Jerome Powell's legal counsel has conveyed a clear message to federal prosecutors: if the criminal investigation targeting Powell continues, he will not voluntarily step down from the Federal Reserve Board after his term as Chair concludes in May. His term as a Governor extends until January 2028. This statement directly links the fate of the Fed's leadership transition to the trajectory of the Justice Department's probe.
According to court documents unsealed Friday, Powell's private attorney met with federal prosecutor Jeanine Pirro on January 29 and communicated this position. The Justice Department characterized this exchange as an attempt to "pressure" the prosecutors. Concurrently, Chief Judge James Boasberg of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia quashed a grand jury subpoena against Powell on March 11. In a 27-page ruling, he wrote that the "government has provided no evidence that Mr. Powell has committed a crime," and the only reasonable inference is that the government is targeting Powell "out of malice or an intent to harass." Prosecutor Pirro promptly announced an appeal.
The initiation of the appeal process means the Senate confirmation procedure for Kevin Warsh, former President Trump's nominee for Fed Chair, will face further delays. Republican Senator Thom Tillis of North Carolina, a key vote on the Senate Banking Committee, stated he would continue to block Warsh's nomination until the investigation into Powell is resolved, a position unchanged by the court's ruling.
Analysts at TD Cowen stated Friday that the probability of Powell remaining on the Board after his term as Chair ends on May 15 has increased significantly due to these developments. Joe Brusuelas, chief economist at RSM, suggested that an extended tenure for Powell could have a calming effect on markets, noting that "central bank independence is an indispensable cornerstone of the modern American economy, and its erosion is not in the interest of the U.S. economy."
**Unprecedented Tenure Prospects and Market Impact** Powell's term as Fed Chair concludes on May 15. Conventionally, an outgoing chair vacates their board seat upon the successor's inauguration. However, Powell's statutory term as a Fed Governor does not expire until January 2028, meaning no law forces him to depart. If he chooses to stay, he would remain a voting member of the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) throughout the midterm elections and into the final year of a potential second Trump term.
For financial markets, a scenario where a former chair serves alongside the incumbent is unprecedented. How markets would interpret potential disagreements between the two, and how a new Trump-appointed chair would share decision-making authority with the predecessor, are significant unknowns. TD Cowen analysts noted Friday that the likelihood of Powell remaining past May 15 has increased, citing the Justice Department's appeal and government statements in the unsealed documents.
However, some view the potential for Powell to stay as a stabilizing factor. RSM's Joe Brusuelas pointed out Friday that Powell's extended presence could reassure markets. He emphasized that central bank independence is essential for the modern U.S. economy, and undermining it is not beneficial.
**Escalating Legal Battle and Grand Jury Investigation** The unsealed documents reveal details of the January 29 meeting. Powell's attorney conveyed four key points to prosecutor Jeanine Pirro: the President lacks sufficient Senate votes to confirm a new chair; Powell believes upholding Fed independence requires him to retain his position; he will not relinquish his governor seat while the investigation is ongoing; but the outcome might differ if the investigation were dropped.
The investigation stems from Powell's June testimony before the Senate Banking Committee concerning a $2.5 billion budget overrun for the renovation of the Fed's Washington headquarters. In late 2025, the U.S. Attorney's office initiated a grand jury investigation to determine if the overrun constituted fraud and whether Powell made false statements to Congress. The prosecutor's office stated it contacted the Fed in December seeking a meeting but received no response.
On March 11, Chief Judge Boasberg quashed the related grand jury subpoena. In his opinion unsealed Friday, he stated the subpoena lacked a legitimate law enforcement purpose, noting the "government has no evidence that Mr. Powell has committed any crime other than angering the President." The judge inferred the government acted with malicious or harassing intent. Powell had previously publicly countered, stating the threat of criminal charges arose because the Fed sets interest rates based on public interest, not presidential preference.
**Nomination Stalled by Political Impasse** Despite the court ruling in Powell's favor, the Justice Department has not retreated. Jeanine Pirro criticized Judge Boasberg as an "activist judge" whose ruling was "untethered from the law," and announced the Justice Department would appeal. She accused Powell of currently being shielded by immunity, preventing her office from investigating the Fed. When asked if the appeal would further hinder the confirmation of Trump's Fed Chair nominee, Pirro dismissively stated she was only concerned with the legal aspects, calling the rest "white noise."
A direct consequence of this legal battle is the stalled nomination of former Fed Governor Kevin Warsh in the Senate. Key Republican Senator Thom Tillis reiterated Friday that the Justice Department's appeal would only further delay Warsh's confirmation process, vowing to block the nomination until the investigation into Powell is settled.
In response to the unsealed court files, the White House did not directly address their contents in a statement. A White House spokesperson, Kush Desai, was reported stating that Kevin Warsh's academic background, private sector experience, and prior service on the Fed Board make him fully qualified to be the next Fed Chair. He emphasized the White House is working closely with Congress to confirm the nomination swiftly and restore confidence in the Fed's credibility.
Comments