U.S. Tightens Export Controls Targeting China's Chip Sector; Commerce Ministry Responds

Deep News06-04 19:02

The United States has once again invoked China as a justification for its trade policies, ordering the closure of what it terms "regulatory loopholes" to prevent the export of advanced semiconductors to Chinese companies. How has China's Ministry of Commerce responded to this move?

At a regular press conference held today, a spokesperson for China's Ministry of Commerce, He Yongqian, addressed inquiries regarding the U.S. Department of Commerce's actions to block these alleged chip-related loopholes. The spokesperson stated that in recent years, the U.S. has persistently abused export controls under the pretext of national security. These actions have severely infringed upon the legitimate rights and interests of Chinese enterprises, seriously undermined the international economic and trade order, and caused significant disruption to the stability of the global semiconductor industry chain and supply chain. China has consistently opposed such measures.

China urges the United States to promptly correct its erroneous practices, cease its discriminatory measures against China, and work to maintain the stability of global industrial and supply chains.

Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

Comments

We need your insight to fill this gap

Leave a comment

{"i18n":{"language":"en_US"},"isChannel":false,"data":{"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1185231270?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","thumbnail":"","is_english":true,"pubTime":"2026-06-04 19:02","share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","id":"1185231270","market":"hk","top_or_hot":-1,"title":"U.S. Tightens Export Controls Targeting China's Chip Sector; Commerce Ministry Responds","media":"Deep News","content":"<p>The United States has once again invoked China as a justification for its trade policies, ordering the closure of what it terms \"regulatory loopholes\" to prevent the export of advanced semiconductors to Chinese companies. How has China's Ministry of Commerce responded to this move?<br><br>At a regular press conference held today, a spokesperson for China's Ministry of Commerce, He Yongqian, addressed inquiries regarding the U.S. Department of Commerce's actions to block these alleged chip-related loopholes. The spokesperson stated that in recent years, the U.S. has persistently abused export controls under the pretext of national security. These actions have severely infringed upon the legitimate rights and interests of Chinese enterprises, seriously undermined the international economic and trade order, and caused significant disruption to the stability of the global semiconductor industry chain and supply chain. China has consistently opposed such measures.<br><br>China urges the United States to promptly correct its erroneous practices, cease its discriminatory measures against China, and work to maintain the stability of global industrial and supply chains.</p>","source":null,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>U.S. Tightens Export Controls Targeting China's Chip Sector; Commerce Ministry Responds</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nU.S. Tightens Export Controls Targeting China's Chip Sector; Commerce Ministry Responds\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1039043262\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/8296859682db4b478146245e72de1922);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Deep News </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2026-06-04 19:02</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>The United States has once again invoked China as a justification for its trade policies, ordering the closure of what it terms \"regulatory loopholes\" to prevent the export of advanced semiconductors to Chinese companies. How has China's Ministry of Commerce responded to this move?<br><br>At a regular press conference held today, a spokesperson for China's Ministry of Commerce, He Yongqian, addressed inquiries regarding the U.S. Department of Commerce's actions to block these alleged chip-related loopholes. The spokesperson stated that in recent years, the U.S. has persistently abused export controls under the pretext of national security. These actions have severely infringed upon the legitimate rights and interests of Chinese enterprises, seriously undermined the international economic and trade order, and caused significant disruption to the stability of the global semiconductor industry chain and supply chain. China has consistently opposed such measures.<br><br>China urges the United States to promptly correct its erroneous practices, cease its discriminatory measures against China, and work to maintain the stability of global industrial and supply chains.</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","isBrief":false,"type":0,"news_type":1,"symbol":"SOX","symbol_name":"费城半导体指数","start_time":0,"source_url":"","article_id":"1185231270","we_media_id":"1039043262","thumbnails":[],"rights":null,"url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1185231270","pubTimestamp":1780570954,"columns":[],"sourceInfo":null,"weMediaInfo":{"media_name":"Deep News","introduction":"Global Stock Market Deep Analysis","home_visible":1,"id":"1039043262","head_image":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/8296859682db4b478146245e72de1922"},"summary":"The United States has once again invoked China as a justification for its trade policies, ordering the closure of what it terms \"regulatory loopholes\" to prevent the export of advanced semiconductors...","collect":0,"end_time":0,"defaultTopTitle":"","property":[],"viewcount":null,"language":"en","relate_stocks":{"SOX":"费城半导体指数"},"translate_title":"美国收紧针对中国芯片行业的出口管制；商务部回应","themeId":"","isJumpTheme":false,"ttsUrl":null,"symbols_score_info":{"SOX":1},"content_text":"The United States has once again invoked China as a justification for its trade policies, ordering the closure of what it terms \"regulatory loopholes\" to prevent the export of advanced semiconductors to Chinese companies. How has China's Ministry of Commerce responded to this move?At a regular press conference held today, a spokesperson for China's Ministry of Commerce, He Yongqian, addressed inquiries regarding the U.S. Department of Commerce's actions to block these alleged chip-related loopholes. The spokesperson stated that in recent years, the U.S. has persistently abused export controls under the pretext of national security. These actions have severely infringed upon the legitimate rights and interests of Chinese enterprises, seriously undermined the international economic and trade order, and caused significant disruption to the stability of the global semiconductor industry chain and supply chain. China has consistently opposed such measures.China urges the United States to promptly correct its erroneous practices, cease its discriminatory measures against China, and work to maintain the stability of global industrial and supply chains.","kind":"news","is_publish_news":true,"is_publish_highlight":false,"is_publish_live":false,"is_publish_wemedia":null,"editions":null,"column":"","sentiment":"0","news_tag":"policyRegulatory","news_rank":0,"isVideo":false,"video":null,"symbols":[],"gpt_button":0,"need_auth":false,"need_login_tip":false,"code":"91000000","status":"200"},"commentList":[],"isCommentEnd":true,"newsSizeData":{"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"favoriteSize":0,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false},"APP":{"userAgent":"Mozilla/5.0 AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko; compatible; ClaudeBot/1.0; +claudebot@anthropic.com)","isDev":false,"isTTM":true,"tenantId":"TBGLOBAL","deviceId":"web-server-community-laohu8-v3","version":"4.43.1","shortVersion":"4.43.1","platform":"web","vendor":"web","appName":"ttm","isIOS":false,"isAndroid":false,"isTiger":false,"isTHS":false,"isWeiXin":false,"isWeiXinMini":false,"isWeiBo":false,"isQQ":false,"isBaiduSwan":false,"isBaiduBox":false,"isDingTalk":false,"isToutiao":false,"isOnePlus":false,"isHuaWei":false,"isXiaomi":false,"isXiaomiWebView":false,"isOppo":false,"isVivo":false,"isSamsung":false,"isMobile":false},"href":"/m/news/1185231270","isCrawlerRequest":true}