Following Tencent's share sale, Kuaishou's market value plummeted by nearly HK$24 billion in a single day, raising market concerns about what the company stands to lose.
Tencent's divestment from Kuaishou is more than a routine financial transaction. It represents the latest step in the unwinding of the capital-woven "Tencent ecosystem" from the mobile internet era, following similar moves with companies like JD.com and Meituan. On July 6th, Tencent sold 273 million shares of Kuaishou in a single block, cashing out approximately HK$12.5 billion and relinquishing its status as a major shareholder.
What does this signify for Kuaishou? For the past decade, the "Tencent-affiliated" tag was one of the most valuable labels in China's internet sector, acting like a membership card granting access to WeChat's ecosystem, preferential advertising budgets, cost advantages on cloud services, and a valuation premium from the capital markets. Now, that card's value has been discounted.
Has Kuaishou been pushed out of the core "Tencent ecosystem"? According to the announcement, Tencent still holds a 9.37% stake. Why, then, is Kuaishou considered to have lost the label? In the context of China's internet industry, there is no official definition for the "Tencent ecosystem" or a specific shareholding threshold. It is more a matter of market perception used to gauge a company's closeness to Tencent. Data from IT桔子 suggests that in the Hong Kong and U.S. stock markets, "Tencent concept stocks" typically refer to companies where Tencent holds a stake, often above 10%. Exceeding this line generally signifies being considered a core member of the ecosystem.
Being part of this group meant access to WeChat's traffic, preferential Tencent advertising budgets, discounted cloud services, and, crucially, a market consensus that Tencent would not easily abandon a company in its significant portfolio. In 2021, Kuaishou entered the Hong Kong Stock Exchange with the halo of being a Tencent-affiliated company, with Tencent holding a 21.57% stake. Fast forward five years, and Kuaishou has become an exception among the majority.
As of the latest update, Kuaishou shares closed at HK$43.04, having declined over 33% year-to-date, with its market capitalization evaporating over a trillion from its historical peak. The timing of this perceived loss of security is critical, with market analysis pointing to three primary reasons.
Firstly, Kuaishou's own performance has faltered. In Q1 2026, its revenue was 33.7 billion yuan, a mere 3.4% year-on-year increase—the lowest since its listing. Adjusted net profit fell 26.3% to 3.374 billion yuan. Daily active users (DAUs) for the period were 413 million, growing only 1.2% year-on-year. For Tencent, a platform with single-digit growth and a largely saturated user base holds little "strategic value."
Secondly, Tencent's own Video Channels has grown robustly. The initial logic behind Tencent's investment in Kuaishou was to secure a position in the short-video space, especially as Douyin surged around 2017. However, according to Guohai Securities research, as early as 2023, Video Channels' monthly active users (MAUs) had reached 900 million, surpassing Kuaishou's at the time. By the end of 2025, data from multiple institutions showed Video Channels' MAUs exceeding 950 million, widening the gap with Kuaishou's 772 million MAUs in Q1 2026.
Thirdly, Tencent's investment focus has gradually shifted from stable, profitable mature platforms towards high-growth hard technology sectors. President Martin Lau stated clearly in the 2025 earnings call that Tencent invested 18 billion yuan in new AI products that year, with plans to at least double that to over 36 billion yuan in 2026, excluding significant compute infrastructure costs. Data shows Tencent's capital expenditure reached 31.936 billion yuan in Q1 2026, a sequential surge of about 63%.
The combination of these factors makes Tencent's decision to reduce its stake at this juncture understandable.
Over 5 Billion Yuan in Annual Cooperation Set to Expire
The day after the news broke, Kuaishou's stock price plunged 12.04%, wiping nearly HK$24 billion off its market cap. The market fears Kuaishou stands to lose a great deal. In reality, changes have been underway.
Historically, Kuaishou received substantial traffic support from Tencent's ecosystem. As early as June 2019, WeChat unblocked Kuaishou sharing links, allowing users to share videos directly to Moments. Later, WeChat granted Kuaishou access to its "Channels" information feed, fully opening its social graph. These channels were vital for Kuaishou's push towards 300 million DAUs and its e-commerce business development. Now, Tencent is increasingly channeling resources towards its own Video Channels, diluting Kuaishou's presence within WeChat.
As Kuaishou's derived value from WeChat diminishes, the market began questioning the "Tencent affiliation" premium. The actual divestment of billions in shares turned these doubts into public discourse. Falling below the 10% threshold means Tencent is no longer a major shareholder, and future sales wouldn't even require announcements. From this day forward, the implicit "Tencent ecosystem" credit once factored into Kuaishou's valuation must be reassessed.
Tencent still holds shares, but it is no longer the "supportive" major shareholder. As Kuaishou is demoted from "Tencent ecosystem member" to "an ordinary partner of Tencent," its valuation logic must change accordingly.
In the short term, there is a more immediate concern than credit reassessment. In November 2023, Kuaishou and Tencent renewed four ongoing connected transaction agreements, all valid until December 31, 2026. The announcements indicated substantial cooperation in areas like marketing, cloud services, and payments.
