UK High Court Orders Samsung to Pay ZTE $392 Million in Patent Dispute

Deep News05-01 23:10

On May 1 local time, the London High Court issued a ruling in the global patent licensing dispute between Samsung Electronics and ZTE Corporation, ordering Samsung to make a one-time payment of $392 million to ZTE as licensing fees for the use of its mobile communication patents.

The dispute between the two parties originated from their failure to agree on renewal terms after a patent licensing agreement reached in 2021 expired. Samsung filed a lawsuit in London in December 2024, requesting the court to determine fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory licensing terms. ZTE Corporation simultaneously initiated parallel lawsuits in countries including China, Germany, and Brazil.

In the ruling, presiding judge Richard Meade pointed out that there was a significant gap between the parties' positions on the licensing fee: Samsung argued for a maximum amount of $200 million, while ZTE sought up to $731 million. The court's final adjudicated amount of $392 million falls between the two figures.

The patents involved are standard-essential patents necessary for ensuring smartphones can connect to mobile networks. The UK is a favored jurisdiction for patent litigation because its courts, following a landmark 2020 ruling by the UK Supreme Court, have the authority to set global FRAND terms. Both parties retain the right to appeal the judgment, and ZTE is also separately seeking a ruling on FRAND terms from a court in China.

Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

Comments

We need your insight to fill this gap
Leave a comment