Democrats secured an overwhelming victory in the US midterm elections, reclaiming control of both chambers of Congress and making breakthroughs in several traditionally Republican strongholds. The American political landscape has undergone a major shift, and the Trump administration's policy agenda for the next two years will face greater constraints.
According to US media projections cited by Xinhua, Democrats will not only win control of the House of Representatives but have also defeated Republicans in multiple key states to gain Senate seats.
As the prospect of a Democratic sweep became clear, US stock futures initially plunged sharply, but as investors gradually digested the election results, market sentiment quickly recovered. Major index futures recouped their losses, with Nasdaq 100 futures turning positive from negative and Dow futures rising over 1%. Meanwhile, US Treasuries strengthened across the board, the dollar weakened, and gold returned above $4,000.
Saxo Bank's research team believes the election will push US markets into a new policy environment. The bank has outlined twelve questions investors are most focused on, covering fiscal policy, AI investment returns, dollar trends, and global asset allocation.
What does a Democratic sweep of Congress mean for the US economy and financial markets?
The most significant change is that Washington's policy environment could shift from a relatively unified policy agenda to political gridlock.
Trump remains US President, but Democratic control of both chambers of Congress will significantly constrain his legislative agenda, particularly on taxes, fiscal stimulus, and government spending. However, Democrats cannot simply rewrite policy at will either, because Trump still holds presidential veto power.
Therefore, what is more likely over the next two years is intensified political confrontation, increased congressional oversight, and legislative deadlock, rather than an immediate and comprehensive reversal of existing policies.
For markets, this means reduced certainty around future fiscal stimulus and potentially increased regulatory policy uncertainty.
Today's market performance already reflects some of these concerns.
US stock futures fell sharply at one point, reflecting investor worries about tighter regulation of the US tech sector and changes in fiscal policy. Meanwhile, US Treasuries rose and the dollar weakened, indicating that markets are also reassessing the future path of US fiscal expansion and economic growth.
Does this mean Trump's economic agenda is over?
More accurately, it is constrained rather than completely dismantled.
The US Congress and the White House hold different policy tools, and Democratic control of Congress cannot directly end all Trump administration policies.
Specifically:
Tax and fiscal stimulus: New tax cuts and large-scale spending plans will be harder to pass, but existing tax legislation will not automatically expire.
AI and tech sector: Congress can strengthen regulatory scrutiny and limit new incentives, but comprehensive regulatory legislation may still face presidential veto.
Trade and tariffs: Trump still holds considerable executive power, though these powers are also subject to legal constraints. Democratic control of Congress does not mean tariff risks have disappeared.
Energy and geopolitics: The White House still has significant influence over foreign policy, sanctions, and military decisions.
Personnel appointments: If Democrats control the Senate, Trump's judicial and senior official nominees may face greater difficulty in confirmation.
What truly warrants vigilance is that political confrontation could further escalate into government spending disputes, government shutdown threats, and market volatility from debt ceiling issues.
Saxo Bank believes markets may be too quick to equate Democratic control of Congress with weaker US economic growth. Most of the existing policy framework remains in place, and private sector investment cycles continue.
Will a Democratic sweep bring lower inflation and interest rates?
Narrower fiscal stimulus space could reduce some upward pressure on US Treasury yields, but the inflation outlook is not that simple.
If the likelihood of new deficit-financed stimulus decreases, market expectations for US Treasury issuance scale and long-term financing needs may also decline. This helps explain why US Treasury yields fell as election results became clearer.
Today, US Treasuries strengthened across the board, with the 10-year yield falling about 5 to 6 basis points during Asian trading hours, reflecting market expectations of diminished fiscal expansion ahead.
But weaker fiscal stimulus does not necessarily mean inflation will fall. Tariffs, energy prices, wages, and supply constraints could still continue to push prices higher.
For the Federal Reserve, the election results will not change its policy objectives. If economic growth slows but inflation remains elevated, monetary policy decisions could actually become more complex.
The investment implication is that US Treasuries may benefit from weakening growth expectations, but a sustained rally would still require support from economic data and inflation trends, not just short-term sentiment shifts from the election.
Why are tech and AI stocks particularly hard hit?