This includes an annual marketing cooperation scale with Tencent Advertising of around 20 billion yuan, with Kuaishou's payment ceiling to Tencent set at 2 billion yuan for 2026 and Tencent's payment ceiling to Kuaishou at 800 million yuan. For cloud services, Kuaishou's annual payment ceiling to Tencent is set to increase from 950 million yuan in 2024 to 1.11 billion yuan in 2026. The annual ceiling for payment services rises from 1.672 billion yuan in 2024 to 2.018 billion yuan in 2026.
These three items alone represent annual fund flows exceeding 5 billion yuan between the two companies. To put this in perspective, Kuaishou's Q1 2026 net profit was 3.374 billion yuan. Annualizing this to roughly 13.5 billion yuan, the 5 billion yuan in cooperation represents about 40% of its annual profit. Now, less than half a year remains before these agreements expire.
While Tencent's announcement mentioned continuing strategic cooperation, the specifics of whether and how these agreements will be renewed after year-end remain unknown. A noteworthy comparison is the content collaboration between Tencent Video and Douyin, which provided Tencent Video with new distribution channels and copyright revenue. However, when that agreement expired at the end of April 2026, it was not renewed.
Analyses suggest four possibilities for the year-end renewal negotiations: renewal as-is, renewal with tighter terms, renewal with reduced amounts, or no renewal at all. The first scenario is considered unlikely. Any of the latter three would result in Kuaishou receiving fewer benefits from Tencent than it does currently.
The Independence of Kling and Kuaishou's Path Forward
So, what does Kuaishou have left? The most direct card is the company itself. Tencent's sale of 273 million shares was not a piecemeal secondary market dump but a block trade arranged by Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley, placed with several institutional investors. The willingness of these buyers to take shares at around HK$40 is itself a signal: Kuaishou's fundamental business is still worth that price in their eyes.
Kuaishou itself is also buying. In May 2024, it announced a HK$16 billion share buyback program. By July 6th of this year, when Tencent sold its stake, Kuaishou had already repurchased HK$8.35 billion worth of shares, equivalent to 70% of Tencent's proceeds from this sale. Following the divestment news, Kuaishou continued its buybacks for three consecutive days.
While buybacks don't solve growth issues, the combination of external buyers and the company's own repurchases indicates at least two forces expressing confidence. When both external buyers and the company itself are purchasing, it suggests Kuaishou still holds valuable assets.
One such asset is Kling. In 2025, Kling generated revenue of approximately 1.1 billion yuan. By March of this year, its annualized revenue had grown to about $500 million, up from $100 million a year prior. In Q1 2026, Kling's quarterly revenue exceeded 650 million yuan, surging over 300% year-on-year. Coupled with surpassing 100 million global users and nearly 50,000 enterprise customers, Kling is firmly in the first tier of the AI video generation race.
On July 2nd, Kling completed its first external funding round, with Tencent, Alibaba, and Baidu all appearing as shareholders. The post-money valuation reached approximately $18 billion, setting a record for global video large language model financing and approaching Kuaishou's market cap of around HK$180 billion.
Post-funding, Kling's R&D and compute costs are shared with external capital, easing Kuaishou's cash flow pressure. More importantly, Kling is no longer just a cost center on Kuaishou's financials; it is now an asset with an independent valuation, external shareholders, and a business model.
Capital market sentiment is also shifting. On July 8th, following Tencent's sale, reports indicated that 17 brokerages still maintained "Buy" ratings on Kuaishou over the past 90 days, with an average target price of HK$72.38. Based on the current share price around HK$40, these targets imply 50% to 80% upside potential.
The institutional logic is clear. As Bank of America Securities noted in a report, Kling AI is beginning to unlock shareholder value, alleviating the company's cash flow pressure and revealing hidden worth. In other words, the market is now valuing Kuaishou in two parts: the parent company and Kling.
This creates a paradox. The high target prices are bets on Kling's new AI narrative, while Kuaishou's core short-video business is a separate matter. With 413 million DAUs, annual revenue exceeding 130 billion yuan, and last year's net profit around 13.5 billion yuan, the market's valuation for the parent company (excluding Kling) ranges optimistically at around $13 billion to a more pessimistic $7 billion—neither of which is considered high.
The more successful Kling becomes, the more the market views it as an independent AI company rather than a Kuaishou subsidiary. If it proceeds to an independent listing, Kuaishou would merely be a shareholder, entitled to investment returns rather than fully integrating Kling's growth into its own business value.
Reports indicate that Kling's funding agreement includes a buyback clause. If Kling fails to complete an IPO by October 30, 2031, investors can demand Kling repurchase their shares at the original investment cost plus 8% simple annual interest. The subtext of this clause is clear: investors are betting on Kling's independent listing and exit, not on it serving as a growth engine for Kuaishou's parent company.
Kling's independence may be a positive development, but it's not necessarily a straightforward win for Kuaishou. How to translate Kling's growth into its own value is a challenge Kuaishou itself has likely not fully resolved.
Comments