U.S. Corporate Bond Market Undergoes Major Shift: Trading Goes "Equitized"

Deep News11-11

A profound structural transformation is quietly unfolding in the U.S. corporate bond market. Driven by algorithmic trading and basket trading models, this traditionally relationship-driven, over-the-counter market is rapidly adopting "equitized" characteristics—trading speed, liquidity, and pricing mechanisms are increasingly resembling those of the stock market.

According to a research report released by Barclays on November 9, today’s credit market absorbs shocks five times faster than in 2002. Price dislocations that once took 10 days to resolve now take just two. This shift is placing systematic credit strategies in a "sweet spot" of improved liquidity without excessive crowding.

However, this efficiency comes with direct market implications. Barclays notes that while algorithms and portfolio trading enhance liquidity, they also smooth price disparities between bonds, making it harder to identify mispriced opportunities. In the high-yield bond market, the rise in portfolio trading has suppressed realized volatility by 3% to 7%. This benefits passive investors but poses challenges for active managers seeking alpha, who must dig deeper for excess returns.

This transformation isn’t simply about machines replacing humans—it’s a reshaping of human-machine collaboration. The report argues that "equity-like" speed alone is insufficient for a market still reliant on relationships. The future lies in centering algorithms within workflows, freeing traders to focus on complex transactions and uncovering narrative value.

**Speed and Volatility: A Shift in Market Pricing Models** One of the most notable effects of the "equitization" trend is the revival of previously illiquid bonds. Barclays data shows this liquidity revolution is particularly pronounced for smaller bonds.

Since 2015, the weekly non-trading ratio for the least liquid half of investment-grade (IG) bonds has plummeted from 50% to 10%. In the high-yield (HY) market, the improvement is even more dramatic, dropping from 35% to 5%. By contrast, larger, inherently more liquid bonds saw only a modest decline from 10% to 1%.

Faster trading is fundamentally altering pricing logic. Barclays finds that technological advances now allow macroeconomic shifts and rating adjustments to be digested far quicker. This efficient pricing, in turn, impacts market volatility.

The report highlights that in HY credit, portfolio trading has shifted focus from analyzing single-bond "idiosyncrasies" to assessing broader "portfolio risks." This flattens price swings, reducing realized volatility by 3%–7%. While this lowers tail risks, it challenges traditional strategies reliant on single-bond mispricing, forcing active investors to work harder for alpha.

**Human-Machine Synergy: Algorithmic Core and Relational Value** As "equitization" progresses, talent structures in trading are also evolving.

Barclays notes that front-office roles requiring AI skills surged from 1% in 2017 to nearly 5% by 2025. Yet machines haven’t fully taken over—electronic trading rates plateau at 60% for U.S. Treasuries and 50% for corporates. This isn’t due to tech resistance but because algorithms create new space for voice trading. During extreme volatility or complex trades, "investors prefer human dialogue over algorithms quoting mid-prices."

The future, Barclays concludes, isn’t pure speed but embedding algorithms at the workflow’s core, enabling traders to focus on narrative value and judgment-intensive deals. As encapsulated in its "A.L.G.O." philosophy: "Alpha Lives in Going On(Off)line."

Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

Comments

We need your insight to fill this gap
Leave a comment