The election is accelerating a reassessment of AI investment logic that had already begun.
Before the midterms, the tech sector was already facing questions about elevated valuations, massive capital expenditure, and how quickly AI investments could translate into profits. Democratic control of Congress adds a new variable to these concerns: regulatory scrutiny.
There are three main risks:
Increased regulatory scrutiny: Congress may launch more investigations into AI companies, covering areas such as market competition, consumer protection, data privacy, and model safety.
Greater restrictions on data centers: Power consumption, grid costs, water usage, and project approvals for data centers may face stricter review. Local community opposition could also drive up costs and delay project timelines.
Stricter scrutiny of capital expenditure: A tighter regulatory environment may lead investors to demand more from AI infrastructure financing capacity and profitability prospects.
Additionally, congressional scrutiny could drive the development of AI safety standards, independent model evaluations, and accountability mechanisms for data center developers.
Today's performance of Asian tech stocks already reflects these concerns. South Korea's stock market fell about 4% at one point, and Japan's market was also hit by the cooling of AI trades. Investors worry that if Democrats push for stricter AI regulation, data center construction and related infrastructure investment could be affected.
However, this does not mean the US will pivot entirely to anti-AI policies. Both parties still share considerable common interest in maintaining US AI leadership.
Saxo Bank believes this political shift provides a catalyst for AI sector valuation reassessment, but the deeper issue is that investors are increasingly unwilling to reward companies simply for increasing AI spending. They are starting to demand a clear path to investment returns.
Does this mean the AI boom cycle is ending?
Not exactly, but the AI industry may be shifting from an investment expansion cycle to a profitability cycle.
Previously, companies could be rewarded by markets simply for continuously expanding AI computing power and infrastructure. Now, investors are asking tougher questions: Who is paying for this expansion? How much debt is involved? How long before new capacity translates into revenue? And ultimately, who captures the economic returns in the AI value chain?
Saxo Bank categorizes AI investment targets into three groups:
First category: Established industry leaders.
These include profitable platform companies, core chip suppliers, and memory manufacturers. These companies have relatively solid balance sheets and clearer demand, giving them stronger risk resilience, though they cannot entirely avoid valuation contraction.
Second category: Capital-intensive infrastructure companies.
These include data center developers and highly leveraged computing power suppliers. These companies face greater financing, power supply, and regulatory risks, and their business models depend more heavily on continuously increasing capital expenditure.
Third category: AI application companies.
These companies use AI to improve production efficiency, profit margins, and customer experience without having to bear the enormous costs of building AI infrastructure on their own.
Saxo Bank believes the next phase of AI investment may favor the third category while maintaining selective allocation to the first.
This also means that some of the better AI investment opportunities in the future may emerge outside of traditional semiconductor and hyperscale cloud computing companies.
Is now the time to buy the dip in US tech stocks?
Saxo Bank believes selective positioning is possible, but buying the entire tech sector simply because prices have fallen is not advisable.
From a technical perspective, the 14-day Relative Strength Index (RSI) for Nasdaq 100 futures has approached 30, entering oversold territory. This could create conditions for a short-term rebound, especially when market positioning is overly concentrated and investor sentiment has clearly weakened. On the other hand, Nasdaq futures have already broken below the 200-day moving average, meaning technical selling and new short positions could continue to extend market volatility.
Today's US stock futures swinging from sharp early declines to recovering losses also reflects the rapid shifts in market forces. However, a short-term rebound does not mean the AI investment logic has been repaired.
The key is to distinguish between technical rebounds and fundamental reassessment.
For long-term investors, Saxo Bank prefers AI leaders with profitability, solid balance sheets, mature customer bases, and the ability to consistently generate cash flow. In contrast, greater caution is needed for highly leveraged infrastructure companies whose business models depend on continuous capital expenditure growth and smooth financing channels.
Investors should also not assume that falling US Treasury yields will necessarily rescue all growth stocks. Lower discount rates are certainly beneficial for valuations, but if corporate earnings expectations deteriorate simultaneously, this support could be offset.
Saxo Bank's advice is to buy quality assets in stages and selectively, rather than trying to perfectly time the bottom. Corporate earnings performance, including Nvidia's upcoming earnings report, will be a better test of AI investment logic than the election results themselves.
