As new Federal Reserve Chair Kevin Warsh prepares to lead his first policy meeting, the market knows almost nothing about how he views the recent surge in employment data, rising inflation, and the path for interest rates.
This may be precisely his intention.
Warsh has previously criticized the Fed's communication strategy harshly, arguing that such practices have led to policy errors and given the central bank an outsized role in market decisions and economic operations. He plans to implement a model change, overhauling the Fed's monetary policy forecasts and public messaging, adjusting both the length of statements and their frequency of release.
At his nomination hearing this past April, when discussing the Federal Open Market Committee, Warsh stated: "Frankly, the Fed Chair and other central bank officials on the committee speak far too often today. In my view, seeking truth is far more important than repeating statements. Press conferences should be for delivering key information."
The most immediate question now is whether Warsh intends to remove the easing bias language from the policy statement—wording that has traditionally signaled to markets the Fed's inclination to continue lowering rates. At the last meeting, three committee members dissented, arguing the Fed should no longer signal an easing bias.
The so-called Fed speak has always been parsed word by word by markets, and such communications may become more cryptic in the future.
Michael Feroli, Chief Economist at JPMorgan, believes Warsh will not explicitly say he is "open to" rate hikes, but "he might indicate that rate hikes are not off the table."
Removing the forward guidance on an easing stance would also align with Warsh's long-term vision—to reduce the Fed's practice of pre-signaling its future policy moves.
The Fed has confirmed that Warsh will hold a press conference following next week's policy meeting, indicating he will initially continue the practice of his predecessor, Jerome Powell. However, during his Senate hearing, he did not commit to holding a press conference after every meeting. This has led markets to speculate he may revert to the previous schedule of four press conferences a year—a frequency that was changed to after every meeting only after Powell took office.
However, adjusting the communication strategy carries potential risks, possibly increasing market volatility while diminishing the influence of the Fed Chair.
Former Cleveland Fed President Loretta Mester noted: "It would not be wise for the Fed to deliberately surprise markets or regress in its communication framework. But that doesn't mean the current system cannot be improved."
Yet, Warsh may find it difficult to restrain other committee members from public speeches and media interviews. The 12 regional Fed presidents have independent voices and often share their views publicly around meeting times.
As Richard Clarida stated in a CNBC interview: "It's impossible to keep everyone silent; officials will always speak out. It's a reasonable choice to proactively control the narrative."
This is also a key argument for retaining the practice of "holding a press conference after every meeting."
Warsh believes excessive communication from the Fed disrupts the transmission mechanism: once market expectations are formed, Fed officials may feel compelled to follow them, even if they judge the policy to be off course.
He holds a similar critical view of the dot plot. This chart anonymously plots each member's forecast for the federal funds rate. Warsh argues this mechanism hindered the Fed from acting promptly to curb inflation triggered by the COVID-19 pandemic.
At his April Senate hearing, Warsh said: "The Fed publishes its interest rate dot plot and economic projections globally, but human nature being what it is, officials become stubbornly attached to their initial forecasts. I believe making decisions at the formal meeting, through gradual deliberation, can prevent the central bank from compounding its mistakes."
Comments