Last week, the Federal Reserve's interest rate hike and the Senate's failure to pass the CLEAR Act led to widespread expectations of a sell-off in the cryptocurrency market. Yet, Bitcoin did not crash; instead, it held steady following the pivotal vote.
Market analysts suggest that Bitcoin's sensitivity to Washington's legislative process is waning, with global liquidity and adoption cycles emerging as the primary price drivers. Meanwhile, U.S. crypto regulation appears to be pivoting from a legislative path toward a rulemaking approach led by the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission.
A week ago, most market participants predicted that the Fed's rate hike combined with the CLEAR Act's failure in the Senate would trigger a sharp crypto sell-off. However, even without a favorable shift in either event, Bitcoin displayed notable resilience.
On the evening of September 14, ahead of the Senate vote, rumors of partisan deadlock over stablecoin yields and the bill's ethics amendment weighed on the market, briefly pressuring Bitcoin. But by the time senators prepared to cast their votes, Bitcoin had climbed to near the $75,000 level, and after the measure failed, it appeared to shake off the outcome entirely.
The Senate's procedural motion to end debate was rejected 49 to 50, immediately sparking a wave of forced liquidations. Within 24 hours of the vote, crypto futures traders holding long positions saw a staggering $571 million in liquidations.
U.S. crypto infrastructure companies also took a hit. Shares of cryptocurrency exchange Coinbase Global and stablecoin issuer Circle Internet dropped 10% following the vote, though both rebounded by Friday.
Jag Kooner, head of derivatives at Bitfinex, noted that derivatives traders had largely anticipated the Senate would not approve the bill. "Leading up to the vote, there was little evidence that traders were positioning for its passage," he said. With few market participants betting on approval, the corresponding unwinding of positions was limited. Kooner believes the more significant consequence is that the industry remains without clear statutory rules, prolonging regulatory uncertainty.
Ilya Kalchev, analyst at Nexo Dispatch, said that Bitcoin's recovery after the CLEAR Act vote, the Fed's rate increase, and the long liquidation event points to consolidation rather than an immediate breakout. "Bitcoin's next move is tied to a catalyst that has yet to arrive," he commented. Having absorbed three separate shocks this month without a genuine repricing, Bitcoin is more likely to trade in a range than to break out in the near term.
Kalchev identified $77,950 as the first level Bitcoin needs to break above, followed by $79,300 and $80,000. A rise past $80,000 could open the door toward $81,400, while a drop below $75,000 would call this recovery into question.
The regulatory outlook, however, leans supportive. After the Senate's rejection of the CLEAR Act, analysts expect the SEC and CFTC to continue using existing authority to establish industry rules, shifting U.S. crypto regulation from a permanent statutory approach to an institution-led, rule-driven framework.
The SEC issued a temporary, conditional innovation exemption on Thursday, allowing eligible crypto platform users to trade tokenized U.S. stocks. Luke Davis, founder of Bull Market Blueprint, said, "The SEC's actions give investors a reason to look beyond the failed vote." He expects Bitcoin to end the year higher, noting that liquidity conditions and currency debasement trades matter more than the timing of any single bill.
Matt Hougan, chief investment officer at Bitwise Asset Management, believes there are still two and a half years of relatively crypto-friendly regulatory environment ahead, allowing the industry to keep moving forward. He remains optimistic on digital assets and does not think this will stop investors from considering small-cap tokens with strong tokenomics and real-world asset ties. Hougan pointed out that if the CLEAR Act had passed the Senate vote, crypto would have become a consensus fourth-quarter trade, with prices potentially revisiting all-time highs. The bill's failure makes the path bumpier, but the change from the pre-vote Monday situation is minimal. He called the CLEAR Act "irrelevant" for Bitcoin, adding that if Bitcoin dips on sentiment tied to the legislation, he would view it as an opportunity.
Vineet Budki, managing partner and CEO of Sigma Capital, said Bitcoin's recovery and the long liquidation have not yet confirmed that the market has bottomed. "I'm not ready to make that call," he said. "I'd prefer to give it a quarter and let price action speak before taking a firm directional view." Budki argues that Bitcoin's four-year cycle still needs to unfold, and that high interest rates plus a slowing U.S. housing market could push investors toward safe havens. His stance is to hold and wait, leaning neither strongly bullish nor bearish at the moment.
The market's next focus is on the September jobs report due October 2 and the Consumer Price Index due October 14. Kalchev noted that sustained ETF inflows or fresh spot buying would be the clearest signal that Bitcoin is ready to break out of its range.
Mati Greenspan, founder and market analyst at Quantum Economics, said Bitcoin, like a honey badger, doesn't depend on regulation. "It's resilient and certainly not reliant on any government or its legislation," he remarked. Greenspan believes the U.S. regulatory setback is not a make-or-break moment for Bitcoin, and historically, prices have performed even better during periods of regulatory pressure than during periods of clarity.
Comments