According to a previous article from Wall Street See, Morgan Stanley's chief US equity strategist Mike Wilson offered a similar assessment.
In a client note published Monday, Wilson said the US midterm elections, regardless of the outcome, could become a classic "clearing event." As the election concludes, market uncertainty is expected to dissipate significantly, and high-quality cyclical stocks may present buying opportunities.
Historical data also supports this assessment. Wilson cited data showing that since 1982, large-cap stocks have gained an average of about 15% (market-cap weighted) to 16% (equal-weighted) in the six months following midterm elections, with gains expanding to about 22% over the following year.
How will US stocks, Treasuries, currencies, and commodities perform after a Democratic sweep?
Saxo Bank believes that after a Democratic sweep of Congress, markets may face a period of rising policy uncertainty and diverging asset performance.
With fiscal stimulus space constrained, combined with concerns about AI regulation and massive capital expenditure, US stocks, especially tech stocks, may remain under short-term pressure with increased volatility. However, some tech stocks have already shown oversold signals, and if corporate earnings remain strong, markets could also see a rebound.
In contrast, US Treasuries and gold may continue to attract capital: cooling fiscal stimulus expectations could push Treasury yields further lower; the dollar may weaken due to diminished rate advantages, providing support for gold. The euro, yen, and some emerging market currencies may also benefit from dollar weakness, but their respective economic fundamentals remain important factors. Oil price movements are more complex, as growth concerns could weigh on prices, but if the Iran situation escalates again, oil prices could still surge rapidly.
Today's market performance echoes this assessment in many ways. US Treasuries strengthened, the dollar weakened, and gold reclaimed $4,000, reflecting that investors are adjusting their expectations for US fiscal policy and interest rate prospects.
However, US stock futures swinging from sharp declines to rebounds also shows that markets have not turned fully bearish on US assets due to the Democratic victory. Whether corporate earnings can offset the pressure from policy uncertainty remains the key determinant of US stock trends ahead.
Is the dollar entering a more prolonged decline?
Dollar weakness has some logic, but it is still too early to declare the end of US economic exceptionalism.
In the short term, the logic is relatively clear: declining fiscal stimulus expectations could push US Treasury yields lower, thereby weakening the dollar's rate advantage.
At the same time, greater uncertainty surrounding US tech sector leadership could prompt international investors to further diversify their portfolios and reduce concentrated exposure to US assets.
Today the dollar index weakened, with the dollar touching a one-month low at one point, while the euro and yen gained support. Gold also benefited from dollar weakness, further breaking through the $4,000 mark.
But the dollar's ultimate direction still depends on growth and rate differentials between the US and other economies. If the US economy continues to outperform other major economies, or if geopolitical tensions escalate further, dollar demand could recover.
Saxo Bank's advice is that investors can consider reducing overly concentrated dollar exposure, but should not rashly bet on a one-sided, sharp dollar decline.
Do US Treasuries still have room to rise? Are duration assets attractive again?
The election reinforces the tactical investment case for US Treasuries.
Democratic control of Congress could limit further fiscal stimulus, leading investors to reassess US economic growth, government financing needs, and interest rate trends.
This could support the bond market through two channels: first, declining growth expectations, and second, a possible decline in the fiscal expansion premium previously reflected in Treasury yields.
Today US Treasuries strengthened across the board, with expectations that future fiscal spending and tax cut plans will face obstacles becoming an important reason for bond support.
But political gridlock does not mean US debt problems are resolved. Regardless of which party controls Congress, the US still faces massive interest expenses and structural fiscal pressures.
In terms of allocation, Saxo Bank prefers high-quality bonds with intermediate duration rather than aggressively betting on the longest end of the yield curve.
The middle section of the US Treasury yield curve may offer a more attractive combination of yield and price appreciation, especially in a slowing growth environment.
The main risk is that if inflation resurges or term premiums rise, long-term Treasury yields could still rise even as economic growth weakens.
Will gold be a winner of the US midterm elections?
Gold faces relatively favorable supporting factors: falling US Treasury yields, a weakening dollar, and renewed political uncertainty.
