NIO Inc. achieved its first quarterly profit since its founding in the fourth quarter of 2025. Company founder William Li announced during an earnings call: "The company has officially entered the third stage of its development, initiating a new cycle of rapid growth."
However, beyond the celebratory lights, two significant challenges—often termed "gray rhinos"—linger in the shadows: one is named "Cost," and the other "Energy Replenishment."
On March 10, NIO released its financial results for the fourth quarter and full year of 2025. In Q4 2025, the company achieved revenue of 34.65 billion yuan, a year-on-year increase of 75.9%, setting a new historical record. Net profit was 283 million yuan, a significant turnaround from a net loss of 7.112 billion yuan in the same period the previous year, marking the company's first quarterly profit.
Although the company still faced a net loss of 14.9426 billion yuan for the full year, this result represents a positive turning point for NIO.
William Li has never lacked confidence in setting ambitious goals. He has set the operational target for 2026 as "achieving full-year profitability." Despite the challenging environment in China's passenger vehicle market, he stated, "NIO's current product cadence aligns with market development trends, and we are very confident in achieving 40% to 50% sales growth for the full year."
The financial report indicates that NIO's delivery guidance for the first quarter of 2026 is between 80,000 and 83,000 vehicles, representing a year-on-year growth of over 90%. Revenue guidance is set between 24.48 billion and 25.18 billion yuan, implying a doubling of revenue compared to the previous year.
The market quickly responded to NIO's signals. On March 10, NIO's US stock price rose throughout the day, closing up 15.38%. The following day, when the Hong Kong stock market opened, NIO's stock price surged over 17% before paring gains in the afternoon to close up 14.05%.
Beyond record quarterly deliveries across its three brands, NIO's return to profitability is closely tied to the improvement in its vehicle margin. The company's vehicle margin for the quarter reached 18.1%, the highest in three years, with large SUVs like the ES8 making a significant contribution, achieving a margin close to 25%. NIO's product portfolio will continue to shift towards higher-margin vehicles—in 2026, NIO will have five large SUV models on sale, aiming to sustain high margin performance.
Furthermore, the contribution of "cost savings" to this profit was no less significant than "revenue generation" itself.
Since the first quarter of 2025, NIO has extensively implemented its "Core Business Unit" (CBU) mechanism. This approach breaks down operations into multiple, non-overlapping units, establishes clear input-output ratio metrics, and fully explores cost optimization opportunities. As William Li stated, "We need to get the accounts clear, calculating everyone's time, expenditure, and output within each project."
The control over costs is evident in R&D expenditure. The company's R&D spending in Q4 2025 was approximately 2 billion yuan, a decrease of 44.3% compared to the same period last year, a shift from previous quarters where spending often exceeded 3 billion yuan.
However, there is a limit to cost compression, especially in a fiercely competitive market where R&D is crucial for maintaining competitiveness. NIO's CFO, Yu Qu, clarified that the company will maintain quarterly R&D investments between 2 and 2.5 billion yuan this year and continue to use the CBU mechanism to enhance efficiency. Nevertheless, the ceiling for cost reduction will only be lowered further as the battle intensifies in technology and infrastructure development.
On the other hand, NIO's Q4 profit was achieved in a relatively favorable raw material price environment. Due to a combination of macro geopolitical risks and industry supply-demand dynamics, the cost foundation for manufacturing is being reshaped. For NIO and many other automakers, soaring raw material costs will be a challenge they must face this year.
Yu Qu indicated that prices for key materials, including copper and lithium carbonate, are trending upwards in 2026 and are highly volatile, creating significant pressure on the company's cost control and margins. NIO will work with its supply chain to study ways to continuously improve efficiency and mitigate the negative impact on margins. NIO's confidence in setting "full-year profitability" as a goal largely relies on increased sales volume and the high-margin performance of its large vehicles.
However, NIO is not alone in targeting the "large vehicle" segment. Competitors like Li Auto, XPeng, and Xiaomi are also betting heavily on this segment in 2026, potentially challenging NIO's market share.
A week before NIO's earnings release, an industry announcement drew significant attention: Wang Chuanfu unveiled the second-generation Blade Battery at a technology launch event, claiming charging efficiency close to that of refueling a gasoline car, with plans to build 20,000 ultra-fast charging stations by the end of this year. In contrast, NIO's target is to build 10,000 battery swap stations by 2030.
This has reignited the debate between charging and battery swap routes: Will the significant improvement in charging efficiency dilute the advantage of NIO's long-term investment in battery swap infrastructure? Executives from both sides have adopted a conciliatory tone of "peaceful coexistence."
Li Yunfei, General Manager of BYD's Group Brand and Public Relations Department, commented that both models have their merits, describing the situation as "a hundred flowers blooming" and "different paths leading to the same goal."
William Li also stated that the two routes address different scenarios and needs, suggesting they are not mutually exclusive or contradictory. However, he added, "No matter how fast ultra-fast charging becomes, it cannot be faster than battery swap. Solving the battery lifespan issue is the biggest systemic advantage of the battery swap system."
As the charging efficiency gap narrows, NIO is attempting to shift consumer focus beyond mere replenishment speed. It is emphasizing other key advantages of its battery swap model: the alignment of vehicle and battery lifecycles, and the systemic capabilities related to safety and grid coordination.
While the "coexistence theory" is diplomatically sound, when the advantage gap between the two models shrinks, the market tends to favor the cheaper and more convenient option. Moving forward, both sides will inevitably use their latest technologies and infrastructure deployments to continuously persuade the market and consumers.
NIO has limited time. It needs sufficient sales volume to amortize the high cost of its swap station network and to prove to the market that "battery swap is superior to ultra-fast charging," or it must find a more harmonious way to coexist, thereby justifying the massive investments made over the past decade.
The celebratory banquet for achieving profitability marks the beginning of a new phase, but the two "gray rhinos" remain, waiting. NIO has no choice but to face them, address them, and perhaps one day, confront them head-on.
Comments