s naturally active trading profile. The Call/Put volume ratio is 1.57.

Large Trades

A bearish bear put spread worth $22.18 million was the largest highlighted trade, built by buying 1,580 July 31, 2026 $400.00 puts and selling 1,300 July 31, 2026 $370.00 puts. This structure is a downside directional strategy that seeks to profit from a decline in TSLA while reducing upfront cost versus an outright long put. Using the preprocessed leg amounts, the long-put purchase cost $14.32 million and the short-put sale brought in $7.86 million, resulting in a net premium paid of $6.46 million, or a net debit. With TSLA referenced at $308.85, both strikes are in the money, which suggests the trader was positioning through deep intrinsic-value puts for a defined-risk bearish stance rather than pure volatility speculation.

A bullish bull put spread worth $21.65 million was the second major displayed trade, created by selling 1,680 July 31, 2026 $400.00 puts and buying 1,450 July 31, 2026 $350.00 puts. This is typically an income-oriented bullish strategy that aims to collect premium while expressing a view that TSLA can remain above the spread’s risk zone over time, with the long lower-strike put serving as downside protection. Based on the provided amounts, the short $400.00 puts generated $15.46 million and the long $350.00 puts cost $6.19 million, leaving a net premium received of $9.26 million, or a net credit. Since TSLA is currently at $308.85, both strikes are also in the money, indicating the trade was placed in a deeply intrinsic area of the put curve and reflects a defined-risk bullish exposure with meaningful premium intake.

Overall, the large-trade flow leans slightly bearish. Although one of the two dominant trades was a sizable bullish bull put spread, the full large-trade summary shows bearish activity outweighing bullish activity, and that edge is reinforced by the presence of additional bearish structures elsewhere in the tape. The combination of a major bear put spread, other downside-oriented positioning, and only a modest imbalance rather than an overwhelming one suggests sentiment is cautious and defensively negative on TSLA rather than aggressively bearish.

Strategy Reference

For traders seeking a neutral-to-bullish approach with low assignment risk, selling an out-of-the-money put spread, such as a September 2025 $250.00/$240.00 put spread, could allow for premium collection while keeping the short strike well below current price levels and the recent high-volume action zones.

Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

Comments

We need your insight to fill this gap
Leave a comment