Today gold prices reclaimed the $4,000 mark. Reuters reported that spot gold rose as much as 2.4% to $4,021.68 per ounce. Dollar weakness and falling Treasury yields provided direct support for gold prices.
Moreover, gold's investment appeal is not limited to this election. Geopolitical tensions, fiscal sustainability concerns, and investors' desire to diversify overly concentrated equity portfolios all continue to support gold's long-term allocation logic.
However, investors need to distinguish between gold as a portfolio diversification tool and gold as a short-term election trade.
If US Treasury yields rebound or the dollar strengthens again, gold could still see a pullback. Geopolitical developments are also a significant risk, especially if the conflict between the US and Iran escalates further, the gold market could face new shocks.
Saxo Bank believes gold remains suitable as a strategic asset for hedging against inflation, geopolitical shocks, and policy uncertainty, rather than a tool for chasing short-term election moves.
Should investors shift from US assets to international markets now?
The election further strengthens the case for diversification, but it does not mean investors should abandon US stocks.
US companies still have clear advantages in tech leadership, profitability, innovation, and access to capital. Political gridlock will not directly eliminate these advantages.
However, US stock markets have been highly concentrated in large-cap tech stocks, and investors may increasingly question whether these companies can continue to generate excess returns at current elevated valuation levels.
Saxo Bank believes three directions are worth watching:
Asian markets: Selectively focus on Chinese tech companies and companies benefiting from domestic AI application adoption.
Broadening investment within US stocks: Focus on equal-weighted index allocations, quality companies outside large-cap tech, the healthcare sector, and companies that can use AI to improve profit margins.
Multi-asset diversification: Use intermediate-duration bonds and gold as supplementary assets rather than relying entirely on the stock market for portfolio returns.
Today's Asian market performance also shows that global asset rotation is not simply capital flowing from the US to other markets. South Korea's stock market fell about 4% at one point before recovering; different markets are affected differently, and markets with higher tech stock weightings are particularly vulnerable to shifts in AI regulatory expectations.
It is worth noting that a US tech stock correction does not mean all international stock markets will rise. If a broad risk-off event occurs, global equity assets could all come under pressure.
What factors could reverse the current negative market reaction? What should investors watch before year-end?
Saxo Bank believes three major factors could drive a reversal in market sentiment.
First, AI company earnings performance.
If leading tech companies can demonstrate that capital expenditure is translating into revenue and profits, market concerns about the AI investment cycle could ease. Investors need to watch Nvidia's earnings report, hyperscale cloud providers' capital expenditure guidance, data center financing conditions, and semiconductor orders.
Second, US economic data.
If employment and economic growth data remain strong, the market's judgment that political gridlock will significantly weaken the US economy could be challenged. At the same time, if inflation proves stubborn, the previous rise in US Treasury yields could also reverse.
Third, reduced policy uncertainty.
If investors gradually conclude that the new Congress may create political noise but is unlikely to cause substantial damage to AI investment, some of the regulatory risk premium previously priced into markets could dissipate.
Beyond these three reversal catalysts, four questions are worth tracking before year-end:
Is AI spending actually slowing, or are markets just starting to demand better investment returns? Key indicators include Nvidia's earnings report, cloud giants' capital expenditure guidance, data center financing, and semiconductor orders.
Is the decline in US Treasury yields driven by improving inflation expectations or deteriorating growth expectations? The implications for stocks and credit markets are very different.
Can dollar weakness persist? If the dollar continues to fall, it would provide stronger support for Asian stocks, emerging market currencies, and gold.
Will political gridlock escalate into fiscal confrontation? Budget negotiations, debt ceiling progress, congressional committee investigations, and new state-level restrictions on data centers could all become sources of the next round of market volatility.
The next two months will test whether this midterm election simply accelerated an asset rotation already underway or signals a deeper shift in market leadership.
For investors, a Democratic sweep of Congress is not simply a bearish or bullish signal. Today's global market performance—falling first and then rising—precisely illustrates that markets are simultaneously weighing policy uncertainty and the impact of slower fiscal expansion.
Going forward, whether AI investments can deliver returns, how US fiscal policy evolves, and whether the dollar and Treasury yields can sustain their current direction will determine the market's next move more than the election results themselves.
Comments